...IDIRECTOR’S DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS Contents The Director’s are under the obligation to ensure the goods were insured in their duty to act with due care and diligence. 1 Area of Law 1 Principle of Law 1 Application of Law 4 Conclusion 4 The Company has been traded into insolvency. 4 Area of Law 4 Principle of Law 5 Application of Law 6 Conclusion 6 The Director’s Liability for insolvent Trading 7 Principle of Law 7 Application of Law 9 Conclusion 9 The Director’s are under the obligation to ensure the goods were insured in their duty to act with due care and diligence. Area of Law The area of law involved in this particular case to prove director’s duty to take due care is the Corporation Law. Principle of Law The Director’s duties fall under two categories the fiduciary duty and the duty to exercise care, diligence and skill while they are discharging their duties under the position. The Corporations Law provides that that a Director has to exercise reasonable degree of care and diligence while he is exercising his or her duties (Section 232 (4), The Corporation Law n.d.). If there is a failure to comply with the provision of 232(4) it leads to an offence punishable with fine up to $5000 and shall also lead to civil proceedings (Fisse 1992). Austin J was the first to review the statutory duty of care and diligence where the entire history of the same begins (ASIC v Vines 2003) (ASIC v Rich 2003). The circumstances which ae necessary in such...
Words: 2871 - Pages: 12
...Lec 6: Ch 10 (the role of company directors and other officers and the means by which they are appointed and removed); main focus is on the directors * ‘officer’ and ‘director’ definition- s9, p200 (Morley v ASIC). * ‘director’- a) appointed director regardless of the name given to their position; b) not validly appointed director but acts in position or; c) not validly appointed but the directors of the company are accustomed to act in accordance with the person’s instructions and wishes; person in a) OR b) is de facto director, within c) is a shadow director * Statutory duties, including the duty to act with reasonable care and diligence and the duty to act in the best interests of the company * Statutory requirement for all companies to have at least one director; PTY company must have at least one, with one ordinarily residing in Australia (s201A(1)); public companies must have at least 3, with at least 2 in Aus (s201A(2)) * Directors’ role: manage or supervise the management; for companies that rely on the replaceable rules as their internal governance rules, s198A provides that “the business of a company is to be managed by or under the direction of the directors’” * Company secretary: public companies must have at least one company secretary (s204A(2)) be 18yo and have at least one residing in Aus; PTY company may have one but is not required to appoint one (s204A(1)); secretary is appointed by directors; responsibilities include record-keeping...
Words: 6745 - Pages: 27
...1. DIRECTOR 1. WHO IS DIRECTOR? A company is a business entity whereby it is associated or collected of individual real persons and/or other companies, who each provided some form of capital. This group has a common purpose or focus and an aim of gaining profits. This collection, group or association of persons can be made to exist in law and then a company is itself considered a "legal person". The name company arose because, at least originally, it represented or was owned by more than one real or legal person. Therefore to operate the company, it needs a person who called a director. Any person can be a director, but only for those who is qualified as required under the Malaysia Companies Act 1965 (MCA). As stated under the Act[1], it requires at least 2 directors and both of them must have principal or only place residence within Malaysian[2]. In addition, it includes any person occupying the position of a director of a corporation by whatever name called and include a person in accordance with whose directions and instructions the director of a corporation are accustomed to act and an alternate or substitute director and a director is an officer of a company but he is not an employee unless he has separate contract of employment as a salaried executive[3]. Secondly, the director must be at their natural person[4] of full age [5] and the limit maximum age of 70 that is other than private company, which is not a subsidiary of a...
Words: 7316 - Pages: 30
...1. DIRECTOR 1. WHO IS DIRECTOR? A company is a business entity whereby it is associated or collected of individual real persons and/or other companies, who each provided some form of capital. This group has a common purpose or focus and an aim of gaining profits. This collection, group or association of persons can be made to exist in law and then a company is itself considered a "legal person". The name company arose because, at least originally, it represented or was owned by more than one real or legal person. Therefore to operate the company, it needs a person who called a director. Any person can be a director, but only for those who is qualified as required under the Malaysia Companies Act 1965 (MCA). As stated under the Act[1], it requires at least 2 directors and both of them must have principal or only place residence within Malaysian[2]. In addition, it includes any person occupying the position of a director of a corporation by whatever name called and include a person in accordance with whose directions and instructions the director of a corporation are accustomed to act and an alternate or substitute director and a director is an officer of a company but he is not an employee unless he has separate contract of employment as a salaried executive[3]. Secondly, the director must be at their natural person[4] of full age [5] and the limit maximum age of 70 that is other than private company, which is not a subsidiary of a public company[6]...
Words: 7429 - Pages: 30
...of the corporation in encouraging economic growth and appropriate risk taking BUT also recognising that there should be some control over corporations given their importance to society (as a conduit or pipeline through which resources are channelled into goods and services). Where is this regulation?-Corporations Act 2001, Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001, These are both federal or commonwealth (central government). Subordinate legislation also (regulations under these Acts plus ASX listing rules, statements and Guides, Accounting Standards). Finally, A lot of the important principles relating to corporations and their responsibilities have evolved via case law. The (Corporations) Act has been described as “Bloated” – why???, Moves have been made to simplify the Act, but every time this happens, something else comes in to make it bigger again! The Administrative and Enforcement bodies ASIC, Under ASIC Act, Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee, Takeovers Panel, Companies Auditors and Liquidators Disciplinary Board, Financial Reporting Council, Australian Accounting Standards Board,...
Words: 11028 - Pages: 45
...CORPORATE LAW ASSIGNMENT TASK1 Introduction The board meeting conducted by the board of directors of Juices Ltd in December 2010 revealed a new proposal for Juices Ltd to acquire the juice container manufacturing business owner by Fruit juice containers Pty Ltd, $48 million being the settlement price. The proposal was duly considered important as Juices Ltd operated an apple and pear juice producing business and owned ore hands around Australia and the juice container manufacturing business can provide Juice Ltd’s juice containers to the customer who already falls under Juice Ltd’s target market. In order to broaden the domain of its business the proposal was put forward by Chen who is a non executive director of the company though all the board members were suppose to be present in the board meeting else one of the non executive director could non- attend the meeting as on the same day and time she met with an accident and broke her arms and unable to receive treatment from the emergency department of the local hospital. The company managing director Uma was authorized the chairman Jack to acquisition within 10 minutes. Though the company’s chief financial officers Isaacs financial report was presented on the impact of the acquisition but unfortunately he was forbidden to participate in the board meeting and gain or deliver any views in regards to the business proposals. Though it was decided in the meeting to approve the acquisition and signing up of the contract by Uma to...
Words: 3710 - Pages: 15
...The role of a director of a company carries with it much legal responsibility This is the topic that will be discussed in this essay. It will begin with a definition of what a director is, followed by the relevant legislation. I will go on to discuss the different types of directors in a company followed by the main duties directors owe to a company. I have taken a look then at the powers directors have in a company and ended this topic with the personal and criminal accountability directors may experience if they don’t exercise their powers in good faith and in the interests of the company. Section 2(1) of the Companies Act 1963 defines ‘director’ as “including any person occupying the position of director by whatever name called.”(Keane 1991) The primary function of a director is to manage the company on behalf of the members. The Articles of Association usually provide for the delegation of the members’ management powers to the Board of Directors and many of the functions of the directors are set out in a company’s Articles of Association. (Abbott et al 1993) The relevant legislation that applies to companies and its directors is the Companies Act 1963. It states regulations for management of a company limited by shares not being a private company. (Callanan 2007) There are numerous types of company directors, Shadow Director, Alternative Directors, De Facto Directors, Executive Directors and Non Executive Directors. A shadow director is any person other...
Words: 2746 - Pages: 11
...* Duty of care and dillgence – statute law – s180 * S588G imposes a duty upon directors to prevent their company trading whle it is insolvent . s588G requires directors to be continually monitoring the financial status of their coy (* only apply to directors) * S181 – duties to act in good faith in the interest of coy and for a proper purpose * S 191 – duties to avoid conflicts of interest * S182&S183 – not to make improper use of position or information (* apply to employee) * S9 – define officer of coy- have management responsibility relation to a coy in financial difficulties * Generally the duty will be owed to the members as a collective whole (not a minority) that should be considered by directors: * Generally there will be no duty owed to individual shareholders; The director needs to have been in direct and close contact with the individual member so that the director caused the member to act in a certain way which turned out to be detrimental to them: Here, the facts are similar to Brunninghausen v Glavanics, where a fiduciary arose to the individual. In that case there were only 2 shareholders (both were directors also), and B convinced G to sell their shares and resign as director so that B could act on an offer of sale (unknown to G). An individual fiduciary duty was found because G was the company, aside from B, and G relied on B for information about the company. Our situation is similar in that [reasons] and therefore [director]...
Words: 4518 - Pages: 19
...breached the duties of directors. 2. Whether Aaron has breached the duties of directors 3. Whether Duffy has breached the duties of directors. 4. Whether Frederick has breached the duties of directors Relevant Law Directors’ duties include statutory duties, common law duties, duties in equity and fiduciary duties. The court will probably examine all of them in determining whether the defendant has breached the duty of directors. Statutory duties Sections 180 to 1841 define the general duties of directors. Section 1802 states that directors should discharge their duties with care and diligence. Section 1813 states that the directors must discharge their duty in good faith in the best interest of the company, and for a proper purpose. Section 1824 states that directors should not improperly use their position to gain advantage for themselves or cause detriment to the corporation. Section 1835 states that the directors should not use the corporate information to gain advantage for themselves or cause detriment to the corporation. The obligations in ss. 180 to 183 are civil; however, if a director is reckless or intentionally dishonest when he/she breached ss. 180 to 183, he/she is liable for criminal charges6. Specific duties of directors include: directors should disclose material personal interest to other directors7. Section 1898 considers the director’s reliance on others to be reasonable if he satisfies three conditions: a) The director reasonably...
Words: 2354 - Pages: 10
...‘Directors duties occupy a strange position in company law. They must be sufficiently strong so as to keep directors in line but sufficiently weak to allow directors to take risks. It is no wonder the courts can’t enforce them properly.’ Do you agree with the above statement? By any measure the 2006 Act is a momentous and monumental piece of legislation. The largest statute ever enacted by the Westminster Parliament, it has engineered the modernisation, consolidation and codification of the vast panoply of UK company law. The Act subsumed the compendious 1985 Companies Act, and the Companies Act 1989.The modernisation of UK company law necessitated reform, redrafting and reorganisation in many fields. The law relating to directors’ duties received particular attention. Indeed, it is submitted that the reforms made in the context of the law on directors’ duties constitute some of the most important and valuable innovations incorporated in the new Act. Under s.171 CA 2006 a director must act in accordance with the company’s constitution and only exercise powers for the purposes for which they are conferred. This was formerly known in the case law as the proper purpose rule. In the case of Hogg v Cramphorn Ltd the principle found was that it was not enough that the directors issued the shares in the honest belief that it was in the best interest of the company. Hence the power must have been exercised for its proper purpose. In Howard Smith Ltd v Ampol Petroleum Ltd the Supreme...
Words: 1754 - Pages: 8
...1 Satyam Scam in the Contemporary Corporate World: A Case Study in Indian Perspective Introduction Satyam Computer Services Ltd was founded in 1987 by B.Ramalinga Raju. The company offers information technology (IT) services spanning various sectors, and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and Euronext.Satyam's network covers 67 countries across six continents. The company employs 40,000 IT professionals across development centers in India, the United States, the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates, Canada, Hungary, Singapore, Malaysia, China, Japan, Egypt and Australia. It serves over 654 global companies, 185 of which are Fortune 500 corporations. Satyam has strategic technology and marketing alliances with over 50 companies. Apart from Hyderabad, it has development centers in India at Bangalore, Chennai, Pune, Mumbai, Nagpur, Delhi, Kolkata, Bhubaneswar, and Visakhapatnam. "The truth is as old as the hills" opined Mahatma Gandhi, christened the Father of the Nation by Indians. So a company named "Satyam" (Truth, in Sanskrit) inspired trust. The IT boom in India, was fuelled by young, middle-class, and educated, budding Indian entrepreneurs and Western firms anxious to outsource to take advantage of high-skill, low-wage worker. This trend created a new breed of businessmen for the 21st century and generated many fortunes literally overnight. The global corporate community was flabbergasted and scandalized when the Chairman of Satyam, Mr. Ramalinga Raju resigned...
Words: 16279 - Pages: 66
...Formation of a proposed company 2 1.3 Registration 2-3 Section 2 Memorandum of Association 3 2.1 Article of Association 4 2.3 Directors of Company 4-5 2.4 Secretary 5 2.5 Share Capital 5 2.6 Charges 5-6 2.7 Auditors 6 2.8 AGM or EGM 6 Section 3 Any Protection under Irish Company Law 6-7 Section 4 Conclusion` 7 Reference 8 Appendix Appendix A Company limited by share 9 Appendix B Duties of Shareholders 9 Appendix C Directors/Secretary/ Companies 9-10 Appendix D Directors Responsibilities 10-11 Appendix E Secretary Responsibilities 11 Appendix F Ten points to contracts 11 Appendix G Standard form contract 12 Appendix H General Principles 13-20 Section 1 Memo to Joe Bloggs Relating to going in to business with the Corcorcan brothers in the manufacture of hurleys and protection of supply of Ash in Poland. 1.1 Corporate Structure. Recommend a private company limited by shares. Consisting of 4 members, 3 Corcorcan brothers and Joe Bloggs. Corcoran brothers well supply facilities, contacts, accountancy knowledge and marketing. You will supply web based sales knowledge. Each member must contribute a nominal sum of money and be issued with shares. The right of members to transfer their shares is restricted, under Article of Association. You must request 26% or more shares in the company to prevent majority rule...
Words: 7036 - Pages: 29
...CMS_LawTax_CMYK_28-100.eps Duties & Responsibilities of Directors September 2012 With increased consolidation of business across Europe, executives of multinational groups can find that they are required to become directors of companies in a variety of jurisdictions, often at short notice. The rules relating to directorships vary considerably from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. This guide is intended to provide an overview of the duties and responsibilities of directors across 23 countries in Europe, answering the most frequently asked questions for directors coming from another jurisdiction. In many jurisdictions, there are various forms of company available, and there are different rules for directors according to the type of company used. This guide focuses for each jurisdiction on the most common form of company, and on the rules which apply to executive / managing directors. CMS is the organisation of independent European law and tax firms of choice for organisations based in, or looking to move into, Europe. CMS provides a deep local understanding of legal, tax and business issues and delivers client-focused services through a joint strategy executed locally across 28 countries with 52 offices in Western and Central Europe and beyond. CMS was established in 1999 and today comprises ten CMS firms, employing over 2,800 fee earners and is headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany. This guide is intended only to provide a general overview of the matters covered. It is based...
Words: 76452 - Pages: 306
...shares of the company. A company’s creditors can only look to the share capital for the payment in the event of a winding up. To protect creditors, a general rule known as the rule in Trevor v Whitworth was developed to prohibit a company from reducing its share capital because a reduction in capital would prejudice the rights of creditors. Moreover, the reduction would in effect diminish the pool of funds available to the company to pay its creditors. The rule in Trevor v Whitworth has been incorporated into Ch 2J of the Corporations Act 2001.Certain provisions of the Corporations Law 2001 seek to enforce the rule Trevor v Whitworth. There are a few Sections of the Corporations Act 2001 that enforce the maintenance of capital principle (or the rule of Trevor v Whitworth). Section 254T of the Corporations Act 2001 stated that a dividend may only be paid from profits. The Section 254T of the Corporations Act 2001 states that a company must not pay a dividend unless: the company’s assets exceed its liabilities before the dividend is declared and the excess is sufficient for the payment of the dividend, and; the payment of the dividend is fair and reasonable to the company’s shareholders as a whole and; the payment of the dividend does not materially prejudice the company’s ability to pay its creditors. This means that a dividend can be sourced otherwise than from profits. Moreover, Section 259 A of the Corporations Act 2001 prohibits self-acquisition. A company directly acquiring...
Words: 10455 - Pages: 42
...Satyam which is one of the largest IT companies in India. All these events have made stake holders realize the urgency and importance of good corporate governance. Before investing money in any company people are quite concerned how companies are being managed. International organizations like IMF, WTO and World Bank are also insisting on transparency. All this has made Corporate Governance and transparency up the public agenda. Good Corporate Governance makes for good business sense. It increases confidence of shareholders in the company. This leads to better stock prices. Good disclosure practices lead to a more liquid market for the company. This lowers cost of debt for the company. Thus the CEOs of today, there is a clear business case for complying with principle of good Corporate Governance. In the era of Globalization & Liberalization market forces plays a crucial role. We know that liberalization in emerging economy has made access to foreign funds easier. Availability of foreign funds will lower the cost of capital. It is quite understood. All companies will like this to happen, but the international lenders will be careful. They will expect that the companies they lend to follow good Corporate Governance. These lenders will demand transparency. These factors force the companies to modify their behavior and values to meet the norms of Corporate Governance. It is critical for any company that people they recruit believe in the company in the company's values and takes in...
Words: 17221 - Pages: 69