...The Use of Armed Military Drones Should Be Banned The shape of warfare was changed dramatically over the past decades. In 2001 the armed military drone (unmanned aerial vehicle) was first used in warfare in Afghanistan (Schmit, E. (06.11.2002.)). Recently the world’s praise has been directed towards the military drone, which seems to be the perfect weapon for destruction. Although used more under Obama than Bush (Tschida, T. (26.09.2012.)) and responsible for the deaths of a number of Al Qaeda members the UAV has not been immune to criticism (Volker, K. (27.10.2012.)).[1] Drone attacks can be blamed for a growing irresponsibility as they create an emotional distance between the target and the attacker and lessen the possible losses. Furthermore, they have in no way eliminated the risks of collateral damage not to mention the unresolved issue with [3] promotion of warfare and extrajudicial killings as such. Therefore, the use of armed military drones should be banned. Military drones create more incentive for pilot irresponsibility. Not only does the distance from the actual warfare reduce the ability to fully comprehend the situation, but it also lessens the responsibility felt for the actions as the emotional contact is lacking and the pilot is in a safe situation where a mistake doesn’t mean possible harm coming to him/her. A comparison is often made between flying a drone and playing a video game. The similarity is so clear that even the United States Air Force uses...
Words: 1652 - Pages: 7
...Drones, which are unmanned vehicles, are being used more frequently by the American military. From January 2009 to January 2014, during the first five years of the Obama administration, over 250 acknowledged American military drone strikes were been carried out, resulting in almost 2,500 people being killed (Serle, "More than 2,400 Dead as Obama’s Drone Campaign Marks Five Years | The Bureau of Investigative Journalism"). According to a paper released by the United States Department of Defense, military drones will become increasingly precise, lethal, and in the coming decades, some systems will have, “Effective Autonomy,” ("Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap" page 106). That means they will be able to largely control themselves and react to their environment. However, aside from the military applications, drones have many other uses and are becoming an increasingly valued technology. The drones themselves are diverse and not synonymous to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as they can...
Words: 1029 - Pages: 5
...The controversy surrounding military drone usage in sovereign countries in an attempt to mitigate any potential terrorist threats has been portrayed as an ethical dilemma that has no immediate solution in sight. Drone usage is considered to be an inhumane way to wage war on enemies as many innocent lives are either brutally tortured or simply lost, and arguments indicate that drones ultimately aid in the propagation of war. Because of this there is a constant battel between The United States and the governments of the countries being invaded, not to mention the unrest of the civilians on both sides. However, on the contrary, evidence suggests that drones are not a completely detrimental tool of warfare, in fact the benefits of military drone...
Words: 1609 - Pages: 7
...Should drones be used in the military? Drones are "remotely-controlled aircraft which may be armed with missiles and bombs for attack missions." The other use of drones in the military is to monitor certain areas.They can be harmful and should not be used in the military because they can cause many conflicts if the use of them increases. One of the reasons drones should not be used is because it's causing the death of innocent civilians. Throughout the five years of drone strikes, 2,400 deaths occurred due to the use of drones. When drones engage in "targeted killing", the target is often missed and results in the death of civilians, and even more missiles are fired to attack the missed target. From the total targeting of just 41 people, it has resulted in the death of 1,147 people that weren't targeted. Because civilians are being killed and fails to reduce armed militants, Drones are creating more terrorists than they kill.They are causing a growth in the hatred of America and possibly more terrorism. Radical protests and movements have broken out as a result of drone strikes....
Words: 510 - Pages: 3
...Drones can be defined as “unmanned aerial vehicles, most commonly associated and used by the United States military(Source A).” After examining all of the positive and negative connotations associated with the use of drones, one could say that the negative consequences do not outweigh the positive consequences of using drones in military actions. Drones not only save lives on the stuck on the front lines, but are also popular among the American population. One of the positive consequences, of using drones in high risk military actions, is that it saves the lives of United States military personnel and civilians that live a life caught in the crossfires of war. This can be exemplified by the statistic that shows “following the September 11,...
Words: 703 - Pages: 3
...These drones aren’t just used for entertainment purposes anymore or for drone races, these what these drones do aren’t typical to the public at all. These drones have jobs like us humans but more intense. Why were drones made? Drones arewere made for many different reasons. These reasons are tTransporting supplies, being flying taxies, war, to make one-way trips, and to stop poachers these are some reasons why drones are being made. Some reasons on why pPeople use drones for these reasons is to make jobslives easier and to help others faster or animals from being killed. Certain drones are designed different than other drones. Some drones are designed for a disposable drone for one way journeys and some drones are designed as weapons or as search dogs. The drones that are designed for a disposable one way journey were designed by APSARA for people that need critical supplies in California. The drones that were designed as weapons were made to help the military in wars they are able to launch missiles and take down a building in just seconds. The search dogs drones were made to track criminals and to spy and plan attacks. In 2002 American drone pilots launched 1,400 strikes...
Words: 732 - Pages: 3
...attention of the American public with heavy drone use under President Barack Obama’s administration but unmanned technology has been around for decades. The only difference is that now the military is pouring more money into research and development of these types of technologies. The current five-year budget is set at $23,883.2 billion or about $4.8 billion per year on unmanned air, ground and maritime systems (Lewis). The Department of Defense defines unmanned aircraft as “an aircraft or balloon that does not carry a human operator and is capable of flight under remote control or autonomous programming.” Around the world, militaries are continuing to use drones because they believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. According to Lieutenant Colonel David B. Glade, unmanned technologies “will be able to conduct military operations in a more efficient and less risky fashion than was the case when aircraft[s] were piloted by humans” (Glade, 1). More importantly, he states, “it is possible that the United States will be able to build military systems […] which can conduct military operations without human intervention” (Glade, 1). The military is motivated to develop and deploy unmanned technologies because they save lives, the costs are lower and operational hours cease to be an issue. If the United States can develop and deploy technology that can minimize the exposure of military personnel in places that will dominate American military operations, U.S. policymakers will have...
Words: 3400 - Pages: 14
...also another exercise in nation building. Thirdly, though America (at least publicly) had been chasing Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan, he was ultimately captured from about an hour's drive from Pakistan's capital city of Islamabad. Fourthly, Osama Bin Laden's assassination came after a blatant violation of Pakistan's national sovereignty by American special forces and without the knowledge of its infamously strong military. Fifthly, Osama Bin Laden's body was disposed in secrecy, and though the opportunity was there to bring the most wanted man in the world to trial, it was deemed unsuitable for the American cause to do so. However, all these concerns though important, are dwarfed when compared to the American policy of conducting drone attacks within Pakistani borders. Interestingly, all of these concerns remain relevant to the issue of drone operations conducted by America within the Pakistani territory. The paper will analyze the use of drone attacks with a primary focus on whether the use of drones can be justified, and attempt to prove that the use of drones is in fact a moral and an administrative evil. History and Nature Of The Conflict The notion of conflict here...
Words: 3157 - Pages: 13
...Drones of Warfare Since October 1, 2015, alone two thousand three hundred and twenty-six United States Military officers have died. If there was any way to save those two thousand brave men and women would you take that chance? The solution for that problem is military drone use. Drones should be used for military actions. By defining the benefit of drone usage in the military, refuting arguments that drones are not worth the risk and are pressing up against international laws, and presenting evidence one will be persuaded to believe that drones should be used in the military. By using drones in the military thousands of lives will be saved each month by taking those men and women out of the crossfire. “ A drone strike can kill a person in one room of a house and spare the lives of other people in other rooms.” (source A) This evidence is proving that drone strikes have a more precise aim than that of armed military men especially with many civilians in between the army man and the target. “The traditional weapons...
Words: 585 - Pages: 3
...4, 2012 Ms. Zbitkovskis Drones are Going Mainstream Drones are unmanned computerized aircraft issued to the military and only the military. They come in all shapes and sizes, but no matter how small they are the danger of what they are capable of is still there. The military have used these drones for bombing and spying. Civilians are trying to push rights to own drones for reasons such as keeping an eye on crops. Many believe that the constitution would be taking a back seat to let boys play with their toys if this were allowed. Too many things would happen if these machines were put in civilian hands. Violation of privacy, danger of bombing, and interference with commercial air traffic are main issues when thinking of letting civilians have this kind of technology. Drones, also known as UAV’s, have many different purposes. There are so many different types of drones in the marketing world. The most common ones have been used for military purposes. The US military has two types of drones. UAV’s, unmanned aerial vehicles, are used for high tech surveillance. UACV’s, unmanned aerial combat vehicles, are used for destroying targeted objects in war (Pugliese). There are many drones that can be mistaken for remote controlled helicopters as well. These are now issued to some police forces around the US in order to keep a closer eye on cities. Civilians are starting to demand the use of drones in many different areas. Farmers are asking for drones to watch their crops better...
Words: 1024 - Pages: 5
...CDT Geblein MIL401 Midterm Essay 18OCT15 “The Legality and Morality of Autonomous Drone Strikes” My initial thought when I had heard I would be considering the legal and ethical implications of the use of autonomous drone strikes was that these strikes would be a bad thing. However the articles I have read about this have convinced me otherwise. Not only do these strikes provide a significant tactical advantage for the user but also they are cost efficient. The strikes made by these autonomous drones are allowed within the U.S. law and the Law of War. Additionally there is no moral obligation to limit your fighting power in a war to what your enemy has so there are no moral or ethical issues with these strikes. The use of these drones...
Words: 1541 - Pages: 7
...The controversy surrounding drone practice for targeted killing is questionable ethically, legally, and strategically. The U.S. policy of drone warfare is directly correlated with the war on terrorism. The aftermath of 9/11 convinced the U.S. military and intelligence community to target Taliban and al-Qaeda militants by utilizing drone technology. The Authorization for Use of Military Force permits the use of all necessary and appropriate force against terrorism. The U.S government to justify drone strikes without restrictions has used this settlement as a defense mechanism. Drone technology promotes secrecy, governmental power, and a foreign policy that operates without limitations. The issue of drone technology is analyzed using the ethical...
Words: 2160 - Pages: 9
...especially in the military sector. These modern designed aircrafts, autonomously or remote controlled, have already shown that they will play an important role in the future global environment. The research process which is used for describing methodology was grounded theory, with structure elicitation technique. Qualitative data were collected by a questionnaire, which referred to a number of 16 people who have Cypriot citizenship. This research, answered in questions such as: should Cyprus participate with drone procurement? Furthermore, what will be the reactions and concerns of civilians when they inform about the existence of this advanced program in National Guard and that can be used as a weapon? The existing army equipment is modern or obsolete? Must National Guard upgrade the existing weapons and communication equipment? Evaluating the results of the questionnaire it can be said that the majority of the participants believe that the current military equipment is not appropriate or high advanced and it needs to be upgraded with weapons and communication systems. Most of the participants supported the idea of introducing UAVs in the Cyprus army. Additionally, the participants did not express major concerns about drone procurement except from the need of compliance between UAVs utilization and human rights (illegal surveillance from the sky). Keywords- drones; use of drones in army; military drone; drones perceptions; drones science; policies; ...
Words: 4578 - Pages: 19
...The Strategic Use of Drones in Modern Warfare Caleb E. Moore IS 3310 Troy University Author Note This article is intended solely for research and will have no biased opinions. Table of Contents 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Title page. 2------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Table of Contents. 3-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abstract. 4-5 --------------------------------------------The Strategic Use of Drones in Modern Warfare. 5-6 ----------------------------------------------------------The Effectiveness of Drone Warfare. 6-7 –-----------------------------------------------------------------The Financial Cost of Drones. 7-8 –-----------------------------------------------------The Operational Capabilities of Drones. 8-9 –-------------------------------------------------------------------- Fueling Anti-Americanism. 9-10-------------------------------------------------------The Limitations of Drone Capabilities. 10-12 –------------------------------------------------------------------------The Future of Drones. 12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reference Page. Abstract The emergence of drone warfare has completely revolutionized the strategy of our military surveillance and fights overseas. This study is intended to analyze...
Words: 3596 - Pages: 15
...Is the Use of Drone Military Tactics or not? In 2002 of February 4th history was made that allowed CIA and military to use such extraordinary equipment that made it safer for pilots and national security defense to use to spy on our enemies around the world without being noticed or even harming a human life at stake. But what can we really say that these drones let alone can be worth so much money of the tax payers that we don’t see the results that they are really made for.The drone was made and it was made for just that purpose in that world to help aid in the fight in counter-terrorism let alone not let any more of our military pilots put their lives at risk in dangerous zones. But due to recent events that lead to a sort of downfall in using these pilot less drones, is it actually worth the billions we spend on it to be used in the military or is it even worth having though due to some malfunctions of the drone killed innocent civilians not only from other lands, but our own American civilians as well. Does America really needs these drones that can help with the war on terror and costing us so much money let alone deaths, or do we need something different or not even the drones at all. Back in 2008 while I was serving in Afghanistan and right now I am gearing up for another tour right after the final week of school has ended, I remember hearing about the drones and what the purpose was for. At the time I could never really see one up close and let alone be in the same...
Words: 2713 - Pages: 11
