Premium Essay

ELPA Assessment And Behavior Analysis

Submitted By
Words 1068
Pages 5
EVENT(S)/BEHAVIOR(S):
In the Marshalltown Community District, there are a couple different types of assessments that are used to assess language learners. A student that is new to the country will take the TELPA assessment, which is required by the state. This test needs to be taken within thirty days from the beginning of the year, fourteen days after the start of the year. Another assessment that is given annually is called ELPA21, which is a new assessment for the Marshalltown District. It has replaced the annual assessment, I-ELDA. The new assessment, ELPA21, connects with the Iowa Core and the ELP standards.
For the ELPA 21 assessment, a student will be marked “proficient” when all domain levels are greater or equal to 4. A student will be marked “progressing” when the domain level combinations fall in between the criteria for “proficient” and “emerging.” A student will be marked “emerging” when all domain levels are less than or equal to 2. …show more content…
If a student is marked “proficient”, the student is exited out of the program and is in a Monitoring Phase. Students are monitored for the next four years. If there are concerns on student’s growth or progress. the problem solving method looks at the type of instruction, skills and strategies that are being used, reinforcing the differentiated and scaffold levels within the general education

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

English Profeciency

...English Language Proficiency Assessment in the Nation: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PRACTICE Edited by Jamal Abedi U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A , D AV I S • S C H O O L O F E D U C A T I O N Copyright © 2007 The Regents of the University of California The work reported herein was supported in part by the National Research and Development Centers, PR/Award Number R305A050004, as administered by the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences (IES). The findings and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of the Institute of Education Sciences, or the U.S. Department of Education. T his study required the participation of all fifty states, their assessment directors, particularly those involved with the NCLB Title III assessments. Their cooperation and patience is much appreciated, and their dedication to educating young people is greatly admired. We cannot thank the states enough for their collaboration with this project. Many people generously contributed to the development of this report. We are especially indebted to the chapter authors for their invaluable contributions and for their patience throughout this process. Sue Rigney from the U.S. Department of Education contributed greatly to the quality of this work by providing excellent comments and suggestions. We are so grateful for her support, advice and contribution to this report. Kathleen Leos of the U.S...

Words: 115272 - Pages: 462