...2015 The Effect of War and Peace on Foreign Aid Egypt is a developing country that has poor living conditions and very few job opportunities. Since 2011 the Egyptian government has been questionable about what it stands for. This has caused almost no economic growth and in return lead to borrowing lots of money and relying on their allies to foot the bill. Egypt chosen a new path to reform which will lead to economic growth and stability by building new infrastructure and creating jobs for the people. Foreign aid is providing Egypt with the funding to help reach economic stability. To bad the countries internal conflicts are likely to erupt into a civil war that will easily be a negative effect on their growth. On Tuesday, January 25, 2011, in Egypt protesters took to the streets. They were protesting against poverty, unemployment, and government corruption. The protest was taking place in Cairo and two other major cities. The police arrested and injured many protesters. The military moved in to take over security, and the protesters did not even care because they have more respect for the military than the police department. The government shut down internet access in the country to keep the protesters from sending out information. After eighteen days of protest, President Hosni Mubarak resigned and left Cairo. Due to the protest the United States will be investigating how financial aid is used that they provide to Egypt, which is the second largest contribution of U.S. aid...
Words: 1417 - Pages: 6
...The Suez Crisis During the 1950’s, Britain’s rule over Egypt led them to gain joint control over the Suez Canal with the French. However, many Egyptians were tired of Britain’s presence because they felt as if they were second class citizens in their own country. This led to Egypt’s military beginning to pressure Britain’s armies, located in the Canal Zone, so they would leave. Not only were attacks made on the British, but also on Israeli troops along the border between the two countries. Years later, this long and negative history between the nations would eventually lead to the joint decision for Israel, Britain, and France to attack Egypt when Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal in July 1956. As a result, the Suez Crisis ensued. During the course of this paper, I will argue that the Suez Crisis had a greater impact on Britain and Frances’ power as colonizing countries as it exposed significant military weaknesses. I will first discuss in further detail what the Suez Crisis was. Then I will explain the different measures that were taken to maintain peace amongst the nations involved. Lastly, I will discuss the different outcomes Egypt, Britain, France, and Israel faced. When Colonel Nasser replaced General Neguib in 1954 he had three main goals for Egypt. These included: making Egypt independent by ending British occupation, building up the Egyptian forces for an effective attack on Israel, and building the economy by constructing a dam at...
Words: 2002 - Pages: 9
...Madalyn Huffman Nasser and Sadat in Egypt On June 23, 1956, the people of Egypt voted for a president. They really did not have much of a choice. The ballot had just one single name on it. Gamal Abdel Nasser. Since he was the only name to pick from, he was elected by the people of Egypt to be their first president to rule over the Republic of Egypt. Along with Nasser being the only person on the ballot, so was his new constitution. Under this new constitution, Nasser is making Egypt become a one-party socialist state. The official religion would now be Islam. Nasser is originally from Alexandria, Egypt. He was born there. During his young years, he often was involved in demonstrations against the British rule. After going to school,...
Words: 1082 - Pages: 5
...Islamist Militant attacks Egypt n February, 11 2014 Islamist militant formally known as Jihadist attacks Egypt Islamist militant massive attack in Egypt was done by detonating car bombs, gunning down the Senior Interior Ministry official in broad daylight, security headquarters, and shooting down military helicopter with air missile. Caro, a security headquarter in Egypt was one of the four places that was fatally car bombed. Some officials in Caro believe that more Egyptians are going to join the jihad of terrorism. The governments’ backed-military is the main target for the Jihadist. The “Jihad” is a spiritual or political goal struggle by Muslim for holy morals. So Jihadist is Muslim who is involved in Jihad..Since the early 1990’s Egypt history of violence with Muslim Brotherhood has increased. President Mohamed Morsi is the blame for majored of jihadist attacks in Egypt. Morsi angry leadership set off a new crusade of terrorism for the new government. Mohamed was allies with Muslim Brotherhood which cause Islamists to gain power through democratic. However this made it easier for Jihadist to cross into Egypt. Later after Mohamed dismissals from presidency, as a result affect cause civil wars with different countries and getting rival terrorist groups to come together to take down Egypt’s government. First, Jihadist started killing high ranking officials by killing themselves as suicide bombers. Meanwhile Egyptian military fight back against terrorism with extreme...
Words: 417 - Pages: 2
...Anwar Sadat was the president of Egypt and an in depth member of the Egyptian Free Officers. He was one of the more successful leaders of the Egyptian state due to his great military leadership and his control over enemy states. However, on October 6, 1981 he was assassinated because on his ideal of peace with Israel. Israel had been under attack from Egypt and other Arabic countries for years because of their Jewish origin and way of current life and was completely looked down upon. Israel was the original ‘Holy Land’ mentioned in the Bible and other holy books but the Arabic people denied that the Jews have any ownership of the area. Therefore, the Arabic states constantly try to invade and take over via Nationalism, however, Sadat had...
Words: 758 - Pages: 4
...CONTEXT" By Michael B. Bishku* INTRODUCTION What began in Tunisia in December 2010 and continues most violently in Syria today has been labeled by observers of and experts on the Middle East as the "Arab Spring," but is that the correct term? (It should be noted that Lebanon engaged in the Cedar Revolution in 2005 - following the assassination of Sunni Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri by Hezbollah operativeswhich resulted in the withdrawal of Syrian froops after 30 years.) While Tunisia seems to be emulating Turkey as a historically secular country with mildly Islamist politicians exercising the greatest amount of influence in their country's respective foreign and domestic affairs, Egypt, the birthplace of the Muslim Brotherhood, appears to be at the center of a struggle between the Islamists and the military, which has dominated politics in that country since the early 1950s, while secularists and the minority Copts feel as if they have been sidelined. Majority Shi'a in Bahrain were quashed in their attempt to have a minority Sunni government recognize their rights, while Yemen's longtime leader was replaced by that country's vice president. Libya toppled an erratic dictator, but has no experience with representative government and like in Yemen the population possesses tribal identities. Syria is now engaged in a brutal civil war in which at least 20,000 people have lost their lives by the summer of 2012. Other countries in the Arab world either buy the loyalty of their inhabitants...
Words: 8450 - Pages: 34
...unrest in the Arab world, better known as the Arab Spring. The objective of the paper is to help the reader understand the situation better and decide if the United States should support the new Islamic backed governments in the Arab world. The cause that led to the unrest will be presented. Also the regimes which were overthrown and their authoritarian style of governance will be discussed as well as the nature of who replaced them. Arab Unrest: Islamic Winter Is Coming President Barak Obama said of the Arab Spring in 2011, “There must be no doubt that the United States of America welcomes change that advances self-determination and opportunity”. All across the Arab world there has been a plethora of change. In Tunisia, Libya, Syria, Egypt, and even Mali longstanding governments have been toppled, and almost all have been replaced by Islamist governments. The paramount question, at least for Americans, about these revolutions is, should the United States help support them. To answer this question one must know what ignited the Arab Spring, who was removed from power and who replaced those removed. The best way to understand a product is by looking into the process in which it was made. During what has been coined “The Arab Spring”, unrest has acted like a plague in the Arab world. Riots, demonstrations, and full blown civil war has spread too much of the Arab controlled world. This has not come out of thin air. The spark which ignited the Arab Spring was a rather literal...
Words: 1371 - Pages: 6
...Eygypt’s political transitions. Summarize political developments in post Mubarak Egypt and identify that country’s most likely political trajectory over the next five years. What do you see as the major forces shaping contemporary political development in Egypt? Introduction Dr Jamal al-Din Hamdan, a renowned Egyptian historian, wrote in Volume 1 of his four-volume book Shakhsiyat Misr (Egypt’s Distinctive Character), In Egypt the ruler is regarded as a God until he falls. He is above criticism, until he departs. He is the history and geography [of Egypt] until he is replaced by someone else. He always fancies Egypt as his private property, his hamlet or his larger village. He is the state and the fatherland. Loyalty to the fatherland is synonymous with loyalty to his regime, and to him personally ... He regards any criticism of Egypt as criticism of him personally and, hence, an unforgivable treason. (Najjar, Fauzi 2008) This has been the character of the state of Egypt from its earliest rulers, the pharaohs. In January 25 the foundations of this slumber Tahrir Square and elections For eighteen days, from January 25 to February 11, 2011, Tahrir was occupied in order to take down Mubarak’s regime, and over these weeks, the square witnessed many bloody episodes. On Tuesday, January 25, thousands of Cairenes responded to a Facebook call to follow the model of the Tunisian revolution that had just deposed that country’s president and forced him to flee. Of the hundreds...
Words: 2148 - Pages: 9
...helped the Slavic people who were rebelling against the Ottomans at the time * Ottomans lost Romania, Montenegro, Cyprus, Bosnia, Herzegovina, and Bulgaria. Geopolitics lands create problems again * Great Britain and Russia fight over Muslim Lands * Great Game was the war over India, which were currently Britain’s most profitable colonies. * Russia wanted to gain India’s’ wealth but the British had successfully defended. * After successfully defending, the British actually tried to spread its empire into Afghanistan. * Afghanistan was familiar with powers trying to invade the kingdom. Great Britain retreated after decades. Egypt makes reforms * Seeing how powerful other nations were Egypt had to adapt. * Egypt made political and social reforms * Military and economic reforms followed. *...
Words: 346 - Pages: 2
...region by the United States and the Soviet union-and to what extent the Cold War was imported into the region and manipulated by regional leaders for their own ends USSR: the USSR was able to step into the power vacuum left by France and Britain, and it emerged (along with the united states) as the one of the new foreign powers in the Middle East. The USSR had now entered the Cold war battlefield, in the Middle East. It also gave money to Egypt, for the completion of the Aswan dam. The action taken by the USA, also raised a point of scholarly contention: the question, to what extent the Cold war had been imposed upon the region by the United States and the Soviet union-and to what extent the Cold War was imported into the region and manipulated by regional leaders for their own ends UN: UNEF, was created, and it guaranteed freedom of shipping in the gulf of Aqba , providing Israel with a red sea port. UNEF also provided some limited control over the Fedayeen infiltrations Britain: Britain was seen as a loser of the conflict, as Egypt remained in control of the canal, and the perception that Nasser had successfully challenged the former colonial powers led to a further decline of British influence in the Middle East, as well as in Africa, and south East Asia. Britain was not able to counter the damage done to an already declining diplomatic position....
Words: 646 - Pages: 3
...from the books, in addition to the material from lecture (so prepare accordingly). You must write in essay form with an introduction, substantive body paragraphs and a conclusion. Be sure to answer all of the sub-questions. Essay #3)What is the history behind the 9/11 attacks? Explain how the US intervention in Afghanistan contributed to the formation of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. What three reasons were given for the 9/11 attacks and why is US involvement in Iraq, Israel, and Saudi Arabia a factor? The history behind the 9/11 attacks include issues between countries in the Middle East and the United States. Issues included the importance and interest in Middle East oil, the United States support for Israel in providing them with military equipment, and the presence of the United States army in the Middle East. The attack consisted of two airplanes that were led by terrorists who were associated with the al Qaeda which was led by Osama bin Landen. Their purpose to do this was to slam the World Trade Center which is located in New York. Terrorists that attacked the American interests were usually trained by the U.S but they became part of the Taliban which was founded with Osama bin Ladens’s money. He was determined in spreading conservative forms of Islam, with religious laws. In 2001 al Qaeda was recognized as the most dangerous terror network in the world. They were planning actions against the U.S. In September 11 of 2001 it hit the World Trade Center. This was never...
Words: 939 - Pages: 4
...Amr Amr 12/10/2013 Egypt Burning: How one Egyptian revolutionary movement overthrew a dictator while one another overthrew a democracy. On the 17th of December, 2011 a vegetable vendor lit himself on fire in response to the corrupt and inefficient bureaucratic system in Tunisia. This small event by an unknown vendor led to the biggest and fastest spread of social movements in the history of the Arab world known as the Arab spring. Yet while the Tunisian example has been seen as relatively successful, in Egypt things seems to be more complicated and difficult especially with two different social movements, the first mobilized on the 25th of January and overthrew the long time autocratic ruler Hosni Mubarak, while the second had its beginnings in December of 2012 led to the overthrow of the first democratically elected president on June 30th of the following year was able to rally the biggest protest in modern history. This research paper’s goal will be to analyze the two social movements, their origins, make-up, organizational structure, their image abroad and finally their conclusion. For example why did the January 25th movement, which had clear goals from the onset and an extremely diverse make up ranging from secular liberals to conservative Islamists get sidelined and collapsed after achieving their first goal? And why did the Tamarod movement (rebel in Arabic) which had its origin in a petition form and was able to garner more active support, including...
Words: 2536 - Pages: 11
...Gamal Abdel-Nasser was an excellent and a great leader and in fact he was one of the charismatic Arab Leaders who emerged within the military group inside the Egyptian army that was called “Free Officers’ Movement” in the early 1950s. In addition, Gamal Abdel-Nasser was an Egyptian and a national leader among the United Arab Republic. He wanted to get rid of the corruption, bribery, and governmental instability found during King Farouk’s reign and to regain all the rights of the Egyptian citizens at that time and under the British control. Nasser’s ambitions were obvious in eliminating the British influence and interference within the Egyptian internal affairs as well as the exploitation of the country’s resources. When the British threatened the king and forced resignation into assigning Moustafa El-Nahas, a pro-Britain government, Gamal Abdel Nasser refused to be quiet about that and considered it a shameful event. Many officers regretted being unhelpful for their country and decided to help Gamal and sacrificed their blood for their nation. As a result, revolution began and the king was forced to exile while Gamal Abdel Nasser was elected as president of Egypt who successfully drove out the British troops. At that moment, he was considered a national hero who gave Egypt its independence and got rid of the corruption that was existed during the king’s reign. His efforts to regain Egyptians’ rights from British control were successful when he announced the nationalization...
Words: 618 - Pages: 3
...United States. "The Egyptian citizen, and the Arab citizen as a whole, is not ready to accept the kind of behavior that former president Mubarak and his group used to accept," said Nabil Abdel Fattah of the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies. The wind began to change soon after Mubarak's removal. Egypt made goodwill gestures to Israel's arch-foe Iran, eased the isolation of Islamist group Hamas in Gaza by opening the border with the territory and brokered a reconciliation deal between Hamas and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah movement. It also moved to redraw contracts for gas export to Israel to squeeze a better deal. When five Egyptian security personnel were killed during an Israeli clash with gunmen who had killed eight Israelis close to the Sinai border on Thursday, Egypt accused Israel of breaching their peace treaty and said it would recall its ambassador. BLOOD "Egyptian blood is not cheap and the government will not accept that Egyptian blood gets shed for nothing," state news agency MENA quoted a cabinet statement as saying. Egypt's Information Minister Osama Heikal told state TV: "The assurance that Egypt is committed to the peace treaty with Israel ... should be reciprocated by an equivalent commitment and an adjustment of Israeli statements and behavior...
Words: 792 - Pages: 4
... The Six Day War was fought in June, 1967. It was fought between Israel and a coalition of Arab forces including Egypt, Syria and Jordan. The United States and Soviet Union were both involved. The U.S. supported Israel and the U.S.S.R. supported the Arab forces. Countries like France and Great Britain were also involved but tried to remain neutral. The war was caused by the mutual distrust, mounting tension and military build up on each side. The war led to more conflict and tension in the Middle East. The Six Day War was caused by the history of war between Israel and Arab countries. Before the Six Day War, there had already been two wars involving Israel and a neighboring Arab country. Israel was involved in the Arab-Israeli War and the Suez Crisis. Israel won both wars, securing their spot in the Middle East. Israel also had numerous armed conflicts with Arab forces. In between major armed conflicts, there were terrorist attacks committed by Arabic. Groups like the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Arabic guerrillas from countries like Syria, Egypt and Jordan committed these attacks. Another cause of the Six Day War was the mounting tensions on each side. Although Arabic guerrillas already conducted attacks on Israel, the formation of the PLO in 1964 resulted in an increased level of terrorism in Israel. In May, only one month before the war, Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran to Israelis. U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson said “If a single act of folly was more...
Words: 1431 - Pages: 6