Free Essay

Enron Scandal

In:

Submitted By sharmila2312
Words 1475
Pages 6
Phoenix or vulture after acquiring the rover group from british aerospace in 1994, german automaker bmw set about carving up the assets of the group :the land rover division was sold to ford motor company in the united states, and the reborn mini business was established as a subsidiary of bmw based in the uk. the remaining assets were sold as mg rover in 2000 after continued losses and declining market share. having recouped some of its purchase price with the land rover sale to ford for 1.8 billion, and with an expected contribution of positive revenue from the mini subsidiary,the assets of mg rover were sold for a nominal $20 in may 2000 to a group of businessmen led by ex-rover chief executive john towers. called the 'phoenix consortium,' towers and his partners (john edwards,nick stephenson, and peter beale) received an interest-free loan of 427 million from bmw and the backing of the british government and automobile trade unions as they committed to turning around the last domestically owned mass production car company in britain.

critics argued( and water later vindicated) that the project was doomed from the start. despite having purchased a large stock of unsold inventory from bmw for only 10,the new consortium lacked the financial resources to design and develop new cars that could match its global competitors. even with aggressive cost cutting measures(including cutting 3000 jobs), mg rover continued to lose money for the next four years. in june 2004, the company signed a development agreement wit the shanghai automotive industry corporation(saic) to a joint venture of new car models and automobile technologies with saic contributing 1 billion for a 70 percent share in mg rover. a computing offer from india's tata motors was disclosed in december 2004,but by then mg rover was out of money and desperately negotiating with the british government for a 120 million loan to keep the company alive until one of the deals could be completed. in april 2005,mg rover confirmed that it had received a 6.5 million 'stop gap' loan from the british government, but the funds proved insufficient to maintain the company as a viable operation,and it ceased trading on may 20,2005, with debts of 1.3 billion and a further 6000 jobs lost.

the closure of mg rover marked the end of british mass production of automobiles,but the story of mg rover was about to take a dramatic turn. with suspicions of poor financial management at the company ,the british government commisioned a report by the national audit office (nao) into the collapse of the company. that report,issued in march 2006,revealed that the seniour executives of the 'phoenix consortium ' (soon to be referred to as the 'phoenix four', had,along with chief executive kevin howe, received total compensation in the amount of 42 million over the 5 years in which the group operated mg rover. while the compensation (around 80 million) may be small by american bailout standards, the phoenix consortium had been welcomed as saviours of mg rover and had negotiated aggressive cost cuts based on its popularity and its commitment to rescuing britain's last volume carmaker.

the nao report prompted an investigation by the serious fraud office (sfo) over misuse of taxpayer funds (for the 6.5 million loan from the government). the investigation took four years to complete and cost the british taxpayers another 16 million on top of the 6.5 million loan that was now worthless. the sfo report concluded that the phoenix four had done a much better job of structuring their compensation and pension plans than they had of running the company,but found insufficient grounds for criminal prosecution.the phoenix four maintained their innocence throughout the investigation and condemmed the sfo report as 'a witch hunt against us and a whitewash for the government.

Questions

1)why would bmw sell millions of pounds of assets for 10 and lend the buyer an additional 427 million?
2)why would saic want to buy 70 percent of a company that was losing money for 1 billion?
3)with compensation packages already locked in,do you think the executives were committed to making the saic's or tata motor's deals work?
4)if mg rover had been successful in winning a 120 million loan from the government rather than a 6.5 million loan, would the outcome of the sfo investigation have been any different?
5)the phoenix four maintain they did nothing wrong. how would you defend their conduct from a business athics perspective?
6)what do you think the outcome should have been for the phoenix four?

selepas memperolehi kumpulan rover dari aero angkasa British pada tahun 1994, jerman pembuat bmw menetapkan tentang ukiran aset kumpulan: rover bahagian tanah yang telah dijual kepada syarikat motor ford di negeri-negeri yang bersatu padu, dan perniagaan mini dilahirkan semula telah ditubuhkan sebagai anak syarikat bmw berdasarkan di uk.aset yang selebihnya telah dijual sebagai mg rover pada tahun 2000 selepas kerugian yang berterusan dan pasaran menurun saham. telah dikembalikan sebahagian daripada harga pembelian yang dengan yang dijual tanah rover untuk ford 1.8 billion, dan dengan sumbangan 1 dijangka hasil positif daripada anak syarikat yang mini, aset mg rover telah dijual 10 $nominal 20 Mei 2000 kepada sekumpulan ahli perniagaan diketuai oleh bekas rover ketua eksekutif john menara. dipanggil 'phoenix konsortium,' menara dan rakan-rakannya (john Edwards, nama samaran Stephenson, dan peter Beale) menerima pinjaman tanpa faedah sebanyak 427 juta dari bmw dan sokongan kerajaan British dan kesatuan sekerja automobil mereka komited untuk memulihkan jisim terakhir di dalam negara milik pengeluaran kereta syarikat di Britain.

pengkritik berhujah (dan air yang kemudian didakwa.Sekiranya) bahawa projek itu telah ditakdirkan dari awal.walaupun setelah membeli saham besar inventori tidak terjual dari bmw untuk hanya 10, konsortium baru kekurangan sumber kewangan untuk mereka bentuk dan membangunkan kereta baru yang dapat menandingi pesaing global.walaupun dengan langkah penjimatan kos yang agresif (termasukmemotong 3.000 pekerjaan), mg rover terus kehilangan wang untuk empat tahunakan datang.pada Jun 2004, syarikat ini telah menandatangani perjanjian iaitupembangunan industri automotif shanghai perbadanan (saic), usaha sama model kereta baru dan teknologi automobil dengan saic menyumbang 1 bilion bagisaham 70 peratus dalam mg rover.tawaran pengkomputeran dari india, tata motor telah dinyatakan dalam Dis 2004, tetapi pada masa itu mg rover wang dan sedaya upaya berunding dengan kerajaan british bagi pinjaman 120 juta untuk mengekalkan syarikat itu hidup sehingga salah satu urus niaga boleh disiapkan.pada April 2005, mg rover mengesahkan bahawa ia telah menerima pinjaman 'jurang henti' 6.5 juta dari kerajaan british, tetapi dana terbukti tidak mencukupi untuk mengekalkan syarikat itu sebagai operasi yang berdaya maju,dan ia tidak lagi perdagangan di boleh 20,2005, dengan hutang daripada 1.3 bilion dan pekerjaan 6000 lagi hilang.

penutupan mg rover menandakan berakhirnya pengeluaran besar-besaran britishautomobil, tetapi cerita mg rover adalah kira-kira untuk mengambil gilirandramatik.dengan syak wasangka pengurusan kewangan di syarikat yang miskin,kerajaan british telah

mentauliahkan laporan oleh pejabat audit (NÃO) negara kedalam keruntuhan syarikat.laporan yang dikeluarkan Mac 2006, mendedahkanbahawa eksekutif seniour 'phoenix konsortium' (tidak lama lagi akan dirujuk sebagai'phoenix 4', telah bersama-sama dengan ketua eksekutif kevin Howe, menerimajumlah pampasan dalam jumlah 42 jutalebih 5 tahun di mana kumpulan beroperasimg rover. manakala pampasan (sekitar 80 juta) mungkin kecil mengikut piawaian bailoutamerika, konsortium phoenix telah dialu-alukan sebagai penyelamat mg rover dantelah dirundingkan pemotongan kos yang agresif yang berdasarkan populariti dankomitmen untuk menyelamatkan pengeluar kereta kelantangan terakhir Britain.

laporan NÃO mendorong siasatan oleh pejabat penipuan serius (SFO) di atas penyalah gunaan dana pembayar cukai (untuk pinjaman 6,5 juta daripada kerajaan).penyiasatan yang mengambil masa empat tahun untuk menyiapkan dankos pembayar cukai british lain 16 juta di atas pinjaman 6,5 juta yang kini tidak bernilai. laporan SFO menyimpulkan bahawa phoenix 4 telah melakukan pekerjaan yang lebih baik menstruktur rancangan pampasan mereka dan pencen dari mereka yang mentadbir syarikat itu, tetapi mendapati alasan yang tidak mencukupi untuk jenayah prosecution.the phoenix 4 mengekalkan mereka tidak bersalah sepanjang siasatan dan mengutuk yang SFO melaporkan sebagai 'memburu ahli sihir terhadap kami dan mencukur habis-habisan untuk kerajaan.

1) mengapa bmw akan menjual berjuta-juta pound aset untuk 10 dan meminjamkan pembeli tambahan 427 juta?
2) mengapa saic mahu membeli 70 peratus daripada syarikat yang telah kehilangan wang untuk 1 bilion?
3) dengan pakej pampasan yang telah dikunci di dalam, adakah anda fikir eksekutifyang telah komited untuk membuat atau saic kerja tawaran tata motor?
4) jika mg rover telah berjaya memenangi pinjaman 120 juta daripada kerajaan danbukan daripada pinjaman 6,5 juta, hasil siasatan SFO telah berlaku apa-apa yang berbeza?
5) phoenix 4 mengekalkan mereka tidak melakukan sebarang kesalahan.bagaimana anda akan mempertahankan kelakuan mereka dari perspektif etika perniagaan?
6) apa yang anda berfikir hasilnya sepatutnya untuk phoenix 4?

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Enron Scandal

...Busicom2 – 05/02/10 Executive Summary In 2001 fell Enron after one of the biggest scandals in the modern economy. Creative accounting, oppressive management and deceptive communication are in the heart of that affair. The first ruse was a cheating accounting. The company used the mark to market system, but in an illegal way for they calculated the assumed profits for the next 20 years, ie long term assumed profits. Moreover, they did not declare all the expenses (only a third for the trade with the station in the North Sea) and manipulated subsidiaries, which are told independent when they belong at least 3% of their capital, to hide debts and boost earnings. Besides, the management in Enron used the staff performance review which conducts the staff to work hard in order to be in the group of the ‘winners’. There were actually rewards for good employees, pension and savings, so that they would be interested in the good form of the firm and would not complain against the scam. Enron also managed to corrupt some politicians, bankers, analysts by pressurizing them or by giving great advantages and funds. For instance, the Energy Regulation Board earned one million dollars. Their marketing strategy was a diversification of the production of the corruption of analysts who would promote those new products. When the frauds were discovered by an employee and exposed to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the free fall began for Enron. The shares dropped from 90$ to 1$, the company...

Words: 365 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Enron Scandal

...| The Enron Scandal | | Introduction Enron Corporation was an American energy, commodities and services company based in Houston, Texas. From the 1990's until December 2001, Enron was famous throughout the business world and was named by Fortune as "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years. It grew wealthy due largely to marketing, promoting power, and its high stock price. Before its bankruptcy, Enron employed about 21,000 staff in forty countries and was one of the world's major electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper companies, which claimed revenues of $100.8 billion in 2000. Enron gave the illusion that it was a steady company with good revenue which was not the case, as a large part of its profits were made on paper through a creatively planned accounting fraud. Deep debt and surfacing information about hiding losses gave the company big problems and in the late 2001 Enron declared bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code. The collapse was followed by a series of revelations on how the executives manipulated Enron's success. The Fraud Schemes The Enron scandal, revealed in October 2001 was a management fraud involving top executives of Enron who deliberately manipulated the accounting structures in order to conceal their losses and debts so that the corporation appeared to be performing favourably. They adopted mark-to-market accounting, an accounting system based on market value, which was then inflated; the...

Words: 2330 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Enron Scandal

...The Enron Scandal Background Enron Corporation was an American energy, commodities, and services company based in Houston, Texas. Before its bankruptcy on December 2, 2001, Enron employed approximately 20,000 staff and was one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion in 2000.[1] Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years. At the end of 2001, it was revealed that its reported financial condition was sustained substantially by institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting fraud, known as the Enron scandal. Financial Frauds Enron’s downfall is basically the accumulated effect of its unethical practices in financing and reporting. Enron's non-transparent financial statements did not clearly depict its operations and finances with shareholders and analysts. In addition, its complex business model and unethical practices required that the company use accounting limitations to misrepresent earnings and modify the balance sheet to portray a favorable depiction of its performance. Enron's accounting and financial transactions is designed to keep reported income and reported cash flow up, asset values inflated, and liabilities off the books. The combination of these issues later led to the bankruptcy of the company: Aggressive Revenue Recognition As an energy supplier, Enron can be considered as merchants or agents. As merchant...

Words: 869 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Enron Scandal

...“ENRON SCANDAL” The Enron Corporation was the biggest in a series of scandals that damaged the reputations of corporations in the United States. It represented one of the largest fraud scandals in history. As a result, the company was said to force to file for bankruptcy in 2001 of December. This is where Sarbanes-Oxley Act was imposed with stricter rules on auditors and made corporate executives criminally liable for lying about their accounts. Enron was known as a provider of products and services related to natural gas, electricity and communications to wholesale and even retail customers. As an accounting major student I recognized that there were several doubtful accounting schemes that Enron used just to manipulate the employees, investors, customers and everyone. While I found that there are a lot of issues to expound on, the main issue is how fraudulent their company was especially having misrepresented their public financial reports. The financials presented by Enron were restated. In 2000, the profitability was less than 1%, becoming clear that Enron’s profits were realizable only if the quality of their revenue is good but if not it is not realizable. Enron used SPEs or Special Purpose Entity this is used to keep Enron’s debts and losses away from its balance sheets, therefore allowing it have a good credit rating and look good in front of the investors. In this case it is purely seen as an investment scam. In the company were I worked on last year...

Words: 590 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Enron Scandal

...The Enron Scandal and Moral Hazard Prof. Leigh Tesfatsion Department of Economics Iowa State University Ames, IA 50011-1070 http://www.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/ Last Revised: 3 April 2011 The Enron Scandal and Moral Hazard • Enron, the 7th largest U.S. company in 2001, filed for bankruptcy in December 2001. • Enron investors and retirees were left with worthless stock. • Enron was charged with securities fraud (fraudulent manipulation of publicly reported financial results, lying to SEC,…) • QUESTION: In what ways are security market moral hazard problems at the heart of the Enron bankruptcy scandal? Brief Time-Line of the Enron Scandal • Enron was a Houston-based natural gas pipeline company formed by merger in 1985. • By early 2001, Enron had morphed into the 7th largest U.S. company, and the largest U.S. buyer/seller of natural gas and electricity. • Enron was heavily involved in energy brokering, electronic energy trading, global commodity and options trading, etc. Brief Time-Line of the Enron Scandal…Continued • On October 16, 2001, in the first major public sign of trouble, Enron announces a huge third-quarter loss of $618 million. • On October 22, 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) begins an inquiry into Enron’s accounting practices. • On December 2, 2001, Enron files for bankruptcy. : Oct – Dec 2001 Regulatory Oversight of Enron Auditors Arthur Anderson Audit Committee (Directors) SEC Company Report Shareholders Enron Board...

Words: 1722 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Enron Scandal

...Alexis Isbell 11/1/2012 Case Project The Enron Scandal Near the turn of the 21st century, a seemingly large Dallas-based gas company sent a shockwave around the world in what would become known as the Enron scandal. The Enron scandal would cause many people to not only lose their jobs and their ways of life, but it would also cause people to become weary of these incredibly large companies. The Early Years (1985-early 1990’s) Enron was the brainchild of Kenneth Lay, when he brought about the merger of Houston Natural Gas and Omaha-based InterNorth. Enron Corporation created the first nationwide gas pipeline network in America, and would continue to grow throughout the 1990’s. In the early 90’s, after the United States government deregulated natural gas, Enron started growing into an extremely large company, whom employed over 21,000 workers. Enron would continue to grow into the nation’s seventh largest company. Enron’s profits skyrocketed through the roof once they were able to freely sell and buy natural gas in the United States. Enron would continue to grow into one America’s most profitable companies in the late 1990’s, but the argument could be made that is what possibly led to their drastic, and frankly embarrassing downfall. The Later Years (mid-late 1990’s – 2001) As previously stated, Enron would become one the nation’s most profitable companies in the late 1990’s. “Enron’s reported annual revenues grew from under $10 billion in the early 1990s...

Words: 1581 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Enron Scandal

...1. Enron was valued at $2.3 billion when it was formed in July 1985. On August 23, 2000, its stock was at $90 per share and it had a market capitalization of $65.9 billion. Explain the major business practices that created such dynamic growth in the price of the stock. Enron used many different tactics to inflate their stock prices. The one that sticks out to me is when they signed a 20-year contract with Blockbuster. Early in the contract Blockbuster and Enron parted ways with a null and void contract. However, Enron still kept the contract on the books as future earnings when they knew that money was never going to come in. They did this so their stocks prices would stay inflated. Another practice is that they switched from an agent model to a merchant model when recognizing revenue. Doing this gave them a 65% increase when typical industry standards only gain between 2-3%. Once they switched to this accounting method other companies started to follow their lead in order to stay competitive with Enron. In addition, Enron understated its liability and overstated its equity. They would do this by creating special purpose entities. These entities were created to show investors the downside of risk. I believe the main reason the stock increased so much is due to corruption of Arthur Andersen, an independent audit firm. On Wikipedia’s website there was a statement from Enron’s Power Committee and it appears they were placing blame on the Andersen firm. They were quoted...

Words: 765 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Enron Scandal

...Focus: The Enron Scandal This corporation was identified by Fortune Magazine as America’s Most Innovative Company 1996 to 2001 (Lindstrom par. 1). It was garnered as the 7th largest company on the Fortune 500 list in the US in 2000 and it placed sixth in the largest energy company in the world in 2000 (“Enron Corporation” par. 6). Who does not know the Enron Corporation, a giant in the commerce of energy? But among all these prestigious titles, there is another that the Enron Corporation is famous for, the Enron Scandal. Enron was the result of a merger between two gas pipe line companies in 1985. The Houston Natural Gas Co and a Nebraska based company called InterNorth. The fusion between the two became the Enron Corporation in 1986 (“Enron Corporation” par. 2). The firm experienced a rapid growth as it shifted from being a gas pipeline company into a “global energy trader (“Enron Corporation” par. 6).” Enron enjoyed profuse economic benefits and experienced revenues amounting up to 100 billion dollars by 2000 (“Enron Corporation” par. 6). The firm ventured to other facilities like Internet broadband called Enron Online (Lindstrom par. 9). For a company who reported to be harvesting so much profit and having so many investments would boggle your mind on why Enron still broke down. Where did Enron go wrong? What brought this billion dollar business down into bankruptcy? It was in the year 2001 that the company’s stability was put into question. Enron entered...

Words: 689 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Enron Scandal

...The Enron scandal Tobias Pavel 910422 Mylene Encontro 850224 Chalmers University of Technology Finacial Risk, MVE220 Examiner: Holger Rootzén 2012-12-02 Göteborg This report has been written and analyzed by both group members jointly. Abstract From the 1990's until the fall of 2001, Enron was famous throughout the business world and was known as an innovator, technology powerhouse, and a corporation with no fear. The sudden fall of Enron in the end of 2001 shattered not just the business world but also the lives of their employees and the people who believed that their soar to greatness was genuine. Their collapse was followed by a series of revelations on how they manipulated their success. Introduction Enron shocked the world from being “America’s most innovative company” to America's biggest corporate bankruptcy at its time. At its peak, Enron was America's seventh largest corporation. Enron gave the illusion that it was a steady company with good revenue but that was not the case, a large part of Enron’s profits were made of paper. This was made possible by masterfully designed accounting and morally questionable acts by traders and executives. Deep debt and surfacing information about hiding losses gave the company big problems and in the late 2001 Enron declared bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Many factors affected Enron's surge to the top and its sudden fall. In this report we will discuss and present what we think...

Words: 2734 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Enron: a Corporate Scandal

...energy, commodities and services company, Enron Corporation, filed for bankruptcy. This was not just an ordinary corporate bankruptcy; this was the largest corporate bankruptcy in the history of the United States (Gutman, 2002). Understanding the reason behind the bankruptcy filed by Enron, which employed over 20,000 people, is instrumental in understanding why major changes in the accounting industry have to come to pass. To understand why Enron filed for bankruptcy, one must first understand who was handling their company finances. That who was Arthur Andersen, the accounting firm convicted of obstruction of justice by destroying documentation relating to Enron’s finances. Although Arthur Andersen was auditing the accounts of the Enron Corporation, it was Enron’s own executives that lead to its downfall. At the time, there were certain securities in place to help protect investors and the public such as Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS), Statements on Auditing Standards (SAS), and a few other things such as the business code of ethics. However, Enron executives found a way around this. Unfortunately for them, that way was illegal and led to the scam being known as the Enron Scandal. The top executives at Enron had been inflating their balance sheets by valuing assets at far greater values than their worth as well as hiding their liabilities. Not only did Enron build a mountain for their company in engaging...

Words: 1651 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Enron Scandal

...Enron as an ethical dilemma can only be described as a travesty. The violations of ethical code and moral obligation ceased to exist while the company was alive. A tremendous contributor to the scandal is Arthur Anderson, who was Enron’s outside auditor since 1985. Arthur Anderson was able to hide major losses from Enron. Many projects that had failed through Enron seemingly went unnoticed as they were covered up by Anderson. Not only was this illegal, but it was ethically wrong of Anderson and Enron to do. Most of what Enron did violated business legality. The decision to break these laws is surrounded by the unethical approach the company took in order to maintain company power. The categorical imperative of the energy giant is that in order to maintain power, we as a company must hide our losses. This is one of Immanuel Kant’s theories that focuses on imperatives and what human beings deem as necessity, and what actions must occur in order to reach ones goal. So in this case it is clear what Enron deemed as necessity. Next, I will talk about the utilitarian theory and how it relates to the ethical dilemma at Enron. Utilitarian is the theory in which we as people attempt to minimize the harm in our decision making process while also maximizing the good. In the case of Enron, executives, on the surface, may have acted in a utilitarian manner, but ultimately created more harm than good. The deeper levels of unethical behavior and illegal activity would show that Enron was...

Words: 660 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Enron Scandal

...ENRON SCANDAL Enron was formed in 1985 from merger of two companies; Houston Gas and InterNorth Inc. by Kenneth Lay. It grew to be among the highly innovative companies throughout 1990s. Its unique business strategy made it known. Initially, the company’s objective was to sell electricity and gas but by 1990s it had ventured into other businesses such as pulp and paper companies and communications . Its success was indicated by the rise in annual revenues; between 1995 and 2000 Enron recorded a revenue rise of $91 billion dollars. However in 2001 as notes accounting fraud was revealed in its financial reports. It was established that the company had indeed experienced a loss of more that $500 million dollars (Li, 2010) for the previous five years; contrary to its audit reports. The company fell bankrupt later in 2001. This essay examines the scandal, its effects and critically gives an ethical analysis of the situation. Enron scandal is the worst to have ever happened in the US business industry. Enron’s bankruptcy was a result of accounting fraud which was substantially institutionalized and creatively crafted within the management. The management focused on converting all the strategies into success to maintain their heavy compensations-through accounting manipulation; a greed financial officer with underground agreements to enrich himself; a collaborative law and auditing firms in Elkins and Arthur Andersen respectively; corrupt investment bankers- they structured...

Words: 882 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Enron Scandal

...Enron Corporation was established in 1985 by Ken Lay after merging Houston Natural Gas and Internorth, it has more than 20,000 employees and it's one of the seven largest electricity, natural gas company. Before it went to bankruptcy, Enron claimed revenues of almost $101 billion in 2000, placed Enron at sixth on the Fortune Global 500, it also named "America's most innovative company" for the past six years(1996-2001). In 10/22/2001, The "street.com website pronounced a message revealed the complex financial transaction between Enron and Osprey Co., through Osprey, Enron debited 340 billion dollars"○1 which never appeared in the financial statement. At the same time, SEC began to investigate Enron, thus, the Enron's accounting scandal finally above the water. The first person who became the whistleblower disclosure Enron's financial fraud was Watkins and Cooper, although the CFO asked cooper to postpone her investigation, Cooper still doing her audit to alert the board about the financial statement problems, at the meantime, Watkins outlined the problems in a memo to Ken Lay, "but by the time Watkins and Cooper blew the whistle, much damage had already been done and the shareholders and employees were the ultimate losers."○2 Whistleblower program is very important to minimum a corporation's hazardous activities, but the blower often face some awkward situations, such as fear of the manager's retaliation, fear to be treat as a betrayer by the workmates, unwilling to be...

Words: 982 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Enron Scandal

...A CASE ANALYSIS Of Enron SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF MBAC422: Business & Society Case 2 BY RAHUL DADA 2011H149219 UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Prof. Anil K Bhat & Dr. Sarvesh Satija Management Department BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE PILANI, RAJASTHAN – 333031 1 Introduction Enron Corporation was an American energy, commodities, and Services Company based in Houston, Texas. Before its bankruptcy on December 2, 2001, Enron employed approximately 20,000 staff and was one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion in 2000. Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years. At the end of 2001, it was revealed that it’s reported financial condition was sustained substantially by institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting fraud, known as the Enron scandal. Enron has since become a popular symbol of willful corporate fraud and corruption. The scandal also brought into questions the accounting practices and activities of many corporations throughout the United States and was a factor in the creation of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. The scandal also affected the wider business world by causing the dissolution of the Arthur Andersen accounting firm. The Enron scandal, revealed in October 2001, eventually led to the bankruptcy of the Enron Corporation, an American energy company...

Words: 949 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Enron Scandal

...The Enron Scandal The Enron Scandal Ethics is defined by The American Heritage Dictionary as “The study of the general nature of morals and of specific moral choices; moral philosophy; and the rules of standards governing the conduct of the members of a profession”. The Enron scandal is already part of the history as one of the reasons why Business and Accounting Ethics had become more than ever a major concern in today’s businesses. In this paper we’ll review and analyze all the major reasons why will Enron collapse. To begin with, Enron in only 15 years grew rapidly and became of the biggest companies in the United States. Enron employed more than 21,000 people in more than 40 countries. Everything was running perfectly; however, one day unexpectedly the company stared to have major Accounting problems. Let’s review and list the facts : - Enron Corporation, created in 1985 by merger of Houston Natural Gas and Nebraska based InterNorth Natural Gas Company. - After the merger in February 1986, Ken Lay was named as the new company’s CEO and chairman of the board. He served from February 1986 to February 2001. He stepped down in February 2001 but reassumed the position in August 2001 until he resigned in January 2002. He was one of the top key players. - Soon after the Enron was created, the natural gas market got deregulated. Deregulation of the Nation's energy markets created tremendous challenges for the Enron and elimanitated its...

Words: 1604 - Pages: 7