Premium Essay

Euthanasia In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

Submitted By
Words 654
Pages 3
The quote “To save a mans’ life against his will is the same as killing him” describes Euthanasia (Horace). Many people during this time struggled with this topic and John Steinbeck shows the reader what it is like to be surrounded by struggling people in this era throughout the book Of Mice and Men. Euthanasia is still seen today all over the world. Steinbeck uses the death of Candy’s dog and the death of Lennie to show how a helpless and defenseless person or animal can be killed against their will. Mercy killings have been committed by people since the seventeenth century and are described as a happy end to suffering. This suffering is usually from a disease or a cancer the person are just done fighting. It is said “mercy killing means …show more content…
Candy’s relationship with his dog is very close. When Carlson notices the dog is struggling, he says, “If you want me to, I’ll put the old devil out of his misery right now and get it over with. Ain’t nothing left for him. Can’t eat, can’t see, can’t even walk without hurtin’” (Steinbeck 47,ch. 3). Candy says no that his dog is fine but Carlson thinks differently. Behind Candy’s back, during the night, Carlson takes his dog out back and shoots him to end his suffering. While he might have ended the dogs suffering, he started the suffering of Candy with the loss of his dog. When he heard this news about his dog, he knew of nothing to do but lay down and stare at the …show more content…
Lennie has killed Curley's wife, and George knows if he doesn’t do something, Curley will make Lennie’s death slow and painful. George knows what action he has to take: “And George raised the gun and steadied it, and he brought the muzzle of it close to the back of Lennie’s head. The hand shook violently, but his face set and his hand steadied. He pulled the trigger” (Steinbeck 106, 6). This was the best option for Lennie so not only could his suffering end, but also George’s suffering. Euthanasia is shown between Candy’s dog's death and Lennie’s death and how their suffering was taken control of by Carlson and George. Even though it was a hard decision, it was the best one regarding the situation. Steinbeck shows the controversy about this topic throughout these two characters and their deaths in the novel. Mercy killings are continually seen around the world and Steinbeck decided to show the reader a version of this through his writing of this

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Role Of Euthanasia In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

...Suffering with an incurable disease is horrendous, with the only way out is euthanasia. In Of mice and Men, by John Steinbeck, Candy’s dog is getting older every day, without any treatment. This hurts not only the dog, but it Candy as well. This is an outcome to the dog being with Candy from day one. In addition, Lennie has an illness with no antidote, he’s intellectually disabled. With that in mind, George knows about this and is frightened about what Lennie does throughout the day, making sure he’s not causing any trouble, or who Lennie speaks to. Considering what Candy and George were going through, before they decided to mercy kill their best friends, it must have hurt them more than it hurt the dog and Lennie. In the book, Candy’s dog...

Words: 664 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Role Of Euthanasia In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

...Your best friend has just killed someone and ran away, you take the gun from his pocket. You know they are coming to get him and kill him, what do you do? For over the past years people in America have struggled getting their mind around the idea of euthanasia because of the implications of mercifully letting someone’s life go. The general argument is that people don’t see it as the right way for someone to die. They should die naturally rather than choosing when they are going too. “Stephen Hawking has described keeping someone alive against his wishes as the “‘ultimate indignity’”..” (The Right to Die). Take this from the smartest man in the world, he even has his own point of view on this topic. Euthanasia has affected America the...

Words: 1120 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Wrong Reasons To Kill In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

...a disabled person is not compassionate. It is not euthanasia. It is murder.” In John Steinbeck’s book Of Mice and Men, there are many reasons to believe that killing is wrong. Lennie, one of the main characters, is a large man, but would be considered mentally handicapped and he loves soft things. When Curley’s wife and him are in the barn alone, he grabs ahold of her hair and she tries to pull away, but his grip on her hair was too strong for her to pull away from, she screams in terror. When she cries out, Lennie slaps his hand over her mouth in hope that nobody would hear her. As she continues to struggle under his firm grasp, Lennie continues to tighten his grip on her hair...

Words: 726 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Lennie Justified In John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

...According to John Bouvier, a justifiable homicide is, “a killing without evil or criminal intent, for which there can be no blame.” Without out a doubt whether it may be justified or not the act of murder is messy. John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men, almost concludes when Lennie Small, a guy who had a mental illness accidentally kills Curley’s wife. Unfortunately, the book tragically ended with George Milton, another struggling migrant worker and Lennie’s friend, murdering Lennie. On the contrary, many people see how George can be justified for this action for having Lennie's best interest in mind and for saving him from a path of destruction in the future. However, George’s decision in ending Lennie’s life can not be justified because George did it for his own selfish needs, Lennie could have escaped like he did in Weed, and even though he was mentally ill, he still had the right to live.     For example, George can’t be justified for killing Lennie because he killed Lennie...

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Art of Thinking Clearly by Rolf Dobelli

...CONTE NTS Introduction 1 WHY YOU SHOULD VISIT CEMETERIES: Survivorship Bias 2 DOES HARVARD MAKE YOU SMARTER?: Swimmer’s Body Illusion 3 WHY YOU SEE SHAPES IN THE CLOUDS: Clustering Illusion 4 IF 50 MILLION PEOPLE SAY SOMETHING FOOLISH, IT IS STILL FOOLISH: Social Proof 5 WHY YOU SHOULD FORGET THE PAST: Sunk Cost Fallacy 6 DON’T ACCEPT FREE DRINKS: Reciprocity 7 BEWARE THE ‘SPECIAL CASE’: Confirmation Bias (Part 1) 8 MURDER YOUR DARLINGS: Confirmation Bias (Part 2) 9 DON’T BOW TO AUTHORITY: Authority Bias 10 LEAVE YOUR SUPERMODEL FRIENDS AT HOME: Contrast Effect 11 WHY WE PREFER A WRONG MAP TO NO MAP AT ALL: Availability Bias 12 WHY ‘NO PAIN, NO GAIN’ SHOULD SET ALARM BELLS RINGING: The It’llGet-Worse-Before-It-Gets-Better Fallacy 13 EVEN TRUE STORIES ARE FAIRYTALES: Story Bias 14 WHY YOU SHOULD KEEP A DIARY: Hindsight Bias 15 WHY YOU SYSTEMATICALLY OVERESTIMATE YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: Overconfidence Effect 16 DON’T TAKE NEWS ANCHORS SERIOUSLY: Chauffeur Knowledge 17 YOU CONTROL LESS THAN YOU THINK: Illusion of Control 18 NEVER PAY YOUR LAWYER BY THE HOUR: Incentive Super-Response Tendency 19 THE DUBIOUS EFFICACY OF DOCTORS, CONSULTANTS AND PSYCHOTHERAPISTS: Regression to Mean 20 NEVER JUDGE A DECISION BY ITS OUTCOME: Outcome Bias 21 LESS IS MORE: The Paradox of Choice 22 YOU LIKE ME, YOU REALLY REALLY LIKE ME: Liking Bias 23 DON’T CLING TO THINGS: Endowment Effect 24 THE INEVITABILITY OF UNLIKELY Events: Coincidence 25 THE CALAMITY OF CONFORMITY: Groupthink 26 WHY...

Words: 75018 - Pages: 301