...Week 3 Assignment 2 Personality & Attitudes 1. What did you think of the profile assessment? How did you feel while taking it? I took it imagining I was a job candidate I felt nervous about it as do all job candidates. I also felt confident as I would have been shocked if I somehow “failed” the personality profile or assessment. One misconception we see in the general public is the use of the word “test” when they refer to profile assessments. A test you can pass or fail or fall somewhere in between, but what profile assessments measures are behavioral styles. You are a measure of the behaviors you use and adapt to. The only way to fail a profile assessment is to lie on it. There is a tremendous amount of value that can be learned about you from these tools. Chances are your assessor wants to use profile assessments to see how you would fit with different team members, whether you’d be happy doing the type of work required, or how they may work best with you. You can only fail an assessment designed to pick up on your behavior styles if you tell it you behave in ways you don’t typically behave. 2. Would you use this or another profile to hire/promote within your organization? If so, why and how? If not, why not? Profile assessments were developed during World War II, when there was a desperate need to find people capable of certain types of leadership. Companies then began adopting this process for recruitment. Their popularity increased, and now there's...
Words: 1534 - Pages: 7
...decades to be developed in research. According to Schmidt and Hunter (1977), this research development introduced validity generalization, an application of meta-analysis that is used for employment tests to provide validity to the data. Through this development, qualitatively gathering results from large numbers has provided by small scale studies results in a quasi-massive multipurpose scale study (Brannick & Levine, 2002). Through the meta-analysis, it aids the way that generalization validity studies of employee selection are conducted. This knowledge is relevant as because of the introduction of this occurrence, it has provided researchers with the weight of being able to connect in consider the effects of artifacts such as range restriction, measurement error, and sampling error (Brannick & Levine, 2002). This process therefore has revolutionized employment selection and testing for an organization. The proposal lists valid as well as reliable test tools that are suggested by Iwamoto Crews Coe in order be used during the employee selection process for the available positions that are needed to be filled by Gilliland-Moore Wines. Varied Selection Tools There are a variety of important considerations that need to be associated with both implementation and design of a pre-employment selection tool in system (Aguinis, Pierce, & Culpepper, 2009). There are two practices which have been acknowledged to be the...
Words: 1978 - Pages: 8