Premium Essay

Expansion for Protection’s Sake

In:

Submitted By KyOd
Words 1094
Pages 5
Civil war: many students in America associate those two words with a particular period in our history. They think of a time when people, once united in revolution, split apart and held bloody battles. Thousands of soldiers never left those bloody fields and hillsides, forever lost to their families and friends. What had caused a country that had fought together for its independence, to turn against itself? The most crucial issue that caused a division between the North and the South was based in the institution of slavery. The two clashed over the expansion of slavery into western territories; would western territories be allowed to enter the union as slave states? Many people in the South feared that if the number of free states were to outnumber those of slave states the imbalance might lead to the gradual dismissal of slavery. There were many social and economic reasons why expansion was such a crucial issue for southerners who wished to use new slave states to balance power and protect the institution of slavery. The first social issue was how slaves were viewed by slaveholders. Many slave owners adopted an ideology known as paternalism (Norton, 275). Paternalism was the view of slaveholders that they were a parent of sorts to their slaves, a guardian that took care of a child. Using this ideology, a slave owner could think of himself as the guardian of an inferior people instead of the oppressor of masses (Norton, 275). This paternalistic view worked hand in hand with another social norm of the old South, the Master and Dependent relationship. The male owner was master of his house, presiding over his wife and children (Module 4: Family & System of Masters/Dependents). This relationship was also quite apparent between and master and his slaves. Slaves were dependent on their owner, the master, for food, clothing and shelter. This system had been

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Women

...12:06 Page 1 WOMEN, GENDER AND WORK People are not defined solely by their work, nor is it possible to ignore the effects of factors outside the workplace on a person's status at work. To seek equality at work without seeking equality in the larger society – and at home – is illusory.Thus an examination of the issues surrounding women, gender and work must be holistic. That means considering the role of productive work in life as a whole and the distribution of unpaid work as well as the myriad questions relating to employment. This important anthology brings together the thinking of leading philosophers, economists and lawyers on this complex subject. Selected recent articles from the multidisciplinary International Labour Review are assembled for the first time to illuminate questions such as how we should define equality, what equal opportunity means and what statistics tell us about differences between men and women at work, how the family confronts globalization and what is the role of law in achieving equality. There is an examination of policy – to deal with sexual harassment and wage inequality, for example, as well as part-time work, the glass ceiling, social security, and much more. A major reference on the best of current research and analysis on gender roles and work. Martha Fetherolf Loutfi has been Editor-in-Chief of the International Labour Review, a Senior Economist for the Brandt Commission and in the ILO’s Employment and Development...

Words: 243134 - Pages: 973