Free Essay

Exxon Valdez and Tylenol Case Study

In:

Submitted By blueskyf16
Words 3690
Pages 15
presents a training conference:

Minimizing Casualties and Limiting Collateral Damage
Human Effects Focus Day: August 20, 2012 Main Summit Days: August 21 – 22, 2012 Washington, D.C. Metro Area

for the highly-anticipated law enforcement and military operator panels!

Look inside
See pages 4 & 5.

Unprecedented representation from key decision-makers in alternative weapons:
Rear Admiral Massimo Annati Director/Chairman European Working Group on Non-Lethal Weapons Alan Ashworth, Ph.D Senior Science Advisor, Bioeffects Division U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Lieutenant Colonel Christian De Cock Chief of Operational Law/President Commission on the Evaluation of New Weapons Belgian Armed Forces Special Agent Robert Redd ATF Special Response Team Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Lieutenant Commander Kenneth Nagie Office of Specialized Capabilities United States Coast Guard Raymond Grundy Branch Head, Escalation-of-Force USMC Deputy Commandant for Combat Development and Integration

Gain insight into the latest non and less-lethal initiatives in sessions that will:
• Examine ways to respond to hostile situations with escalationof-force options that minimize casualties and collateral damage • Identify opportunities for industry to provide the best nonlethal weapon systems with a range of capabilities across the full spectrum of threats and crises • Show how non-lethal technologies can be applied to counter insurgency scenarios • Discuss less-lethal needs and requirements of various government and military agencies • Delve into interagency cooperation between the DoD, DHS, DoJ, and other relevant offices and military services

Benefit from the highly-anticipated Human Effects Focus Day including:
NLW Bioeffects Research and Management Architecture Alan Ashworth, Ph.D Senior Science Advisor, Bioeffects Division USAF Research Laboratory Modeling of Human Effects of Underwater Acoustics Michael Qin, Ph.D Principal Investigator, Underwater Acoustic Bioeffects Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory

Media Partners

@ www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com | ( Call: 1-800-882-8684

presents a training conference:

Minimizing Casualties and Limiting Collateral Damage
Human Effects Focus Day: August 20, 2012 Main Summit Days: August 21 – 22, 2012 Washington, D.C. Metro Area

Dear Colleague, American forces frequently operate in uncertain environments where it is difficult to distinguish the enemy from the civilians. Checkpoints, entry-control points, convoys, maritime security, patrols and crowd control are among the operations where our men and women in uniform routinely encounter threats. Success in these types of operations requires capabilities that enable our forces to minimize civilian casualties and collateral damage. Non-lethal weapons can support escalation-of-force and complement lethal weapons in these challenging environments. The committee reiterates its belief that non-lethal weapons can and should play an increasingly important role in meeting the evolving requirements of U.S. military strategy. — U.S. House of Representatives, National Defense Authorization Act There is a growing demand from combatant commanders, law enforcement officers and political establishments for NLW capabilities. This demand is driven by their need to win the hearts and minds of the civilians and prevent the outcry and media attention that would result from non-combatant casualties. These requirements have influenced governments worldwide to invest in non-lethal weapons R&D and procurement dedicated to the full spectrum of public safety, law enforcement, crowd control and asymmetric warfare. What makes IDGA’s Non-Lethal Weapons Summit your must-attend event for 2012? — Exposure to the top government agencies and military offices dedicated to strategically enabling operators with NLW — Updates on the force options available to warfighters and law enforcement so they can adapt to mission needs — Discuss the latest implementation strategies and program initiatives to ensure the flexibility of our military and law enforcers — Discover soon-to-be-fielded non-lethal weapons, highlighting effects, performance and effectiveness IDGA’s Non-Lethal Weapons Summit will examine current and advanced technologies, operational and tactical efforts, requirements, legal and public acceptance, and the effects of NLW on their targets. Keynote speakers will discuss international human rights law, the laws of armed conflict, and planning considerations for the employment of non/less-lethal weapons. Time out of the office is sometimes hard to come by, and if you’re going to attend one alternative weapons conference this year, the industry’s choice for the best educational value and networking opportunity is IDGA’s Non-Lethal Weapons Summit in Washington, DC. The speakers, sponsors and the IDGA team all look forward to seeing you in August for the Non-Lethal Weapons Summit. Sincerely,

Who will be at the conference?
At IDGA’s Non-Lethal Weapons Summit, you will have the opportunity to collaborate and network with representatives from the non-lethal weapons community, as well as personnel from military units, government agencies, research, manufacturers/ contractors, and technology service providers. Attendees will include Program Managers and Project Managers, Branch Heads, Project Leads, Commanders, Scientists and Engineers with the following responsibilities: • Program Management • Escalation-of-Force • Law Enforcement • Research and Development • Joint Strategy • Requirements and Acquisition • Technological Advancement • Interoperability • Capability Integration

Sponsorship and Exhibition Opportunities
Sponsorship and Exhibits are excellent opportunities for your company to showcase its products and services to high-level, targeted decision makers attending the Non-Lethal Weapons Summit. IDGA helps companies like yours achieve sales, marketing and branding objections by setting aside a limited number or event sponsorships and exhibit spaces – all of which are customtailored to help your company create a platform to maximize its exposure at the event. For sponsorship opportunities, please contact Thomas Boccard at 646-253-5517 or sponsorship@idga.org.

Anthony LaRocca Executive Program Director, IDGA Anthony.LaRocca@idga.org

r spot P.S. Gather your team to secure you le at today! Early registration is availab aponsEvent.com or by www.NonLethalWe er to ask calling 1-800-882-8684. Rememb about group discounts.

Get your ALL ACCESS pass at www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com or by calling 1- 800-882-8684 today!

2

Human Effects Focus Day |

Monday, August 20, 2012

Sign up for this in-depth and interactive workshop to discover how non-lethal technologies are developed, tested, and fielded. Hear from leading researchers and innovative leaders on the evolving roles, methodologies, and requirements of non-lethal capabilities for use in escalation-of-force situations. These practical application sessions will deliver high-impact knowledge led by renowned experts. 8:30 AM – 9:15 AM Registration and Coffee 9:15 AM – 11:00 AM Modeling of Human Physiology for Injury Simulation

How to Structure NLW Bioeffects Research: AFRL Bioeffects Research Architecture
This session will examine validated models of blunt trauma, blast, burn, optical and auditory functions that are used to predict injury due to non-lethal munitions as well as directed energy devices. This process allows the Air Force Research Laboratory to predict medical consequences of any munitions whose physical characteristics and directed energy output can be modeled. What will be covered: • Capturing and quantifying the biological effects of non-lethal weapons • Characterizing the physiological and psychological effectiveness and risks • Developing technologies to enable the design of scalable non-lethal and novel effects weapons How you will benefit: • Gain insight into how treatment options are derived • Acquire advanced knowledge and decision-making skills for training • Understand how operational medical consequences are determined Alan Ashworth, Ph.D Senior Science Advisor, Bioeffects Division U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Reducing Electro-Lethality

11:00 AM – 12:00 PM

Effects of Electro-Physical Stimulation from Taser-like Devices
Electroshock weapon technology uses a temporary high-voltage, low-current electrical discharge to override the body’s muscle-triggering mechanisms. The recipient feels pain and can be momentarily paralyzed while an electric current is being applied. Applying electroshock devices to more sensitive parts of the body is even more painful. The output current upon contact with the target will depend on various factors such as target’s resistance, skin type, moisture, bodily salinity, clothing, the electroshock weapon’s internal circuitry, discharge waveform, and battery conditions. What will be covered: • Electroshock weapons: effective and safer than other use-of-force options • Medical risks such as cumulative exhaustion and breathing impairment • Ventricular fibrillation How you will benefit: • Investigate electroshock weapons techniques currently used • Learn how to make accurate predictions of how these tactics may be used in various escalation-of-force situations James Comeaux, M.S. Senior Scientist Naval Medical Research Unit 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM Lunch 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM Light Based Non-Lethal Technologies

Modeling Visual Performance Degradation and Recovery as a Function of Light Stimuli
Current global and domestic threat environments present US military forces, law enforcement and security personnel with non-lethal crowd control challenges. During this workshop session, examine the latest optical systems advancements that have demonstrated the feasibility of developing a nonlethal, but powerful and flexible crowd control weapon. The proposed weapon is a portable, non-lethal, multidirectional strobe light for military and law enforcement applications. What will be covered: • Novel fiber optic scanner for dazzling devices • Real time to brain frequencies • Maximum permissible exposure guidelines How you will benefit: • Discover how to utilize in-house developed lasers and commercial multicolor light sources • Delve into the effectiveness of the strobe by conducting detailed studies • Learn about physiological and psychological effects, conduct comparative in-field tests Robert Thomas, Ph.D Senior Physicist, Optical Radiation Branch U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory

Visit www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com for complete information.

3

Human Effects Focus Day (cont’d) |

Monday, August 20, 2012

2:00 PM – 3:30 PM

A Look into Sonic Weapons

Using the LRAD to Facilitate or Disrupt Communication
This session will look at the various ways to facilitate and disrupt communications using the Long Range Acoustic Device. The device was created to send messages, warnings, and harmful, pain inducing tones over long distances. The discussion will address the LRAD systems used to counter piracy, as nonlethal crowd control weapons, and as communication devices. What will be covered: • Utilizing the LRAD device against protestors • Uses in maritime, law enforcement, military and commercial security companies • “Beam of Sound” Alan Ashworth, Ph.D Senior Science Advisor, Bioeffects Division U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory Jeremy Beer, Ph.D Senior Scientist Naval Medical Research Unit (NAMRU)

Modeling of Human Effects of Underwater Acoustics
In their ongoing battles around the world, American service men and women are asked to simultaneously win the hearts and minds of a local populace and fight destructive elements mixed in with the population. The threat of a terrorist attack though is not limited to the exposure of the masses but exists within the surrounding waters of our ports and harbors. The threat of a hostile suicide swimmer is real and there is a need to determine at what point these threats can be detected and deterred. This session will detail the new technologies that are particularly important in addressing this situation and have been developed that focus acoustic waves on potential hostile swimmers stopping them before they can either plant explosives or blow themselves up. How you will benefit: • Discover underwater acoustic deterrent with the potential capability • Define safe acoustic levels from auditory pain to warning • Review rugged deployable prototypes for full evaluations

3:30 PM – 4:30 PM

Deterring Underwater Terrorist Threats

Michael Qin, Ph.D Principal Investigator, Underwater Acoustic Bioeffects Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory

Visit www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com for complete information.

4

Main Summit Day One |
7:30 8:30 8:45
INTERNATIONAL KEyNOTE

Tuesday, August 21, 2012
1:45 Officer Safety and Protective Technology • Recently completed research, findings, and future work that NIJ is funding/sponsoring • Looking at the broad category of equipment designed to offer law enforcement safety and protection in threat environments • Providing law enforcement and correction officers with technologies that aid in their protection while in the line of duty Brian Montgomery Officer Safety and Protective Technologies Program Manager National Institute of Justice From the Box to the Courtroom: Considerations for Less-Lethal Devices • Crowd control and individual less lethal considerations • Understanding the differences of physiological and psychological considerations when dealing with crowds • Critical components of post event collection and evalution of less-lethal options Rick Wyant, M.S Supervising Forensic Scientist Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Officer Tom Burns Master Instructor for Specialty Impact Munitions, Chemical Agents, NFDDs, and ECDs NIJ TWG for Less Lethal Devices Networking Break Modular High-Power Microwave Systems for Immobilization of Vehicles and Boats • Denying ground vehicles entrance to a selected area using a microwave system • Avoiding permanent damage to vehicles and danger to humans • Electro-magnetic interference and parameter trade-off analysis Dr. James Tatoian Scientific Investigator IEEE Life Fellow Utilizing Less-Lethal Capabilities in Corrections • Overview of use of force doctrines • Improving capabilities for riot/crowd control • Needs and wants for law enforcement and the less-lethal world U.S. Marshal Scott Malkowski Special Operations Task Force United States Marshals Service End of Main Summit Day One

Registration and Coffee Chairperson’s Welcome and Opening Remarks Non-Lethal Weapons: A European Perspective • One global set of challenges vs. different national perspectives and sensitivities • Updates on the progress Europe has had in developing, producing and fielding non-lethal weapons • Discussion of significant projects under development i.e. DESTO Rear Admiral Massimo Annati Director/Chairman European Working Group on Non-Lethal Weapons Transferring Energy to a Target for a Desired Effect • Biophysical and molecular mechanisms that are responsible for causing nociception in response to millimeter wave exposure • Application of tissue engineering approaches to mimic skin and eye tissues • Determining nociceptive molecular effects in response to active denial type 94-GHz irradiation Michael Cho, Ph.D Stem Cell Tissue Engineering, Cellular Mechanics, & Multimodal Imaging Bioengineering Department, University of Illinois

9:30
DIRECTED ENERGy WEAPONS

2:15

10:15 Networking Break 11:00 Less-Lethal Options for Enforcing the Law Learn the various uses of less-lethal weapons and technologies in law enforcement and hear firsthand accounts from a variety of operators highlighting current less-lethal capabilities and future potential uses in the field and training. Special Agent Robert Redd ATF Special Response Team Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Sergeant Don Whitson Less Lethal Section Chair National Tactical Officers Association Corporal John Mullaney Less-Lethal Weapons Instructor Special Event Riot Team, MCPD
LAW ENFORCEMENT PANEL

3:00 3:45

4:30

12:00 Lunch 1:00 Non-Lethal Weapons Human Effects Modeling • Use of modeling and simulation, field measurements, and laboratory studies to develop recommendations for reducing the risk of injury • Assess injuries from blunt trauma, burns, blast, acoustics, and thermal and broadband hazards from optical effects • HE-MAP: Human Effect Modeling Analysis Program James Simonds, M.S. Deputy Chief, Biomedical Engineer Human Effects Center of Excellence

5:15

All speakers were relevant and professional – gave valuable insight from personal perspective. — Squadron Leader, Royal New Zealand Air Force

Get your ALL ACCESS pass at www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com or by calling 1- 800-882-8684 today!

5

Main Summit Day Two |
7:30 8:30 8:45 Registration and Coffee Chairperson’s Opening Remarks Less-Lethal Force, Concepts and Considerations

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

1:30

Future Combatant Non-Lethality: Shaping the Battlefield of the Future • The role of Non-Lethal weapons in contemporary maritime operations • Non-lethal weapons and the non-traditional role that they may play in the future • Scalable-force concept rather than “kill vs. doing nothing” CAPT Edward Lundquist Principal Science Writer MCR Federal LLC

• Less-Lethal projectiles, flash/sound diversionary device and chemical agents
NTOA BRIEF

• Weapons and munitions • Assessing risk in the use of less-lethal technology Sergeant Don Whitson Less Lethal Section Chair National Tactical Officers Association Integrating Non-Lethal Escalation-of-Force Options
CHEMICAL WEAPONS

2:15

9:30

Historical Use and Future Capabilities of Non-Lethal Chemical Weapons • Utilization of incapacitants and anti-material agents • “Calmative” effects on humans • Future developments in the field Michael Feasel Edgewood Chemical Biological Center U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering Command Networking Break Using Non-Lethal Weapons in JIEDDO Counter Suicide Bombing Efforts • JIEDDO non-lethal weapons work and the next steps • Efforts to integrate non-lethal methods of counterterrorism • JIEDDO capability gaps Dr. Tom Stark Scientist Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization Planning and Execution of Non-Deadly Response Military operators from various services discuss current efforts, challenges, future needs and what they are looking for from industry. This interactive session will examine lessons learned from joint coalition operations and the use of escalation-of-force options in defense. Panelists and Moderator TBD End of Summit Day Two

• USMC’s current non-lethal programs and requirements • Warfighter challenges and gaps • Mission Payload Module Non-Lethal Weapon System and Escalation-of-Force Mission Modules Raymond Grundy Branch Head, Escalation-of-Force USMC Deputy Commandant for Combat Development and Integration

USMC COMBAT DEVELOPMENT

3:15 4:00
JIEDDO BRIEFING

10:15 Networking Break 11:00 Maritime Security: Battling Piracy and Illegal Drug Trade • Augmenting lethal weapons to protect the maritime economy and environment • Warning and stopping vessels at safe distances • Determining the intent of potential hostile individuals Lieutenant Commander Kenneth T Nagie Office of Specialized Capabilities United States Coast Guard
COAST GUARD SESSION

4:45
MILITARy OPERATORS PANEL

11:45 Non-Lethal Capabilities and Complying with Global Operational Law • Addressing the legal need for global armed forces to use NLW • Changing the nature of warfare: winning the hearts and minds of the population • COIN campaigns versus the traditional and attritional ‘kill and capture’ approach Lieutenant Colonel Christian De Cock Chief of Operational Law/President of the Commission on the Evaluation of New Weapons Belgian Armed Forces 12:30 Lunch

5:15

Wow! These guys came in with “real world” experiences and took the time and effort to present the information in an organized manner. What a wealth of knowledge they freely shared. Thanks! — Operations Analyst, Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems

Visit www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com for complete information.

6

Location & Lodging Information
This event will be held in the Washington D.C. Metro Area. As soon as a specific venue is confirmed we will post the information online. If you would like to be notified via email as soon as the information becomes available please email idga@idga.org with the following in the subject line: “Non-Lethal Weapons Venue Request”.

5 EASy WAyS TO REGISTER NOW!
Web: Email: Phone: Fax: Mail: www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com info@idga.org 1-800-882-8684 646-378-6025, 24 hours a day IDGA 535 5th Avenue, 8th Floor New york, Ny 10017
Register & Pay by 5/11/12 Register & Pay by 6/1/12 Register & Pay by 6/22/12 Standard Price

Package

About IDGA
The Institute for Defense & Government Advancement (IDGA) is a non-partisan information based organization dedicated to the promotion of innovative ideas in public service and defense. We bring together speaker panels comprised of military and government professionals while attracting delegates with decision-making power from military, government and defense industries. In addition to our live events, IDGA also offers an online community dedicated to providing defense industry professionals with breaking news, business opportunities, introductions, podcasts, videos, webinars, articles, and presentations from key industry leaders. Members of our online community are able to extend their live event experience and interact with the defense industry by leveraging the opportunity to network, share ideas, best practices, and business solutions. Join our community today at www.idga.org.

All Access Pass Two Day Main Summit Focus Day Only Team Discounts*
Number of Attendees

$1,535 (Save $300) $990 (Save $300)

$1,635 (Save $200) $1,090 (Save $200) $645

$1,735 (Save $100) $1,190 (Save $100)

$1,835 $1,290

Savings of:

3 to 4 5 or more

10% 15%

* Discounts apply to registrations submitted together, at the same time. Cannot be combined with any other discount. SOCO ADVISORY 09-03: 7.(a) Admission fees of $645 per day or less for all attendees are considered reasonable costs worldwide for the purposes of JER 3-211 (a)(7).

Dress Code: Military personnel are kindly requested to be in uniform. Appropriate attire for Industry is business casual. MAKE CHECKS PAyABLE TO: IDGA A $99 processing charge will be assessed to all registrations not accompanied by credit card payment at the time of registration. * CT residents or people employed in the state of CT must add 6.35% sales tax. Details for making payment via EFT or wire transfer: JPMorgan Chase Penton Learning Systems LLC dba IQPC: 937332641 ABA/Routing #: 021000021 Reference: Please include the name of the attendee(s) and the event number: 18680.002 Payment Policy: Payment is due in full at the time of registration and includes lunches and refreshments. Your registration will not be confirmed until payment is received and may be subject to cancellation. Please refer to www.idga.org/cancellation for cancellation, postponement and substitution policy. Special Dietary Needs: If you have a dietary restriction, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-882-8684 to discuss your specific needs. ©2012 IDGA. All Rights Reserved. The format, design, content and arrangement of this brochure constitute a trademark of IDGA. Unauthorized reproduction will be actionable under the Lanham Act and common law principles. IDGA is not affiliated with the U.S. Government or any branch of the Armed Forces

Media Partners

Get your ALL ACCESS pass at www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com or by calling 1- 800-882-8684 today!

7

presents a training conference:

Minimizing Casualties and Limiting Collateral Damage
Human Effects Focus Day: August 20, 2012 Main Summit Days: August 21 – 22, 2012 Washington, D.C. Metro Area

for the highly-anticipated law enforcement and military operator panels!

Look inside
See pages 4 & 5.

5 Easy Ways to REgistER today!
PLEASE REGISTER ME:

Web:

www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com

Email: info@idga.org Phone: 1-800-882-8684 Fax: Mail: 646-378-6025, 24 hours a day IDGA 535 5th Avenue, 8th Floor New york, Ny 10017

Name __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Job Title/Rank____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Organization_________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address________________________________________________________________________________________________________ City______________________________________________State/Province_______Country_________Zip/Postal Code________________ Phone________________________________________________Fax_______________________________________________________ E-Mail_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Approving Manager ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Please register me for:
See page 6 for pricing details

q All Access Pass

q Summit

q Focus Day Only

q Please keep me informed via email about this and other related events. q Check enclosed for $______________(Payable in US Dollars to IDGA) Please charge my: q AmEx q Visa q MasterCard q Discover

Card #______________________________________________________ Exp Date:_______/________CVM Code:________ Details for making payment via EFT or wire transfer can be found on preceding page.
18680.002

Visit www.NonLethalWeaponsEvent.com for complete information.

8

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Exxon Valdez and Tylenol Case Study

...Rawl, chairman and chief executive of the Exxon Corpoation was in his kitchen sipping coffee when the phone rang and received the news regarding the spilling of crude oil into the frigid waters of Prince William Sound, just outside the harbor of Valdez, Alaska. What was about to happen was the worst environmental disaster in the history of the United States. These were the documented facts that media had portrayed across the United States and to the world: Exxon Valdez, a 978-foot tanker piloted by a captain whom later revealed to be drank, ran aground on a reef 25 miles southwest of the port of Valdez. The results caused a spill of 250,000 barrels, the largest spill ever in North America. The devastating results affects, 1,300 square miles of water, damaging some 600 miles of coastline and murdering as many as 4,000 Alaskan sea otters. The disaster also enshrined the name of Exxon in the all-time Public Relations Hall of Shame. (Seitel, 2000). According to the book, Exxon’s dilemma broke down into five categories. First was the hesitation of Mr. Rawl if he is going directly and personally to Alaska. In an interview Mr. Rawl has said, “We had concluded that there was simply too much for me to coordinate from New York. It wouldn’t have made any difference if I showed up and made a speech in the town forum. I wasn’t going to spend the summer there; I had other things to do”. Secondly, Exxon failed to establish media control. Exxon, wanted to take charge of the news flow and...

Words: 3558 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Jhonson and Jhonson: Tylenol and Exxon Valdez Case Study

...Background Information JHONSON AND JHONSON: TYLENOL The image and reputation of a company is so important in order to gain the trust of the consumers. Crisis need not strike a company purely as a result of its own negligence or misadventure. Often, a situation is created which cannot be blamed on the company - but the company finds out pretty quickly that it takes a huge amount of blame if it fumbles the ball in its response. On September 30, 1892, Jhonson and Jhonson announced that three persons had died as a result of taking Tylenol capsules that had been laced with cyanide. Within the next two days, four additional deaths from the same cause were reported. All seven deaths occurred in the Chicago Area, but J & J recalled thirty-one million bottles of Tylenol from store shelves throughout the nation. The publicity surrounding this was unprecedented in American business history; in the print media alone, more than 125,000 stories appeared. Many business analysts said that no product could survive this, and they pronounced Tylenol dead as a product line. From the outset of crisis, J & J recognized the immediate and long-term stakes involved. Its strategy was based on maintaining high visibility and avoiding any appearance that the corporation was trying to duck responsibility. The incident involved four specific “publics” – the management at Johnson & Johnson, its employees, the consumers and the stores which were selling Tylenol. By communicating with the management...

Words: 706 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Johnson and Johnson, Tylenol and Exxon Valdez Case Study

...Public Relations A Bagful of Knowledge Response Script Characters: Celdran : President Sunga : Applicant Navarro : Man, Reporter, employee 3 Lim : Woman, Reporter, employee 2 Gamboa : Organizer, Reporter, employee 1 Lao : Spokesperson/Technicals Proposed running time : 7mins. Set design : reality (office), re-enactment 1, re-enactment 2, re-enactment 3 Costume : business attire Things needed: Sounds Music Laptop Speaker Bangko Kimkim sign (2) Posters for the concert Presentation Flow * The president is not satisfied with what his bank have achieved, he will think of something deeply/ visualize/ dream / reflect. * Then, he will search on the internet about Public Relations. * The President will call the secretary to hire someone to “do the PR” for the bank. * The Secretary will post a wanted signage. * Experienced PR person saw the signage and he will be interested about it. * He will be applying for the job. (Note: two other applicants in line) the secretary will call his name. * Interview Session President : Good morning! Applicant : Good morning Mr. Celdran, I am applying for the position of Public Relations person. President : oh I see, can you tell me more about yourself? And just call me Mr. Miguel Applicant : I am a graduate from De La Salle University- Dasmariñas taking an extensive course in Public Relations. I join the first national PR conversity here in the Philippines...

Words: 1137 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Exxon Case Study

...Exxon Valdez and Tylenol Case Study DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY - DASMARIÑAS Communication Arts Department Lawrence G. Rawl, chairman and chief executive of the Exxon Corpoation was in his kitchen sipping coffee when the phone rang and received the news regarding the spilling of crude oil into the frigid waters of Prince William Sound, just outside the harbor of Valdez, Alaska. What was about to happen was the worst environmental disaster in the history of the United States. These were the documented facts that media had portrayed across the United States and to the world: Exxon Valdez, a 978-foot tanker piloted by a captain whom later revealed to be drank, ran aground on a reef 25 miles southwest of the port of Valdez. The results caused a spill of 250,000 barrels, the largest spill ever in North America. The devastating results affects, 1,300 square miles of water, damaging some 600 miles of coastline and murdering as many as 4,000 Alaskan sea otters. The disaster also enshrined the name of Exxon in the all-time Public Relations Hall of Shame. (Seitel, 2000). According to the book, Exxon’s dilemma broke down into five categories. First was the hesitation of Mr. Rawl if he is going directly and personally to Alaska. In an interview Mr. Rawl has said, “We had concluded that there was simply too much for me to coordinate from New York. It wouldn’t have made any difference if I showed up and made a speech in the town forum. I wasn’t going to spend the summer there;...

Words: 3532 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Case Study

...are in a great crisis. Crisis need not strike a company purely as a result of its own negligence or misadventure. Often, a situation is created which cannot be blamed on the company - but the company finds out pretty quickly that it takes a huge amount of blame if it fumbles the ball in its response. One perfect example of this is that of Johnson & Johnson, and their response to the Tylenol poisoning back in the year 1982 when the company’s Tylenol medication commanded 35 per cent of the US over-the-counter analgesic market. Unfortunately, one individual succeeded at lacing the medication with cyanide. This caused the death of seven people which resulted into a nationwide panic about how widespread the said contamination may be. In the end of that certain incident, everyone knew that Tylenol was associated with the scare and J&J’s market value fell by one billion dollars as a result. History repeated for Johnson & Johnson. The incident reenacted itself in 1986, but the company has learned its lesson and is not willing to suffer the same consequences. It acted rapidly and recalled every Tylenol products from every market – not just those which are in the affected state. Not only that, the company also stated that the product would not be re-established on the market until something had been done to provide better product protection. Thus, Johnson & Johnson developed the “tamperproof” packaging that would make it difficult for a similar incident to occur in the future. Another...

Words: 2465 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Exxon Valdez and Johnson & Johnson

...I - Background Study EXXON VALDEZ CASE Companies would always be prone to crises and problems beyond their control. What makes a company stand; amidst all problems they are dealing with is how they deal with it. One of the greatest controversies during the 1980’s was the Exxon Valdez oil spill that happened on a reef in Alaska’s Prince William Sound. The Exxon Valdez ship had identified icebergs and decided to take a different route to get around them. Unfortunately the oil tanker crashed into shallow water, this area is actually called the Bligh Reef, but because of the hit the tanker had about 10 million gallons of crude oil into the reef.This catastrophe got the media’s attention, and Exxon’s response to the environmental damage they had caused was very unprofessional. The company completely refused to communicate openly and effectively. The CEO of the company, Lawrence Rawl even refused to be seen for almost a week. Efforts to contain the spill were slow and Exxon's response was even slower. Because of the lack of appearance from high profile personnel from Exxon and the lack of action from their company, it left the impression that the Exxon Corporation did not take this accident seriously. Exxon Valdez case became one of the classical case examples of a “not to do in handling with a crisis”. By the time, they started to do some action; their reputation is already tainted with negative comments from...

Words: 2314 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Exxon Valdez, J&J

...residents near the waters of Prince William Sound awoke to the catastrophe brought by the tanker Exxon Valdez spilling more than 10 million gallons of crude oil. This incident caught the attention of the public and received many and different criticisms. Eight of eleven cargo tanks were ruptured during the incident. ARLIS or Alaska Resources Library and Information Services with the help of Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council released a collection of materials on Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. It included the following information: * The crude oil spread approximately 1, 300 miles. 200 miles were heavily oiled. The impact was obvious while the remaining 1, 100 miles were lightly or very lightly oiled. * Aerial observations were used to determine the size of the oil spill to give immediate response and clean-up activities. It includes the estimation of the thickness and volume of oil on the water. * Exxon spent more than $2.5 billion on clean-up expenses. * Caption Joseph Hazelwood was the captain of the ship, a senior officer. He was convicted of a misdemeanour charge of negligent discharge of oil, fined $50, 00 and sentenced to 1, 000 hours of community service. * Exxon was fined $150 million, it was the largest fine imposed for an environmental crime. The court forgave $125 million in acknowledging Exxon’s cooperation in cleaning up the spill. During the clean-up, Exxon hired thousands of workers through several companies. There were more than 11, 000 workers, 1...

Words: 2581 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Pr Case Study

...[pic] DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY – DASMARIÑAS Communication Arts Department REACTION PAPER: JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND EXXON VALDEZ Submitted by: MARK ABELARD ARIAS BAUTISTA Submitted to: Prof. ROEL S. RAMIREZ, APR July 12, 2012 1/9 I. Background Information/ Additional Perspectives Johnson & Johnson: Tylenol Tylenol known as a kind of pain reliever also known as Acetaminophen and it may be used even without physician’s prescription. This pain reliever became controversial when an issue involving seven death people, cyanide, and Johnson & Johnson broke out on September 1982. In print, more than 125, 000 stories appeared describing the said issue. Johnson & Johnson is well-known industry in terms of health, medical devices, biological studies and pharmaceutical field. Way back on1960’s , Tylenol ended the almost a score dominance of P&G’s Crest toothpaste after being recognized as biggest-selling item in drug, food, and mass merchandising outlets. Focusing with the 1982 Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol issue, many business analysts predicted that the said issue would be detrimental for Johnson & Johnson’s perception from the public. In print media alone, 125,000 stories published regarding the Tylenol issue. Due to that eventuality, Johnson & Johnson decided to recoil the product within just six months to reclaim 30 % of the market. In spite of being sensational, suspects 2/9 had not...

Words: 1460 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Exxon Valdez and Tylenol Reflection Paper

...I. Background Information/ Additional Perspectives A. Exxon Valdez Oil Spill March 24, 1989 marked the date of the largest oil tanker spill in the history of United States as the tanker Exxon Valdez spilled 11 million gallons of oil into Alaska’s Prince William Sound. This incident put Exxon into a crisis as it made the Alaskan region into a worldwide symbol of environmental chaos. The enormity of the ecological ruin and the phenomenal task of cleanup caught the attention of the many nations. Many workers and volunteers flooded the area for its restoration which required extensive labor and $2.1 billion of Exxon funding. The crisis is blamed to the following reasons: the faults were Exxon’s inadequate equipments on the ship and the insufficient number of trained members. Another thing is that a crew was unable to maneuver the ship properly due to exhaustion with work aboard. It was also traced that Captain Joseph Hazelwood was under the influence of alcohol which was the reason why he cannot give proper instructions to the staff. Hazelwood's activities in town and on the ship are the main focuses of the investigation. This also became the basis of widespread media sensation. Indeed, Exxon’s reputation suffered severely. Some Public Relation Practitioners said that Exxon seriously worsened the damage to the public due to its slow and insufficient responses. Exxon also failed to establish itself as a company concerned about the problems it had caused....

Words: 3506 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Public Relations

...In 1989, Exxon Corporation caused one of the worst environmental disasters. The oil tanker Exxon Valdez spilled 250,000 barrels, an amount equal to more than 10 million, into the waters of Alaska’s Prince William Sound after striking Bligh Reef at approximately 12:04 a.m. on March 24. The spill eventually covered 11,000 square miles of ocean and coated 1,300 miles of coastline. Shortly after the incident, different media piled in to begin extensive coverage often pointing out Exxon’s corporate irresponsibility. Company’s efforts to contain the spill were not good enough and slow but Exxon’s response was even slower. In addressing the problem, it tool company officials 10 hours after the accident to deploy booms that will contain the spill. Company executives refused to comment on the accident for almost a week and refusing to acknowledge the extent of the problem. In addition, statements made to the press by high-ranking executives were often inconsistent and contained contradictory information making the press question the credibility and truthfulness of Exxon. After the Exxon Valdez ran aground, the company conducted all its communication from the small town of Valdez, Alaska. This area proved inadequate, having only limited communication capabilities. Exxon seemed unwilling to disseminate its information using any other method or location. But the biggest criticism the company received was the fact that CEO Lawrence Rawl waited nearly six days to make a public statement...

Words: 1974 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Exxon Valdez Case Study

...DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY – DASMARIÑAS Communication and Journalism Department CASE STUDY ANALYSIS: EXXON VALDEZ OIL SPILL Submitted by: Chaira Mae C. Aguilar Submitted to: Prof. ROEL S. RAMIREZ, APR January 11, 2016 I. SUMMARY and SYNTHESIZE In March 1989, the oil tanker Exxon Valdez underwent an accident in Prince William Sound in Alaska. This accident resulted in a massive oil spill, where more than 10 million gallons of crude oil leaked into the sea. Exxon’s problems were worse by its lack of preparation and bravery in dealing with the situation. Lawrence Rawl, CEO, stayed out of the public view for almost a week after the incident happened. After a meeting, he faced the demonstrators and stakeholders. He took all the responsibility and promised an investigation. Facts According to Office of Response and Restoration, with this banishment institutionalized in U.S. law, Exxon Shipping Company shifted the operational area to the Mediterranean and Middle East and renamed it. In 1993, Exxon spun off its shipping arm to a subsidiary, Sea River Maritime, Inc., and Exxon Mediterranean became the Sea River (S/R( Mediterranean. In 2002, the ship was re-assigned to Asian routes and then temporarily mothballed in an undisclosed location. According to The Whole Truth, Exxon, along with the rest of the oil industry knew that navigating a large supertanker through the icy and treacherous waters of Prince William Sound was extremely complicated. Armed with this knowledge...

Words: 1682 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

International Business

...TermPaperWarehouse.com - Free Term Papers, Essays and Research Documents The Research Paper Factory Join Search Browse Saved Papers Ads by videosaverAd Options Home Page » Business and Management Case Study In: Business and Management Case Study Case Study MTV Arabia Challenges and Strategies Case Study MTV Arabia Challenges and Strategies MTV network or music television is a worldwide brand which produce music channels and different programs, Located in America in New York States. Lunched on August, 1981 the channel was about playing music videos along with music news, interview and promotion 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. MTV's demographic targets were young adults and teenagers. MTV network start to expand their work by adding new programs such as reality programs, animated programs, rebroadcast programs……ext. And also they expand their network outside America by lunching multiple native languages of MTV channels to countries around the world by providing programs with localized contents, for example MTV has channels in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia and Middle east or MTV Arabia, which is a shared project between Arabian television network located in United Arab Emirates which is a part of Arab Media Group the largest media group in UAE and MTV network. The channel was launched on November 17.2007. The channel plans to be a stage for young Arab adults, revealing their...

Words: 473 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Exconom

...Relevant facts  Company specialized in cable and small-bore pipelaying technology  Started as a technical division to a major utility  Competitive edge gained by its “mole” excavating tools  21 emplyess and over €4,000,000  Electrical and gas bills provide the core of business Questions  1. Analyze the problem presented by the client. Can Alan's problems be re-presented as opportunities? Alan’s problems can be presented as opportunites due to the lack o interest in his work team. He could do something to motivate the team (extra pay, bonus or bigger salaries) so the team can start working on the new action plan Questions  2. Formalise four objetives to protect Make a meeting with all the emplyees, have a motivational talk and see others opinions about the new plan. Explain how the business can grow with new technologies and explain that the company is not going to grow unless the employees chip in their part too. Start researching for information that could lead to new contracts Formalize all new incoming plans. Questions  Consider what problems might emerge in reconciling the clients objectives with your own as a consulting team. There could be several problems with the clients objective, the first and foremost that we can think of is a situation where a client asks Exconom to do a job that our employers are not trained to complete, making the consulting team look unprepared. Major problems to solve  Bad attitude around the work team  The...

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Crisis Management

...Faculty of Economics Seminar paper on the subject: English 4 Crisis management June, 2012 Crisis management is the process by which an organization deals with a major event that threatens to harm the organization, its stakeholders, or the general public. The study of crisis management originated with the large scale industrial and environmental disasters in the 1980. Three elements are common to most definitions of crisis: (a) a threat to the organization, (b) the element of surprise, and (c) a short decision time. Venette argues that "crisis is a process of transformation where the old system can no longer be maintained." Therefore the fourth defining quality is the need for change. If change is not needed, the event could more accurately be described as a failure or incident. In contrast to risk management, which involves assessing potential threats and finding the best ways to avoid those threats, crisis management involves dealing with threats before, during, and after they have occurred. That is, crisis management is proactive, not merely reactive. It is a discipline within the broader context of management consisting of skills and techniques required to identify, assess, understand, and cope with a serious situation, especially from the moment it first occurs to the point that recovery procedures start. Introduction Crisis management consists of: * Methods used to respond...

Words: 6157 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Bosy

...213-255_Trevino_08p4.qxd 6/21/06 5:18 PM Page 213 PA R T IV ETHICS AND THE ORGANIZATION 213 213-255_Trevino_08p4.qxd 6/21/06 5:18 PM Page 214 CHAPTER 8 ETHICAL PROBLEMS OF ORGANIZATIONS INTRODUCTION In the third quarter of 2002, the Brookings Institution, a Washington, D.C., think tank, estimated that the corporate scandals that began with the Enron debacle in late 2000 would cost the U.S. economy $35 billion. That is the equivalent of a $10 increase per barrel of oil.1 It is, in a word, staggering. And we may not have seen the end of it. Long before Enron’s collapse, a number of business ethicists and business professionals watched with concern as Wall Street analysts demanded increasingly strong corporate financial performance to support rising corporate stock prices. At the same time, the gargantuan compensation packages (including stock options) of the top executives running these companies became inextricably linked to their companies’ stock prices. In 1990, average CEO pay at major corporations was 107 times the pay of the average worker. By 2004, CEO pay had risen to 431 times the pay of the average employee. (If the pay of average workers in the United States had risen as fast as CEO pay, the lowest paid workers would be earning $23.03 an hour, not $5.15 an hour.)2 It was an “accident” waiting to happen, although everyone was making so much money in the market that no one wanted to admit that something could be fundamentally...

Words: 20980 - Pages: 84