...Organizational Structure Paper General Motors has a long, proud history of one of the biggest car manufacturers in the world. By 1980s and 1990s; however the company was losing profits to newer, more efficient manufacturers. Since then, the company has updated its factories and streamlined its operators to reduce costs. Without an appropriate organizational structure, a business will not succeed. In this paper the subject to describe is the organizational structure of General Motors. It will also describe how the organizational functions influence and determine the organizational structure for General Motors. Last, it will explain how the organizational design helps determine which structure best suits General Motors. Organization structure is a way to organize employees into some kind of structure to meet goals, minimize confusion, and coordinate activities by clearly identifying, which individuals are responsible for which tasks. The type of organizational structure General Motors uses the matrix structure. Matrix structure allow employees from different departments to come together temporarily to work on special projects as a team. It provides flexibility to respond quickly to a customer need by creating a team of people who devote all their time to a project then return to their departments or join a new project team. Compare to the team structure that is similar to the matrix because employees are in a group together on a team of people with different skills to...
Words: 1171 - Pages: 5
...Ford Motor Co Industry: Automobile (Auto Manufacturers – Major) Sector: Consumer Goods Products and Services: Ford Motor Company primarily develops, manufactures, distributes, and services vehicles and parts worldwide. Ford operates in two sectors: • The Automotive sector: Offers vehicles primarily under the Ford (www.ford.com) and Lincoln (www.lincoln.com) brand names. This sector markets cars, trucks, and parts through retail dealers in North America, and through distributors and dealers outside of North America. It also sells cars and trucks to dealers for sale to fleet customers, including daily rental car companies, commercial fleet customers, leasing companies, and governments. In addition, this sector provides retail customers with a range of after-sale vehicle services and products in the areas, such as maintenance and light repair, heavy repair, collision repair, vehicle accessories, and extended service contracts under the Ford Service, Lincoln Service, Ford Custom Accessories, Ford Extended Service Plan, and Motorcraft brand names. • The Financial Services sector: offers various automotive financing products to and through automotive dealers. It offers retail financing, which includes retail installment contracts for new and used vehicles; direct financing leases; wholesale financing products that comprise loans to dealers to finance the purchase of vehicle inventory; loans to dealers to finance working capital, purchase real estate dealership, and/or...
Words: 1138 - Pages: 5
...Evaluation of General Motor’s Innovation Strategy STR/581 March 5, 2012 Evaluation of General Motor’s Innovation Strategy Introduction An innovation strategy is an action plan used to advance the technology and service offerings for a product or company. An organization’s innovation strategy is integral to the longevity of the company and integral to creating and maintaining competitive advantage (Goktan & Miles, 2005). General Motors Company is an American based multinational automotive company, headquartered in Detroit, Michigan. General Motors Company is one of the world’s largest automakers and employs over 200,000 people in over 150 countries (General Motors, 2012). The following will describe and examine the innovation strategy of General Motors Company. Design and Technology Chris Borroni-Bird from General Motors is one of the world's leading experts on fuel cells directs GM's Design and Technology Fusion group. “His group's mission and name-Design and Technology Fusion-communicates the importance we attach to thinking about technology through the lens of design. When executed correctly, the two have a symbiotic relationship in that good design promotes technology and vice versa” (Vaz, 2004). GM’s engineers are focused on driving safety, efficiency, and independence through forward thinking of visions that they can share with the world. The company continues to develop an improve technology that allows its vehicles to alert the drivers of potential...
Words: 1030 - Pages: 5
... Professor Hamilton SWOT Analysis 8/22/12 General Motors SWOT Analysis Strengths If we look to the strategy analyses General Motors (GM), first of all GM needs to focus on their strengths. The advantage that General Motors had it’s the brand value that they made over these pass decade. Everything started in Michigan; General Motors was created around 1900’s. They always has been made some amazing high quality cars for their customers, and from this remarkable work they were know as one on the best automobile brand worldwide. The products that General Motors provide are safe and they guaranty a long lasting service to their client. In addition GM wanted to be unique compare to the competitor such as Ford whom as been on the automobile market at the same period. GM developed a large different brand such as Cadillac, GMC, Buick and Chevrolet. With These different products line General Motor was able attract a large number of costumers. Another strength, General Motors from been just an US company afterward they became an international company. Even though they had been successful in the worldwide market but not as great as the US markets. General Motor sell they car oversee in 60 countries over the globe. To make this possible GM needs partner such as dealerships over the world to provide they new product and they service to the costumer. GM has one of the most important and biggest dealership network in the globe. Through...
Words: 820 - Pages: 4
...Global Issues of General Motors Company (GM) Full Name Institution Global Issues of General Motors Company (GM) Introduction General Motors is a multinational company holding various subsidiaries and interests in many countries across the world. Although this company has been holding a recommendable reputation in motor vehicle industry, there are numerous challenges and opportunities that this company has been facing in the global market. In the global market, there are many challenges and opportunities that are not available in the mother country hence subjecting general motors to a challenging business world (Sperling, 2010). Business environment changes with the change of location holding the fact that there are many factors that the company ought to streamline before making a relevant market entry in a given market segment. General motors has therefore many subjects to handle in a global market, some being of advantage to the company while others challenge company viability in the global platform. Some of these issues are globalization, finance, management, political business interference, competition and Social challenges. These subjects affect the company directly or indirectly hence being reflected in the company performance at the end of every financial year (Sperling, 2010). General Motors is a Multi national and is therefore subject to the influence of several global factors among...
Words: 2507 - Pages: 11
...ADM2372M Take Home Case #1 Team 7 Hall Colin 6903014 Cai Wangting 7452384 Randall James 6437876 Gabriel Dumulon 7517564 RongningHu 7546890 Question 1: I) General Motors faced the major issue of having an enormous company that was splintered apart. They need these divisions to be brought together. The goal for General Motors was to have an information system that brought all the divisions together under one system. However this was not achieved by EDS. By 1995, just before the split off, GM had over 7000 information systems. These systems although more efficient than the previous methods GM had been using was not as effective, and not what GM had been looking for. II). Lack of Communication between divisions. With GM’s vast network of departments, and being a global company, communication is a key to success. The company needed for separate departments such as, accounting, supply chain management and sales to be able to communicate with one another fast and efficiently. EDS was not able to address this issue after the acquisition. III) Mainframe issues were preventing GM from being as effective as it could be. EDS was able to fix many of these issues after the acquisition. This help GM reduce cost and gain some competitive advantage. IV) Organizational issues within the company. This was such a grave concern of the company the management had decided that they would need to partner with another company to maintain their competitive edge. Once EDS was acquired...
Words: 2278 - Pages: 10
...department to get a finished product or service to customers. During the economic downfall of 2008, many companies were hit hard financially and suffered huge losses. General Motors, one of the biggest automobile manufacturers in the world, took a major blow when the bottom fell out of the automobile industry. In the last five years, the company has been under major scrutiny because of poor decisions that led the automaker to ask the government to bail it out and save it from financial ruin. After receiving a financial bailout, the company needed to reevaluate the operation of the company. It is the vice president of operations’ responsibility to ensure that the company can recover and remain in business. Operations management is responsible for the planning, coordinating and the control of a company’s resources which are used to produce a good or service (Reid & Sanders, 2012, p. 3). The vice president is the head of this department and manages lower level employees who directly complete the tasks necessary to operate the company. As the head of this division, the vice president must ensure that the operations division is operating in a manner that is aligned with the organization’s operational strategy. After a thorough review of General Motors’ operational strategy it was determined that there has been a shift in the operation of the company that has caused it to stray away from the company’s original strategy. In particular, General Motors operational strategy involved operational...
Words: 1014 - Pages: 5
...General Motors SWOT analysis MGT 521 March 31, 2014 Overview of SWOT matrix “The SWOT matrix is an important matching tool that helps managers develop four strategies.” (David, 2011) This matrix is important to any business because it will show the organizations strengths and weaknesses as well as any opportunities and threats that arise. The SWOT analysis is a great tool for strategic planning, however, it is not as useful for showing how to achieve a competitive advantage. The matrix is divided by SO (strengths –opportunities), WO (weaknesses-opportunities), ST (strengths-threats) and WT (weaknesses-threats). Each type gives a different focus for the organization. Internal Weaknesses and Strengths After the recall of April 2012, and the continuous recalls thereafter, there was a negative impact on the company sales. When looking at the Internals of General Motors, leadership plays a role in the weaknesses that it is having today. The internal strengths of General Motors are a strong market position and brand portfolio. General Motors is brand that people know and respect and many are very loyal to the brand. While using this as a factor, General Motors stated to focus on new research and developments that would give them an advantage over their competition. While they were behind Toyota in the energy efficient car, they are making strides to make their bigger vehicles bore fuel efficient. General Motors is also becoming diversified globally. External...
Words: 716 - Pages: 3
...Business-Level and Corporate Level Strategies General Motors (GM) is a public company based in the United States that is headquartered in Detroit, Michigan. In the year 2011, the company was able to acquire the title of the largest automaker in the world by achieving the highest number of vehicle unit sales since inception (General Motors, 2012). General Motors led global automobile unit sales for 77 consecutive years from 1931 through 2007; however, the company lost its position to Toyota, which has continued to dominate the market with GM standing at second. The core competencies of a corporate corporation are focused on ensuring that the business entity is able to satisfy the needs and preferences of their customers. This stands as the main determinant in realizing above average returns especially in a highly competitive business environment. This is achieved through business level strategies, which are strategies that outline the various actions to be taken in order to ensure that the company is able to provide value to its customers in addition to gaining the critical competitive advantage by utilizing its core competencies in specific, service markets or individual products. Business level strategy therefore pertains to the corporation’s firm position in its operating industry compared to its main competitors and the five forces of competition. One of the fundamental business level strategies that General Motors has employed is cost leadership. The company has been...
Words: 1619 - Pages: 7
...EC motor vehicle block exemption reform: are you ready for the new regime? By Susanne Zuehlke and Gianni De Stefano Reprinted from European Competition Law Review Issue 3, 2010 Sweet & Maxwell 100 Avenue Road Swiss Cottage London NW3 3PF (Law Publishers) ZUEHLKE AND DE STEFANO: EC MOTOR VEHICLE BLOCK EXEMPTION REFORM: [2010] E.C.L.R. 93 EC motor vehicle block exemption reform: are you ready for the new regime? Susanne Zuehlke and Gianni De Stefano* Block exemptions; Concerted practices; EC law; Motor industry; Vertical agreements The motor vehicle sector, in particular the distribution of passenger cars, commercial vehicles, spare parts and repair services, is subject to a specific block exemption, Regulation 1400/2002 (the motor vehicle block exemption), which is due to expire on May 31, 2010.1 Following a review launched in mid-2007, the European Commission (the Commission) adopted a Communication on July 22, 2009 to set out the basic policy orientations for the future legal framework that should apply to motor vehicle distribution and aftersales services agreements after the expiry of the motor vehicle block exemption. Currently, the motor vehicle sector is subject to a specific competition law regime which deviates from the general rules applicable to supply and distribution agreements. In particular, the motor vehicle block exemption provides for rules that are stricter than those provided in the general vertical block exemption, Regulation 2790/1999...
Words: 4355 - Pages: 18
...automobile began during the late 1700s when European engineers began producing powered vehicles that consisted of combustion, steam, and electrical motors. The 1900s also proved to be a time when the uncertainty of determining which type of motor could actually power the automobile was in question as well. The production of the first U.S. automobile in 1901 by the Ford Motor Company has revolutionized, and changed the course of the auto industry as we know today. In the beginning of its production, automobiles were considered a luxury that only the rich could afford, but today, it is viewed as a necessity that can provide consumers with the freedom to take them anywhere they choose. Henry Ford (Ford Motor Company) helped to shape the auto industry by pricing cars to be affordable, and paying his employees’ wages that would allow them an opportunity to afford to purchase the automobiles they produced. General Motors has been in the auto industry for more than one-hundred years, and has produced about 450 million automobiles worldwide. Although there has been a decline in the production of domestic and foreign automobiles by more than thirty percent in the past fifty years, General Motors way of doing business must reflect positive change in order to ensure its survival. The strategy of Brand Re-structuring will be one of General Motors goals while continuing to focus on their core business as well. Buick, Cadillac, and Chevrolet will remain as the focus of their business. Other...
Words: 2037 - Pages: 9
...Information in this paper begins by summarizing the market surroundings concerning the General Motors vehicle Chevy Volt, including a proposed marketing mix such as product, price, promotion, and plan. Additional information includes market affects and explains certain elements and there implementations. Specific information tells about General Motors position in the automobile industry, and General Motors existence. Closing information will put in plain words how other companies for such as, Ford and Honda produce their version of the hybrid car. General Motors Founded General Motors was established in 1908, and holds the highest standard as the number one leading in automobile sales in America. General Motors Organization staffs over 209,000 employees nationwide. The Chevrolet Motor Company is the leading General Motors brand, and others include GMC, and Cadillac. Louise Chevrolet , and William Chevrolet established the Chevrolet Corporation and General Motors purchased the Chevrolet Corporation in 1918, and have been the predominate owner until this day (Chevrolet Volt Campaign Strategies, p. 6). Mission Statement General Motors Corporate Officer, and Chairman Daniel F. Ackerson, and other chairmen developed a mission, and vision statement concerning General Motors Organization General Motors simple values and beliefs consist of the organization’s mission statement. According to General Motors Mission Statement (2013) emphasized: G.M. is a multinational corporation engaged...
Words: 1078 - Pages: 5
...A term paper On Competitive Dynamics Submitted to: Kashfia Ahmed Assistant Professor Department of Business Administration East West University Submitted by: The Radiant Group Group members Name: | ID: | Anam Hossain | 2013-3-10-143 | Sourav Saha | 2013-3-10-155 | Md Faqrul Hoque | 2013-3-10-173 | Mousumi Akter Mila | 2013-3-10-024 | Letter of Transmittal 9th April, 2015 To, Kashfia Ahmed Assistant Professor Department of Business Administration, East West University Dhaka-1212 Bangladesh. Subject: Submission of term paper on “Competitive dynamics regarding Toyota Motor Corporation& General Motors.” Dear Madam, We have successfully prepared the term paper titled “Competitive Dynamics regarding Toyota Motor Corporation & General Motors” which we the members of the Radiant group, are submitting along with this letter. The report has been prepared by visiting the website of the company and by taking information from their website. Through our best sincerity, we have tried to uptake all the issues in the report with several limitations. We all had a very good time while collecting the information and preparing the term paper. We really hope that the experience that we have got from working on this paper will help us in future. We sincerely hope that the contents of our paper will meet the requirements of this course and fulfill your expectations. Therefore, we would like to place this paper for your kind judgment and valuable suggestions...
Words: 4599 - Pages: 19
...Introduction: Introduction: Doing this organizational analysis, I wanted to further my knowledge about the car industry. The first prospect that came to mind was General Motors. I picked General Motors because of its popularity in the United States. I had some interesting general knowledge of the company like the dependability and quality of their cars. Some comments were, “I rather have a Chevy Truck than a Ford” and “The general motors cars are more dependable than Ford.” These comments made it clear that I liked the General Motors auto line of cars. Then, I asked myself what would be a cooperate company just as enormous. I came to a conclusion that Ford would be the other company. Though Ford has a nice line of cars, I had some negative thoughts about the company. Acronyms were said such as, “Found On Road Dead” or “Fix Or Repair Daily.” Each of those sayings had put a dent in my thoughts that I would not buy a Ford, not solely on those sayings, but also because of the influence of my parents and other such adverse publicity. These companies have a long-standing tradition in the U.S as manufacturing giants in the automobile industry, since they began here. With these two cooperategiants, I can evaluate and compare both companies financially. My over all preference. was to buy the General Motors line of cars; in doing this project I wanted to know if by researching each company if I would change my mind. Also, this will enable me to draw a conclusion on which company would...
Words: 2386 - Pages: 10
...Report of General Motors FOR THE Corporation Fiscal Year ended December 31, 1918. GENERAL MOTORS Board CORPORATI0.N of Directors F.W. HOHENSEE L.G. KAUFMAN J.H. MCCLEMENT R.S. MCLAUGHLIN C. S. MOTT J.J. RASKOB A. P. SLOAN, JR. EDWARD VERLINDEN II;‘. w. TiVARNER PIERRE S. DUPONT, Chairman A.G. W.P. R.H. W. L. H.F. BISHOP CHRYSLER COLLINS DAY DUPONT IRENEEDUPONT LA~IMOTDUPONT W.C. DURANT J.A. HASKELL Finance DUPONT Committee LAZVIRIOT DUPONT J. J. RASROB, Chairman H.F. IRENEEDUPONT PIERRE SDUPONT W.C. DURANT J.A. HASKELL Executive Committee F. W. HOHENSEE R.S. MCLAUGHLIN A. P. SLOAN, JR. EDWARDVERLINDEN W. C. DURANT, Chairrnan W. P. CHRYSLER R.H. COLLINS W. L. DAY J. A. HASKELL F.W. WARNER Officers C. DURANT, President. ................... G. BISHOP, Vice-Presidepzt. ................... P. CHRYSLER, Vice-President. ............... H. COLLINS, Vice-President. ............... ................... W. L. DAY, Vice-President. J. A .. HASKELL, Vice-President. .................. A. W. HIGGINS, Vice-Preside&. ................. R. S. MCLAUGHLIN, Vice-President. ........... C. S. MOTT, Vice-President ..................... ................... J. J. RASKOB, Vice-Preside&. A. P. SLOAN, JR., Vice-President. ................ EDWARD VERLINDEN, Vice-President. ........... F. W. WARNER, Vice-President. ................. I'. S. MERRILL, Secretary. ....................... H. H. RICE, Treasurer. ....................... M. L. PRENSKY, Comptroller...
Words: 4484 - Pages: 18