Free Essay

Georgia Court of Appeals

In:

Submitted By MacetteQueen
Words 1635
Pages 7
Georgia Court of Appeals

Abstract
This paper is about my experience at the Georgia Court of Appeals in Atlanta Georgia. It is also about the judges, its symbol and what an appeal court actually is V. other courts in the criminal justice system.

The history of Georgia Court of Appeals; The Court of Appeals has statewide appellate jurisdiction of all cases except constitutional questions, land title disputes, the construction of wills, murder, election contests, habeas corpus, extraordinary remedies, divorce and alimony and cases where original appellate jurisdiction lies with the superior courts. The Court of Appeals of Georgia certifies legal questions to the Supreme Court. The first courtroom cases were held in an courtroom in the afternoon while in the morning the supreme court would hold their cases before the appeals. These were continued for a while but would be held on separate days. In 1956, a motto was created and engraved on a marble wall behind a bench. This motto stated: "Upon the integrity, wisdom and independence of the judiciary depend the sacred rights of free men." Later there was a first lady judge by the name of Dorothy Toth who changed it to "Upon the integrity, wisdom and independence of the judiciary depend the sacred rights of free men and women."
At a point and time, the Chief Judge was elected by the Court and served in that capacity at the pleasure of the Court. Chief Judge is then rotated; they are rotated for about a two-year term and upon the basis of seniority of tenure on the Court. By statutory authorization the Chief Judge appoints a Presiding Judge for each of the four divisions. The Presiding Judges remain at the top of the four divisions for the full two-year term of the Chief Judge. The other Judges are assigned to the panels on an annual basis. The Court decided this rotation procedure was best to diffuse the judicial power among the members of the court, to give each Judge the opportunity to serve with every other Judge on the court, and to avoid stereotyping of the judges, divisions, and their opinions. When I think about this history of the judges, it brings me back to one of our first lectures when talking about the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches. Not letting all the power go to one person or in this case one Judge. Walking into the Georgia Court of Appeals I noticed a symbol which reminded me of the Zodiac symbol of a Libra. There symbol is sealed to the State Judicial Building doors, first walking into the court. In the Centennial Year of the Court of Appeals of Georgia, in the year 2006, the Court adopted this seal. In the middle of the seal is a lady who is called “Lady Justice.” Lady Justice symbolizes the fair and equal administration of the law, without corruption, avarice, prejudice, or favor. Yet, prior to this the centennial seal was also adopted in 1907 on January 2nd at the first "en banc" meeting of the judges. Passing those two double doors was the security and metal detector to make sure everyone in the building is safe, pass the security looking ahead was the elevator doors to go up into the court on the 6th floor. Once the doors open you could make a left or a right because there were more cases going on, the case that I was scheduled for was on the left which was the second division. Coming into the courtroom I noticed the clerks were sitting on the left with the attorney and the state was on the right, smack down in the middle was the three judges by the name of Anne Elizabeth Barnes, who was a presiding judge, M. Yvette Miller and William M. Ray who were both judges. A presiding judge can be in both, the state and federal appeals court, they are the judge who chairs the panel of three or more judges during hearings and supervises the business of the court. This judge is chosen to direct the management of the courts. The presiding judge are who makes the assignments of judges to specialized courts (juvenile, probate, criminal, law and motion, family law etc.), oversees the calendar, and chairs meetings of the judges. Judge Anne Elizabeth Barnes won an election in the year, 1998 in the Georgia Court of Appeals in a three-way race. She then went into office on January 1, 1999. She was the first woman to be elected in a state-wide judicial race without being appointed to the bench at first, she was then re-elected, without opposition, to a second term in 2004. In the year 2010, she was elected to a third term, receiving more votes than any other in the State of Georgia. Barnes been a part of a lot such as, Women in the Profession Committee of the Atlanta Bar, the Younger Lawyer Division of the State Bar, and Justice Served. She is a member of the American Bar Association, the State Bar of Georgia, the Atlanta, DeKalb, and Gate City Bar Associations, and so on. Judge M. Yvette Miller was originally appointed to the Court of Appeals of Georgia by Governor Roy Barnes on July 12, in the year 1999, when she became the first African-American woman and 65th Judge on the Court. Miller was re-elected statewide without opposition by the citizens of Georgia for three six-year terms, in July, 2012. Miller was unanimously selected by her fellow judges to serve as Chief Judge for a two-year term, which she started on January 1, 2009, and ended in January 1, 2011. Judge Miller is the first African-American woman to serve as Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. During her tenure as Chief Judge, the Court implemented the e-filing initiative, which has improved access to the appellate court for attorneys and parties throughout the state of Georgia. After serving as the Court's Chief Judge, Judge Miller became a Presiding Judge on the Court. Lastly, Judge Ray On January 14, 2002, Judge Ray took the oath of office as a Superior Court Judge for the Gwinnett Judicial Circuit, having been appointed by then Governor Roy Barnes to fill an unexpired term. He was re-elected in November of 2002, 2006, and 2010. In 2005, Judge Ray founded the Gwinnett Drug Treatment Court, among the first handful of treatment courts in Georgia, and he served as its Presiding Judge for seven years. He also served for many years as the Chair of the Legislation Committee of the Council of Superior Court Judges, and most recently, as the Secretary-Treasurer of this statewide governing council of the 200 plus Superior Court Judges. He has also served as a Trustee on Board of the Judicial Retirement System. An appellate court, also known as an appeals court or court of appeals, sometimes court of second instance or second instance court, it is a court of law that is to hear an appeal. In some jurisdiction, the court system is divided into at least three levels: the trial court, which initially hears cases and reviews evidence and testimony to determine the facts of the case; at least one intermediate appellate court; and a supreme (or court of last resort) which primarily reviews the decisions of the intermediate courts. A jurisdiction's supreme court is that jurisdiction's highest appellate court. The authority of appellate courts to review decisions of lower courts varies widely from one jurisdiction to another. In some places, the appellate court has limited powers of review. Sitting in the court waiting for everything to start, I started looking around and noticed many paintings hanging; I assumed it was previous judges who were important to certain trials. My case that I heard was John James Lampl V. The State. They didn’t go in real big details and it was a bit confusing but from what I got out of it was that he was a former employee who was targeted and did not know that he was. The lawyer brought to every ones attention that this is supposed to be a justice system and that everything should be considered fair. He stretched the fact that they didn’t let his client know that he was the one who was going to be at cross-examination and that his client was unprepared for this (no lawyer, no evidence etc.) He related this case to Jenkins V. State 70 years ago. The lawyer went off emotions explaining how should he tell his client that this is not fair? They also based this off of not going by the 5th amendment. Each the lawyer and the state had only 15 minutes to plead their case, while he finished a lady stepped up on the state side by the name of Katherine Power, she represented Clayton County (I was excited when I heard this because this is the county I live in) Katherine stated that the grand jury was not abusing such acts. That no constitutional right was abridge, she believed this was related to State V. Hill of 5-7-2 and she requested that they deny the appeal as she sat down. For some reason when this case came up I thought about Gideon V. Wainwright even though it’s not exactly the same but this came to my attention because they both did not have a lawyer present at the time. Overall, now that I am interested I would like to know how this would work out if the State will win or James. I had a great time in such a short amount of time and I am glad that this was one of my assignments.

Reference
http://www.gaappeals.us/

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Hawkins V. the State. Court of Appeals of Georgia.

...Report on E evidence admissibility issues in the case of HAWKINS v. THE STATE. Court of Appeals of Georgia. MEMORANDUM Subject: E evidence admissibility issues Using an online data base or an internet search engine, search for a situation in which an electronic device or recorder implicated someone of a crime or wrong doing. Write a report on the E evidence admissibility issues in the case. In your report, describe how that evidence was discovered and retrieved by law officers or computer forensic experts MEMORANDUM Subject: E evidence admissibility issues Here is the report you requested on E evidence admissibility issues on a case that involved the use of electronic device or recorder which implicated someone of a crime or wrong doing. I am confident that the knowledge gleaned from this report will be invaluable. Table of contents | Memo of authorization | 1 | Memo of transmittal | 2 | Executive summary | 4 | 1 Introduction | 4 | 1.1 Purpose | 4 | 1.2 Scope | 4 | 1.3 Method | 4 | 1.4 Limitations | 5 | 1.5 Assumptions | 5 | 1.6 Background | 5 | 2 Findings | 7 | 3 Discussion | 7 | 4 Conclusion | 10 | References | 11 | Executive summary This report looks at the admissibility issues pertaining to a case that involved the use of an electronic device by the state to implicate and subsequently convict a perpetrator of a crime. The defendant on conviction sought a judicial review of the lower court’s ruling. At...

Words: 2133 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Georgia Court System

...Component: Georgia Court System, April 6, 2014 | | | The state court system is the second component of the dual-court system of the American court system. With the passing of the Reorganization Act of 1801, state court systems began to follow a “three-tiered structure of trial courts of limit jurisdiction, trial courts of general jurisdiction and appellate courts” (Schmalleger, 2014, p. 206). The Georgia court system is composed of five classes of trial level courts, which include the magistrate, probate, juvenile, state and superior courts; in addition to those five trial level courts, the Georgia court system also includes about three hundred fifty municipal courts, which operate on a local basis. The Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court make up the two appellate level courts of the Georgia court system (Georgiacourts.gov, 2014). The magistrate court is a trial court of limited jurisdiction, and the magistrate court of the Georgia court system includes one hundred fifty-nine courts and chief magistrates and three hundred thirty-three magistrates (AOC, 2014). The magistrate courts “issue warrants, hear minor criminal offenses and civil claims involving amounts of $15,000 or less,” “it is the first resort for many civil disputes…in criminal matters magistrates hold preliminary hearings, issue search warrants to law enforcement and also warrants for the arrest of a particular person…or set bail for defendants” (Georgiacourts.gov, 2014). The magistrate court “does not...

Words: 1160 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Gooding V Wilson Case Brief Summary

...Gooding v. Wilson 405 U.S. 518, 92 S. Ct. 1103, 31 L. Ed. 2d 408 (U.S. 1972) PROCEDURAL FACTS The defendant, Wilson, was convicted in Superior Court, Fulton County, Georgia on two counts of using “fighting” and abusive language in violation of a Georgia statute through the state court. The defendant appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court of Georgia. The Supreme Court of Georgia rejected Wilson’s appeal and retained the conviction. Defendant then took his case to the federal District Court for the Northern District of Georgia were his conviction was appealed and the U.S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit confirmed his appeal. SUBSTANTIVE FACTS In Georgia, the defended picketed his way into a United States Army induction ceremony in efforts to protest his opposition of the Vietnam War. Once inductees started to come through, the defendant was involved in a small fight in which he committed assault and battery against police officers along with the use of abusive language towards them. The defendant was charged with two counts of using “fighting” and abusive language as it is in violation of a Georgia statute which makes it a misdemeanor to use “opprobrious words or abusive language, tending to cause a breach of peace” in the presence of someone else. The defendant sought to engage in an appeal as he felt this statute was in violation of his rights protected by the First and Fourteen Amendment of the United States. ISSUES...

Words: 633 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Questions

...the judicial court structure for the state of Georgia is and how each court functions and what each courts responsibility is. Georgia’s Judicial Court system consists of two levels of courts. One level is the Trial –level courts, and the other is the two appellate-level courts. Within the operation of the trial-level courts there are over 350 municipal courts what are operating locally with in the state of Georgia. I learned that the purpose of the courts is to listen to criminal, and civil cases and as well as overseeing each case, and to make sure that it is within the conjunction with the Constitution of the State of Georgia. I also found through my research that State court laws are based on state penal codes, ordinances which are state local and laws enacted by state and local governments. Federal court laws are based off of the U.S. Constitution, and laws enacted by Congress or executive agencies Code of Federal Regulations. (Reference book Meyer and Grant, p 94, 2003) The trial-level courts in the Georgia Court Judicial System have limited Jurisdiction. Those courts are the Magistrate Court (159 courts, small claim cases and ordinance violations), Probate Court (159 courts, estate case and DUI cases), Juvenile Court (48 circuits, Juvenile offenses), State Court (71 courts, traffic violations, arrest warrants), and Municipal Court (361 courts, handle traffic offenses and other ordinance violations). Within the trial-level courts is another court that has General...

Words: 472 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Legal and Ethical Dilemma of Physician Assisted Suicide

...The Legal and Ethical Dilemma of Physician Assisted Suicide: An Analysis: People v Kevorkian Angelia Prince Shorter University The Legal and Ethical Dilemma of Physician Assisted Suicide: An Analysis: People v Kevorkian This research was aimed at providing an analysis of the ethical and legal dilemma surrounding physician assisted suicides. The subject of physician-assisted suicide has raised many thought provoking and controversial questions. This paper will evaluate, the ethical dilemma surrounding physician assisted suicides, the case of People v. Kevorkian, the differing laws pertaining to physician assisted suicide in Michigan, Georgia, and Oregon. The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with information on the state’s most current laws regarding assisted suicide and how the case of People v. Kevorkian was a unique case involving physician-assisted suicide. The Ethical Debate of PAS In his article, Hosseini (2012), argued that physician-assisted suicide (PAS), is a moral and ethical dilemma faced by physicians, ethicists, legal experts, and others. Hosseini went on to explain that PAS is opposed by the American Medical Association (AMA) and all the US states except for Oregon. In his research, Hosseini (2012) used the case, People v. Kevorkian, as a basis to argue that although there is an ethical dilemma surrounding PAS, it was not the act alone that resulted in Dr. Kevorkian’s arrest and sentence. Hosseini posed the question in his research...

Words: 3476 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Furman V Georgia

...Furman v. Georgia Death Penalty Furman v. Georgia Death Penalty University of Phoenix Cultural Diversity in Criminal Justice University of Phoenix Cultural Diversity in Criminal Justice The Furman v. Georgia case states that the United States Supreme Court rules that capital punishment was not constitutional. There were five justices that had come together in this ruling and together they thought that capital punishment was to be banned in the United States. On August 11th, 1967 Micke William Jr. woke up when he heard noises in his house. When he got up he went to see where the noises were coming from and he ended up finding Henry Furman in his kitchen. Furman, an uneducated African American, broke into the kitchen with a gun (Smith 2008). When Furman realized that he had been spotted by Micke he ran for it while he fired a shot at Micke. The shot that was fired got Micke in the chest and it killed him instantly. His family immediately called the police. When the police reported to the scene they searched the house and the neighborhood. They ended up finding Furman in the neighborhood with the murder weapon where he was arrested and charged with the murder of Micke William Jr. The court ordered that Furman have a psychological exam done before the trial is held. The results came back from the psychological exam stating that Furman is psychotic and mentally ill. Murder cases can usually last a good while and they can become complicated cases. The trial for Furman...

Words: 642 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

SLYE KARGUY IN THE STATE OF GEORGIA

...IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA No. 00-00001 SLYE KARGUY, Petitioner, v. STATE, Respondent. ON APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA FROM THE GEORGIA SUPERIOR COURT BRIEF OF PETITIONER Mary Smith Attorney for Petitioner 1234 Main Street Atlanta, Georgia 30301 TABLE OF CONTENTS Index of Authorities ……………………………………………………………………………... 2 Statement of Jurisdiction…………………………………………………………………………. 3 Statement of Issues………………………………………………………………………………. 3 Statement of Facts………………………………………………………………………………... 3 Argument………………………………………………………………………………………. 3-5 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Relief……………………………………………………………………………………………... 5 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES Case Reece v. State, 152 Ga. App. 760,...

Words: 674 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Observation Report

...notions, ideas, and perceptions on what you expect to observe. Your pre-work should then be contrasted or compared with your actual observations. Your “gut” reactions to issues, personalities, competencies and results will most likely be very accurate and should serve as the backbone of your report. DO NOT wait until the last minute to attend the observation since it is common for students to discover the scheduled or planned observation does not take place when the student thought it was to take place. It is permissible for students to observe the same activity. FINALLY, ALTHOUGH COURTROOM EXAMPLES ARE GIVEN IN CLASS, IT IS NOT SUGGESTED THE STUDENT OBSERVE A COURT PROCEEDING. THE STUDENT SHOULD CHOOSE THE GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY THAT MOST INTERESTS THE STUDENT. Usually, but not always, the best days to observe courts are Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday....

Words: 1386 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

United States Court Systems Essay

...your about to read consists of the federal court system, federal court’s jurisdictions, and lastly I’m going to compare the federal court system to the state of Georgia’s court system. Let’s start with the federal court system, which consist of three tiers. The Federal Courts According to the Paralegal Professional by Henry R. Cheeseman and Thomas F. Goldman, the trial courts of the federal system is the District Courts (2011, p.211). Cheeseman and Goldman say there are 94 district courts in the federal court system (2011, p.211). Also in their 2011 book, they say the district courts are decided by geographical area and how populated that area is (Cheeseman, p.211). Lastly, Cheeseman and Goldman state that there is at least one District Court in every state (2011, p.211). Next, is the intermediate appellate court in the federal court system. The Paralegal Professional says the U.S. Court of Appeals is the intermediate appellate court in the federal court system (Cheeseman, p.211). Cheeseman and Goldman also say there are thirteen circuits, which are the geographical area that the court serves (2011, p.211). They also state that the courts can only take appeals from inside their circuit (2011, p.211). According to their 2011 book, each circuit has a three judge panel and someone in a case can request a review after the judges make their decision (Cheeseman, p.211). The last part of the federal court system is the highest court of the federal system. According to Cheeseman...

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Carl M. Miles Case Study

...Council of Augusta, Georgia, et al. 551 F. Supp. 349 Plaintiffs contended the Augusta, Ga. Ordinance No. 5006 requiring them to obtain a business license for “Blackie – The Talking Cat”. It is undisputed that Blackie the cat is the main source for their income and requires them to spend most of their days soliciting money for Blackie’s performance. In the case Broadrick, et al. v. Oklahoma et al., 413 U.S. 601; 93 S. Ct. 2908, state employees appealed a district court’s decision that ruled in favor of defendants, the State of Oklahoma. The appeals court determined the Okla. Stat. tit. 74, §818, regulating political activity of civil servants, was constitutional because it gave clear warning of banned...

Words: 485 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Role of the Courts

...University of Phoenix Role and Functions of Law Paper Federal courts and Florida state courts systems are similar in some ways, but also very different in many ways. Both systems function with specific process of order, and a chain of command to adhere to. Neither the Federal Court nor Florida Court has seniority over the Constitutional Laws that our Country has in place. Federal Vs Florida The federal courts consist of a three part structure that combines the Supreme Courts, the Courts of Appeal, and the District Courts. The Supreme Court is the highest level court in the federal court system, with nine justices ("Florida Supreme Court ", n.d.). The Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction is limited over some cases, but appeals jurisdiction through certiorari process. The Courts of Appeal is considered the medium level courts in the federal system, including twelve regional circuit courts. The Courts of Appeal is specifically appellate court and does not have an original jurisdiction because of that. The District Courts are the lowest level courts in the federal system, combining a total of ninety four judicial districts over fifty states and territories. These lower level courts have no appellate jurisdiction, but have original jurisdiction over most cases. The Supreme Court is the highest level court for Florida as well, only containing seven justices. The Supreme Court is required by jurisdiction to review final orders resulting in death, some...

Words: 764 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Case Study

...sentence, death. The jury determined that there were aggravating factors, because of the extremely heinous crime and severity of the child’s injuries, and sentenced him to death under Louisiana’s aggravated rape statute. This statute stated that a sentence of death could be imposed for a conviction of rape of a child under the age of 12 (Cornell University Law School, 2008). Upon receiving his sentence of death, Kennedy appealed his case first to the Louisiana Supreme Court on the grounds that the death penalty was “cruel and unusual punishment” for a crime where the victim did not die (Cornell University Law School, 2008). The Louisiana Supreme Court noted two cases, Atkins v. Virginia and Roper v. Simmons. These cases were used to determine whether there was a national consensus on the punishment of death and then they were applied to determine whether the court would find the punishment excessive (The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2013). The Louisiana Supreme Court felt that the adoption of similar laws in five other states, coupled with the unique...

Words: 707 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Amanda Lowell Case Summary

...CREAC OF AMANDA LOWELL’S CASE CONCLUSION: Ms. Lowell is not likely to know that Monica would be driving after she left he party. RULE: A person of unlawful drinking age, with knowledge that the minor will soon drive a motor vehicle, may be held liable for damages caused by the minor to a third party, when proximate cause of such damage is the ‘furnishing’. Further, ‘Reasonable care’ is defined as the degree of care that an ordinarily prudent and competent person should exercise under similar circumstances, under § 51-1-40 (m). EXPLANATION: Similarly, In Riley the court held, 436 S.E.2d 659 (Ga. 1993) that if one in exercise of reasonable care should have known that the recipient of alcohol was minor and would be driving...

Words: 1738 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Toffoloni V. Lfp Publishing Group, 572 F.3d 1201 (2009)

...Toffoloni v. LFP Publishing Group, 572 F.3d 1201 (2009) In today’s society, privacy laws have become of a great concern to the courts. Many legal claims are being filed by the people concerning privacy issues. Privacy laws are among the most difficult issues to handle in today’s mass communication. This issue can be traced back to Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren, who wrote an article concerning the people’s right to privacy. Nowadays, no one can be too careful when it comes to privacy because any information that reaches the press can be used to their advantage. The press does not have the right to decide whether the information gathered or provided to them is newsworthy or not, this is for the Constitution to decide. An individual should have the right to be protected by the government when the media abuses their power. The people should have the right to do or say whatever they feel at the moment without having to worry about the media. According to Zelezny, “Privacy-related lawsuits against the media have continued to escalate in the new millennium. The media successfully defend against most of these lawsuits. Yet there are enough plaintiff victories to rouse more plaintiffs…” (178). The media constantly monitors the government, but the government does not monitor the media enough. This is the reason why the courts are bombarded constantly with law suits. Government has let the media abuse of its freedom and this is why privacy has become a great issue in society. ...

Words: 2361 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Detrimental Reliance

...Detrimental Reliance Detrimental Reliance occurs when someone takes action or fails to take action because of what appeared to be a promise made by another individual, without knowing if true or untrue. It is very similar to Promissory Estoppel in that the other party is "estopped" or legally prevented from denying liability, even though no formal contract was formed, because of its promise. An estoppel by representation [of fact] will arise between A and B if the following elements are made out. First, A makes a false representation of fact to B or to a group of which B was a member. [It is not necessary to demonstrate A knew that the representation was untrue.] Second, in making the representation, A intended or [in the alternatively,] knew that it was likely to be acted upon. Third, B, believing the representation, acts to its detriment in reliance on the representation. [It must have been reasonable to rely on the representation.] Fourth, A subsequently seeks to deny the truth of the representation. Fifth, no defense to the estoppel can be raised by A. (The Law of Waiver, Variation and Estoppel) Section 90 of the Restatement (Second) of the Law of Contracts reads, “Promise Reasonably Inducing Action or Forbearance: A promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee or a third person and which does induce such action or forbearance is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise...

Words: 2785 - Pages: 12