Free Essay

Giza Zoo

In:

Submitted By reem1
Words 3495
Pages 14
MONTH: March 2008
Could the Giza Zoo become a rescue center? CAIRO--Little changed in 117 years, the Giza Zoo is either the best of zoos or the worst of zoos, according to many noisy authorities, and may actually be a bit of both.
The animal collection is distinctly idiosyncratic and of little value from a conservation perspective, since most of the examples of rare species represent inbred genetic lines. Yet the zoo does include enough lions, elephants, hippos, zebras, giraffes, and monkeys to satisfy most visitors. The animal care attracts far more complaints than the variety.
Much ridiculed by non-Egyptians, the exhibits of Rottweilers, Dobermans, German shepherds, and other dog breeds are of interest, albeit apparently declining, in a society where keeping pet dogs is still rare, cold climate breeds are seldom seen, and most dogs are rat-catchers and scavengers.
People, many of them elderly, who might never keep a dog from fear of landlord hostility or social ostracism come to feed and pet the zoo dogs. Most of the Giza Zoo is a gathering place for teenagers, but the quiet corner housing the dogs, ducks, and geese is something of a senior center.
The Giza Zoo is among the more enduring works of Khedive Ismail, who at age 33 in 1863 inherited the governance of Egypt as senior 
representative of the Turkish-based Ottoman Empire. Khedive Ismail in 1869 opened the Suez Canal, 10 years after a French corporation began digging it, and in 1875 turned the canal over to the British government, who held it until 1956. Eventually alienating both France and Britain, Khedive Ismail was removed from office by the Ottomans in 1879. He went on to seek Egyptian independence from the Ottomans, fought the slave trade in Sudan, and opened the Giza Zoo on March 1, 1891, as his last major action in public life. He died four years later.
Eiffel bridge
Khedive Ismail copied the Giza Zoo style from Europe. He accentuated the European influence with an iron suspension bridge from which pedestrians could view animals from above, built by French engineer Alexandre Gustave Eiffel, who had erected the Eiffel Tower in Paris in 1889.
The bridge may have been the first elevated viewing platform at any zoo, and was only one of many inovations. Beyond the bandstand and wrought iron railings, the Giza Zoo was like none in Europe. The curving landscaped paths and the long lakes in the middle resembled the grounds of a sultan's palace--and indeed, the zoo was adapted from the gardens of a summer palace that King Farouk's family continued to use for more than 50 years after the zoo debuted.
The animal accommodations were exceptionally spacious by European standards, featuring semi-natural habitat, an approach still seldom seen in Europe and only widely attempted in the U.S. toward the end of the 20th century.
The animal collection, emphasizing native Egyptian species both then and now, multiplied up to a claimed peak of 20,000 specimens, representing 400 species--of whom many appear to have been migratory birds, not permanent residents, who make the zoo a resting point and feeding station on their way between Europe, Central Asia, and Africa.
The resident bird numbers are now diminished, following a February 2006 outbreak of the avian influenza H5N1. After H5N1 was identified in six of 83 birds found dead on the grounds, the Giza Zoo veterinarians killed another 563 birds to try to eradicate H5N1 from 
the collection.
Zoos featuring live animals long competed for attendance in the U.S. and Europe with museums of taxidermically mounted specimens, which could be visited comfortably in all weather, and offered models who held still in dramatic poses at a time when visitors more often 
brought sketchbooks than cameras.
Khedive Ismail's successors in 1906 linked the zoo and museum concepts by opening a three-hall museum of natural history, making use of the remains of dead zoo specimens. Later the Farouk family stables and steeds were recycled into a pony-ride and carriage concession.
By the mid-20th century the Giza Zoo was widely acclaimed as one of the best in the world. But like much of the rest of Egypt, the zoo has had a hard time adapting to the pace of growth and change, as the human populations of Egypt and Cairo have increased 350% in 60 years.
"During my six years in Cairo, 1979-1986," recalls animal advocate Rosemary Tylka, who now lives in France, "I lived on Sharia adwan ibn Tabib," a street facing the zoo, "and had the pleasure of having the monkey island right outside my window. I woke to hear the elephants greeting the new day. Many times I found that my cats Ousama and Emira Nasr had made their way to the monkey cage by jumping on a tree and leaping in among the monkeys, and I had to walk to the entrance and back to the monkey island to retrieve them.
"The zoo was a fading glory architecturally, and there was some unnecessary prodding of the animals to amuse the crowds," Tylka remembers, "but from my perch, the animals I could see were pretty well balanced. Those I met personally, due to my constantly climbing up and down ladders to catch my cats, were more amused than suffering. One monkey looked at me as if were crazy, asking me why I went through all that trouble to rescue a stupid cat. Another monkey once offered me half of his apple."
Monkeys watch soccer
As the visitor traffic increased, descriptions of the conditions became more critical.
Wrote William F. Schmidt for The New York Times in March 1991, "One hundred years after its founding, Cairo's tired old zoo endures zs a victim of its own popular success, a place that draws such large and unruly crowds that the zookeepers must sometimes hide the znimals. The zoo is one of Cairo's last urban refuges," 
Schmidt explained, "a green if somewhat tattered oasis sprawling over 81 acres of shaggy grass, palm groves, and banyan trees. During its centennial season, like other years, the zoo expects to draw more than six million visitors. The Bronx Zoo, by comparison, draws only about 2.5 million visitors annually, and is twice as big.
"While some visitors come to look at the animals," Schmidt assessed, in a description that could have been written yesterday, "most seem to regard the zoo more as a sprawling park and picnic area, an open-air preserve of lagoons and looping walkways that just happens to also be the home of Nadia the elephant, Saeed the hippopotamus, and Aziz the sea lion."
Although the zoo entrance fee has increased tenfold since 1991, it is still only the equivalent of about 25¢ U.S.
As when Schmidt wrote, teens fill the Giza Zoo, visiting, listening to music, and making discreet use of the chance to meet, in an otherwise closely chaperoned society. There is little privacy. Nothing goes on that hundreds of others cannot observe. By American or European standards, the atmosphere is chaste and sedate--except for the rowdy sidewalk soccer games played mostly in front of the monkey cages. Three games were going on at once when ANIMAL PEOPLE visited in December 2007. Spectators stood on three sides of each game, with the monkey cages forming the fourth boundary. Most of the monkeys were enthusiastic observers, whose behavior suggested that at least some of them understand the significance of goals, saves, and stealing the ball--or at least enjoy cheering when the humans do. They seemed unperturbed when errant kicks bounced balls off their grillwork, but disappointed when the games broke up at closing time.
The Giza Zoo appears to be much the same now as when Tylka and Schmidt were familiar with it, during the tenure of director Mohammed Hussein Amer. The regime of his successor Moustafa Awad. 1995-2003, drew much harsher notices. Appointed by then-minister of agriculture and land reclamation Youssef Wally, Awad brought to the job little relevant background and a tendency toward self-promotion. An obsequious account of Awad's deeds by Hoda Nassef of the Egyptian Mail, published in December 2002, asserted that as result of Awad's work, "One day will not be enough to visit the zoo. It needs really a seven-day visit to see all...The beauty of the garden extends on into the night," Nassef enthused. "After the gates are closed, after dark, strings of beautiful multi-coloured beaded lights adorn the trees in forms of waterfalls, and soft hidden spotlights of different hues are placed around and throughout the zoo grounds."
Besides hanging Christmas tree lights, Awad according to Nassef resolved drainage problems that caused backwash from the Nile River to clog the zoo canals with debris, resulting in stagnation and sporadic stench--but the problem again made headlines in 2006.
Awad purportedly eliminated an accumulation of garbage on the zoo grounds, also again noted in 2006; expanded the space available to the lions, apparently by reopening access to the field of high grass behind their night cages that the original design suggests they were meant to have all along; added educational facilities and a playground donated by Egyptian first lady Suzanne Mubarak in 1997; and got as far as building the foundation for an animal hospital.
Awad also enlarged the taxidermy collection. Toward the end of Awad's directorship, controversy arose over the longtime zoo practice of accepting donations of lame or injured working animals for slaughter to feed the lions and other carnivores. The "donations" reputedly came mainly from police, who impounded the animals of semi-literate peasants who ventured into parts of Cairo where animal-drawn vehicles are banned to help reduce traffic congestion. So many arrived at times that some waited weeks to be killed, allegedly with inadequate care. This was described as keeping the animals in quarantine to ensure their health before slaughter.
An "R. Chandler, tourist 2002-2003," in January 2003 posted an extensive rebuttal of Awad's claims, as amplified by Nassef. The only education going on at the Giza Zoo, Chandler asserted, was in "stabbing, poking, starving, abusing and killing captive animals for baksheesh." The buildings for stuffed specimens were enlarged, Chandler alleged, because so many live animals were dying of abuse and neglect.
Wrote visitor Maya Fawzy to ANIMAL PEOPLE and the World Society for the Protection of Animals in August 2002, "I think there were around 20 foxes in one tiny cage, suffering from overcrowding, heat and dehydration. The lions were so hungry, thirsty and sick that they could not move. The elephants were dirty and dehydrating and all they were given was dirty hay, which they kept throwing over their backs to cool off. The hippos could hardly be seen, as their water was extremely dirty. There was a polar bear in a cage alone with a small pond to swim in and a shower of water, which in the Cairo heat is not enough. The grizzly bears were in a cage with not much space to move around. Most of the monkeys were caged with hardly anything to climb on."
Similar criticisms were amplified by Born Free Foundation founder Virginia McKenna and Julie Wartenberg, then representing the International Fund for Animal Welfare, now the founder of Animal Care in Egypt. Wartenberg remembers that her involvement with the Cairo Zoo first sparked her interest in working in Egypt.
WSPA fixed feral cats
WSPA had already tried to help. "WSPA became involved with the Giza Zoo back in 2000," recalls WSPA North African representative Nick De Souza. "The management requested assistance to control the feral cat population. The zoo has a large number of vets, so I introduced them to mass sterilization and held a training course for the younger vets. WSPA provided sufficent material, drugs and equipment to theoretically sterilize 1,000 cats. The idea was to keep the project going for a few years. Monitoring the project was left to the zoo management. The vets rapidly used up the ketamine on other species," but told then-WSPA international projects director John Walsh that they had sterilized 500 cats.
"WSPA did not revisit the zoo for about a year after the cat project," De Souza told ANIMAL PEOPLE, "but when I went back, there 
seemed to be fewer cats and definitely fewer kittens. The problem is there was no true survey carried out pre-intervention. Even more worrying is that it is not clear how the reduction, if it occurred, was achieved."
Counting cats while observing other aspects of the zoo, ANIMAL PEOPLE estimated the current population as comparable to that of the surrounding residential neighborhoods: up to 120 cats per square kilometer."Re the zoo itself," De Souza remembers,"when WSPA first became involved the management was very anti-foreign involvement.
After agriculture minister Youseff Wally was sacked, Moustafa Awad also got the boot and since then the attitude has been a lot more cooperative. "The position of director has changed a couple of times in the last few years, " De Souza said, "but each time I engage in dialogue with the zoo management their main question is can I help them regain membership in recognized zoological societies. As WSPA has an anti-zoo policy, it is very difficult for me to help them with this. I do however believe that linking Cairo with one of the good zoological societies would be the best way forward for improving animal welfare."
Keepers work for tips
Before that can happen, the Giza Zoo must become able to meet accreditation standards. That will require a complete change of the zoo modus operandi, beginning with learning to raise the funds needed to pay the staff enough to abolish the custom of keepers working for tips. This practice tends to erode the credibility of the keepers on every other subject. E-mailed Laine Strutton of San Diego on January 15, 2008, to Society for Protecting Animal Rights in Egypt founder Amina Abaza, "I was not mentally prepared to see the lions in cramped cement cells with little room to move...clearly underfed and a few were emaciated. I was disturbed to see their handlers prodding them with sticks to make them roar for children. I was told by Egyptians that they are kept underfed so that they don't fight back against their handlers, and that their handlers actually eat most of the meat that is supposed to go to the lions. Some are kept inside where they get no sunlight. Their cells smell of fecal matter and appear to never be cleaned. "Unfortunately," Strutton added, "I did not see the conditions until after I had paid for a photo with a baby cub. Three cubs are kept hidden away indoors in a cement cell and tourists pay to have their picture taken with them. Does anyone in Egypt even know these cubs exist?"
Agreed Emad Shenouda, "I'm an Egyptian who lives in Cairo, a father of two children. It is not a zoo, it is an animal torture camp, managed by a group of ignorant animal guards, who know nothing than of taking tips from parents so that children can feed the animals." Shenouda said he had seen lions being prodded with an iron bar.
"I recently visited the Cairo zoo and saw how confined the lions are," affirmed another American, Joyce Iskander. "When I was taken to see the lion cubs," for a tip, "I was shocked at the way these little babies were treated, at only 4 or 5 months old. They are kept in a very small wooden box with no light, tightly confined, and only dragged out to be held by other people or to be fed."
Some of the frequent criticisms could be debated. Many visitors, for example, fail to notice the guillotine doors that are used to rotate compatible groups of lions from the night house where they are fed to the exercise yard, where the lions on furlough tend to be almost invisible amid the tall grass. U.S. and European zoo-goers seldom see lions on exhibit who are as old as some of the Giza Zoo collection appear to be; are used to seeing lions who have bulked up against much colder climates than they occupy in nature; and are often unaware that lions in nature tend to make a kill, gorge on meat while it lasts, and then go several days without killing and eating again. Not eating every day is normal for lions. But so long as the keepers work for tips, the abuses associated with tip-collecting will continue, and the keepers will have correspondingly little credibility when they assert that other perceived abuses are not always what they seem.
"When I was an Egyptian Society of Animal Friends board member, they always assured us these practices would stop. We gave the zookeepers lectures and incentives, but nothing ever changes," fumes Cairo activist Susie Nassar.
SPARE founder Amina Abaza expresses similar frustration. "Not less than 10 articles in the first pages of the national newspapers in 2007 attacked the zoo after scandals happened there," recalls Abaza. "All the pressure, press articles, and scandals had no effect."
But Egyptian Society of Animal Friends president Ahmed El Sherbiny takes a more optimistic view. ESAF initiated a series of three-day training programs for the Giza Zoo staff in early 2007, El Sherbiny recounts. Each day-long session was attended by about 20 of the 
60 keepers, while the other 40 remained at their posts. Each session was repeated three times so that the whole staff could benefit.
El Sherbiny told ANIMAL PEOPLE that the keepers seemed quite eager to learn, but that the basic problem remains that they are paid just a fraction of a living wage. They therefore have to work for tips. "Due to ESAF's recommendations," El Sherbiny said, "the zoo entrance fees have been raised from 25 piasters to one Egyptian pound. This alone is a huge achievement." Also, "A monkey enclosure has been enlarged and designed to contain a large tree, which supplies a suitable structure for the monkeys to climb."
But El Sherbiny acknowledged considerable inertia. "Many of our recommendations have not been given consideration," he said. "We are strongly suggesting privatizing the zoo in order for the necessary improvement to be made."
Removing the zoo from governmental management, El Sherbiny believes, will result in direction by experienced personnel, rather than political appointees, and will enable the zoo to raise the funds needed to operate acceptably.
Egyptian Association for Environment and Community Services founder Suhaila El Sawy has argued that the zoo should establish a trust fund to finance improvements, including removing a karaoke concession, Awad's Christmas tree lights, and other attractions that interfere with the purposes of operating a zoo and botanical garden.
El Sawy also favors confining food consumption to a single picnic area, "causing less noise and clutter and making the place overall cleaner because it is easier to tidy and scrub one big allocated area than the entire zoo," she told freelance writer Shaimaa Fayed in 2006.
Animal Welfare Awareness Research Group of Egypt coordinator Dina Zulficar recently proposed that Egyptian animal advocates should organize an annual fundraising event, "from which the annual income would be directed to revitalizing the zoo, including zoo employees conditions."
Redefining mission
Somewhere along the way the Giza Zoo mission may need to be redefined. The Giza Zoo has survived as the popular cultural institution that Khedive Ismail envisioned, albeit drifting from the educational focus he intended. But the Giza Zoo has never managed to successfully emulate the European and American zoo focus on endangered species conservation, despite some success at captive breeding to replenish its own collection and facilitate trading animals with other zoos.
To try to win back major zoo association accreditation might result in having to replace most of the present animal collection with scarcer specimens and animals of more genetically diverse lineage. Instead, the Giza Zoo might most easily evolve into a wildlife rescue center similar to the growing network of rescue centers operating on the premises of major Indian zoos under the umbrella of the Indian Central Zoo Authority, profiled in the April 2007 edition of ANIMAL PEOPLE.
A step in that direction came in August 2007, when the Giza Zoo accepted 265 baby crocodiles who were confiscated at the Cairo international airport from a Saudi man who claimed to be a collector for a "scientific institute."
Traffickers moving animals from Africa to Europe and Asia have made Cairo a frequent waystation in recent years. As interdiction of 
the traffic becomes more successful, there will be increasing need for a wildlife rescue center capable of taking in almost any species on short notice.
That could be the Giza Zoo, perhaps with volunteer help recruited from among the many young visitors.
--Merritt Clifton http://www.animalpeoplenews.org/08/3/couldthegizazoo0308.htm

.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Underpaid Workers in Public Sectors: Giza Zoo

...UNDERPAID WORKERS IN PUBLIC SECTORS: GIZA ZOO Visiting the zoo used to cost fifty piasters, nowadays it costs three pounds. Despite the six times increase in tickets almost all the employees did not have a raise in their salary. The zoo is one of the places low-income families can spend a fun day at. However, for most of the employees working there, the Giza zoo is a harsh working environment where they do not get paid enough and receive no benefits. The Giza Zoo was once the most beautiful zoological gardens in Egypt; the Ministry of Agriculture in Egypt runs it. Over the past decade its status has been deteriorating more and more. After the 25th of January movement in Egypt, many workers in the public sectors have been striking all over Egypt; among them were workers in the Giza zoo. Workers in the zoo have been living in inequality for as long as they can remember, they work over hours, six-days-a-week, many of them even sleep over in the zoo gardens because they cannot afford public transportation. Working conditions and Salaries: As you enter the zoo, you realize that by every cage there is a man standing by it wearing a green overall with stains and holes all over it. Abdel Haleem Gomaa is one of them gatekeepers. Gomaa has been working as a gatekeeper for 28 years in the zoo. Unlike many is Gomaa is a satisfied worker, he works six days a week; he has six children and his salary amounts to 480 EGP. Gomaa has been working with many...

Words: 990 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Research Paper

...usage of animals. Animals do not belong in a zoo for personal visual enjoyment. Almost every child has taken a trip to the zoo. At the zoo we see different animals in created habitats eating prepared food. A variety of different animals are either captured or born to amuse humans for a profit. The rights of freedom stripped from animals to make us smile are not essential to our survival. Animal’s that are raised outside their natural habitat cannot survive among their fellow species in the wild. The Zoo and the circus are prime examples of animals misuse and abuse. Animals from the zoo and circus would not be able to coexist due the difference in freedom. Less animal attacks would occur as well. Zoo’s and Circus’s argue that they save endangered species and educate the public, but I strongly believe the costs outweigh the benefits, and individual animal’s rights are violated and unjust. Zoos define themselves as bringing people and animals together, as well as educate the public with the appreciation of the animals. This exposure and education motivates people to protect the animals as they believe. Zoos save endangered species by bringing them into a secure environment, where they are protected from predators, habitat loss, and starvation. Many zoos also have breeding programs for endangered species. In the wild, these animals can find it hard to locate mates and reproduce. Reputable zoos are accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (1994), and are held to high standards...

Words: 2097 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Business Communication

...Zoos are Inhumane Camps for Animals Wild animals are just that; wild. For centuries humans have taken wild animals out of their habitats and put them in captivity. There are many reasons behind this act, some being protection from predators, disease, and possible extinction. Individuals maintain that zoos are a way for youngsters and adults to attain education about animals. The animals are well cared for, maintained, and fed regularly. People are the biggest danger towards animals that live in the wild. Certain species such as African Elephants are hunted for their tusks, minks for their fur, bears for their pelts, and Mediterranean monk seals merely because they eat all the fish. There are several other animals and mammals that are either severely endangered or extinct. With that, zoologists and others seem to think it is better to have species such as these kept captive in a zoo. Zoos are a means of entertainment in addition to a safe haven for animals that are in danger. “Both the Baltimore Zoo and the Detroit Zoo have taken in polar bears rescued from a traveling circus, and the Bronx Zoo took in an orphaned snow leopard from Pakistan in 2007. The cub, Leo, now spends his time frolicking and chasing small animals that wander into his enclosure” (Nancie Majkowski, ver. 2). On the rebuttal side, zoos are believed to be inhumane camps merely for the enjoyment of spectators and for cities to make a buck. There are several organizations that demand the release...

Words: 449 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Invesigate Science at Work

...Research We received a task which was to investigate science at work. This would vary from many different fields in science meaning that there are many different options which are available to us across the U.K. Due to this, we decided to narrow the search to local companies so that finding information from them was easier to attain due to them being easily accessible. So, to do narrow the companies to make it easier to find the companies and group them; 1. Firstly, before anything, sat with my peers and teachers and came up with different sectors of what companies would have aspects of sciences which are used and then we created the groups to specific aspects of sciences such as Health, Food, farming, education, manufacturing etc. We chose these types of sectors due to them being specific to a type of science which would split the companies due to the different uses of what the comp 2. .anies focus on. As we created the groups, we made sure that our groups were such of those that can be linked with each other. 3. After doing so, we then brainstormed on what the company types would fit under the categories we created. This was done on a mind map so that we could see the groups and what type of company or what the company specializes in would be visible to us after we had found the types of companies we were looking for, we could then find the companies that were close to us. We were looking for the companies that were near us due to them being easily accessible...

Words: 5024 - Pages: 21

Free Essay

Zoo Should Be Bannned

...Are humans too dependent on machines/computers Too Dependent.   We have become too dependent on computers for answers, personal interactions, and we spend way too much time on them. Our Children are the product of our Technology.Thirty years ago, 90% of the kids were outside getting oxygen and playing sports. In addition, they were building forts and enjoying life. In this day an age, more than 75% of our children are playing video games and staying indoors. Now, our dilemma is that we are having a weight issue with our children. Child obesity is a growing concern with our nation. If we used the computers for learning and as a tool this issue wouldn't be as big. The sad truth is that people use this great tool for an easy way to get out of face to face interactions with other people. In 10-20 years it is said that there will be a computer smarter than the whole human race alive today. That is a scary future that we don't have to look very far to. Against No. Computers are tools essential for today's lifestyle. The invention of the computer has been effective and efficient. Computers offer a variety of resources from social networking, marketing websites, educational websites, software, databases, and so much more. With these resources, construction and creativity have increased, and you can connect with anyone around the world. Computers are also a fast and easy way for research, obviously faster than going to a library. We do not rely on computers too much; we merely...

Words: 935 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Zoos Are Prisons

...Argument Essay Comp I April 16, 2014 Zoos are Prisons When I was a child I loved going to the oversized Fort Worth Zoo, but now I am older and more aware of the truth about zoos. To the general public, zoos give the impression that they are there to educate and preserve endangered animals while performing beneficial research, but that is not entirely true. The actual truth behind the scenes of most zoos, not all zoos, is very sad and ugly. I will never visit or support another zoo now that I am aware of how those animals have to live when kept in captivity. Zoos are prisons for wild and exotic animals that deserve to be free. The first reason I am against zoos is because of the fact that they are not fully committed to the well-being of the wild and exotic animals they inhabit. I agree with the “Last Chance for Animals Organization” when they said, “While zoos claim to provide conservation, education, and entertainment, their primary goal is to sustain public support in order to increase profits” (“Zoos”). It is a fact that many zoos are aware that baby animals attract crowds so they breed their animals frequently for the sole purpose of making more money (“Animal”). Once these cute babies start to grow up, zoos very sadly begin to discard of them in various ways (“Zoos”). This only shows that zoos are in fact putting profit, entertainment, and the creation of new attractions above the well-being of their animals. Zoos are also guilty of choosing big animals that...

Words: 1631 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Animal Rights Speech

...speaker tonight has voiced her opinions numerous times in the last year on one specific heartbreaking case. Although in North America there are many laws pertaining to animal welfare, these do not spread around the globe. Cruelty to animals in captivity can include neglect that is so monstrous (ie withholding food water and the need of natural habitat) that the animal has suffered physically or psychologically, died or has been put in imminent danger of death. In North America there are over 500 accredited zoos. Each one has gone through numerous health code regulations as well as random check ins from the SPCA. Animal welfare codes are constantly changing and zoos in Canada and the United States must adhere to the changes. If we look at our local zoo in Winnipeg, The Assiniboine Park Zoo, they recently made a multimillion dollar upgrade to their polar bear exhibit. This upgrade didn’t come out of the blue, the city of Winnipeg decided to fund the upgrade after the zoo failed to meet the new polar bear enclosure regulations. The new enclosure is home to 4 bears, but last January it sent and invitation out for a new resident. Perhaps the most talked about case of animal cruelty of the decade is that of Arturo the polar bear. It was November of last year when our guest speaker first tweeted about the tragic case of Arturo. Cher took to her social media accounts to inform the world of the horrendous living conditions this polar bear had in his Argentina based enclosure. As the...

Words: 408 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Seaworld: People For The Ethical Treatment Of Animals

...Ever since animals are manipulated for greedy people. Making revenues their priority and not the effect of their actions. Animals do not live solely for people’s entertainment and institutions similar to SeaWorld have taken orcas from their natural habitat and held them captive for “tricks”, endangering these creatures’ lives, therefore we should boycott these businesses that contributed to the unjust treatment of these animals. SeaWorld have held animals captive in small tanks for their own selfish reasons. Forcing orcas to entertain visitors for food. Even orcas with serious illnesses are to perform tricks in front of an audience. Animals held captive for a long time will create a serious effect on them. Displaying aggressiveness toward their trainers resulting to accidents. These animals are supposed to be in the wild where they can roam free. Tanks with concrete walls cannot compensate for their needs. This causes orcas to die with stress-related problems. Ever since 1971, at least 37 orcas have died and 30 orcas remain captive because of SeaWorld. None of the orcas died in their hands because of old age whereas orcas live an average of 30-50 years. PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, made the public aware of SeaWorld’s horrifying actions. They repeatedly kept telling people not to support SeaWorld. Asking to never buy a ticket or visit their parks to help the animals held captive. PETA created different campaigns, petitions and even protested. Hoping their...

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Do Elephants Belong In Zoos Summary

...I would argue the article “Do Elephants Belong in Zoos?” by Jeffery P. Cohn is effective because he employs pathos to move his audience to action, he presents evidence in a logical way, and he fairly evaluates counter arguments. The article first starts out by saying how elephants in zoo captivity do not have enough space to roam around. Then it goes into how zoos are getting rid of their elephants, because they don't have enough space and the visitors are getting very upset that they don't have elephants anymore. Once they get rid of their elephants, they are trying to make upgrades to the elephants’ sanctuaries to have a bigger space and make it feel as if they were still in the wild. One of the main arguments that I think makes this article effective is how the elephants don't have enough room to get the amount of exercise needed to stay healthy. In the article, the author states “They walk up to 50 miles a day. When they don’t move that’s when they have physical problems” (Cohn 715). Elephants do need exercise to stay fit, because they are large mammals. There are many zoos out there right now that are making their elephant sanctuaries large. They are spending an abundance of money to get these sanctuaries up to date so that elephants can live longer in captivity. They are making a “$38 million, 3.7-acer elephant...

Words: 872 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Tantulas Research Paper

... Tarantulas How long tarantulas live and their behavior are very interesting. Their not like just any spider. Female tarantulas can live thirty years or longer in the wild. Even in captivity, they have been known to live for over twenty years. Although on the other hand, males have a life span of just five to ten years on average. Now tarantulas do come in many sizes. The largest tarantulas have a leg span of nearly ten inches, or about the size of a dinner plate. This does however depend on the size of your dinner plate. Tarantulas are docile(ready to accept control or instructions) and rarely bite people. Tarantulas only attack when they feel threatened. However when they are threatened, they defend themselves by throwing needle like barbed hairs at their attackers. Tarantulas can feel threatened simply by being touched the wrong way or being held the wrong way by a human. They use their hind legs to scrape barbed hairs from its abdomen and flings them in the direction of the threat. How tarantulas catch their food and what they eat seem strange. Although this also may sound like a good way to get food, it’s not. Tarantulas ambush small prey at night, stealthily sneaking up on a potential meal and then pouncing. Tarantulas paralyze their prey with venom, then use digestive enzymes to turn the meal into a soupy liquid. Tarantulas will eat anything small enough to catch and consume. They will eat things things such as: arthropods, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and even small...

Words: 479 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Persuasive Essay Zoos

...Animal rights is an emotive issue to argue with. People have different views about keeping the animals in zoos. I believe that zoos are one of the ways to safe the instict of animals who are in danger. Opponents of constraint animals in zoos argue that it is against the nature to prison animals in small cages, which deters their natural capabilities, as a result they are emotionally weak as compared to the wild animals in jungles. It is also believed, that caged animals are presented as an entertainment to people who come to visit the zoos. Therefore, these animals have to be there all the time to entertain which can be the reason of their lack in sleep and diet and lead them to be sick. However, I am unconvinced that zoos should be banned....

Words: 288 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Captivity

...Animal captivity is the case in which animals live under human care. Animals in captivity do not have as much freedom as those in the wild. Animal captivity is common in farms, private homes, zoos and laboratories. These places domesticate the animals either for sentimental or scientific reasons. In short, animals should not be kept in captivity because it is morally wrong and alters the evolution process of natural selection. Animal captivity is morally wrong. All animals, including humans, exist with their own evolutionary motives to reproduce and prosper. Humans should not interfere with this process by taking animals out of their natural habitat. When they are domesticated, it is also much more likely to be cruel to them. For example,...

Words: 413 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Persuasive Essay On Zoos

...people believe zoos can gain benefit to people by educational and economical, so we should support them. For freedom, environmental, and zoos are not for educational or protection place, three reasons I believe zoos are cruel places and they should all be shutdown, set the animals to be free. The first reason why I believe all zoo should be close and all animals should be free is freedom. Animals belong in nature and each animals' species have their own natural behavior. When people imprison them in the cage where limited spaces, the animals can get the negative effect in their physical and mental. Animals can lose abilities to do physical activities, they won't be able to hunt because people always feed them, and they won't learn how to escape because there are not any animals can hurt them. The physical...

Words: 678 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Are Zoos Inhumane

...Zoos are a popular place to visit, but according to research, zoos are in fact not what they seem to be. According to research zoos are proven to be inhumane. Researchers say that the animal’s enclosures are too small and they’re unhygienic. Also zookeepers are mean to the animals. Zoos are not suitable education tools, zoos are unethical. Not all zoos are bad, but this research shows the downside of zoos. In addition to these facts, this paper will provide an in depth look at zoos. One reason that proves that zoos are inhumane is that their enclosures are too small. One researcher said that the enclosures are “1000 times smaller than their natural habitats” (Pomeroy). This is bad because the animals need the room to roam so they don’t feel...

Words: 319 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Animal Captivity Research Paper

...You have probably been to a zoo before, but there are some things you may not know. This includes, animals being held captive, habitat change, and lack of food. In my opinion animals in zoos are not being treated properly. Animals should have the same amount of freedom as us, but instead they are being locked up in zoos their whole life. This has been going on since 1847 and has affected many animals lives in a negative way. Lets help change the future! Animals have been held captive since zoos have opened. APECSEC.org has informed me that this can cause high stress level of the animal. Another thing I have learned is when the animal is feeling trapped can cause aggression that is above normal. I have also learned from Zoos pro or con that animals should have the same right to be free as us and that we never realize that we are trapping animals for our entertainment. We are getting entertained while the animals are most likely bored in those small cages. Some people even believe that animals are being abused by zoos....

Words: 490 - Pages: 2