Free Essay

Gods Nature and Activity in the Universe

In:

Submitted By Briant
Words 2038
Pages 9
INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP UNIVERSITY

GODS NATURE AND HIS ACTIVITY IN THE UNIVERSE

BY BRIANT LUBANGA

PRESENTED TO DR. PLAWSON KURIA IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE COURSE ETHICS AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (UCC 106)

1ST MARCH 2014

The book of Amos presents itself as very relevant and timely in our world today in terms of cultural, economic and ethical issues. The book is actually a message that was given during a time when the land of Israel was experiencing great prosperity and abundance. However, in the midst of this prosperity, the people ignored God and embraced vices such as extortion, hypocrisy, corruption and social injustices. Amos’ prophecy came as an announcement of the impending doom and judgment that God was going to release to the people. Eight times the prophetic warning spoke of the three, even four sins that the people had committed. This was an expression of the extent and magnitude of which it had gone beyond limit. These sins are what angered God and moved him to speak of bringing judgment upon them.
Because of these sins, Gods warnings to them were a clear expression and communication of who he really is and what he stands for. It was not going to be business as usual because, just like in times past, God’s intolerance for sin had been experienced, and since he is a God who does not change, his response to these acts was going to openly manifest what his nature and character is truly like. As much as he is a God of mercy, we also see that his anger can be kindled and that he can unleash wrath in judgment.
Eight times in chapter one and two, (Chapters 1:3, 1:6, 1:9, 1:10, 2:1, 2:4, 2:6) God uses the phrase, “for three sins…even for four, I will not turn back my wrath.” The re-use of this phrase not only served as an emphasis or reminder of their sins, but rather it spoke of the extremes of the peoples’ engagement in sin. The sins of the people could no longer go unnoticed and excused but God had to step in in his might and act.
Because of their continual sin, God made it clear that he will pour out his judgment upon the people. His warnings were not just mere threats upon the people. According to him, it was a serious matter as he was going to punish even his very own. The judgments to be released were therefore the consequences of man’s violations of God’s principles. God in his sovereignty does not show any sign of tolerance to sin.
The various sins committed by both Israel and his neighbors serve as a good explanation of Gods nature and activity in the universe. As much as Israel were God’s chosen people, his warnings and readiness to punish them as well as Israel’s neighbors went to show that he is not a respecter of persons, neither does he show partiality when dealing with mankind. His demand of justice and righteousness from both Israel and the neighbors is an affirmation of his equity and fairness.
God’s hatred for sin is very clear as he pointed out all the sins that both the Israelites and his neighbors were committing. In regards to the sin of Gaza where they took communities captive and sold them, God made it clear that he does not in any way support the idea of slavery of mankind. Because man is made in the image of God, the selling a fellow human being will be utter disregard and disrespect of Gods workmanship. Through this we can see that God values man and he desires him to live in freedom. Similarly, in todays’ world, if someone is sold out for slavery without their wish, there would be an outcry because it is generally considered unethical and to be in violation of human rights.
God continues to point out the sins of the people and condemns the murders being undertaken by Edomites. They killed their brothers with the sword in order to remove any kind of competition rising from within the family. Even with the desire of success in man, God still does not allow man to go against his brother for self-gain. The value of human life is very close to Gods heart that he highly condemns murder regardless of the motive. In our society today, men will go to the extent of killing a family member so as to safeguard their selfish interests. Since God does not change, murder, for whatever reason, is unethical and unacceptable.
The sin of Ammon as described in chapter one was the murder of the unborn children for the sake of gaining territory. God made it very clear that he was displeased with these acts. His displeasure was because he still viewed the unborn child as valuable life. Such acts of abortion are not strange in our world today. As much as it may have been legalized in many parts of the world, the killings are still a violation of Gods laws. This is because God does not change his principles and values over time. He still values life even while it is in the mothers’ womb.
Judah too was not spared. Her sin was the rejection of Gods laws as seen in chapter two and verses four. God is the one who sets the laws for man and he expects him to abide by them to the letter and not ignore or alter them. Instead of following the Lord, they were led astray by the false gods that their ancestors worshipped in the past. Irrespective of the traditions that we have been born in to or acquired over time, God still expects that we follow that which he has laid down as his principles for us to follow. In Exodus chapter twenty verse five; God tells us that he is a jealous God. We therefore must accord him the glory that is due his name.
Now concerning the Israelites, God condemned them for the oppression of the poor. As if they did not regard them as their neighbors and brothers, they exploited and used them by taxing them unfairly. They did this so as to only benefit themselves by building houses cut of stone. Certainly, this was unethical and because of this, God in his anger declared that the vine-gardens they had planted by their hands will not give them wine. Such unethical practices are rife even in our society today. As the rich promise to help the poor, they fleece them for self-gain and advancement. It is clear that instead of fleecing the poor, God desired equity for all men.
Another sin that was being committed by Israelites was immorality. The levels of immorality had reached abominable levels and God could not watch it continue anymore. It was gross to the point where a father and son went in to the same young woman. By all standards, this was unacceptable before God as it would in any cultural setting even in this present day. As a result, God had to release his wrath and judgment on them. Looking at our society today, such vices are not any strange. Sexual sins are rampant even to the point of men having relations with fellow men and women doing the same. Without a doubt, God hates sin, especially when the sanctity of sex is disregarded and corrupted.
During the time of prophesy, the Israelites were also engaged in the perversion of justice by oppressing the righteous through taking of bribes and also depriving the poor of justice in their courts. They hated the ones who reproved in the courts and them that said the truth. Such practices are very common in our world today. The one who has money is the one who has his way. God is a God of truth and the advancement of truth is a means of glorifying him. He has not changed and just as he was not pleased with the Israelites, so it is today. His desire is that justice will be rendered to every man as it befits him.
Despite all the sins that the Israelites were committing, God still kept sending warnings to the people. As we see in Amos chapter three, God says that he would do nothing without first revealing his plans to his prophets. This clearly shows that God in his nature is full of love and caring enough to send us warnings. Perhaps through these warnings, we will change our ways and return to him. However, it is common for men to ignore such warnings and just continue in their old ways.
It is never Gods intention to destroy us even though it is in his power to do so.it has always been hi desire that man will return to him so that they can have a renewed relationship as intended. As we can see in Amos Chapter 4:10-11, God brought destruction upon the people as it were in the days of Egypt and Sodom and Gomorrah. This was all in an attempt to get the peoples’ attention so that they can desist from their sin. Seeing that God had sent to them similar destructions as in times past, it is clear that in all generations, he is consistent in regards to his dealings with mankind and stand regarding sin. Never is there a time when God will bend his rules simply because it is a different cultural or economic setting. God and his principles are as consistent to the extent that he unleashes similar punishments for sins of a similar nature done with a different people in a different setting. We may be living in different times but we are still dealing with the same God who hates sin. There is nothing that would stop him from punishing his people because of their acts of sin.
According to Amos 5:21-23, we see God rejecting the sacrifices of the people. No matter what good they did, God said he did not recognize them. Unlike for man who will be moved by the good things that other men bring to the extent of overlooking sin, God is so interested in the state of our hearts that he will not receive even the choicest of our offerings and sacrifices. He is a God of integrity and no matter what good we bring him, he wants to be sure that we have the right attitude of heart when doing it. Unlike in our societies today, God never bends rules to accommodate anyone or anything. He fixed and set standards are there in order for man to align himself to them.
In Chapter 4:7-9 God had sent destructions on the fields as well as holding back the rain. This is evident enough in showing his power, not only over the people but also over the created universe as a whole. Being the creator of all things, he held back the rain from which man highly depends and benefits from. All that he is demonstrating is that he still reigns supreme and has control over his creation. He needs to consult man to do what he deems right. He even challenges the people to go and consult the maker of the constellations of which he was speaking of himself.
God in his love still desires that man returns to him. As seen in Amos chapter five, God is calling man to seek him so that he may live. Despite all the sins they had engaged in, he still reached out to them offering them hope. Such kind of unconditional love can only be found and experience in God. It is never Gods intention to just cast us away. In his love he is still calling us back to him so that we can have a renewed relationship. Through his words in chapter 3:7 he says that two cannot walk together unless they have agreed to do so. We must choose our associations rightly because through such associations, values and morals are learnt and developed. May we return to God because he is righteous and just.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Existence of God

...Is it Possible to Prove the Existence of God? Name Institution Is it Possible to Prove the Existence of God? Several theories have been put forward to explain how the universe came into being. While most religious groups maintain that, the universe is as a result of an act or acts of a Supreme Being, scientists proposes other theories to counter or agree with this argument. For example, the Big Bang theory tries to explain the origin of the universe because studies in astrophysics have clearly shown that indeed the universe had a beginning (Hatcher, 1994). In addition, the Charles Darwin’s theory also tries to explain the origin of man by suggesting that the human race as it exists today originated from a single cell to a complex being (Hatcher, 1994). However, some of these theories contain inconsistencies that may explain the existence of God. To prove the existence of God, one has to look at the observable phenomena such as the complexity of the universe, laws of nature and inconsistencies in proposed theories. The complexity of the universe suggests the presence of a Supreme Being. While the evolution theory tried to explain the origin of man, it failed to provide substantial evidence on the complexity of the human being (Hatcher, 1994). In fact, the theory suggests that a human being evolved from a single cell organism. However, the complexity of the human brain and the nervous system may suggest otherwise due to its structure. The...

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

World View Chart Assignment

...WORLD RELIGIONS – REL 212 World Religions      HINDUISM & JAINISM  WEEK 2      Cosmogony ­ Origin of the  Universe  Hinduism and Jainism cosmogony­ origin of the universe is that there isn’t no specific origin or  founder.   Nature of God/Creator  The Gods are in male and female form and represent many different things.  View of Human Nature  Hinduism and Jainism: Karma is what comes around goes around.  View of Good & Evil  Hinduism and Jainism: Good actions have a good effect and bad actions have a bad effect. “Karma”.  View of Salvation   Hinduism and Jainism salvation is called Moksha. It’s when an enlightened human being is freed from  the cycle of life­and­death and comes into a state of completeness. And the Jainism salvation is achieved  through three cycles right belief, right knowledge, and right conduct.  Hinduism and Jainism: Samsara reincarnation is taught that the soul leaves the dead body and enters a  new body. They believe in the rebirth and reincarnation of the souls. Jainism following liberation one’s  jiva ascends to the apex of the universe to join the other siddhas. One can ascend to a heavenly realm due  too good karmas accrued but must return to a human incarnation in order to achieve final liberation.  Hinduism and Jainism: Practices (both): Praising the Cow called “The Cow is our Mother, for she gives  us her milk.”  Worship with fire, yoga, sacred chants, verbal formulas, and sacred actions. Worship deity  images, pictures and sculptures...

Words: 2787 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Final Paper

...supports the existence of God. The ontological argument used for the existence of God was fist constructed in the Proslogion of Saint Anselm, the Archbishop of Canterbury. The ontological argument is concerned with the nature and relations of being. It attempts to answer questions like “What is real?” Anselm’s ontological proof tends to answer the question of whether or not God is real. In this argument, Anselm defines God as “which nothing greater can be conceived,” which can also be understood as God as perfect. God is defined as “the greatest possible being” in this argument. God too is said to have perfect power : omnipotence. There arises the question if God can create a round square. Can this God bend the rules of logic? But it can be said that God is only omnipotent to the greatest possible extent. Also, in this argument it claims that God cannot do what is logically impossible, but he can do anything that can be done. To conclude, it comes down from “God is omnipotent and can do literally anything,” to “God is omnipotent to the greatest possible extent.” Chapter 2 In this St. Aquinas’ cosmological argument for the existence of God, it is constructed in 5 proofs. First is the argument from motion which talks about, from his observations from Aristotle that concluded from common observation that an object that is in motion is put into motion by another object or force. From this, St. Thomas believes that there must have been an unmoved mover (God) who first put things in...

Words: 1678 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

General

...It is the duty of all human beings to take care of the environment and should they destroy it then they will have no place to stay. According to Isaiah 45:18 “God formulated the universe so that it can be occupied.” There are alternate biblical notions as well as details that show the significance of the environment and the desire to safeguard and keep it running. Environment fortification has constantly been the key concern among many socialists, ecologists as well as scientist thought the universe. Everybody is looking towards the welfare as well as the need for safeguarding the environment. Thus, the progression and creation of technology has smashed the earth to the larger extent and how it is very vital to take actions against the features that are hazardous to the environment. Consequently, this is never perceived as the responsibility of religion to concern about nature as well as the environment. The novel thoughts of Christianity along with environment restoration and preservation have offered the novel aspect of thought and new rationale to consider the significance of saving the environment. Therefore, this is the most outstanding issue of uniting the impression concerning Christianity with the environment protection. The key query that arises here is why as Christians it is our responsibility to preserve nature. Also, what are the procedures along with events that a Christian can take so as to safeguard our environment (Hubert, 2015). Therefore, this argumentative paper...

Words: 1414 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Explain the Theory of Natural Law

...deontological theory that says there are definite rights and wrongs. This Natural Law exists to assist humans to direct their actions in such a way that they may reach their eternal density with God. There is a Natural Law for the physical world and the moral world that is discoverable through observation. The theory of Natural Law was created by Thomas Aquinas, who built his theory on key ideas from Ancient Greeks, in particular The Stoics and Aristotle. Amongst the Stoics teachings was the fact that the universe had a rational and purposeful order; to live in accordance with the universes order one had to follow Natural Law. This meant when making laws, they should be made and developed so that they correspond to nature of the universe. Aquinas taught, on ideas based on Aristotle that good person is someone who fulfils their purpose, meaning acting in accordance to Natural law. Aquinas believed that God had put inclinations in each human to behave in certain was; following our inclinations will lead us to the highest good and fulfil our purpose. The most basic and fundamental inclination that a person has is to do good and avoid evil. This brings about the question of: what actually is good and bad? There are real gods and apparent goods in the world. It was believed by Aquinas that human nature was essentially good, as natural law is absolute and is within everyone. He maintained that humans were oriented towards the achievement of perfection and that they could never knowingly...

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Teaching Business Ethics and Environmental Responsbility, Using Hinduism as a Tool.

...Teaching Business Ethics and Environmental Responsbility, Using Hinduism As A Tool. Abstract The crux of Hinduism is to revere nature in all its forms as they are considered to be manifestations of God himself. Even humankind is understood to be a composition of elements of nature and therefore maintaining a symbiotic relationship is essential for self preservation which is reinforced through the theory of karma which lays heavy emphasis on one’s action and corresponding rewards and punishment and therefore establishes adverse consequences to negative acts of destruction and depletion. The current paper proposes to use these basic tenets of Hinduism to teach business ethics to students through examples and validations from the Hindu texts and scriptures. This combination would help bring to class a synergetic combination of theology and business management where students shall find essence and a deep sense of association between the theological thoughts and their commercial applications. Key Words: Business Ethics; Hinduism; Management application; Education. Research Type: Concept Paper Affiliation Details: Dr. Ruchi Tewari; Assistant Professor; Amrut Mody School of Management (Ahmedabad University) Navrangpura; Ahmedabad – 380058 (India) Phone No.: 093761 44037 Email id: drtewariruchi@gmail.com; ruchi.tewari@ahduni.edu.in Introduction Human development has been over-zealous and has in the process...

Words: 3051 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Worldview

...Arnoldy Christian Worldview Professor Chip Lamca January 25, 2014                 1. Who is God and what are His characteristics?   God is the infinitely knowledgeable divine element whom is answerable for the formation of everything, all that exists, and all that will exist.” …God is the creator of heaven and earth and all their inhabitants” (Cosgrove pg. 135). God is liberal, overlooking, adoring, all-influential; yet, to numerous it appears that his activities demonstrate a generally viewpoint of lack of interest from him. 2. What is a human being and what happens when one dies? A person is the consolidation of a material form and the human spirit/soul. A person is more than simply a creature, it has the ability to show the strongest feelings, complex thinking, and show across the board empathy. "For the fate of the sons of men and the fate of beasts is the same; as one dies, so dies the other. They all have the same breath, and man has no advantage over the beasts; for all is vanity. All go to one place; all are from the dust, and all turn to dust again." (Ecclesiastes 3:19-20 RSV) 3. What is the nature of the universe? The universe is a mixture of material and soul, not one or the other. Soul and material in the universe are joined inconclusively. The universe is here for us “…the belief that each individual person constitutes the center of one’s universe” (Wilkens pg. 29). 4. How do you know what you know? How do you know what is true? People realize what...

Words: 658 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mythology

...Ch.2 Week 2 Notes: Cosmogonic myths pick up the action at a point just before the divine touch creates time and space. Before this critical moment, though there are often gods or a god preceding the world or the physical universe, the only thing that exists is the infinite potential of chaos. Not unlike the Genesis account of creation, most of the world’s creation myths begin with an eternal being sleeping within or hovering in contemplation above the infinite abyss of a primeval sea. These waters represent the “chaos” of a world without physical form, where no height, no depth, no breadth, no time, and no created beings exist. All is quiet; everything rests in a state of infinite potential. At the decisive moment, potential universes give way to the one in which we actually live. * Maclagan suggests, in Creation Myths: Man’s Introduction to the World, that Cosmogonic narratives are patterned after the following themes: (1)inner and outer; (2) horizontal and vertical; (3) something from nothing; (4) the conjugation of opposites; (5) world order and the order of worlds; (6) descent and ascent; (7) earth body and sacrifice; and (8) death, time, and the elements. In these various schemes, we see areas of overlap, which suggests that a finite number of motifs are at work in creation myths. * Weigle’s Creation and Procreation: Feminist Reflections on Mythologies of Cosmogony and Parturition presents the most nuanced typology of creation myths. Building upon Eliade...

Words: 1354 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Egyptian and Mesopotamian Culture

...political structure of these civilizations differed between Mesopotamia’s unstable collection of city-states and Egypt’s unified monarchy, both societies were comprised a polytheistic philosophy where the Gods reflected a larger, universal system. Furthermore, both ancient civilizations relied on the flooding of their adjacent rivers for survival and these floods manifested within their religious ideologies. Although, the annual flooding of the Nile gave the Egyptians a sense of comfort and satiability surrounding death and was the direct rational of the Egyptians belief that rebirth followed death, the inconsistent flooding of the Tigris and Euphrates left the Mesopotamian people uncertain of the continuity of lives, evident in their harsh God’s and lack of interpretation of what the after-life consists of. Nevertheless, the similarities between the two culture’s religious beliefs are far too comparable to be discounted. Being polytheistic in nature, the religious beliefs of the Mesopotamians and Egyptians consisted of a chief or father god who all the other gods descended from. Each god represented a different part of nature or physical or societal phenomenon. Mesopotamians specifically believed that “human society was merely a part of the larger society of the universe governed by...

Words: 897 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Does Science Make Belief in God Obsolete?

...Does science make belief in God obsolete? Yes, if by… No, and yes. Absolutely not! Not necessarily. Of course not. No. No, but it should. No. Yes. No, not at all. It depends. Of course not. No, but only if… Steven Pinker Christoph Cardinal Schönborn William D. Phillips Pervez Amirali Hoodbhoy Mary Midgley Robert Sapolsky Christopher Hitchens Keith Ward Victor J. Stenger Jerome Groopman Michael Shermer Kenneth Miller Stuart Kauffman 2 4 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 Does science make belief in God obsolete? irteen views on the question Online at www.templeton.org/belief INTRODUCTION T he John Templeton Foundation serves as a philanthropic catalyst for research on what scientists and philosophers call the Big Questions. We support work at the world’s top universities in such fields as theoretical physics, cosmology, evolutionary biology, cognitive science, and social science relating to love, forgiveness, creativity, purpose, and the nature and origin of religious belief. We encourage informed, open-minded dialogue between scientists and theologians as they apply themselves to the most profound issues in their particular disciplines. And, in a more practical vein, we seek to stimulate new thinking about wealth creation in the developing world, character is booklet neatly embodies our approach to the Big Questions: the contributors are education in schools and universities, and programs for cultivating the talents of the gifted. scholars and thinkers of the...

Words: 13856 - Pages: 56

Premium Essay

Report on Religious Field Research

...Report on Religious Field Research Joe Carter Bob Andrews Religion 212 June 4, 2012 Report on Religious Field Research Religion is defined by Brodd (2003) as a collection of beliefs concerning the existence of nature, the purpose of the universe, the existence of human beings, and deities. Religion is usually related to the cultural beliefs systems, which are connected to humankind, spirituality, and the moral values. There are different types of religions in the world that have different signs, beliefs, descriptions, ethnicity, and, sanctified accounts that explain the meaning and origin of life and the universe. Through the accounts ideas, principals, morals, sacred laws, and the way of life are generated in addition to the existence of the universe and the human nature. Examples of religions include Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Islam, and atheism. Among all the religions, atheism tends to be different from the others as it is not similar from any of the others. I watched a program on atheist and this encouraged me to conduct a research on atheism through interviewing an atheist and through books to gain a complete understanding of atheism. According Neilson (1985), atheism is said to have a great connection in the lack of beliefs of God’s existence. This situation occurs due to a purposeful choice of not believing or from a natural failure to believe the religious teachings of a certain religion, which literally seems unbelievable...

Words: 1773 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Naturalism

...Naturalists believe that nature alone represents the entire reality and is there beyond or behind other than nature. For naturalists, nature is everything and nothing exists superior than nature. So they separate nature from God and allot no space for supernaturalism and spiritualism. They also believe that all our activities are initiated by our instincts. Naturalism stresses the need to return to nature from artificiality. It is also concerned with natural self and believes that reality and nature are identical and beyond nature there is no reality .With the help of physical and chemical laws, naturalism explains the universe, the physical world, life and mind. This nature is governed by its own laws and man is regarded as the child of nature. It considers matter as superior to spirit and gives importance to scientific methods of observation and verification. MEANING OF NATURALISM The term naturalism, by its ordinary meaning, means ism laying emphasis nature in every field of education. Naturalism is a system which follows exclusion of whatever is spiritual, or indeed whatever is transcendental of experience from our philosophy of nature and man. Naturalism is a doctrine that separates nature from god, subordinates sprit to matter and setup unchangeable laws as supreme. According to naturalism, ‘material world is the real world”. Naturalism is concerned with ‘natural self’ or ‘real self’. According to naturalists, human life is a part of nature; it is a self-sufficient entity...

Words: 5413 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Introduction

...is not questioning the orthodox teaching of the Church on these fundamental points about the nature of God and humanity. Although Sayers's theological premises are not original, what she does with them is. Her contribution in The Mind of the Maker is to develop a lucid, extended analogy between the Christian dogma of the Trinity and the creative activity of the human being. With this, she not only explaining "this fascinating and majestic mystery" of the Holy Trinity (The Mind of the Maker 149), but also produces one of the most illuminating inquiries into the creative process ever written. She begins the essay by making another important distinction, saying "this book is not an apology for Christianity..." this is significant, because too often people confuse matters of fact with personal opinion. The first chapter of The Mind of the Maker is thus concerned with distinguishing fact from opinion, and the text proceeds to check the Church's "statements of fact" about the universe against the actual experience of the artist. Specifically, the book considers whether there is anything in the artistic process that parallels the Christian conception of God as Trinity-in-Unity. The author give a brief suggestion about her book as a "it is brief study of the creative mind" and states its thesis as directly as possible: The point I shall endeavor to establish is that these statements about God the Creator are not, as is usually supposed, a set of random mystifications which are irrelevant...

Words: 1462 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Emerson Essay Nature

...edition of Nature with a passage from the Neoplatonic philosopher Plotinus. The 1849 second edition included instead a poem by Emerson himself. Both present themes that are developed in the essay. The passage from Plotinus suggests the primacy of spirit and of human understanding over nature. Emerson's poem emphasizes the unity of all manifestations of nature, nature's symbolism, and the perpetual development of all of nature's forms toward the highest expression as embodied in man. Nature is divided into an introduction and eight chapters. In the Introduction, Emerson laments the current tendency to accept the knowledge and traditions of the past instead of experiencing God and nature directly, in the present. He asserts that all our questions about the order of the universe — about the relationships between God, man, and nature — may be answered by our experience of life and by the world around us. Each individual is a manifestation of creation and as such holds the key to unlocking the mysteries of the universe. Nature, too, is both an expression of the divine and a means of understanding it. The goal of science is to provide a theory of nature, but man has not yet attained a truth nbroad enough to comprehend all of nature's forms and phenomena. Emerson identifies nature and spirit as the components of the universe. He defines nature (the "NOT ME") as everything separate from the inner individual — nature, art, other men, our own bodies. In common usage, nature refers to...

Words: 3638 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Religion 101

...theory. During this time Edward Tylor, who was a leading figure in anthropology came up with a theory that said “primitive” people believed that souls were not only found in people but in all of nature” (1). Things like plants, animals, mountains, rivers, even the entire world itself was seen as being alive with spirits of all kind. People viewed these spirits in many different ways therefore, it became a part of life of “primitive” societies to pray to these spirits, offer sacrifices, and avoid offending them. “Ultimately, this animistic view of the universe produced this religion that would worship the sky, earth, and water” (1). Max Muller, who was also a leading figure in anthropology, had his mind set on another theory, which is the nature- worship theory. According to this theory, “primitive” people became aware of things such as the changing of the seasons, the tides, and the phases of the moon. The people decided to personalize them thus giving names to things such as the sun, the moon, and so on. “They also began to describe the activities of these forces with tales that eventually became mythology” (1). Muller became convinced that he found the key to origin of all religions: “Primitive” people identify the forces in nature, personify them, created myths to describe their activities, and eventually developed pantheons and religions around them” (1). The third theory is a completely different approach to the origin of religion called the theory of original monotheism. Wilhelm...

Words: 635 - Pages: 3