...In Glenn Greenwald's article, “The Digital Surveillance State: Vast, Secret, and Dangerous” he states, “ There is no surveillance power too intrusive or accountable for our political class provided the word “terrorism” is invoked to “justify” those powers. Mass surveillance and the idea of using fear to justify the implementation of it has been practiced within the government for years. A pattern has occurred in history where the government has turned to surveillance to stay in power and use it to their advantage. Power lies at the heart of surveillance, and lies at the heart of the American government who conserve their power in everything they do. America competes to remain a powerhouse against other countries by expanding its military, and...
Words: 1147 - Pages: 5
...Surveillance in Society "There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment... It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized." –George Orwell, 1984 Social control is a prevalent method in multiple societies in order to influence the way people behave and think. In George Orwell’s novel, 1984, he describes a fictional, dystopian, society, Oceania; a society built upon a totalitarian government with constant control of its citizens. Much like Oceania, present day American society is falling to the powers of this authority. A form of social control in both Oceania and present day America is surveillance. In 1984, Oceania and its people are under constant watch. With the use of their societal surveillance, telescreens and microphones, the Party and Thought Police (much like the WWII Gestapo), were able to watch and closely observe every move made by the citizens. Telescreens were used as machines that relay information and broadcast almost like a radio, while simultaneously allowing Thought Police and Party to tap into the wire at any given time to watch over and listen in on the citizens. Though one may think to just shut off such a ridiculous gadget, the citizens had no capability...
Words: 1216 - Pages: 5
...No Place to Hide, that the government believes that they should have surveillance on the entire state because of safety factors and that it would unite it more effectively. This coincides with the statement “Mass surveillance is a universal temptation for an unscrupulous power. And in every instance, the motive is the same: suppressing dissent and mandating power” (Greenwald, 4). If the government can pacify the people of the state by going under the illusion of safety, they can use “mass surveillance” and control the entire state without much, if any, dissent from the people. Greenwald’s stance is solid but his glazing over of how we can change things (other than using encryption like him)...
Words: 1363 - Pages: 6
...Electronic Surveillance has always been a debatable topic due to the controversy of privacy vs. security. Although Electronic Surveillance invades personal privacy it still manages to make the world a preferable environment and holds criminals accountable for their actions. Individuals should not be hiding information, so they should be fine with the government searching through their personal information. This search does not cause any physical harm or crosses any boundaries, it only keeps the citizens safe and protected. Government spying programs help in the fight against terrorist and ensure Americans to stay safe which prevents many tragedies. Electronic Surveillance can help detect threats such as; terrorism, crime, child pornography, tax evasion, and fraud. Electronic surveillance continues to highly impact the American government because it can help fight back foreign hackers that want to obtain private information...
Words: 442 - Pages: 2
...Big Brother Surveillance is Acceptable In an age where cameras and social media follow people everywhere, integrating themselves into their daily lives, a question as to how much privacy they can truly maintain away from the government is hotly debated. The government has the abilities in this modern age to watch, listen, and read whatever is out in the open, but it should be fair because these privileges allow the government to keep America safe and stay vigilant over potential threats. The National Security Agency (NSA) should be able to invade American citizens’ privacy to a certain extent for the sake of protection. To keep the country out of harm’s way, sacrificing a minimal amount of security is genuinely reasonable and civil. One of the most common modern day tools seen encompassing people are cameras. When they’re not wielded in someone’s pocket or hands, they are all around: mounted on buildings in neighborhoods, public places, and around traffic signals. Many argue that these...
Words: 867 - Pages: 4
...of their employees. This is due to worries about; quality of work, productivity employee theft or misuse of company property One of the main ethical issues of the workplace is employee privacy and surveillance. Argument raised is: is it ethical to monitor employees whilst they are in the workplace? Is there privacy for employees and should employees expect Privacy at workplace? Technology has offered various options to help people maintain privacy depending on their situation. At the same time, technology has made it almost impossible for anyone to have privacy. There are devices and programs that can help you get privacy but they can also be used to invade it. Modern society has too many incidences and events that include invasion of privacy, including on national and international levels. Is it possible to ever maintain a level of privacy when you are on the computer, your cellphone, or even in your own home due to technology advancements? In this writing the prominent examples of surveillance at work that I would like to discuss about are surveillance cameras and internet surveillance. Since this topic is based around privacy in the workplace, "privacy" is a key term to be explored. I will analyze the definition of “Privacy” term as well as the reality of using Surveillance today to illustrate for my opinion on this...
Words: 3636 - Pages: 15
...Act After the September 11 terrorist attacks, the country was in a state a mass hysteria. As a result, the United States Congress passed the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, or known simply as The Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was created with the objective of locating and arresting terrorists working on American soil in order to prevent another major attack from happening. The only way to do this was for the Patriot Act to allow for the unconstitutional surveillance of Americans citizens. As a result, the Patriot Act is an infringement on basic American ideals and freedoms. The first infringement of citizens’ rights is Section 213. Section 213, also known as the “sneak and peek” section, violates the Fourth Amendment by allowing law enforcement to enter a person’s house or apartment, search through their things, and even seize their property while they were gone without having to tell them first. The Fourth Amendment was intended to protect people from any unreasonable searches and seizures, and also requires the...
Words: 920 - Pages: 4
...Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Abstract Jenkins (2011) contends that Americans have increasingly turned toward the American court system as a matter of redress and protection (p. 1). Seeking justice from a dualistic entity charged with fairness, interpreting and honoring the law, ensuring retribution is granted when warranted and protection from abuses of authority and/or due process is maintained in accordance with the Constitution and federal and state statutes, the court system balance these dualistic duties and obligations to society and the government (p. 1, 2). Since September 11, 2001, however, the court’s roles and Judicial duties have become more complex. Subject to emergent laws such as the Patriot Act and the 2011 National Defense of America Act, some of which negate the rights to due process, Judicial decisions relative to charges, warrants, warrantless searches and surveillance and evidentiary admissibility have changed dramatically. Moreover, case assignment and...
Words: 5526 - Pages: 23
...the law – page 5 Impact on computing – page 6 Surveillance on Businesses – page 9 Penalty on non-compliance – page 10 Internet Service Providers – page 10 Conclusion – page 12 References – page 13 Abstract The Patriot Act was written into law just a mere 45 days after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. The Patriot Act was intended to counter terrorism by providing law enforcement agencies and intelligence agencies with an easier means to target those connected to terrorism. The Patriot Act has had a great impact on corporations, how they are surveilled and monitored, and huge penalties on noncompliance of the Patriot Act. This paper will further discuss the Patriot Act and its effects on Corporations. Introduction The terrorist attack on the United States on September 11, 2001 shook the foundation of the faith that America had in her security. This prompted congressional action on counteractive action to avoid a repeat occurrence of the terrorist attack on US soil. Measures that were taken included the passage of a Congressional Act referred to as the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001, hereby referred to as the Patriot Act. The passing of the Patriot Act was intended to provide comprehensive anti-terrorism laws that would enhance national security against terrorism, improve on surveillance of terrorist activities, fight money laundering...
Words: 3253 - Pages: 14
...One specific aspect of surveillance morality is the myth of consent. The idea behind the myth of consent involves one of the most critical but ignored things in America: the terms and conditions. In the terms and conditions of most cell phone contracts, it will be stated that you consent to having your phone metadata, aspects such as call length and phone numbers, shared with the government (Spener 404-405). The problem with this is that not many people actually read those terms and conditions, they just blindly agree. This means that millions upon millions of Americans “consent” to have their information monitored, when virtually none of them are aware that they agreed to that. The debate about the morality of government surveillance is...
Words: 927 - Pages: 4
...PATRIOT Act, or the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, is a basically an anti-terrorism law that was rather hastily passed as a result of the September 11, 2001 attacks. It primarily aims at deterring and punishing acts of terrorism committed in the United States and elsewhere (USA PATRIOT Act, n.d.). However, while it appears to have noble aims of safeguarding American lives and property, the act needs to be repealed or, if not, amended so that the privacy freedoms of citizens are not trampled upon. The USA PATRIOT Act also aims at expanding the investigatory tools of law enforcement and, as well, give authorities from the executive branch more teeth against money laundering and terrorism financing and criminal abuse of financial institutions (USA PATRIOT Act, n.d.). As part of its broadening of law enforcement agencies' investigative powers, the law increased same agencies' surveillance powers, rendering amendments to the Wiretap Statue, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Study guide, n.d.). This means that the government is allowed to considerably obtain even personal information about its citizens and detain aliens even without publicly acknowledging such (Mayeux, 2003-2004). In more lay person's terms, the Patriot Act seeks to accomplish its anti-terrorist objective by allowing government to wiretap more, Internet activities included...
Words: 679 - Pages: 3
...so much devastation, and yielding so much change in the United States Government. In the days following the attacks, many questioned why the intelligence community wasn’t aware of such an impending act of terror on U.S. soil. In what some historians may refer to as a knee-jerk reaction, the intelligence community was granted additional jurisdiction through the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001” or commonly referred to as the “PATRIOT Act.” This expansion of the government’s...
Words: 1328 - Pages: 6
...PATRIOT Act, also known as the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, or the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was created with the intention of finding and indicting international terrorists performing on American soil; however, the adverse ramifications of the Act have been dire. Many of the Patriot Act’s virtues are in violation of the U.S. Constitution, a document outlined in order to protect American rights and freedoms. The Patriot Act infringes on the First Amendment rights, which is protects the of freedom of speech,...
Words: 770 - Pages: 4
...Big Brother’s Eyes – analysis Writers This article about camera surveillance has been posted in The New York Post on 2 May 2002, about 1,5 years after 9/11 where the use of video surveillance has become a bigger part of the reality. The article is written by William D. Eggers and Eve Tushnet. Both Eggers and Tushnet are at the posting time working at the Manhattan Institute where they are working on a book on how technology is transforming government. Eggers is at the posting time at the age of 35 as a senior fellow (member) and Tushnet is at the age of 24 as a research associate and by the way is a lesbian. Readers The New York Post is an American daily newspaper, mostly distributed in New York City and the area around. The intended reader for this newspaper is the common American, thus it reaches out to most people possible. Language The use of language in the article Big Brother’s Eyes is quite simple and easy to read and understand. The article doesn’t consist of long sentences with a high academic language; it is more informal and based on a reader-friendly style, which by the way gets along with the audience the newspaper reaches, i.e. the common American. Let me give an example of how the structure of the sentences is: “Many civil libertarians insist that the only way to protect privacy is through prohibition: tear down the cameras. Ban government from using face-recognition and other biometric technologies.” ll. 10-12 p 46. It is a good illustration of the...
Words: 982 - Pages: 4
...or things to be seized.” The NSA’s surveillance programs violates the Fourth Amendment by collecting telecommunication data and storing it in a database. The US PATRIOT Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act allows the NSA to continue to run these controversial surveillance program today. The United States should end or reform...
Words: 948 - Pages: 4