...the Second Amendment, the United States Constitution states that "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." People who are in favor of gun control and gun bans argue that the Second Amendment only applies to the "militia," by which they mean only the military and police. In other words, according to such an argument, the Second Amendment does not protect the right of an individual to own a weapon, but merely the right of the government to possess weapons. This is like saying people have the right to defend themselves, but only if it's the police or the army defending them; you can't defend yourself on your own. This argument is completely illogical. It is true that in exchange for living in a free country, individuals do give up certain things. For example, some would say people give up the right to determine whether or not someone is guilty of a crime on their own. Instead, people submit to the laws of their country, leaving this...
Words: 489 - Pages: 2
...two main points of view when it comes down to gun control laws. There is the side that is for gun control laws and one that is against gun control laws. Many of you may not have had bad experiences with guns and neither have I. What I do know is that we have all heard of the sad stories that have happened near us that include guns. We may not think much of it but, we need to put ourselves in the shoes of those who have lost love ones to the deadly weapon. Now imagine. Your having the best day ever. Nothing has gone wrong with your day, you've aced all your test, your passing your classes. When all of a sudden the office sends a call slip for you, you are leaving school something has happened, your mother? your father? your siblings? What has happened? Your younger siblings school has had a gun attack. Your Little Brother or sister fallen victim. Their in the hospital fighting for their life because of a loose maniac with a gun. Now who was this man?, we don't know. He has a gun licence, does that make it legal? Does it make it okay? NO! Why would an innocent person who has a gun licence shoot elementary school children? Anyone can be murderer! there is no such thing as true safety with a guns. Even having a gun licence doesn't necessarily mean its okay....
Words: 539 - Pages: 3
...massacres, gun control has once again been thrust back onto the main stage in the United States. In a New York Times op-ed titled, “How to Win an Argument About Guns”, Nicholas Kristof takes on this very issue. According to his bio, Kristof has been a foreign correspondent and columnist for the New York Times since 2001. However, his bio says nothing about any involvement with firearm related topics. This makes his opinions less trustworthy than that of an actual expert on the issue. Kristof is very pro gun control and dispels five main myths from those that oppose his views on gun control. The author believes that greater restrictions and laws concerning firearms will lead to a safer country and far less casualties....
Words: 1268 - Pages: 6
...Gun control is becoming a more prevalent topic of discussion due to the increasing number of mass shootings each year. This article confronts the topic of gun control and delivers an interesting twist on someone’s liberal views. Most liberals believe guns should be outlawed or heavily regulated. The intriguing part of this article is the idea that a liberal owns a gun. Naturally, people with democratic views believe that guns should not be in the hands of the public. The argument has an interesting twist due to this unlikely scenario. The writer begins his essay stating he is “devoutly Democratic” and lives in Texas. He owns many different types of pistols and is looking to buy a shotgun. He states he loves to fire guns and exercise his rights as an American. Among the many reasons to own firearms, the author says the biggest reason is to protect his family. He was introduced to firearms while writing a novel where guns were used...
Words: 980 - Pages: 4
...Gun Control Rebuttal Robert Brown University of Phoenix BCOM/275 Shawn Castle February 17, 2014 Abstract Today, with all of the publicity that crimes involving firearms receives there is a lot of controversy over whether or not stricter gun control laws are needed. This essay will discuss one author’s belief that stricter gun control laws are needed and my rebuttal to his argument. I will analyze the reliability, credibility, and validity of the data used by the author. This essay will also identify fallacies in the argument. Gun Control: One Author’s Opinion and My Rebuttal As I was looking on the internet for an article on a controversial subject, I came across this one article that peaked my interest about gun control and why we should have stricter gun laws. Being the avid gun lover that I am, I decided to read the article. As I was reading this article I found it hard to believe anything that this author had to say. As he was talking about the reason’s that he believes there should be stricter gun laws he starts to mention some statistics about crime rates that involve firearms but fails to mention any sources as to where he ascertained his information. Looking at the statistics I found on the Federal Bureau of Justice website, during 2009 the percentage for violent crimes that involved firearms was only 8 percent (Federal Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2009). I find it hard to believe and support the author’s point of view after analyzing the reliability...
Words: 438 - Pages: 2
... “Just Take Away Their Guns,” Wilson sufficiently reasons how the elimination of illegal guns on the streets should be the central focus in determining the limits regarding American gun control regulations which are frequently debated in our modern world. While Wilson makes an effective argument, at times, he racially profiles which is a definite form of deceptive reasoning; in addition, many of Wilson’s arguments lack the elaboration he needs to avoid making hasty assertions. Wilson argues in his essay that not allowing people to buy guns will have no effect on the illegal use of guns, which in essence, is the sole reasoning for wanting to eliminate guns in the first place. He makes the claim that about two-hundred million American citizens own a gun. These guns, though, are not the ones that are generally used for unlawful acts, but rather those that are stolen, borrowed, or privately purchased. Wilson then makes the point that an increase in these control regulations would take a toll on none other than those law abiding citizens that own these guns more for self-defense purposes. Wilson first extends the argument that, “Our goal should be to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully, especially in places- in streets, in taverns- where the mere presence of a gun can increase the hazards we all face.” By beginning his argument with a clear, concise thesis such as this, Wilson begins to setup an organized structure for his argument. Through a clearly planned...
Words: 825 - Pages: 4
...Legitimate Gun Restrictions Christopher Glover PHI103 Karen Kart February 25, 2013 Legitimate Gun Restrictions A continuous argument between gun owners and concerned citizens is over gun restrictions. Many gun owners support the second amendment of the constitution and believe that any restriction on guns is an infringement on this amendment and there for there right. Concerned citizens of the United States believe that guns are to readily available and believe restrictions should be put in place to prevent these guns from falling into the wrong hands. In this essay I will discuss this argument and reveal the reasons that there are legitimate restrictions on gun ownership. I will start with how background checks keep guns out of the hands of people with a felony on their record. The gun control act of 1968 following the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, Congress passed this law prohibiting convicted felons from possessing firearms. It also required licenses to trade in guns and created procedures to track serial numbers and control imports (www.keyt.com). Many will say that this helped reduce gun valance in America because after the gun control act of 1968 handgun violence dropped by 37% the next year (http://www.saf.org/LawReviews). The real reason behind the drop was the fact that during that year handgun production dropped, resulting in the drop in violence not the new law. Therefore the...
Words: 696 - Pages: 3
...May 30, 2018 Socioeconomic Problems and Gun Related Deaths Carrying gun for personal use may be good for safety to some extent. People will be dying till socioeconomic problems such as unemployment, poverty alcohol consumption exist, but gun related death can be stopped up to some extent by controlling guns. For example, in India, many people are killed by a gun shot in weddings. A recent study says that guns are responsible behind the death of 32,000 people every year in The United States and that is why this topic became a matter of concern. My research question relates to the relationship between socioeconomic problems which mentioned before and its related homicide rates? I took the Mark Gius’s...
Words: 887 - Pages: 4
...“Stuff Is Not Salvation,” belongs to Anna Quindlen criticized the consumer culture. She talks on her essay about the people who buy some not need stuff and goods and waste their money on junk which is not need. The thing, which she argues with people in her essay that, we can be happier if we live simple without unnecessary items. Also, Quindlen shows at the end of her essay that happy people do not actually rely on material things at all but just a few which they really need. Quindlen does a really great job with her argumentative essay by supporting it in a lot of details, personal examples and statistics. She also gets some conversation which attracts the reader by asking questions and make them think more about her argument. She said, “The...
Words: 283 - Pages: 2
...Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns by Molly Ivins In the “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns”, Molly’s Ivins main point is an absolute abolition of civilian gun ownership, and gun control in the Second Amendment. She begins her essay with a fact that she is not anti-gun, she is pro-knife. Also another fact is that as a civil libertarian she supports the Second Amendment. During the all essay she urged us to consider the pros of knifes, giving the benefits of the knife she stating that, “A general substitution of knifes for gun would promote physical fitness.” She is absolutely convinced that the guns are more dangerous than knifes, because the guns can ricochet, and it is a fact that people are less likely to be killed by cleaning their knife as they would be cleaning their gun. In this way the author shows the probability of accidental killing, and indicates the accuracy why the guns should be taken under strict control. She believes that the Second Amendment has a reliability and means exactly what is says, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”, and she refer that a 14 years old youths, and crazy religions that should not owned a guns, because they are not a part of the Amendment. She insists that guns should be just in militia hands, and citizens also are not part of this Amendment. Then Molly Ivins infer that guns in the citizen’s hands will...
Words: 699 - Pages: 3
...A- Block Gun Control essay Why does gun control continue to be an argument in this country? Will America ever come to an agreement? I will explain my opinion in this essay. My opinion will be based on the New York Times magazine “Upfront- The Gun Debate.” The discussion of gun control has many different points of view. Though guns are sometimes kept to help, they can be given to criminals and used in the wrong ways, too. “Gun control is a broad term that covers many kinds of restrictions.” said the article. What is gun control? Gun control is known as the restriction the government puts on the buying, selling, and usage of firearms. Now that we know what gun control is, why do so many citizens argue about it? Some people believe that if the government banned U.S. citizens from personally owned firearms that it would lead to a safer environment. Others counteract that by stating that if people are murdering others now our only protection is guns. However if you take firearms away then people wouldn’t have anything to either scare off criminals or protect themselves and others....
Words: 527 - Pages: 3
...Gun control is a controversial issue that continues to spark heated debates and calls for action. With over 48,800 firearm-related deaths reported in the United States in 2021, the need for effective measures to curb gun violence is more pressing than ever. This essay examines the escalating demand for increased gun control, exploring the complicated aspects of the debate and the importance of stricter regulations. The call for enhanced gun control gained momentum as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported a significant increase in the rate of gun deaths between 2016 and 2020, with a 15 percent rise in 2020 alone. Democratic lawmakers staged a sit-in on the House floor, recommending the reintroduction of bills on gun control,...
Words: 1134 - Pages: 5
...during election season. This essay will examine the gun control issue. It will provide a brief history, statistics, and quotes from gun control experts to describe the present state of gun control in the United States. In addition, it will offer a brief analysis of gun control efforts. This examination and analysis will demonstrate that stronger gun control is necessary to reduce gun violence and ensure the safe use of guns in the United States. “Since the American Revolution, when colonists went to war against Great Britain, the right to bear arms has been central to – and controversial in – American culture. Take a look back over milestones in America’s relationship with and regulation of firearms”. Following by U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, news reports. Gun control is nothing new in the United States, and neither is the controversy surrounding the control of gun ownership. According to an author , gun control has been an issue since at least 1934, when Congress passed a law restricting machine guns and sawed-off shotguns . An Author points out that after the assassinations of Senator Robert F. Kennedy and the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, a law was passed that banned the importation of inexpensive handguns called "Saturday Night Specials;" in 1993, the Brady Bill was passed, which required background checks for handgun purchases; and a 1994 law banned the sale of semiautomatic assault guns . Since 1994, there has...
Words: 1036 - Pages: 5
...Classic Model for an Argument No one structure fits all written arguments. However, most college courses require arguments that consist of the following elements. Below is a basic outline for an argumentative or persuasive essay. This is only one possible outline or organization. Always refer to your handbook for specifics. I. Introductory Paragraph o Your introductory paragraph sets the stage or the context for the position you are arguing for. o This introduction should end with a thesis statement that provides your claim (what you are arguing for) and the reasons for your position on an issue. A. Your thesis: o states what your position on an issue is o usually appears at the end of the introduction in a short essay o should be clearly stated and often contains emphatic language (should, ought, must) B. Sample Argumentative Thesis o The production, sale, and possession of assault weapons for private citizens should be banned in the U.S. II. Body of your Argument A. Background Information o This section of your paper gives the reader the basic information he or she needs to understand your position. This could be part of the introduction, but may work as its own section. B. Reasons or Evidence to Support your Claim o All evidence you present in this section should support your position. This is the heart of your essay. Generally, you begin with a general statement that you back up with specific details or examples. Depending on how long your argument is, you will need to devote...
Words: 684 - Pages: 3
...Gun Control Essay 1 Gun Control Essay 06/14/2015 The right to bear arms is guaranteed in the constitution by the Second Amendment. Many politicians are looking to amend the constitution any way they can to ban handguns or at least Gun Control Essay 2 restrict sales. The argument between pro and anti gun control has been debated for years, both with valid points. Many studies and factual data shows that strict gun control only removes guns from law-abiding citizens, but does not actually help reduce crime. Studies have shown that gun control cannot stop people from committing the crime because if a handgun ban were issued, there is evidence that citizens would not comply with the law, strict gun control does not reduce homicide rates, and studies have found that high crime rates have stimulated purchasing of guns rather than high gun ownership stimulating crime. While the Founding Fathers of this country were developing the system of government, as set forth in the Constitution, many feared that a standing army controlled by a strong central government would leave them helpless. The Federal Constitution contained no provisions to prohibit a standing army or allow states to create their own militias. The Constitution was signed by thirty-nine men from the twelve states represented at the Constitutional Convention on September 17 1787; three delegates refused to sign because of the absence of a bill of rights. Two years later, the First Congress agreed on...
Words: 2074 - Pages: 9
