Free Essay

Holy Roman Empire

In:

Submitted By ladybug11
Words 1569
Pages 7
Holy Roman Empire

The Holy Roman Empire was a large empire throughout Europe during the Middle Ages and into the early Nineteenth Century. Its borders changed considerably throughout its history, but at times it spanned most of modern day Central Europe, with borders that covered modern day Germany, France, Austria, The Low Countries, Switzerland, the Czech Republic, Northern Italy, and more. The empire also included areas of Southeastern Europe such as Croatia, Slovenia, and Hungary. Eventually, it declined into a loose federation of principalities before dissolving entirely. However, before that, it covered a vast amount of territory for almost an entire millennium, necessarily meaning the empire had a large influence on the history of the Western World. The beginning of the Holy Roman Empire is not clear, but it was usually traced back to crowning of Charlemagne by Pope Leo III in 800. Charlemagne was previously King of The Franks, a group of Germanic tribes in modern day France. Charlemagne’s coronation was supposed to shift the power in Europe back to the West centuries after the power of the Roman Empire shifted east to Constantinople, modern day Istanbul (Kagan). In fact, the early name of the Holy Roman Empire was simply the Roman Empire as it was supposed to be seen as the continuation of the original. After the death of Charlemagne, his succession was disputed for generations until the Holy Roman Empire definitively formed. Otto I, a German who took control in 936, consolidated power of the region through a series of battle victories and by marrying Adelaide, the Queen of Italy. In 962, he was crowned Roman Emperor by the Pope in exchange for protecting the Papal States. With this, the Holy Roman Empire had truly formed (Padgen). The structure of the Holy Roman Empire varied greatly over the vast reign of its existence. In fact, any organization that lasts one thousand years will change too much over time to have any system last for long enough to be referred to be seen as its definitive structure. However, it consistently featured great deals of input from lower rulers, resisting centralized power. In fact, during the interregnum between Charlemagne and Otto I the rulers of the empire were elected. This election process continued although many elections served only to elect the emperor’s son as an heir. However, in other cases this voting system made the establishing of long term dynasties significantly difficult. The empire was made up of hundreds of smaller regions controlled by dukes, princes, and kings from whom the emperor derived power. The areas they ruled were referred to as Imperial States (Heer).
By the end of the Holy Roman Empire, the power had become even less centralized. In 1486, the emperor Frederick III needed money for a war. The only way he could get this was by agreeing to cede some power to an imperial court. At first the imperial court’s votes only served to advise the emperor, but within a century their votes were binding, giving the court more power than the emperor himself passed (Wilson). Through further disintegration of the central nature of power, the emperor came to have even less control. By the end of the empire, it had been subdivided into smaller groups each with their own parliament and the title of emperor had become almost entirely symbolic.
While the main struggle for power during the Holy Roman Empire was between the emperor and the localized powers, there was another. Especially in the earliest years of the Empire the emperors and popes struggled for control over the region. As emperors were crowned by the pope in Rome, the popes thought they would have some sort of control over the actions of the empire. However, early rules like Otto and his immediate successors used their roles to control popes, even replacing those popes that they disagreed with too strongly. Later popes would respond with reforms that were aimed at reducing the influence of the emperor, including ruling that only select cardinals could become pope (Gascoigne).
In perhaps the biggest reform in this struggle between papal and imperial powers, Pope Gregory in the late eleventh century changed the selection process for bishops and abbots, granting the power only to church members. Due to the great deal of power contained in these local church offices, this was greatly challenged. Emperor Henry IV was excommunicated for challenging these new rules, ultimately leading to him invading Rome and naming his own pope (Blumenthal). This controversy was ended in 1122, by the Concordat of Worms. This agreement between the Vatican and empire stated that both would have some control over bishops and abbots. Their spiritual obligations still lie with the church, but in their secular duties they would respond to local rulers (Columbia Encyclopedia).
The religious connection and decentralized power of the empire were a great problem when it was met with the sweeping changes brought across Europe by the Protestant Reformation. Martin Luther began it in the Holy Roman Empire territory of Saxony in 1517 when he wrote in disagreement of the church practice of selling indulgences (Catholic Encyclopedia). The reformation was extremely influential in Central Europe and many local rulers throughout the empire pledged their support to it. It was not uncommon for Protestant and Catholic rulers to wage war against one another. It wasn’t until the Peace of Augsburg in 1555 that each ruler agreed to allow other rulers to choose their own religion (Hughes). While this produced peace at the time, the empire was already just a loose collection of states under the banner of religion. With each state now free to practice different religions than other states the unity of the empire was severely weakened.
The final blow to the empire was the Peace of Westphalia, agreed to in various parts throughout 1648. This ended the Thirty Years’ War, fought largely between Catholic and Protestants in the empire. It reinforced the terms contained in the previous Peace of Augsburg. Another result was the official removal of Netherlands and Switzerland from the empire. It was also the creation of an idea known as Westphalia sovereignty, in which each territory was provided with the right to rule itself absent external influence (Terborch). This was clearly a detriment to centralized power within the empire, which at this point had devolved into an almost unconnected group of sovereign states.
After this long period of decline, the Holy Roman Empire finally dissolved fully when Francis II left the throne, choosing to be recognized only as the head of Austria. No one has been known as Holy Roman Emperor since him. The reason for his abdication was likely the ambition of Napoleon to one day claim the throne himself. By ending its existence, Francis assured that this would not happen (Sainty). While there were many factors that caused the empire to decline and end when it did, its very nature made its demise inevitable. For one, as a loose federation it was vulnerable to many issues not normally seen by empires. This includes consistent loss of territory and constant battling between individual states within the empire. Its only connection was religion, and once the Protestant Reformation occurred, the homogeneity of the empire’s religion was gone. Once this occurred there was nothing to connect the vast states and it was only a matter of time for the existence of the Holy Roman Empire.
It was joked by Voltaire that the title of Holy Roman Empire was a misnomer. “Neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an empire” was his description of it (Kors). In fact, this is true. The empire was led by secular men who often worked against the dominant religious institution of the time. It was based mostly out of Germany, with only the initial coronation and support from the Vatican having a connection to Rome. Finally, throughout great deals of its history it was mostly a loose confederation of states that were largely autonomous. Imperial States frequently went to war with one another based on the disagreements amongst their individual rulers. Therefore, it is true that the empire was not holy, Roman, or even truly an empire. Still the Holy Roman Empire was a massive force upon Europe for centuries. However, ultimately, an organization created by the backing of the Catholic Church could not survive the Protestant Reformation that swept through such a large part of its territory.

Works Cited
Beaudry, Pierre. "The Treaty of Westphalia." Schiller Institute and Fidelio Online Home Page. Schiller Institute. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .
"Concordat of Worms — Infoplease.com." Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia. Infoplease.com. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .
Gascoigne, Bamber. "HISTORY OF THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE." History of The Holy Roman Empire. History World. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .
Heer, Friedrich. "The Holy Roman Empire." John Reilly's Homepage. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .
Kagan, Donald, Steven E. Ozment, and Frank M. Turner. The Western Heritage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007. Print.
Kors, Alan C. "Voltaire and the Triumph of the Enlightenment." The Great Courses. University of Pennsylvania. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .
"Martin Luther." NEW ADVENT: Home. Catholic Encyclopedia. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .
Pagden, Anthony. "Peoples and Empires: a Short History ... - Anthony Pagden." Google Books. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .
Sainty, Guy S. "THE HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE." ALMANACH DE LA COUR. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .
Wilson, Peter Hamish. "The Holy Roman Empire, 1495-1806 - Peter Hamish Wilson."Google Books. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. .

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Fasdf

...like France, Spain, and England. How and in what ways were they successful? Why was the Holy Roman Empire not as successful as other European states in centralizing power? Examine the centralizing efforts in countries like France, Spain, and England. How and in what ways were they successful? Why was the Holy Roman Empire not as successful as other European states in centralizing power? Examine the centralizing efforts in countries like France, Spain, and England. How and in what ways were they successful? Why was the Holy Roman Empire not as successful as other European states in centralizing power? Examine the centralizing efforts in countries like France, Spain, and England. How and in what ways were they successful? Why was the Holy Roman Empire not as successful as other European states in centralizing power? Examine the centralizing efforts in countries like France, Spain, and England. How and in what ways were they successful? Why was the Holy Roman Empire not as successful as other European states in centralizing power? Examine the centralizing efforts in countries like France, Spain, and England. How and in what ways were they successful? Why was the Holy Roman Empire not as successful as other European states in centralizing power? Examine the centralizing efforts in countries like France, Spain, and England. How and in what ways were they successful? Why was the Holy Roman Empire not as successful as other European states in centralizing power? Examine the centralizing...

Words: 386 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

30 Years War

...Trough out history, differences on religions, and fight for dominance power and land has been the main cause of war. The 30 years war, named after its length of war during 1618 to 1648 is the only war that was solely fought for religious reasons between European powers of that era. The thirty years was is considered a religious war because the growth increase in religious intolerance and religious rivalries which led to be the sole cause of the war but as the war progressed it became less about religion and more about territory and dynastic issues. Previous to the 30 years’ war the Holy Roman Empire was facing a large hold of its catholic followers; the church had begun to decline due to scandals inside of the church. In 1555 peace of Augsburg became recognized as the first treaty indicating that the leader of the Holy Roman Empire could determine the religion of its people it ruled , this was a tactic to reestablish and re enforce the catholic church and weaken the protestant and Lutheran church. This lead to the 30 years’ war, a time where political differences and fight for religious freedom where fought. During the time of the 30 years war, it faced four different stages during its time. This four eras of the war where the...

Words: 1940 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Treaty of Westphalia

...changed not only borders on maps, it was also the death blow to the Counter Reformation, ushering in a new era of secularization. Though peace talks began in 1644 in Munster and Osnabruck, the actual signing of the Treaty of Westphalia occurred in 1648. The council was the largest assembly of Europeans since the council at Constance in 1414. The accomplishments of the treaty were that it divided the Holy Roman Empire in such a way that it existed in name only after negotiations. Borderlands of the Empire fell away as the Dutch and Swiss ceased to belong to it and the United Provinces and Swiss Cantons were recognized as independent. Other outlying areas were also acquired by the Empire’s French and Swedish neighbors. Another change was that both Catholics and Protestants were allowed to coexist within the new “Holy Roman Empire,” creating a polyglot community of independent, sovereign states. An overarching theme also emerged with the treaty, and it was a theme of balancing power. Surrounding countries knew that in order to maintain a balance of power, the Holy Roman Empire would have to be kept in a state of division. This was because if the 300 principalities ever unified as one country, that country would be unstoppable and could take over the world. In order to do this, the treaty stated that each province would have the right to conduct diplomacy and make treaties with foreign powers. However, the...

Words: 766 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

How Accurate Is It to Describe the Era Before 1848 as 'the Time When Nothing Happened'?

...neighbouring states. Under Friedrich I Prussia emerged as one of the strongest military and economic powers in Europe proper. The strong economy and growing military reputation lay foundations for a strong, proud and militaristic culture. As a relatively new state it could learn from the mistakes of others and as a large state it could bully and manipulate its neighbours, but it was still a subordinate of Austria in the Holy Roman Empire and nowhere near powerful enough to contend Austria’s seat of dominance. The influence that Prussia gained allowed for a stronger Prussia later, the knowledge that Prussia was vastly superior to its neighbours aided in giving Prussians a sense of self-confidence that allowed them to make the exertive steps towards unifying Germany after 1815. From the 9th century until 1806, the Holy Roman Empire dominated the German states, a common language and a notably similar culture had developed and bound the member states together as the ‘Germanic states’ of central Europe. Prior to the dismantling of the Empire by Napoleon in 1806, the Empire had been stagnating and its ‘golden years’ had ended, modernisation was almost non-existent and the member states were growing ever more selfish. In addition to this the empire’s armies posed very little resistance to the advancing French army, regardless of having a larger population...

Words: 2318 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Historical Events

...was a. his excommunication from the Roman Catholic church. b. the sale of indulgences. c. his time spent in England during the English Reformation. d. the turmoil caused by having two popes during the Great Schism. e. the influence of John Calvin. 2. The author of the Ninety-Five Theses was a. John Calvin. b. Erasmus. c. Voltaire. d. Martin Luther. e. Henry VIII. 3. The Catholic church dramatically pushed the sale of indulgences in the sixteenth century because of the a. need to match the resurgence of the Byzantine empire. b. threat posed by Islam. c. need for Henry VIII to pay off the national debt. d. expense associated with translating original Greek classics. e. need to raise funds for the construction of St. Peter’s basilica. 4. Which one of the following was not one of Luther’s problems with the Roman Catholic church? a. the selling of indulgences b. pluralism c. absenteeism d. the immense wealth of the Catholic church e. the church’s decision to translate the Bible into vernacular languages 5. Who said, “I cannot and will not recant anything, for it is neither safe nor right to act against one’s conscience. Here I stand. I can do no other.”? a. Martin Luther b. Jesus c. John Calvin d. Sima Qian e. Henry VIII 6. In the centuries following the fall of Rome, the only unifying force for all of Europe was a. the Byzantine empire. b. the Holy Roman empire. c. the Catholic church. d. the...

Words: 2581 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Nation-State

...RISE OF THE NATION STATE State, Nation, and Nation-state The present-day layout of the world’s political map is a product of humanities endless politico-geographic accommodations and adjustments. A mosaic of more than 200 states and territories separated by boundaries makes the world looks like a jigsaw puzzle. Human territoriality refers to a country’s (or more local community’s) sense of property and attachment toward its territory, expressed by its determination to keep it inviolable and defended. A state is a politically organized territory, administered by a government, and recognized by the international community. A state must also contain a permanent population, an organized economy, and a functioning internal circulation system (infrastructure). Since certain countries have internal divisions, the solution is to capitalize “State” (e.g. State of Florida, State of Uttar Pradesh India)). When used for the formally independent political units, the term country and state are interchangeable. A nation, by contrast, is a tightly knit group of people possessing bonds of language, religion, ethnicity, and/or other shared cultural attributes. Theoretically, a nation-state is a recognized country possessing formal sovereignty and occupied by a people who see themselves as a single, united nation. In only a handful of countries do state territories largely coincide with the distribution of people who feel they are part of one nation. Iceland, Portugal, Denmark, and Poland are...

Words: 2992 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Progression of Church and State Relations

...heavily dependent on many events, but several historical factors were very influential in this time period such as; Charlemagne being crowned Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, church participation in feudalism, lay investiture, simony, and finally the Concordat of Worms. These topics are the major factors that outline the evolution of church and state relations so their effects will be discussed in great detail throughout this paper. Charles Augustus being crowned emperor by Pope Leo III most definitely marks the beginning of church relations in the given time period. Charles Augustus along with many previous Frankish rulers had constantly fought for the Christian church, preserving it throughout its many vulnerable time periods. Charles Martel held back the Muslim invasion while Peppin had succeeded in subduing the Lombards. Charles Augustus only continued the French’s support of the Christian church by conquering many German tribes, and then converting them to Christianity. All the while Augustus also had enforced a tithe, or 10% tax on the income of all Christians to benefit church properties and support them materially. Pope Leo III crowning Augustus also showed the Rome's independence from the Greeks in Constantinople. Since the days of Constantine things had changed extremely, the eastern part of the Roman Empire had greatly increased...

Words: 1836 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

The French Revolution

...leading Italian intellectuals (D) scholarly interest in the study of the classical cultures of Greece and Rome (E) non-Christian themes that became prominent in Italian art and literature 3. Which of the following beliefs was central to Martin Luther's religious philosophy? (A) Salvation by faith alone (B) Saints as intermediaries between the individual Christian and God (C) The sacrament of penance (D) The priesthood defined as distinct from the laity (E) The equality of men and women 4. During the Thirty Years' War, France pursued a policy of: (A) supporting the Hapsburgs against the Protestant princes and rulers (B) allowing French Protestants to fight for the Protestants even though the monarchy supported the Roman Catholics (C) supporting the Protestant princes and rulers against the Hapsburgs (D) remaining neutral (E) opposing England in order to recapture Normandy 5. Which of the following most accurately describes the political system of the Dutch republic of the seventeenth century? (A) Popular democracy (B) Rule by an absolute monarch (C) Rule by wealthy merchants (D) Control by feudal lords (E) Rule by yeoman farmers 6 The enclosure movement in eighteenth-century England did...

Words: 1884 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

21212121212121212121fdsfdfsdfs

...Reflections Important Questions Q.1 Why is it insular for European historians to term the centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire “The Dark Ages”?  Ans. Although the term “The Dark Ages” is generally applied to the early medieval period of Western European history, specifically, it refers to the time (476-800) when there was no Holy Roman Emperor, or the time (500-1500) when there were frequent warfare and a virtual disappearance of urban life. In either case, it was only the Christened Europe which was going through a period of intellectual darkness and barbarity. The Muslim world, as well as Spain, and the Chinese Empire were both culturally brilliant and geographically extensive. Thus, Bertrand Russell in the chapter ‘Reflections of the Re-awakening East’ says that it is the narrow outlook of the Europeans to term this period “The Dark Ages”.  Q.2 On what grounds does the author argue that Communism is the “most modern and virulent form of Western Imperialism”?  Ans. In the chapter ‘Reflections on the Re-awakening East’ Bertrand Russell argues that Communism is the most modern and bitterly hostile form of Western policy to establish their political and economic hegemony over other nations. He says that although Communism is not widely recognized in either the East or the West, it is wiping out the ancient and glorious traditions of civilization in Asia. He also says that China has been greatly affected by it and advises the other Asian countries that re-awakening...

Words: 938 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Whh Vocab

...the hands of a hereditary ruling class of nobility 5. Democracy- A government in which decisions are based upon either directly from the people or through representatives 6. Monarchy- A government in which one person, or monarch, is in power 7. Republic- A form of government in which power is in the hands of representatives and leaders are elected by citizens who have the right to vote 8. 12 Tables- Basis for Roman Law written on tablets and established the idea that all free citizens had a right to the protection of the law 9. Consul-One of the two powerful officials is elected each year to command the army and direct a government 10. Tribunes- An official elected by the plebeians to protect their right, themselves were patricians 11. Social Contract theory- The agreement by which people define and limit their own individual rights, thus creating an organized society or government 12. Justinian- Responsible for the Byzantine Empire, the emperor, who also moved the capital to Byzantine 13. Hagia Sophia- the greatest Christian building in the Byzantine empire The Middle Ages 1. Carolingian Dynasty- Frankish rulers who held power near present day Germany and France, originated by Charlemagne and later Charles Martel, 2/3 major C’s of the time- Clovis was the 3rd 2. Charlemagne- Crowned emperor by pope Leo III on Christmas Day because of his actions to protect Italy from Lombard and to drive the Muslims out of Spain 3. Canon law- Church law 4. Lay...

Words: 769 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Napolean

...destroyed by the British at the Battle of the Nile. France now faced a new coalition - Austria and Russia had allied with Britain. Napoleon returned to Paris where the government was in crisis. In a coup d'etat in November 1799, Napoleon became first consul. In 1802, he was made consul for life and two years later, emperor. He oversaw the centralisation of government, the creation of the Bank of France, the reinstatement of Roman Catholicism as the state religion and law reform with the Code Napoleon. In 1800, he defeated the Austrians at Marengo. He then negotiated a general European peace which established French power on the continent. In 1803, Britain resumed war with France, later joined by Russia and Austria. Britain inflicted a naval defeat on the French at Trafalgar (1805) so Napoleon abandoned plans to invade England and turned on the Austro-Russian forces, defeating them at Austerlitz later the same year. He gained much new territory, including annexation of Prussian lands which ostensibly gave him control of Europe. The Holy Roman Empire was dissolved, Holland and Westphalia created, and over the next five years, Napoleon's relatives and loyalists were installed as leaders (in Holland, Westphalia, Italy, Naples, Spain and Sweden). In 1810, he had his childless marriage to Josephine de Beauharnais annulled and married the daughter of the Austrian emperor in the hope of having an heir. A son, Napoleon, was born a year...

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Gkt1

...2014 Task 2 Martin Luther (1483-1546) was a Catholic Monk and German patriot who challenged the Catholic Church and brought about significant social and political change. He was a powerful individual that changed the course of history without politics or government affiliation (Wilson, 2007, p. 34). Luther believed that anyone who possessed a bible should be able to read it and guide his own religion. He thought the Church corrupt for selling absolution, thereby releasing sinners from punishment in the afterlife. This took power away from the church. He was so convicted in this thought that he translated the Bible into German and had the New Testament printed in 1522 and the Old Testament in 1534. By challenging the Pope and the Holy Roman Empire, he in fact challenged political authority. By giving lay people access to the Bible, learning became something they could treasure. In 1524 Luther urged authorities in Germany to establish schools for all children. This social change became evident in 1580 when half the parishes in Electoral Saxony had elementary schools for boys. Ten percent had even made similar provisions for girls (Wilson, 2007, p. 37). “Indeed, no one more than Martin Luther resembles the flawed hero of which the sacred text affords so many examples”(Wilson, 2007, p. 39). Martin Luther was a significant mechanism in social and political changes in the 16th Century and beyond. Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906) was an American teacher, activist and lecturer. She...

Words: 496 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Chapter 5

... Michelle Hicks EDF 2085 Professor Blaine November 14, 2012 History The most important facts that can be found about Germany are connected to wars. The World Wars were a disaster for Germany. It led to the divide of Germany. One of the major theme of German history, according to William Spencer (1994) is division. This seems to be a common occurrence but doesn’t represent a departure from German history. Spencer noted that Germany has had difficulty during its 2000 year history in becoming a nation-state and maintaining that form, even with the development of a strong ethnic and national identity. The Holy Roman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Empire have been apart of Germany. Germany in its early history resisted being taken over by the Roman Empire. In 1871, a separate German Empire was created but not until Bismarck. The German state remained even after losing in World War I. Germany became two separate entities after World War II including the representation of the opposite hegemonies which was directed by the United States and the Soviet Union. (Germany then and now, 1994) Politics Germany started out as tribes but now has the third largest economy in the world and the largest in Europe. The country went through several rulers or ruling parties. Germany has become a federal, parliamentary, representative democratic republic. Germany follows the 1949 constitutional document called the...

Words: 1620 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Kazmaier Genealogy

...The name Kazmaier is most certainly derived from an estate or a grange which either directly was named Kazmaier but more likely Kast(n)maier. It is likely that this farm was a so called "Maierhof" or "Mayerhof" (from Latin: maiores villae), a farm, estate, grange or building which was occupied or had been occupied by the administrator (the "Maier") of a noble or ecclesiastical estate, belonging to the "Hofkastenamt", collecting and administrating the revenue of the territorial lord. In the centuries after 1600 the name Kazmaier occurs very frequently in the German country of Württemberg. Before 1600 the name mostly appears, although in different spellings, in Bavaria. In Munich the Katzmairs are detectable from 1318 being members of the council. Most famous Georg Katzmair as the author of "Muenchen unter der Vierherzog-Regierung 1397-1403". With Georg III. Katzmair (son of Niklas Katzmair 1480-1523) in 1533 the house Katzmair in Munich dies off. A 1506 born illegitimate son of Jacob II. Katzmair (Niklas' younger brother) did not leave traces. He might have kept the name and carried it forward. In 1607 the first German-speaking immigrant to America, Dr. Johannes Fleischer, arrived in Jamestown, Virginia. Five glassmakers and three carpenters or house builders from Germany followed him in 1608. Germantown in Pennsylvania, founded on October 6, 1683 became the first permanent German settlement. In the ensuing centuries, nearly 7 million of Fleischer's compatriots would follow...

Words: 1252 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Michael Praetorius

...Duke and his court musicians. He was also the secretary for the Duke. He was appointed honorary prior of the Ringelheim Monastery near Goslar. The year before his death, Michael’s health started to decline rapidly and he was dismissed from his position as Kappellmeister because the quality of music was going down. Michael died on February 15, 1621, his 50th birthday in Wolfenbuttel, Germany and left his fortune to charity. His final resting place after his death is beneath the St. Mary’s church in Wofenbuttel, Germany. He had become famous as a composer of Church music. His first composition was in 1602-1603 while he was in his early thirties. Michael started writing some of them when Regenburg was the parliament seat for the Holy Roman Empire. Taking after his father and grandfather’s Lutheran religious believes, he wrote over 1000 songs used in the Lutheran services. Michael wrote three volumes about the art of music named “Syntagma Musician.” This large collection of music had detailed information on instruments and their performing practice which is of great value. Michael was passionate for advancements in music. He admired Italian music and had a liking for rich and various...

Words: 630 - Pages: 3