...While humans and primates are related in many ways, there are distinct characteristics for hominids. The most unique characteristic difference that separates hominids and non-human primates is bipedalism. While hominids walk on two feet, non-human primates are quadrupedal, using all fours to get around. Multiple experiments were conducted to identify between the advantages and disadvantages of being bipedal. The first experiment involved observing human and non-human primates and their difference in methods of locomotion. All of the people observed used two feet to get around. At the same time they all made use of their hands whether it was the biker steering his bicycle or the multiple people on holding their cell phones. On the other hand, the video of the gorilla demonstrated quadrupedalism. While the gorilla was able to go from walking slowly to running on all fours, it was unable to use its hands for other tasks. The gorilla demonstrated knuckle walking because they have many wrist and forearm features that allow them to do so (Hirji, 2009). Through observations in the video as well as at the zoo, it was easy to see that non-human primates do not have a skeletal structure that is specialized in bipedal locomotion. All in all bipedalism is necessary in order to carry objects and complete other tasks while moving. Therefore, the human body was able to evolve to compensate for bipedal locomotion. The next station involved putting the observations from station one into...
Words: 870 - Pages: 4
...parabolic shape of humans and the rectangular shape of apes. Their pelvis was bowl shaped which indicate that they were bipedal. Their legs were shorter and they were more adapted to walking than running (Leakey 1994). Their first toe was in line with the other toes (Ward, 2002; Harcourt-Smith and Aiello, 2004). Their forearm, toes and fingers were long and curved which suggests that they used trees regularly to forage and to refuge from predators at night. Their body size was small. Males weighed about 40kgs and females about 30kgs (McHenry, 1992).Their height ranged between 107 and 152cm. Works cited Foley, Jim. “Hominid Species,” http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/species.html, 04/30/2010 McHenry, H.M. Body size and proportions in early hominids. American journal of physical anthropology(1992)...
Words: 311 - Pages: 2
...the years as bipedalism. We humans take this form of stance for granted, not fully understanding its importance. Compared to other stances, such as quadrupedalism, bipedalism serves us a better in many areas. Here we will look at the the advantages of walking upright Many theories have been said about how early hominids began evolving their stance from quadrupedal to bipedal. Charles Darwin, for example, claimed that we stood up to free our hands for tool making (Douglas 2012). Others say that our evolution began up in the trees where we see other primates, such as orangutans, walk bipedal to get fruit. Another is the idea of “carrying,” here we see other primates go from a qudrapedal position to a bipedal position when carrying something of importance (offspring, food, tool). All of these theories have something in common, each shows how advantageous it is to be bipedal and it could be said that these advantages helped our ancestors survive. One possible explanation for the development of bipedalism, is our search for food. Here the argument is that 5 million years ago, fruit trees in Africa were spreading further and further apart from one another. Hominids would have to walk with their young to find fruit trees, this caused a great deal of discomfort for the females, so the solution was to have the monogamous male do the travel while the female stayed put taking care of the young (Lovejoy 1984). By gathering food in a bipedal position our ancestors carried it over to...
Words: 560 - Pages: 3
...An Evolutionary Fork: Fossil Record Evidence of Humanity and Its Variation From the Primate The early history of humans (homo-sapiens) is a contentious and heavily debated subject in the scientific community. Exactly when and from which ancestry our species evolved is a topic of speculation that many disagree on. What most in the scientific community can almost unanimously agree on is that homo-sapiens did indeed evolve from lesser beings. There is no shortage of fossil record indicating evolution as a force in this world’s early progression. The real debate begins with when humans arrived in the fossil record themselves. The function of this essay will be to first designate which characteristics define and distinguish humans from other animals and in particular other primates. Second it will serve to discuss the earliest fossil records of humanity and their significance scientifically. These conclusions will seek to provide a viable definition for the above posed question of the evolutionary root of homo-sapiens. In order to determine when humans first began showing up in fossil records one must assign humans recognizable and unique characteristics that can distinguish them from other primates that may have been similar in appearance and structure to homo-sapiens’ early ancestors. Prior to that designation though, one must ascertain why the distinction must be made at all. Why must a clear distinction be made from other primates and not from early reptiles or other...
Words: 1673 - Pages: 7
...Bipedalism Through the use of experimental studies, it can be concluded that locomotion in human beings showed that the evolution of bipedalism was more an intricate transformation rather than a simple transition from quadrapedalism. These studies also suggested that bipedalism first came about from an arboreal ancestor, rather than a terrestrial, land ancestor. 1. A 2007 study suggests that energy was the primary reason why bipedalism (walking on two legs) arose from quadrapedalism (walking on four legs or ‘knuckle walking’). Because of the reduction in energy expended from walking on two legs, it is suggested that this provided evolutionary advantages, and allowed chimpanzees to better accommodate to the varying terrestrial phenomena. It’s concluded that the smaller the chimpanzees steps, the greater the energy it uses. From the data gathered in the report it can be assumed that energy consumption in chimpanzees played a significant role in the transition from quadrapedalism to bipedalism. The findings allow researchers to examine adaptations such as the lengthening of limbs that may have contributed to the evolution of bipedalism in chimpanzees. 2. A second study from the University of Illinois which involved the study of biomechanics, that is, locomotion, joint movement and stress in bones and limbs assumes a dissimilar perspective to the notion put forward above. The hypothesis that is reached by a team of paleoanthropologists is that the evolution of upright...
Words: 597 - Pages: 3
...In a search to find our ancestors, several anthropologists have found evidence to support their conclusions. In the films about Don Johanson's discovery of Lucy in Hadar, one may be very intrigued by the first film but very disturbed by the second film. I was very intrigued by the findings of the Australopithecines. The idea that Lucy, the skeleton found in Hadar, Africa, was closely related to the human species was amazing. Lucy was bipedal and her brain was smaller than that of modern humans. Lucy resembled an ape and was able to make tools to find food and weapons. Hadar, Africa was believed to be a heavily vegetated area but had evolved into a dry and desolate desert. After Lucy died, it was difficult to find her remains due to erosion and sediment in the body of water in which she died. Johanson and his team worked were able to use the advancement of technology to calculate about how old Lucy's remains were. The second film by Johanson seemed to disturb me because it discussed how some believe that all primates are killers and it portrayed this idea in film and in television. I disagree with the idea that all primates are predators and are always hunting harmless animals and destroying things. I understand that some primates must rely on hunting as a source of survival but I believe the portrayal of primates as barbaric in the film was unnecessary. In the second film, the primates were shown destroying piles of bones and throwing large objects. Johanson's...
Words: 556 - Pages: 3
...appeal to emotion, and ethos is an appeal to ethics. Both, Shostak, Seth in “Why Hominids and Space Go Together” which he argues that humans are the better choice in space exploration than robots and Logsdon, John M in “American Patrimony” where he makes the point to say that space exploration should continue, use these appeals to persuade their readers to believe the way they do about their topics. While Logsdon appeals to pathos, I believe Shostak executes his appeals to persuade his audience through all the different appeals was superior to Logsdons. In “Why Hominids and Space Go Together” Shostak using his appeal to logos, which may be a small appearance in the article, to persuade his audience. He states “When it comes to looking for life on Mars, it’s been said that a human explorer could survey that world’s rusty landscape at least 10 times faster than a rover.” While in Logsdon's “American Patrimony” has no formal logic that has to do with any math, philosophy, or computer science....
Words: 648 - Pages: 3
...discipline like paleontology, but thus far the search for early hominids outside of Africa has been pursed without success. For now we may assume that these early hominids did not stray to any meaningful degree, unlike earlier apes and later hominids. (Finch, 2011) Africa is said to be the motherland of all human beings along with the hominids that were before them. Some believe that as hominids reached the homo erectus stage they begun to populate the rest of the world and formed into homo sapiens through parallel evolution. While on the other hand there is a belief that hominids stayed in Africa up until the homo sapiens stage and populated the rest of the world because they were advanced enough to do so. It is uncountable evidence to support that all human life comes from Africa. The large debate is; the belief that hominids evolved in the continent Africa until they reached the homo sapiens stage versus the belief that hominids left Africa in the homo erects stage and walk out of Africa through parallel evolution and formed into the homo sapiens stage. Evolution took place in Africa for hominids up until the homo sapiens and at that point they were intelligent and well equipped enough to begin to walk out of Africa and populate the rest of the world. (Finch, 2011). There is no doubt that the hominids that existed early in history still exist to this day, but just in a different form. As times changes hominids evolve along with other life forms. Paleoanthropologists have...
Words: 1790 - Pages: 8
...educate the audience on what a crucial puzzle piece Lucy has come to be to anthropologist everywhere. First I will explain who found Lucy, where she was discovered, and when she was uncovered. I will then write about Lucy herself. I will describe her age, size, and how her gender was determined. Last but not least, I will explain how we know Lucy is a hominid, where she lies in the hominid line, and the significance of Lucy’s discovery to anthropology. Lucy On the morning of November 24th, 1974, Dr. Donald Johanson found the remains of a hominid that would shake the world of anthropology. Then a University professor, Johanson was on an expedition to Hadar, Ethiopia. Although this site was a proven haven of early fossil remains, Johanson had no idea he was about to make the discovery of a lifetime. Dr. Donald Johanson’s discovery of Australopithecus afarensis in Hadar, Ethiopia is a crucial piece to the puzzle of the human family tree. In this paper, I will not only discuss the 3.18 million year old “Lucy”, but I will also explain the significance of her revolutionary discovery to the world of anthropology and the hominid line. Being several weeks into his third expedition to Hadar, Ethiopia, finding Lucy was no small feat for Dr. Johanson. At the time, Johanson was a professor at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland who had visited this site several times before (Andrews, 2014). Johanson decided on a hunch to accompany Gray on a trip to scout a nearby site...
Words: 1375 - Pages: 6
...Jeffrey Domond Biology 112 Human Origins Around six or seven million years ago in Africa, our first members of our human family the Hominidae was created in Africa. During through the six or seven million years ago, they spent much of their time in trees, like there close relatives the primates. Once the early hominids went on ground they stood and walk on two feet. That separated them and the primates. Homo sapiens evolved in Africa more than 150,000 years ago. To understand the history on how did human evolved and how they adapt to their setting. Scientist relies on evidence including fossils, artifacts, and DNA analysis. By understanding these clues and exploring the data it is clear how much we are evolved from one period to the next. In the exbiht Human Origins at the Natural History Museum fossils and DNA gave clues about the earliest members of the human family. Humans were thought to be most related to chimpanzees and bonobos. But the DNA of humans and chimpanzees is 98% the same and 2% different. Many scientists believed the 2% occurred when hominids evolved from living in trees to adapted living on the ground. DNA is considered the identifying mark of a living system such as the human evolution tree. The DNA code is complex in its basic structure. DNA is a double helix structure molecule. It’s like a long ladder and twisted into a spiral structure. DNA molecules are sugar and phosphate forms the sides of the ladder. DNA has four bases: adenine, thymine, guanine...
Words: 1192 - Pages: 5
...the first hominids. These subject attracts me a lot since they are the origin of human beings, that is, us. We may have evolved a lot over the years, but it is clear that we still share very important characteristics with the first hominids. Regarding the theory of the Big Bang, the great explosion that created matter, energy, time and space, therefore, the origin of the universe about 13,500 million years ago; or the formation of the planet Earth about 3.8 billion years ago, the 70,000 years of action of us, the Homo Sapiens, and its development can be considered a really short time. It is likely that the most immediate ancestors of contemporary primates have been a relatively unknown group of insectivores...
Words: 1642 - Pages: 7
...social, ground dwellers new world = south and central america long tail, shorter thumbs or absent, aboreal, nostrils flat and open to side & social hominOIDS descended: old world monkeys 23-24 mya larger brain lack tail apes -gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees humans- a group composed of apes, and hominIDS (humans and their ancestors) hominids differences part 1 ape vs humans difference between apes and humans: humans: 1) complex curvature of the spine 2) shorter, broader pelvis 3) foramen magnum at base of skull 4) first toe aligned with other toe hominids differences part 2 ape vs humans human vs gorilla heads 1. human skull lacks the supraorbital ridge 2. has a pronounced chin 3. human brain is larger 4. teeth are arranged in a U shape Sahelantropus tchadensis earliest known hominid, small brain, face and teeth had many char. of larger brained human ancestors. mix ape and huminid features MORE human than ape Orrorin early hominid - about 6 mya probably walked upright and was bipedal based on fossil leg bones Australopithecines include: ardipithecus and australopithecus species australopithecus species- bipedal ( a hominid feature) Genus Homo Genus Australopithecus contains the immediate ancestors of...
Words: 765 - Pages: 4
...used to transport food to a mate and offspring is seen as a strong selection factor for bipedality by directly improving offspring survivorship and increasing reproductive rate.” * This hypothesis based on sexual preference, generally. Due to the drought that happened 5 million years ago in the East of Africa, hominids had to look for new sources of food. As the male would be away for a long duration due to his search for food, monogamy was passed in order to keep his woman not to be involved with other men. His responsibility would mean, he would have to provide for his woman and carry the food. The man was able to carry it because his hands were free and walking bipedally instead of walking quadrupedally. On the Lookout Theory * Original Name: Vigilance Hypothesis * Theory by: Raymond Dart * “Raymond Dart's vigilance hypothesis described a situation where early hominids who stood upright would have the benefit of seeing over tall savanna grass (Dart 1926). This would allow them to see predators from a distance. Additionally, their other sense organs would be elevated with bipedalism.” * This hypothesis/theory states that early hominids stood upright in order to have a better view of what’s over the tall savanna grass and would allow them to see possible predators coming from a distance. As one stands upright over the grass, the upper body will be elevated and only 2 limbs will support you from the ground....
Words: 778 - Pages: 4
...closely related species evolved from one ancestor. Man and ape evolved from a common ancestor. Natural selection was the mechanism for evolutionary change. Over time the characteristics of the fittest species gradually changed over time through generations to survive the environment around them. Humans evolved in Africa and shared a common ancestor with chimps and apes which lived millions of years ago. This common ancestor diverged over time which formed different types of species of hominid. Homo sapiens make up today’s society, the other species of hominids became extinct. The know how of some of our early relatives is known because of fossil evidence, and our understanding of our family tree grows as new fossils are revealed. These fossils show that modern humans are part of a large human evolutionary family. Some distinctive features of H. sapiens the modern human have large brains, adapted to walk on two feet, a small or absent brow ridge and a small chin on the lower chin. Some of the hominids found that are believed to be our ancestors are Australopithecus afarensis, Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis and Homo floresiensis. Australopithecus afarensis is one of the oldest early human relative that was bipedalism which shared characteristics with H. sapiens, this is known because of where the spinal cord sits under the skull. It’s thought to have lived between four and three million two hundred thousand years ago in Eastern Africa. ‘Lucy’ was an...
Words: 979 - Pages: 4
...process still existing today and are we still evolving into another species? First of all, humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans share a common ancestor with modern African apes (similar gorillas and chimpanzees). Scientists believe that this human related ancestor existed 5 to 8 million years ago. There after, these ancestor species were separated into two separate ancestries. One of these ancestries evolved into gorillas and chimpanzees and the other evolved into early human ancestors called Hominids. In other words, these common ancestors that separated over time, formed a number of distinctive species of hominid. Only one of the hominid species survived to become modern humans that we are today. Natural selection led the surviving species (hominids) into evolutionary change. The surviving species had certain characteristics to have greater survival than other species in a population and pass these transferrable genetic characteristic to their off spring. The rest of the hominids, including early humans, became extinct. They became extinct because they were...
Words: 480 - Pages: 2