...How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525? Explain your answer, using the evidence shown in Sources 1,2 and 3. I believe that sources 1 and 3 both do strongly support the statement that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525. Whereas, source 2 both supports and does not support the statement. All of the sources do suggest that there was unrest towards the grant and that the duke was very worried about the consequences that may occur. Firstly, source one agrees with the statement that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525 because firstly, in source one it suggests ‘show the dissatisfaction prevailing’ which shows us the dissatisfaction that some people felt because of grant, mainly due to the amount of money they had to pay. This source relates well to source three because in source three the first line says ‘The people plead their poverty’ which shows us that like in source one there is resistance too many other taxes to pay so creating this one has caused an unwanted outburst from the people because of the amount that they have to pay. Also source supports source one because it reads in source three ‘arose up in arms against the commissioner’ this shows us that there was considerable resistance against the Amicable Grant as stated also in source one with the quote ‘other parliamentary grants are still to be paid’. Source one was written by the Archbishop of Canterbury...
Words: 1030 - Pages: 5
...How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525? Explain your answer, using the evidence shown in Sources 1,2 and 3. I believe that sources 1 and 3 both do strongly support the statement that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525. Whereas, source 2 both supports and does not support the statement. All of the sources do suggest that there was unrest towards the grant and that the duke was very worried about the consequences that may occur. Firstly, source one agrees with the statement that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant in 1525 because firstly, in source one it suggests ‘show the dissatisfaction prevailing’ which shows us the dissatisfaction that some people felt because of grant, mainly due to the amount of money they had to pay. This source relates well to source three because in source three the first line says ‘The people plead their poverty’ which shows us that like in source one there is resistance too many other taxes to pay so creating this one has caused an unwanted outburst from the people because of the amount that they have to pay. Also source supports source one because it reads in source three ‘arose up in arms against the commissioner’ this shows us that there was considerable resistance against the Amicable Grant as stated also in source one with the quote ‘other parliamentary grants are still to be paid’. Source one was written by the Archbishop of Canterbury...
Words: 1030 - Pages: 5
...How far do the sources suggest that there was considerable resistance to the Amicable Grant of 1525? Explain your answer, using the evidence of sources 1, 2 and 3 Sources 1 and 3 agree that there was considerable reistance to the Amicable Grant of 1525, however source 2 suggest that there was conformity to the Amicable grant Source 1 agrees that there was a considerable resistance to the amicable grant of 1525, as it says ‘Reports for the secret ears of the Cardinal, show the dissatisfaction prevailing.’ This suggests that people are unhappy with the amicable grant and there’s growing rest in payments. In comparison to source 1, source 2 disagrees that there was a resistance to the Amicable Grant. Source 2 states that ‘People now conform to king’s request’ this suggest that people are happy to pay the tax this also shows that there was no resistance to the grant and that the ‘clergy will not fail to pay double’. This suggests that people have changed their mind and are happy to pay. However this source is coming from ‘Suffolk’ where people are conforming and paying the tax, whereas in Kent people are refusing to conform to the king’s request. This suggests that people are acting differently in different areas of England. Similarly, source 3 Agrees with source 1; it suggests that people were not comfortable with the amicable grant as they ‘arose up in arms against the commissioners’. Source 1 has been written by Archbishop of Canterbury, William Warham to Wolsey. Warham...
Words: 364 - Pages: 2
...Henry VIII Revision Guide 1 How to answer questions on the Tudors Section A Essays: How far do the sources agree that? Introduction: Explain what you can learn from each source Briefly cross reference the sources Provide an argument in response to the question Main paragraphs: State a similarity or difference between the sources – make sure you focus on ‘How Far’ Select relevant information from the sources to support this point Place this in context using your brief own knowledge Use provenance to explain this similarity/difference Conclusion: Sum up how far the sources agree based on content and provenance Section B Essays: Do you agree with the view that? Introduction: State your line of argument – how far do you agree with the view? State the main similarities and differences between the sources Main paragraphs: State a reason for yes/no. Make sure you phrase this in a way that links to your line of argument and answers the question. Remember that each source will suggest a different reason for yes/no. Support this reason with evidence from the sources and your own knowledge Cross-reference between the sources Weigh up the evidence of the sources. Consider provenance for primary sources and judge secondary sources based on the evidence included and the weight given to certain evidence Link back to your line of argument Conclusion: Explain how your argument has been proven with reference to the sources and your own knowledge Unit...
Words: 34668 - Pages: 139