Premium Essay

Huck Finn's Discrimination Against Society

Submitted By
Words 983
Pages 4
Although characters can distance themselves from society, they are never truly free from it. Through this, the state when Huck and Jim were on the canoe is shown to be temporary and incomplete; temporary in the way that Huck’s canoe was literally crushed by the steamboat. Readers know that Huck is not truly independent and complete on the canoe because either when or after he makes his decisions, he always thinks of society. After he had helped the robbers, he remarks “I wished the widow knowed about it. I judged she would be proud of me for helping these rapscallions.” So not only does he sympathize with the robbers, he still thinks about society even when on the canoe, which emphasizes its incompleteness. He may be separated from society …show more content…
For instance, when the mob goes on a crusade to Sherburn’s house, he, a powerful colonel, does not back away and apologize for his actions, which is something that the mob expects and the social value of obedience demands. Instead, he delivers a long soliloquy about how they are all cowards who merely follow each other. “A mob without any man at the head of it is beneath pitifulness.” This speech changes the audience’s mind, and they all leave Sherburn in peace, acknowledging his words. Sherburn’s victory over the mob represents a true victory over the social norm of obedience to society. He confronts the expectations placed on him and wins. Moreover, when the Wilks’s doctor is the only person who sees through the King and Duke’s charade, he calls them out. Although he is not successful at first, he persists in his conviction and ultimately proves them to be “fraud[s]”. He never steers towards the mob’s opinion, even though it coaxes and urges him. A similar situation occurs in the end. Once again, a mob of farmers, vow to lynch Jim, a runaway slave; however, the prestigious doctor convinces them otherwise. He declares, “ Don’t be no rougher on him than you’re obleeged to, because he ain’t a bad nigger.” This example also shows how the doctor voices his opinion, allows Jim to survive, and ultimately reverses society’s stance, who then treat Jim like a

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Huck Finn: Comparing and Contrasting the Controversies Surrounding Banning Books

...Huck Finn: Comparing and Contrasting the Controversies Surrounding Banning Books The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, deemed one of the great American novels, was published by Mark Twain in 1884. From the start, this novel has sparked a lot of negative criticism. There were heated debates among critics, and in schools debating whether or not to ban this controversial piece of literature. In today's society, this book still offends sensitive readers, because it was written in a time when people were not sensitive to the plight of African Americans. Just a month after it was published, The Concord, library in Massachusetts banned all copies stating that it was “Not suitable for trash.” (Ruta1) It was believed, that racism was at the heart of this book, and the content was, and still viewed as being harsh. Louisa May Alcott was a popular author who served on the very first library committee in Massachusetts, where The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was banned. She voted against this book from being sold, read or viewed. Criticizing Mark Twain saying that "Huck should not sweat. He should perspire." (Ruta1) Other libraries began removing their copies stating that it is inappropriate for children to read. The number of concerned citizens continue to debate on this subject today. Derogatory words are seen throughout this story in reference to showcase the difference between the two classes, white verses black. This book not only celebrates an unlikely friendship between...

Words: 2006 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Literary Theory

...Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction ‘Jonathan Culler has always been about the best person around at explaining literary theory without oversimplifying it or treating it with polemical bias. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction is an exemplary work in this genre.’ J. Hillis Miller, University of California, Irvine ‘An impressive and engaging feat of condensation . . . the avoidance of the usual plod through schools and approaches allows the reader to get straight to the heart of the crucial issue for many students, which is: why are they studying literary theory in the first place? . . . an engaging and lively book.’ Patricia Waugh, University of Durham Very Short Introductions are for anyone wanting a stimulating and accessible way in to a new subject. They are written by experts, and have been published in 15 languages worldwide. Very Short Introductions available from Oxford Paperbacks: ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY Julia Annas THE ANGLO-SAXON AGE John Blair ARCHAEOLOGY Paul Bahn ARISTOTLE Jonathan Barnes Augustine Henry Chadwick THE BIBLE John Riches Buddha Michael Carrithers BUDDHISM Damien Keown CLASSICS Mary Beard and John Henderson Continental Philosophy Simon Critchley Darwin Jonathan Howard DESCARTES Tom Sorell EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITAIN Paul Langford The European Union John Pinder Freud Anthony Storr Galileo Stillman Drake Gandhi Bhikhu Parekh HEIDEGGER Michael Inwood HINDUISM Kim Knott HISTORY John H. Arnold HUME A. J...

Words: 45107 - Pages: 181

Free Essay

Literature

...Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction ‘Jonathan Culler has always been about the best person around at explaining literary theory without oversimplifying it or treating it with polemical bias. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction is an exemplary work in this genre.’ J. Hillis Miller, University of California, Irvine ‘An impressive and engaging feat of condensation . . . the avoidance of the usual plod through schools and approaches allows the reader to get straight to the heart of the crucial issue for many students, which is: why are they studying literary theory in the first place? . . . an engaging and lively book.’ Patricia Waugh, University of Durham Jonathan Culler LITERARY THEORY A Very Short Introduction 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford o x2 6 d p Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Shanghai Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw with associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Jonathan Culler 1997 The moral rights...

Words: 44695 - Pages: 179