4.2 This section seeks to present the findings and analysis to Research Question #2, “What needs to be done to improve the assessment of IPSP Bayanihan?”
To answer this question, the tools used are document analysis and KII. The primary documents analyzed are the IPSP Bayanihan Assessment Plan (2011) and the Campaign Assessment Template (2012). The KII and supplement the result of the document analysis.
4.2.1 Findings
4.2.1.1 IPSP Bayanihan Assessment Plan
As stated in the document, the IPSP Bayanihan Assessment Plan “shall guide the GHQ in evaluating the progress and effectiveness of the IPSP Bayanihan to ensure that the AFP is doing the right things towards attaining the strategic end state. It shall also guide the Unified Command (UCs) in their formulation and implementation of respective assessment plan to evaluate the progress and effectiveness of their respective campaign.” …show more content…
Campaign assessment measures the progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the IPSP toward mission accomplishment, using the MOE-indicator framework. This is conducted by the UCs to aid them to make timely and necessary adjustments in their campaign plan to better attain the campaign objectives. Meanwhile, functional assessment is undertaken to evaluate accomplishment of the tasks under the IPSP strategic concept and is conducted by functional staffs at the GHQ level, using the MOP-indicator framework. While the assessment plan specifies assessment criteria for the campaign assessment (as guide of the UCs), it does not specify assessment criteria for the functional assessment (as guide of the GHQ Functional