I will be explaining the difference between the Inuit, Iroquois, and Haida.

Similarity: The Inuit and the Haida hunted (sea animals), but the Iroquois didn’t hunt. The Iroquois and the Haida both lived in a green grasslands , but the Inuit lived in a icy terrain with mounds of ice and snow. All of the tribes made clothing. The Haida and the Inuit made shirts and coats while the Iroquois made shoes out of leather.
All the tribes used art to show tradition throughout their land. Inuit made tiny sculptures and masks. Haida made baskets and totem poles. And the Iroquois made clay pipes and masks.

Inuit: Inuit people were very good at hunting. They used bows and arrows and knives made out of bones which they used to kill the tough ones like seals. …show more content…
Eulachon oil was a major trade item for the Northwest Coast people. There were often disagreements between neighbouring groups, which could escalate into a full-fledged war. The most common cause of war was to acquire property (including land, chilkat blankets, copper, and slaves). However, full wars were often avoided, because in Northwest culture, most 'wrongs' could be righted by giving gifts.

Iroquois: Seneca, Onondaga, Oneida, Cayuga, Mohawk
Iroquois village locations were south of the Great Lakes. After the 1640s, they inhabited the north shores of the Great Lakes. The population of the Iroquois in the 1700s was about 12,000. There language was Iroquoian. For their transportation, snowshoes worn during winter allowed clan members to walk swiftly across the snow without sinking. They were made from tree boughs bent into frames and laced with animal sinew. These snowshoes made it easy to walk on top of snow that could be two or three feet deep. This way hunters could easily catch up to moose or deer that was floundering helplessly in the deep