In what way(s) does Jenna Wortham follow the Rogerian model and philosophy in her article?
Wortham followed the article by presenting both sides to an argument. She is not biased and seems as though she is willing to compromise over the issue of dating apps. In what way(s) does she NOT follow the Rogerian model and philosophy (ie. where does he lose objectivity or empathy/sensitivity to the issue at hand)? Originally, Wortham seemed as if she was following the Rogerian model until towards the end of her article. This can be a very effective strategy to win an argument. This strategy can make the opponent feel as though everybody is compromising so their guard is now down. Once she has established a common basis with opponent then she begins