...SOC 205 Assignment 1 The State Judicial Selection Process Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/soc-205-assignment-1-the-state-judicial-selection-process/ Assignment 1: The State Judicial Selection Process Due Week 5 and worth 200 points Each state within the United States has its own unique judicial selection process within its own court system. Using the Internet or Strayer databases, research the judicial selection process for different court systems from different states within the U.S. Court System. Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you: 1. Discuss the judicial selection process of your state. Include, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state. 2. Choose a second state, and describe the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state. 3. Compare and contrast for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, identify the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state. 4. Justify the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Justify the response. 5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: ...
Words: 399 - Pages: 2
...SOC 205 Assignment 1 The State Judicial Selection Process Click Link Below To Buy: http://hwcampus.com/shop/soc-205-assignment-1-the-state-judicial-selection-process/ Assignment 1: The State Judicial Selection Process Due Week 5 and worth 200 points Each state within the United States has its own unique judicial selection process within its own court system. Using the Internet or Strayer databases, research the judicial selection process for different court systems from different states within the U.S. Court System. Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you: 1. Discuss the judicial selection process of your state. Include, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state. 2. Choose a second state, and describe the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state. 3. Compare and contrast for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, identify the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state. 4. Justify the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Justify the response. 5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: ...
Words: 399 - Pages: 2
...1 The State Judicial Selection Process Juan Banuelos Professor Sheila Farr SOC205 08/02/2014 2 The judicial selection process can complex at times and many states have different requirements that are needed to become a judge. The two states that I chose for the judicial selection process are Texas and Missouri. The judicial process in Texas require certain qualifications to become a judge. The Texas constitution establishes basic qualifications before being selected. In the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court judges are required to have a license to practice law and must have been practicing law for ten years. Another requirement is that a judge needs to be a legal resident of the United States and a resident of Texas before being selected. In other states age requirements are not mandatory, but in Texas the age requirement is thirty-five years of age. District judges are required to have a licensed to practice law in Texas for at least four years and be a resident of the judicial district for two years, they must also be a resident of the State of Texas. In District Courts judges are to compete in partisan elections as well, the same for the Supreme Court if a vacancy occurs the Governor of Texas will appoint a replacement for the remainder of the term, again this is needed to be approved by the Senate. The requirement's to serve as a judge is to be a citizen of the United States. The nominee must have held a judicial district for two years, they also must...
Words: 2077 - Pages: 9
...SOC 205 The selection for judges is a very important task that voters usually are tasked to do to appoint judges to the courts in their states. However, Virginia and South Carolina are the only remaining states that use Legislative election as the way of selecting judges. Legislative election is where the judges are elected to the position by peer vote, not from residents of the state. In Virginia, this includes the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, the Circuit court, and the District Court of Virginia. Virginia’s courts are the court of limited jurisdiction meaning that they handle cases that derive from power from issuing authority, such as the Constitution or state law. The selection process as mentioned previous is done by legislative election where peers of the judges are deciding who is going to be appointed. As outlined in Article VI in the Virginia Constitution, judges are elected by a majority vote of the general assembly which is combined of the House of Delegates and the senate (judicialselection.us). To serve as a judge in the state of Virginia there are a few qualifications that must be met prior to becoming eligible for selection. Firstly, for selection as chief justice or chief judge, the potential judge must be a legal resident of the Virginia otherwise they will not be considered for a position as judge in the courts. Secondly, the nominee must be a state bar member for at least 5 years and not be older than seventy years of...
Words: 1498 - Pages: 6
...2 The State Judicial Process The State Judicial Selection Process Have you ever wondered how the judges within your state are chosen? The way a judge is chosen for the state varies from state to state, and there are a few ways they are put on the bench. One way for a judge to be put on the bench is to be appointed by the Governor or state legislature (FindLaw, 2012). A second way to choose a judge is through a merit selection. A merit selection is where a judge is chosen by a legislative committee based on each of the potential judge's performance in the past (FindLaw, 2012). A third way to get a judge on the bench is by a partisan election; in which a judge is selected through partisan elections that are voted in by the electorate, or voters registered to parties, because judges often run as part of a political party affiliate (FindLaw, 2012). A Non-Partisan Election is the final way to get on the bench. This is when the potential judges running for a judicial position in the states can put their names on the ballot, but they do not list their political party affiliates (National League of Cities, 2014). In the state of Florida, judges being elected for a term in the state trial courts of general jurisdiction are elected by way of a nonpartisan election (Carp, Stidham, & Manning, 2014). When judges are being selected for a term in the state courts of last resort, the state of Florida utilizes a merit selection (Carp, Stidham, & Manning, 2014). The length of...
Words: 1994 - Pages: 8
...Texas Judicial Assignment The Federalist Paper #78 written by Alexander Hamilton is about him trying to persuade the people of New York to ratify the U.S. Constitution for their own benefits among the support it can give them in the near future. The U.S. Constitution provides an election towards possible leaders to govern its people. This has reasons why Hamilton states that Judicial Branch is the least dangerous branch of government, because it carries out the decision of the president and the needs that the other two branches to use its power. As an example, when a judge breaks a law this enforces the Executive Branch to involve a law by uniting the other separate powers to work together. Some effects that the Judicial Branch is the least dangerous of all the three branches was created to separate and limit them over their powers to control the government. This helps each branch to have its individual power to make, enforce or carry them out to make a law in order to accomplish this they need each other’s support in making it possible....
Words: 776 - Pages: 4
...to build on the background that I have now and pursue a Bachelors degree and eventually a Law degree so that I can become a Justice of the Peace or Judge. This paper is about an interview with a local magistrate, Judge Keith L. Stoney of Utahʼs 3rd District for Salt Lake County Judicial, West Valley City and Saratoga Springs Justice Courts. The time, the education, the benefits and the sometimes lengthy process of what it takes to sit on the “Bench” are all covered in the following paragraphs. JOB TITLE ! The official title of the position that Judge Stoney holds is as follows: Honorable Judge Keith L. Stoney Utahʼs 3rd District for Salt Lake County Judicial, West Valley City Justice Judge. Judge Stoney also works as Saratoga Springs Justice Judge. To break this down let me try to explain in brief how Utahʼs court system is organized. At the top you have Utahʼs two appellate courts, the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. Next are the trial courts which include District, Justice and Juvenile Courts. There are also two administrative bodies, the Judicial of Council and the Administrative Office of the Court. Basically the policy making body of the courts. The state of Utah is divided into 8 judicial districts and in each of those districts there are Juvenile and Justice Courts. Judge Stoney is in the 3rd district and head Judge over the West Valley City Justice Court. BIOGRAPHY ! Before I go any further let me give a brief biography of Judge Stoney. Judge Stoney attended...
Words: 1965 - Pages: 8
...Professional Standards Research the Internet and locate at least one real-life example of each of the following: • Prosecutorial misconduct • Ineffective assistance by criminal defense counsel • Judicial misconduct Select and complete one of the following assignments: Option 1: Paper Option 2: Presentation Option 3: News Article Option 1: Paper Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you summarize each example and address the following questions: • What did the prosecutor do wrong? How does immunity protect the prosecutor from the consequences of his or her misconduct? • What did the criminal defense attorney do wrong? What is the Strickland v. Washington standard? Refer to Ch. 10 of Courts and Criminal Justice in America. How do the performance prong and the prejudice prong of the Strickland standard apply to the example? • What did the judge do wrong? Which judicial selection option—either appointment, election, or merit—would help to reduce instances of judicial misconduct? • How does the misconduct or ineffectiveness of these courtroom participants reflect or thwart the crime control model of criminal justice? How does the misconduct or ineffectiveness of these courtroom participants reflect or thwart the due process model of criminal justice? Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. Option 2: Presentation Create a 10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation, with a minimum of 100 words...
Words: 565 - Pages: 3
...denial syndrome, pretending that the over-a-decade-long crisis of the judiciary which plunged the credibility, reputation and legitimacy of the system of justice in Malaysia to an all-time low when the international judicial and legal community issued its terrible indictment in a report entitled “Justice in Jeopardy: Malaysia 2000” had not happened or was history and could never recur in the future. At the 12th Malaysian Law Conference in December 2003, former Finance Minister, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah quoted an anecdote in the nineties to illustrate his lack confidence in the Malaysian system of justice, how he was advised by his lawyer and a former Supreme Court judge “that it would be very difficult to get justice in my own country, especially when my adversaries were closely connected to the powers that be” and not to resort to the Malaysian courts when his political enemies alleged that he was responsible for the BMF scandal. But “the opportunity came when the same allegation was published in a number of foreign newspapers” and he hesitated no longer and filed actions in the appropriate foreign courts against those newspapers and cleared his name. Let me add my anecdote. In January 2000, I consulted two jurists who had held the highest judicial office in the land, former Lord Presidents the late Tun Suffian and Tun Salleh Abas, on the advisability of challenging in court the constitutionality of the tenth Parliamentary meetings and the validity of its enactments...
Words: 794 - Pages: 4
...REFORM OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN ECUADOR 1. General Description and explanation of the Ecuadorian Judicial System 1. Corte nacional de justicia (The National Court of Justice) It’s composed of 21 judges who are designed for a period of 9 years and they cannot be re-elected. Functions: 1) To know the appeals in the high court, revision and others resources established by law 2) To develop case law system based on triple reiteration failures. 3) To know the cases initiated against civil servants who enjoy immunity 4) To Introduce law projects related to the system of administration of justice. 2. Cortes provinciales de justicia (Provincial Courts of Justice) There is a Provincial Court in each province of the country. The Judicial Council determines the number of courts and tribunals according to the needs of the population. 3. Consejo de la Judicatura (The Judiciary Council) The Judiciary Council is composed of 9 members and their respective alternates that last for 6years and may not be re-elected. Its conformation tends to be equal between men and women. Functions: 1) To define and implement policies for the improvement and modernization of the judicial system. 2) To know and approve the budget of the judiciary system, with the exception of the autonomous bodies. 3) To direct the selection process of judges and other servants of the judiciary, and their evaluation, promotion and punishment. All processes...
Words: 2021 - Pages: 9
...Independence of the judiciary in Malaysia can be further improved by: * Selection and promotion of judges—The use of an objective, merit-based, and transparent process for promotion and selection of judges can be an important step toward enhancing professionalism among the judiciary and increasing the public’s confidence in its integrity and abilities. * Disciplinary procedures— In a democratic context, disciplinary procedures are as much a mechanism to ensure judicial integrity and professionalism as they are important tools for securing a judge’s tenure. A well-designed, transparent disciplinary process reduces the vulnerability to abuses that affect judicial independence. * Transparency of court decisions and operations— The organization and procedures of a court can create a transparent operation with built-in checks that reduce opportunities for interfering with court decisions. Good records management and features such as random case assignment can greatly decrease opportunities for bribery, intimidation, or manipulation. Requiring that judges state the reasons for their decisions in published opinions deters rulings based on considerations other than law and facts. * Judicial capacities and ethics— Only a judiciary that garners high professional regard can fully function as a third branch of government and be accepted by the legislature and executive as an equal power. Judges who lack sufficient commitment to an independent judiciary, or who do not have...
Words: 254 - Pages: 2
...Law and Politics 9/2/15 Office hours 10-11 Monday and Wednesday Hickman 411 What is law- set of rules made by government and enforced by government 4 Institutions that make Laws 1. Legislative Bodies (Ex. Congress, State Legislators, City council) Statutory Law 2. Courts/Judges- Set precedent by ruling: Common Law 3. Executive Branch: bureaucracy/administrative agency Administrative Law 4. Constitutional Law 9/4/15 Constitutional law-makes rules for govt Has gone largely unchanged Blueprint Creates and limits govt Fundamental law that sets up rules for how other kinds of laws can be made What isn’t in the Constitution? Democracy Separation of church and state Right to privacy Right to education One-person one vote Political parties God Articles of Confederation -1777 Loose association States retain sovereignty One house Congress Every state one vote Needed 9 to pass Couldn’t tax Problems Congress little power No taxes State sovereignty Own paper money States could sign foreign treaties No natl army No executive No national courts Shays Rebellion Final spark for constitutional convention Constitutional Convention Philly 1787 Signed in Sept 39 out of 55 delegates Undemocratic Elements Slavery: 3/5ths compromise, no ban on slave trade till 1808 Fugitive Slave clause article IV, fed govt helps slates put down insurrections Senators chosen by state legislators No right to suffrage. Qualifications left...
Words: 3907 - Pages: 16
...others. INTRODUCTION Judges are by far the most easily recognized member of the courtroom work group, both by their conspicuous robes and by their prominent position in the courtroom. They are also the subject of many stereotypes because the public wants to believe that judges combine patience, wisdom, and compassion to arrive at fair decisions, while they eschew the character flaws that sometimes form the basis of decisions by others, including prejudice, intolerance, favoritism, and hostility. Unfortunately, judges are human and their decisions occasionally reflect such a reality. One West Virginia judge, for example, became so enraged at a defendant who began cursing at him in court that he jumped down from his bench, tore off his judicial robe, and bit the tip off the defendant’s nose (Smith, 1998). He served five days in jail on state assault charges, and was then tried in federal court for violating the defendant’s civil rights. Before he was acquitted of those charges, he acknowledged that his behavior was “bizarre and weird,” and that he had reacted poorly in an emotionally charged situation. While this incident is isolated, it shows that judges are sometimes far from the ideals to which the public holds them. We will return...
Words: 21662 - Pages: 87
...bias, unacceptable jurors may be removed, including those members of a group or class. Previously, the Court held that Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment governed the exercise of peremptory challenges by a prosecutor in a criminal trial. A defendant has no right to a jury composed of people of his or her own race, but a defendant does have the right to be tried by a jury whose members are selected based on nondiscriminatory criteria. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly issued opinions that reaffirm its commitment to jury selection procedures that are fair and nondiscriminatory. Whether the trial is civil or criminal, potential jurors and litigants have an equal protection right to jury selection procedures that are free from state-sponsored group stereotypes rooted in and defined by historical prejudice. Intentional discrimination on the basis of gender by state actors in the use of peremptory strikes in jury selection violates the Equal Protection Clause. Litigants in any...
Words: 666 - Pages: 3
...providing a brief history of these process during the past years. HISTORY OF LAW IN U.S. One of the contributions has been given to the Common Law has been the system of trial by jury. For many years, many people tried to show that this system came from a group of indigenous in England back to the beginning of the times of Alfred the Great and the Anglo-Saxon times. This origin was completely disproved by Maintland and Pollock in the wonderful history of the early English Law, where they trace the origin of the system of trial by jury to the era of the Franks, presented by William the Conqueror for their own benefits and not with the idea to give an improvement to the legislation of England. There are also many people who attribute its real origin in the judicial system chosen by the praetor in Roman law to establish the facts which it had established a law applicable to the event. However, the origin of the system of trial by jury was not very important at that time, or even before the late eighteenth century, when it took the most important part in the administration of Justice for the first time, a position that still holds today and has become primary and essential part in the American judicial system. Although it had its origins and first applications in England, gives the impression that its current role in the administration of the law was fully developed during the colonial period in America. The American Judicial System has its roots in English common...
Words: 970 - Pages: 4
