Premium Essay

Justice Sotomayor's Character Analysis

Submitted By
Words 165
Pages 1
During Sotomayor’s confirmation hearing, she was branded a “radical pick” by Charles Krauthammer, a Washington Post columnist. Justice Sotomayor is considered to be a “Legal Realist.” She believes that all laws come from dominant social norms and historical, political policy. To her, the Law is not an undying standard, but rather a living thing that evolves along with the needs of society. Conservatives, fearful of changing status quo, attacked her character and cited the decision before Ricci v. DeStefano, where she aptly applied stare decisis. In 2002, Sotomayor spoke at the University of Berkeley. She said, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the riches of her experiences would more often than not reach a conclusion than a white

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Skilling vs Us

...(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SKILLING v. UNITED STATES CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 08–1394. Argued March 1, 2010—Decided June 24, 2010 Founded in 1985, Enron Corporation grew from its headquarters in Houston, Texas, into the seventh highest-revenue-grossing company in America. Petitioner Jeffrey Skilling, a longtime Enron officer, was Enron’s chief executive officer from February until August 2001, when he resigned. Less than four months later, Enron crashed into bankruptcy, and its stock plummeted in value. After an investigation uncovered an elaborate conspiracy to prop up Enron’s stock prices by overstating the company’s financial well-being, the Government prosecuted dozens of Enron employees who participated in the scheme. In time, the Government worked its way up the chain of command, indicting Skilling and two other top Enron executives. These three defendants, the indictment charged, engaged in a scheme to deceive investors about Enron’s true financial performance by...

Words: 40397 - Pages: 162