Premium Essay

Kennewick Man Essay

Submitted By
Words 522
Pages 3
When it comes about the ownership of the past, my first answer was that everyone owns it. It seems reasonable today, however, if we look ahead into the future, the past should remain speculative.

It is widely accepted and apparent that the local communities have the right to inherit and claim their past today and the access to archaeological and historical remains is truly significant. The controversy about the repatriation of the Kennewick Man serves as a good example that the bones were returned to local tribe by NAGPRA. The tribes had the right to refuse negotiation even if Doug Owsley of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History offered to collaborate and share the findings in his letter to the coalition of the tribes that claimed …show more content…
What we know about the past today is virtually a widely accepted interpretation by those who have the authority and skills to illustrate what was the fact according to the findings present. However, some heritages, languages for example, have been experiencing a long period of time of evulotion and the records in oral and written forms corresponding to it may have been modified or transformed, even possibly lost, which can be a huge obstacle for people to figure out the origin. Moreover, interpreters, not just including historians, anthropologists and archaeologists, play an essential part in determining what the public should be told. For instance, the investigators of Neanderthals (i.e. Fuhlrott, Schaaffausen, Mayer, Virchow etc.) were prone to different theories because their focus and examinations were based on their different specialized fields and interests. (Drell, 2002) Besides, no one can deny that it happens that modified archaeological and historical interpretations have been used to embellish the colonial and imperial facts and some people take advantage of interpretation to meet their demands. Therefore, due to the diverse views and the deficiency of absolute perfect and solid interpretation now, the past should remain speculative for the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Kathleen Kenyon: An Influential British Archaeology

...Kathleen Kenyon was an influential British archaeologist whose legacy still lives on today. She was born on January 5th, 1906 in London. She spent most of her early years in the West London area. Kenyon was first introduced to archaeology in Oxford University and later became the first female president of the Oxford Archaeological Society. But she didn’t stop there. After graduation, she participated at a site in Zimbabwe with her father and Gertrude Caton-Thompson then an excavation at Roman Verulamium, or modern day St. Albans with Mortimer Wheeler and his staff. Later on, when Kenyon had much more experience, she was invited to review John Garstang’s findings from the ancient city, Jericho. Garstang’s goal was to find archeological proof...

Words: 361 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Native American Ethics

...reviewed by Koreans to help develop their ethical codes. The stories of The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) and the Kennewick Man further emphasize three points for biological anthropologists and other professionals working with human remains: First, to be thoughtful about potential ethical issues related to their research, second to be inclusive and encourage the involvement of the community villagers, and last to be respectful of different worldviews of death between (sub)cultures. NAGPRA, and the Kennewick man both demonstrate the difficulty in anticipating ethical issues and unintended misconduct in the course of research. “NAGPRA is an organization that represents a culmination of ethical efforts of U.S. biological anthropologists, archaeologists, museum professionals, Native Americans and the federal legislative body to protect, preserve and return human remains and funerary objects that are affiliated to Native Americans” (Kim et al., 2014). The organization was first founded as a means to help subdue the battle between who can claim the human remains found in American soil, the westerners or the native people. Thus shifting the matter from being an “ethical imperative to a legal mandate” (Kim et al., 2014). Shortly after guidelines were set in 1996 the Kennewick Man appears. The Kennewick Man serves an importance to NAGPRA because the remains of 5 ancestors could not be affiliated with any of the existing federally recognized Native American...

Words: 1501 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Tok Essay

...Theory of Knowledge Essay Eric Sheldon 4-25-13 Kennewick High School  “It is more important to discover new ways of thinking about what is already known than to discover new data or facts.” To what extent would you agree with this claim? Before one can agree or disagree with the above statement, a few terms must be defined. “New ways of thinking” is thinking from a point of view that has not been considered previously, or an unproven idea. For the purpose of this essay, “facts” and “data” will be defined as: a series of empirical evidence, or a proven idea. I think that new ways of thinking and the discovery of new data and facts are equally important. If no one ever thought differently than the currently accepted way of thinking, than nothing new would ever be discovered. They are each no more and no less important than one other because, one cannot exist without the other. If one cannot exist without the other than their symbiotic relationship makes both equally important. It could be argued that discovering new ways of thinking is more important than the discovery of new data and facts. Someone arguing this point may make the point that many useful inventions that we (humans) have today come from an inventor who dared to step outside the norm, and look at a problem differently. One example of an invention is the nuclear reactor. Nuclear power would not exist today if no one had considered fission as a source of energy. Someone who disagrees...

Words: 967 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Managing Cultura Differences

...MANAGING CULTURAL DIFFERENCES SIXTHEDITION MANAGING CULTURAL DIFFERENCES SERIES Managing Cultural Differences: Global Leadership Strategies for the 21 st Century, Sixth Edition Philip R. Harris, Ph.D., Robert T. Moran, Ph.D., Sarah V. Moran, M.A. Managing Cultural Diversity in Technical Professions Lionel Laroche, Ph.D Uniting North American Business—NAFTA Best Practices Jeffrey D. Abbot and Robert T. Moran, Ph.D. Eurodiversity: A Business Guide to Managing Differences George Simons, D.M. Global Strategic Planning: Cultural Perspectives for Profit and Non-Profit Organizations Marios I. Katsioulodes Ph.D. Competing Globally: Mastering Cross-Cultural Management and Negotiations Farid Elashmawi, Ph.D. Succeeding in Business in Eastern and Central Europe—A Guide to Cultures, Markets, and Practices Woodrow H. Sears, Ed.D. and Audrone Tamulionyte-Lentz, M.S. Intercultural Services: A Worldwide Buyer’s Guide and Sourcebook Gary M. Wederspahn, M.A. SIXTH EDITION MANAGING CULTURAL DIFFERENCES GLOBAL LEADERSHIP STRATEGIES ST FOR THE 21 CENTURY 25TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION PHILIP R. HARRIS, PH.D. ROBERT T. MORAN, PH.D. SARAH V. MORAN, M.A. JUDITH SOCCORSY Editorial Coordinator Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann 200 Wheeler Road, Burlington, MA 01803, USA Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK Copyright © 2004, Philip R. Harris, Robert T. Moran, Sarah V. Moran. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a...

Words: 229816 - Pages: 920