Free Essay

Law of the Sea

In:

Submitted By sarahgabr
Words 2590
Pages 11
Territorial Sea is established up to 12 miles from the baseline of the coast. This is an extension of the land and the coastal state exerts full sovereignty over the area. It is an area of national jurisdiction. Also establishes a contiguous zone where the coastal State may exercise the control necessary to (1) prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations (2) punish infringement of the above laws and regulations committed within its territory or territorial sea. The contiguous zone may not extend beyond 24 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured.

1 Compare and contrast the powers of coastal states in internal waters, the territorial sea and the contiguous zone. Internal Waters are assimilated into the territory of the state. A coastal state may exercise jurisdiction over foreign ships within its internal waters to enforce its laws, although the judicial authorities of the flag state may also act where crimes have occurred on board the ship. There exists therefore a concurrent jurisdiction.[1] A merchant vessel in a foreign port or in foreign internal waters is automatically subject to local jurisdiction unless the matter was concerning general conduct of the crew where it did not threaten peace and security it would be left, through courtesy to the flag state.

In the case of a warship however the authorisation of the captain or of the flag state is necessary before the coastal state may exercise its jurisdiction. Due to the status of warships as a direct arm of the sovereign if the flag state.

Contiguous Zone - Historically some states have claimed to exercise rights over particular zones of the high seas. This has diluted the principle of the freedom of the high seas. There have been numerous reasons for such extended authority including (1) prevention of infringement on customs, immigration or sanitary laws (2) to conserve fishing stock (3) to enable coastal state to have exclusive or principal rights. It enables coastal states to protect something without extending their territorial sea and is a compromise measure. These zones are not attached to the land territory in law.

Concept was introduced in 1930 by French writer Gidel and it appeared in the Convention on the Territorial Sea. Sanitary and immigration enforcement is justifiable by the 1958 Convention but protection of customs has long been established. Contiguous zones were restricted to within 12 miles so a state which had claimed a 12 mile territorial sea were exempt from this. This coupled with the restriction of jurisdiction to customs, sanitary and immigration maters is the reason for the decline in the relevance of contiguous zones in recent years. However, based on the 1982 Convention a state may claim up to 24 miles in order to preserve the concept. The 1982 Convention also changed the status of the contiguous zone from being part of the high seas to part of the EEZ.

Territorial Sea comes within the sovereignty of a coastal state also extending to the airspace. These were drafted in the 1982 Convention and represent customary international law. Width of the territorial sea is set at 12 miles. Coastal state may also exclude foreign nationals and vessels from fishing within its territorial sea and, subject to agreements to the contrary, from coastal trading and reserve these activities for its own citizens. Coastal state also has extensive powers relating to security and customs matters.

Jurisdiction over foreign ships when in passage through territorial sea, the coastal state may only exercise its criminal jurisdiction as regards the arrest of any person or the investigation of any matter connected with a crime committed on board ship in defined situations. These are cited in Article 27(1) of the 1982 Convention, reaffirming Article 19(1) of the 1958 Convention. (1) if the consequences of the crime extend to the coastal state. (2) if the crime is of a kind likely to disturb the peace of the coastal state (3) if the assistance of the local authorities has been requested (4) if such measures are necessary for the suppression of illicit traffic in drugs.

If the ship is travelling through the territorial sea having left internal waters then the coastal state may act in any manner within its laws. Authorities cannot act if the crime was committed before entering the territorial sea and the ship has not been in internal waters. Article 28 of the 1982 Convention states that coastal states must not divert a foreign ship for the purpose of exercising civil jurisdiction in relation to a person on board ship, nor levy execution against or arrest the ship, unless obligations are involved which were assumed by the ship. Warships and other governmental ships are immune from the sovereignty of the coastal states altogether.

1 What rights of passage, if any, do vessels of other nations enjoy in the territorial sea or internal waters? Internal Waters - there does not exist any right of innocent passage from which the shipping of other states may benefit. The exception to this rule is where the straight baselines enclose as internal waters what had been previous territorial waters.

Territorial Sea it is taken as custom that foreign merchant ships may travel unhindered through these zones. It is open to interpretation particularly that the passage must be 'innocent'. Article 14 of the 1958 Convention said that states must make known dangers in territorial seas, must not hinder innocent passage, and may not impose charges for this passage unless in exchange for services. Passage ceases to be innocent here when it "is prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the coastal state." Where passage is not innocent the coastal state may take steps to prevent it and may act to stall any approach to internal waters. Coastal states can temporarily suspend passage where security is threatened or at risk. Developed in the 1982 Convention Article 19(2). A key provision may have altered the burden of proof from coastal state to the ship to prove that passage is innocent. There is debate over the passage of warships in peacetime however it seems that former key protester Russia has agreed these provisions also cover warships as does the United States.

1 What are the major rights and powers of a coastal state in its EEZ? What rights do other states enjoy there? Development - developed from claims regarding fishing zones. Marks a compromise between those states seeking a 200 mile territorial sea (due to controversy over fishing zones) and those wishing a more restricted system of coastal state power. 1958 Convention reached no agreement on fishing zones and Article 24 does not give exclusive fishing rights in the contiguous zone. Still states have claimed these zones. European Fisheries Convention (1964) provided that the coastal state has exclusive right to fish and jurisdiction in matters of fisheries within 6 miles from baseline of the territorial sea. Between 6-12 miles other parties may fish there providing they had previously. In view of the practice of many states in accepting at one time or another the existence of a 12 mile fishing zone that can be seen as customary international law. [2]

1970 Iceland claimed 50 mile exclusive zone. UK/Germany referred to ICJ and the Court did not answer the question of legality. They held that Iceland's extension was not binding as no acquiescence. Court emphasised the notion of preferential rights which it regarded as customary international law. [3] Developments took place in 1982 and Article 55 of the Convention provides that the EEZ is an area beyond and adjacent to the territorial sea, subject to the specific legal regime established under the Convention. Legal Situation Today [4] - EEZ starts from the outer limit of the territorial sea but shall not extend beyond 200 nautical miles (Article 57) from the baselines. EEZ would be no more than 188 miles when 12 mile territorial sea existed. Where distance between neighboring states is less than 400 miles then delimitation becomes necessary. Article 58 establishes rights of other states in the EEZ and are basically the high seas freedom of navigation, over flight and the laying of submarine cables and pipelines. States should have regard in this though for the laws of the coastal state. Article 60(2) provides than in the EEZ the coastal state has jurisdiction to apply customs law and regulations in respect of structures and artificial islands. The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea took the view in the M/V Saiga Case that a coastal state was not competent to apply customs laws in other parts. ICJ declared EEZ to be part of customary law in the Libya/Malta Continental Shelf Case.

1 What is meant by the concept of exclusive flag state jurisdiction of the high seas? On the high seas the maintenance of order has rested upon the concept of the nationality of the ship, and the jurisdiction of the flag state. The flag state will enforce the rules and regulations not only of its own municipal law but of international law also. Ship without a flag is deprived of many benefits and rights. Each state must show reason for allowing a ship to register under its flag and their must exist a genuine link (Article 91, UNCLOS). To prevent people using flags for tax or wage purposes. Lotus case and then the 1958 and 1982 Conventions state clearly that the only authority exerted upon ships on the high seas is that of the flag state.

What comprises a genuine link? Issue arose in the Iran-Iraq war with UK/US re-flagging Kuwaiti tankers. Held they did not violate law and the Tribunal held in the M/V Saiga Case that it was to the jurisdiction of the flag state to grant nationality to the ship. Tribunal stated here that ships may sail only under one flag and if they flew more than one were stateless and stateless vessels may be boarded and seized on the high seas.

1 What are the major exceptions to it? (1) Right of visit is where warships are allowed to approach to ascertain the nationality of ships. Does not give a right to board but merely to identify. Warship must be careful as they are liable for damages. May only be undertaken if ship is engaged in piracy, broadcasting, stateless, engaged in slave trading.
(2) Piracy is illegal acts committed for private ends which excludes hijacking. Any state may arrest and seize in this case and the courts of that state may decide what action to take regarding the vessel and property subject to the rights of third parties who have acted in good faith. (3) Slave Trade should be prevented in accordance with Article 99 of the 1982 Convention. Every state should take measures and punish the transport of slaves authorised to fly its flag and prevent the use of its flag for such purposes in future. Any slave taking refuge on board any ship is ipso facto free.
(4) Unauthorised broadcasting stated in Article 109 of the 1982 Convention. Any person engaged in this can be prosecuted by the flag state of the ship, the state of registry of the installation, the state of which the person is a national or any state where the transmission can be received or where authorised communication is disrupted.
(5) Hot Pursuit is a principle designed to ensure that a vessel which has infringed the rules of a coastal state cannot escape punishment by fleeing to the high seas. Coastal state may extend jurisdiction as stated in Article 111 of the 1982 Convention. Pursuit must begin when the ship or one of its boats is in internal waters or territorial sea and may only continue uninterrupted. If the pursuit begins in the contiguous zone then it must violate the rights of protection which the zone was established for. Pursuit must come after a visible demand to stop and can only be done by government vessels. Right to pursuit ceases when the ship enters its own territorial waters of those of a third state. Use of force in this area must be avoided if possible and if necessary be proportional and reasonable. (6) Collisions was overruled from the Lotus Case by the Article 11 of the High Seas Convention. Proceedings may only be taken against the master or other persons in the service of the ship by authorities of either the flag state or the state to which the person is a national. Reaffirmed in Article 97 of the 1982 Convention. (7) Treaty Rights often exist permitting each others warships to exercise certain powers of visit and search as regards vessels flying the flags of the signatories. (8) Pollution by Article 24 of the High Seas Convention. States had a duty to adopt measures as necessary for the conservation of the living resources of the high seas. International Convention relating to Intervention on the High Seas in Cases of Oil Pollution allows ships to act "as may be necessary to prevent, mitigate or eliminate grave and imminent danger to their coastline or related interests from pollution or threat of pollution of the sea by oil." Developed because of the Torrey Canyon incident where UK aircraft bombed a ship spilling oil on UK/French coastline which had run aground. 1982 Convention leaves jurisdiction to the flag state but imposes mandatory minimums.

(9) Straddling Stocks. Article 56(1) of the 1982 Convention provides that coastal states have sovereign rights over their EEZs for the purpose of exploiting, conserving and managing fish stocks. These are accompanied by duties as to conservation and managements measures to ensure that the fish stocks are not endangered. Where the stock exists across two EEZs the states must co-ordinate and ensure the conservation and development of such stocks.

Definitions
1. Contiguous Zone - and zone near by, adjacent to or neighboring the territorial sea.

2. Internal Waters - deemed to be such parts of the sea as are not either the high seas or relevant zones or the territorial sea, are accordingly classed as appertaining to the land territory of the coastal state. They can be, for example, lakes, rivers, harbours and are waters found on the landward side of the baselines from which the width of the territorial and other zones is measured.

3. EEZ - Exclusive Economic Zone

4. Baselines - the basis for measuring the breadth of the territorial sea. The baseline is the low water mark around the coasts of the state. Traditional principle and emphasised in both 1958 and 1982 Declarations.

5. Delimitation - where states cannot have a territorial sea of 12 miles due to proximity of baselines.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[1]R v Anderson (1868) the Court of Criminal Appeal in the UK declared that an American national who had committed manslaughter on a British ship in French internal waters was subject to jurisdiction by all three states. Wildenhus Case the US Supreme Court held that American courts had jurisdiction to try a crew member of a Belgian vessel for the murder of another Belgian national when the ship was docked in Jersey.

[2] International Court remarked as such in the Fisheries Jurisdiction cases especially since the 1960 Geneva Conference. Stated that "the extension of that fishing zone up to a 12 mile limit from the baselines appears now to be generally accepted."

[3] Where the state was said to be "in a situation of special dependence on coastal fisheries."

[4] Provided in Article 55 of the 1982 Convention

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

...Convention on the Law of the Sea also referred to as (UNCLOS) has been in place for many years after its initial establishment. The UNCLOS convention has been amended overtime since it was established for many years. There are calls to revisit the whole convention as some aspects does not auger well with the current trends in the world. The Law of the Sea has caught the public attention due to certain activities such as fishing and the activities in the Arctic. There are arguments that with the continued shrinking of the polar ice cap, there countries that surround the Arctic Ocean have started positioning themselves to the anticipated biggest geographical brawls in the coming years. History & Ratification During the 17th century, the sea was governed by the concept that was known as the ‘freedoms of the seas. The regulation marked boundaries of the sea that countries should not go beyond in their activities. The distance marked was approximately three nautical miles. During the 20th century, many countries wanted this distance to be extended for economic purpose. The extraction of minerals and fishing were seen as very valuable activities that were boosting the country's wealth. In the year 1930 there was a conference that was held to debate the issues in The Hague but the discussion was not fertile. United States made a move to take control of all the natural recourses to its continental shelf which took place under the direction of customary international law and President...

Words: 685 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea

...United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), 1982 Introduction The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is the most comprehensive attempt at creating a unified regime for governance of the rights of nations with respect to the world's oceans. The treaty addresses a number of topics including navigational rights, economic rights, pollution of the seas, conservation of marine life, scientific exploration, piracy, and more. The treaty, one of the longest in history, is comprised of 320 articles and 9 annexes, representing the codification of customary international law and its progressive development. Historical Background Since humanity first set forth upon the seas, the issue of sovereign control over the oceans has been an ongoing concern. Prior to the 20th century, the oceans had been subject to the freedom of the seas doctrine. This principle, adopted in the 17th century, limited national rights and jurisdiction over a narrow band of water along a nations coast, the rest of the sea being free to all and belonging to none. Nearly a century later, the "cannon-shot" rule became the basis for determining how much of the adjacent oceans were under the jurisdiction of a nation. The cannon-shot rule set forth that a nation controlled a territorial sea as far as a projectile could be fired from a cannon based on shore. In the 18th century this range was approximate three nautical miles. As time progressed, three miles became the widely accepted...

Words: 8576 - Pages: 35

Free Essay

United Nation International Convention on the Law of the Sea

...7 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea CONTENTS Page PREAMBLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 PART I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Article 1. PART II. Use of terms and scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 TERRITORIAL SEA AND CONTIGUOUS ZONE . . . . . . . . 23 23 SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 2. Legal status of the territorial sea, of the air space over the territorial sea and of its bed and subsoil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SECTION 2. LIMITS OF THE TERRITORIAL SEA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 3. Breadth of the territorial sea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 4. Outer limit of the territorial sea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 5. Normal baseline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 6. Reefs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 7. Straight baselines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 8. Internal waters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 9. Mouths of rivers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 10. Bays ........ Article 11. Ports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Article 12. Roadsteads...

Words: 81374 - Pages: 326

Premium Essay

Analysis Of Titanic: Three Ways The Disaster Changed Laws And Safety On The Seas

...“Titanic: Three Ways the Disaster Changed Laws and Safety on the Seas” is a newspaper article found in a New York Daily News issue. It was written to give the reader insight on the new laws that were passed after the sinking of the Titanic. It goes into great detail giving the reader the information they are looking for. “Titanic: Three Ways the Disaster Changed Laws and Safety on the Seas” is written for the purpose of informing the reader on the changes that were made after the tragedy of the Titanic. Nicole Bitette is an innovative writer with a focus on online content that provides the reader with more inside coverage. Bitette has been writing articles for the New York Daily News for the past 3 years, where she has written over 975 online...

Words: 303 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Persuasive Ocean Crisis Essay

...This conference’s main mission was to settle the two main issues left unresolved at the first conference – the extent of the territorial sea and exclusive fishery zones. In order to successfully pass these measures, Canada and the United States proposed a piece of joint legislation allowing territorial sea to reach as far as six nautical miles. Despite their efforts, many people wanted a twelve-mile limit and therefore the vote did not obtain the two-thirds majority needed for passage (Lawrence pg 161). This resulted in yet another failure in the mission to codify the law of the ocean. Thirteen years later, a third and final Conference of the Law of the Sea would take place. This conference lasted nine years and was finally concluded in 1982 when all the compromises and deals were agreed upon. At the third conference, it was obvious which nations had the most influence and surprisingly, it was not the typical world superpowers. Instead, the most powerful group at the conference was Group 77 – consisting of about 120 developing African, Asian, and Latin American...

Words: 1659 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Essay About The West Philippine Sea

...nation must conduct themselves in a just and orderly manner to maintain peace and stability in the world". International law should ignore military and economic to resolve the resolution of the disputes water. All nation must follow in a orderly manner to maintain stability and peace in the world. All nations has right to protect their sovereignty in land and ocean. The International law is giving a country access to its own 200 nautical miles away from their home land. The rule of law must be followed and conduct by all nation. Philippines and china is arguing about the sea over in the west Philippine sea. China 9 dashed line map claiming the 200 nautical miles away of the Philippines including other Asia country. The Asians is favorable with the Philippines. Philippines are retrieving the Philippine old map to give it to china. Philippines is doing step with the United Nation sending report of China still in the West Philippines Sea. Philippines dealing with china to...

Words: 905 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Explain and Critically Evaluate the Concept of “Freedom of Navigation”

...FREEDOM OF NAVIGATION.....................................................4 4. THE COASTAL STATE JURISDICTION....................................................................5 4.1. Internal Waters...........................................................................................................5 4.2. Territorial Seas...........................................................................................................6 4.3. Contiguous Zone........................................................................................................6 5. NAVIGATION IN TERRITORIAL SEA......................................................................6 5.1. Innocent Passage.....................................................................................................6 5.2. Straits.......................................................................................................................7 5.3. Transit Passage........................................................................................................7 6. THE HIGH SEAS...........................................................................................................7 7. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME EVENTS..................................................................8 7.1. The Corfu Channel...

Words: 2684 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

South China Seal Oil Dispute

...South China Sea Oil Dispute International Business Law – BUL 6850 South China Sea Oil Dispute Introduction The South China Sea dispute is a territorial wrangle among certain Asian countries. The rivalry dates back to the Sino-Japanese War of 1894 (Roberts & Buszynski, 2015). The interest by these countries is the suspected oil potential of the region and fishing grounds. China claims the majority of the area covering hundreds of miles east and south of its southern province of Hainan. Other countries involved in the dispute include Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei, all part of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (See Appendix 1). The United States (U.S.) is an interested entity in the dispute based on the enormous number of commercial goods that pass through the sea each year (Dutton, 2014). This study will utilize the outcome of historical resolutions taken to resolve the dispute and analyze the conflict. Conducting a thorough analysis of this dispute is significant because it will set a good precedence for other existing global territorial disputes. In addition, finding a working solution for the dispute will benefit the ASEAN member countries through stability and other interested entities, such as the U.S., who rely on the South China Sea for trade. This paper will propose an International mediation alternative to the South China Sea oil dispute that will promote joint utilization of the natural resources within the territorial...

Words: 6528 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Archipelagic Doctrine

...THE PHILIPPINES AND THE ARCHIPELAGIC DOCTRINE Archipelago is defined as a sea or part of a sea studded with islands, often synonymous with island groups, or as a large group of islands in an extensive body of water, such as sea. (De Leon, 1991) In various conferences of the United Nations on the Law of the Sea, the Philippines and other archipelago states proposed that an archipelagic state composed of groups of islands forming a state is a single unit, with the islands and the waters within the baselines as internal waters.By this concept (archipelagic doctrine), an archipelago shall be regarded as a single unit, so that the waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, irrespective of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the state, subject to its exclusive sovereignty. Despite the opposition of maritime powers, the Philippines and four other states (Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Bahamas) got the approval in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea held in Jamaica last December 10, 1982. They were qualified as archipelagic states. The archipelagic doctrine is now incorporated in Chapter IV of the said convention. It legalizes the unity of land, water and people into a single entity photo courtesy of gmanews.tv The Philippines bolstered the archipelagic principle in defining its territory when it included in Article 1 of the 1987 Constitution the following: : "The national territory comprises the...

Words: 2619 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Why Do Air Medical Services Use Gas Laws?

...Gas laws apply in many everyday activities and daily necessities including air travel and recreation. Air medical services use gas laws in order to understand how the changes in altitude affect people, equipment and the internal environment of the aircraft. Several laws affect air travel including Boyle’s law, Henry’s law, Dalton’s law and Graham’s Law. Boyle’s law is relevant as it explains how pressure changes allow the gas to expand (Monroney, 2013). Dalton’s law transfers oxygen molecules from a person’s lungs to their bloodstream depending on the pressure gradient. Henry’s Law relates to the pressure of a gas over liquid (solubility). Within humans physiology the three physiological zones within the atmosphere are utilised to control conditions. Between sea level and 3 048 metres above sea level...

Words: 393 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Business

...Spratlys Islands or Kalayaan Island Group is just within the Philippines' proximity and 200 Nautical Miles Exclusive Economic Zone - under the International Laws Sea - UNCLOS. The Philippines as the closest and archipelagic country of the Spratly island with another Five Asian countries claim the Spratly Islands including - China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei. In 1971, the Philippines officially claimed eight islands that it refers to as the Kalayaan, partly on the basis of this exploration, arguing that the islands: 1) were not part of the Spratly Islands; and 2) had not belonged to anybody and were open to being claimed. In 1972, they were designated as part of Palawan Province, Kalayaan municipality. The total land area of these islands is 790,000 sq meters. The Philippines control the following islands in the Spratlys: 1. Kota or Loaita Island 2. Lawak or Nansham Island 3. Likas or West York Island 4. Panata or Lamkian Cay 5. Pag-asa or Thitu Island 6. Parola or North East Cay 7. Patag or Flat Island 8. Rizal or Commodore Reef Chosen Discussion: How the country Philippines protect its intellectual property rights on the eight (8) officially claimed islands in Spratly? Action Taken: In various conferences of the United Nations (UN) on the law of the sea, the Philippines proposed that an archipelagic state composed of groups of islands forming a state is a single unit,...

Words: 1661 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Analysis

...vessels and fishing boats, China has fired off a barrage of historical records to reinforce its claim over a disputed shoal near the Philippines in the South China Sea.   While this propaganda broadside makes it clear Beijing will take a tough line with Manila as a standoff over Panatag (Scarborough) Shoal continues into a seventh week, the exact legal justification for China's claim and the full extent of the territory affected remain uncertain, according to experts in maritime law.   Like most of its claims to vast expanses of the resource-rich and strategically important South China Sea, Beijing prefers to remain ambiguous about the details, they say.   This allows the ruling Communist Party to demonstrate to an increasingly nationalistic domestic audience that it can defend China's right to control a swathe of ocean territory.   And, it avoids further inflaming tensions with neighbors who are already apprehensive about China's growing military power and territorial ambition.   "This ambiguity serves China's domestic purpose which is to safeguard the government's legitimacy and satisfy domestic public opinion," said Sun Yun, a Washington DC-based China foreign policy expert and a former analyst for the International Crisis Group in Beijing.   Potential flashpoint Rival claims to territory in the South China Sea are one of the biggest potential flashpoints in the Asia-Pacific region.   China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei all have territorial...

Words: 1345 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Philippine Constitution

...fluvial and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines. 1. Section 1, Article 1of the 1987 Constitution 2. The national territory comprises thePhilippine archipelago, with all the islands andwaters embraced therein, and all other territoriesover which the Philippines has sovereignty orjurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial andaerial domains, including its territorial sea, theseabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and othersubmarine areas. The waters around, between, andconnecting the islands of the archipelago, regardlessof their breadth and dimensions, form part ofinternal waters of the Philippines. 3. Necessity of constitutional provision on National Territory 4. 1. Binding force of such provision under international law. A state has the power to try, hear and decide cases throughout the extent of its territory. If there is a territorial dispute it should be settled according to the international law.2. Value of provision defining our national territory. It is important to know so that we and the other nations would know the boundaries of our country. 5. 3. Acquisition of other territories. Even though the bounds of our national territory is already written in the law, this does not prevent the Philippines from acquiring...

Words: 2754 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Spratly And Paracel Islands: A Case Study

...territories because it is a direct violation of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. If they are not challenged, the surrounding nations will not be able to use these waters to engage in trade, nor will they be able to reap the profits of the natural resources, and fighting will erupt. Since the beginning of the nineteenth century, China has laid claim to several archipelagos in the South China Sea with The Spratly and Paracel Islands receiving the most attention. However, several countries in close proximity to the islands claim them also. The Council on Foreign Relations website (http://www.cfr.org) stated the South China Sea encompasses an area of about 1.3 million mi2 and China seeks to own it all. If not settled appropriately, the controversy over these territorial waters will lead to war. This area is rich in natural resources and is a very important passageway for international trade. According to the Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea first...

Words: 1670 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Book Of Hebrews: Analysis

...and Towns, 2016). Although the authorship of the Epistles is still in dispute, majority of it’s authorship has been attributed to Paul, since the writings sre similar to his teachings. The book of Hebrews is directed toward Jewish Christians who are thinking of returning to the old laws of Judaism. The author sets out to show that Christ has fulfilled the purposes of Judaism and that it has nothing more to offer the believer. Hebrews encourages the Jewish beleivers to hold on to Christ...

Words: 776 - Pages: 4