Free Essay

Legal Lynching in America

In:

Submitted By rchamilton
Words 977
Pages 4
Legal Lynching In America

Rodney Hamilton

HIST212

American Military University
Latrese Adkins
3/23/2014

This paper will prove that in the late 1800s until the 1960s, white people used lynching as a form or terrorism designed to oppress Negros. These violent acts left Negros paralyzed in fear with hopes of preserving the white man as the dominant and superior ethnic group. Lynching kept black people terrorized and allowed white supremacy to flourish.

During the reconstruction period, black people had to render the proper respect to white people or suffer severe consequences. ‘‘It was a common custom down in that country…that the Negro people more or less come to the back door when they went to see you, and take off their hat when they meet you on the street, and say, ‘Yesum, Mister…. Yes, Ma’am”. (M. A. Jackson, 1 Dec, 2005, #665) Many victims of lynching were accused of crimes that usually stemmed from false accusations and the belief that all black men fantasized about being with a white woman. This controversy led to countless rape accusations that resulted in the lynching of innocent black men. These accusations were the product of the curiosity of white women about black men and the realization that white men had been rapping black women for years. White men feared that the now free black man would take an interest in white women and white women act on their fantasies about black men.

Lynching was a horrible atrocity that usually took the form of hangings, shootings or both. On some occasions, these crimes would take the form of burning, maiming, castration or physical torture. Lynching was effective and kept blacks afraid and paralyzed in fear. Very few people dared to oppose an angry mob of white people ready to commit unspeakable crimes. Those who did, were usually never heard from or they would be made a public example.

Lynching would take place in public areas or right on the accused’s property. These acts of violence went on and usually no one stepped in to put an end to the mob. The only common factor in lynching was that they would rarely be carried out by one individual. Instead, it would be an angry mob or organization called the Ku Klux Klan. These individuals were ruthless and bent on white supremacy. “Most Americans are familiar with the Ku Klux Klan as a secret and exclusively white order of Southern vigilantes that terrorized former African American slaves and their Northern allies following the Civil War”. (D. A. Horowitz, 1998, #71) These acts further outline the cowardly nature of white men during this time period. When a black man was accused of a crime by a white person, this usually would not end well. Even if the accused made it to the local jail, he or she would be met with an angry mob. Klan members covered in all white attire with a matching hood to hide their face would drag the accused from their cell and hang them on the spot without a trial. Law enforcement did little to nothing to prevent lynching or protect black people instead; they were some of the main conspirators.

Despite all the violence towards black people, they still persevered and some even strived for a

seat in public office. These moves would be totally unacceptable and the white man, armed with

the powers of Jim Crow Laws and the Klu Klux Klan would make sure of that. “If the presence

of black men in politics was illegitimate—in the eyes of white southerners—then it was

acceptable to use violence to remove them. (Hine, 2011, #332) Most Klan members would

never show up around a majority of black people but if the black vote mattered, you were

sure to find the Klan lurking somewhere in the shadows waiting to strike fear by lynching or

public humiliation of some sort.

Lynching did its job; it struck fear in black people and kept them in line. It also instilled fear into those who did not agree with the ideological belief that white is right and nothing else matters. “An Irish-American teacher and four black men were lynched in Cross Plains, Alabama, in 1870”. (Hine, 2011, #332) The use of fear to persuade a person has been around since the dawn of time. White people in the early 19th century used this concept and it worked for quite some time. They were able to reduced support for the Republican Party, which tried to help the former slaves and those who challenged white supremacy were met with unthinkable violence or publicly humiliation.

These behaviors by white people were a direct reflection of their fear of former slaves becoming successful. Newly freed men were now becoming the white man’s competitor in business and society as a whole. Lynching kept people afraid of what would happen to them if they opposed the white power movement. Becoming successful could mean that you would be paid a visit by men in hooded sheets protecting their faces like cowards. Americans in general have always been afraid of the unknown. During reconstruction, white people only knew that black people could take orders and work in a field. There is no way a black man could hold office or be considered a white man’s equal. Lynching controlled the black man’s urge to rise up and better himself. These terroristic acts punished men, women and even white people who tried to help freed men.

Bibliography

Hine, Darlene, William Hine, and Stanley Harrold. The African American Odyssey. Pearson Education, 2011.

Horowitz D. “The normality of extremism: The Ku Klux Klan revisited” Society 35 no. 6 (September 1998): 71-77

Jackson, M. “Dark Memory: A Look at Lynching in America through the Life, Times, and Songs of Woody Guthrie” Popular Music & Society, 28 no.5 (2005): 663-675

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Strange Fruit

...Strange Fruit: An Overview of Lynching in America The article presented a definitive overview of lynching in America. Much of the reasoning behind lynching is very crude. It is shocking to learn that majority of lynchings occurred for absolutely no reason. I wish there was an effective way to protect African Americans from this horrific punishment. Unfortunately, it took decades to spread awareness of the violence. I don’t understand why it was necessary to intimidate African Americans. For whites to take justice into their own hands removes their respect from the legal system. If a black person committed a crime then he should be afforded the same due process as his white counterpart. What is the point of laws if they aren’t enforced by the appropriate agent? An angry mob doling out their own justice isn’t letting sheriffs and judges perform the jobs they were appointed to do. The racism within the legal system becomes more apparent because of these Lynching eventually evolved into a punishment for incorrect social behavior. I would feel real bad for anyone who sneezed in the direction of a white man. This sounds really bizarre for whites to lynch blacks over the simplest things. It is nice to see that there were whites who would sympathize with African Americans. They understood that blacks needed civil participation and legal protection for their own good. Fortunately with the passage of the 13th, 14th, and the 15th amendment, blacks were given citizenship and afforded...

Words: 396 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How Did Ida B. Wells End Lynching In America?

...Ida B. Wells became a leader of the anti-lynching movement, essentially inventing the aloemoration of ending lynching in America. Influenced and moved by a traumatic event due to her friend Thomas being hung, along with two other black men. This lead her to realize the crime that was being committed throughout the whole country was non-humane. This changed her perspective of the South, giving it no hope if lynching continued on the streets. She declared it a national crime across the country, no one was safe from it. Provoking a fire within her it sparked tension between her town and herself, due to a rebuttal against lynching and calling out the white mobs accounted for them in the newspaper. Wells wasn’t going to stop until lynching was erased from society even though death threats were thrown at her....

Words: 576 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Jim Crow

...12/3/2009 | It’s hard to define a beginning to slavery in the United States. It is said to have begun in the mid 1600’s. The American Civil War began in 1961 when 11 states seceded from the United States. The North or the Union fought against the constitutionality of the secession and the expansion of slavery. Slavery came to an end when the North won the civil war, along with the passing of the 13 amendment. Although slavery was abolished in 1865, it did not give African Americans equal opportunity for education, employment, or basic human rights. Whites in the South during the late 1870s and early 1880s, established Jim Crow laws. Merriam-Webster’s dictionary defines Jim Crow as the ethnic discrimination especially against blacks by legal enforcement or traditional sanctions. This act, along with racist terrorism and mistreatment downgraded African Americans to a humiliating second class status for decades; until the U.S. Supreme Court started to dismantle Jim Crow laws in the 1950s. This paper will examine the force and the legacy of Jim Crow laws, from the start and finish, and the ongoing effect in today’s world. What was Jim Crow? Following the civil war, Congress passed three amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The thirteenth ended slavery December 18th 1865, the fourteenth banned discrimination July 28, 1868 and the fifteenth gave African-American males the right to vote February 25, 1869. By the early 1870’s black leaders demanded a larger share of political power...

Words: 2194 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The Women's Suffrage Movement

...While some women fought for racial equality and anti-lynching, other women put their focus on gaining the right to vote. On May 15, 1989, four women by the names of Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and Lucy Stone founded the National Women's Suffrage Association. The National Women's Suffrage Association was founded because, in order for women to obtain voting rights, they wanted to have a constitutional amendment. While they started the most influential associations in the United States, there were other associations that also fought for women's suffrage. The Southern Women's Suffrage Association was also founded to help women gain voting rights.  Laura Clay, of Kentucky. Clay wanted to express the views of the southern women without too much reference to the National Association...

Words: 1977 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

What Are Jim Crow Laws?

...which will eventually become the fifteenth amendment, the freedmen was now equal as the whites under the Constitution. However, the South who had treated freedmen as slaves a while ago experienced difficulties admitting this equality. Although former slaves had rights and freedom, in reality, they weren’t treated equally at all, especially in the South, due to the state-level legal codes of segregation known as Jim Crow Laws. It has brought varying reactions among the African-American community, which they demonstrated resentments as well as minority idea of returning to Africa. “The white man must and will rule.” According to this standard, the southern states enacted literacy requirements, voter-registration laws, and poll to ensure disfranchisement of the black population. Out of all,...

Words: 710 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Comparison of Wells and Washington

...Eddie A. Wigginton Jr. History H106 Dr. Robertson The American Negro The American Negro is a speech written by Booker T. Washington September 18, 1895. Washington was born April 5, 1856 and died November 14, 1915. He was known as an educator and a reformer for the black community. A majority of his professional career was spent living in Tuskegee Alabama, home of Tuskegee University (Encyclopedia Britannica para. 1). “Along with disenfranchisement, the 1890’s saw the widespread imposition of segregation in the south” (Foner p.646). At this period in time whites were having issues coinciding with blacks, rather it was in the workplace, theatre, or on a train. Since Reconstruction, matters have only got worse. The South at this point were still trying to find ways around federal laws like arresting unemployed blacks for minor crimes and placing them onto farms to work as punishment (Foner 641). The biographical detail I will point out is where he lived throughout his professional life, Tuskegee Alabama. Washington is a resident of the problematic and highly racist south. He goes on to explain that blacks are one third of the South’s population (Washington para. 1). They can either be productive, intelligent, hardworking workers or they could be the opposite. Washington genuinely cares about the outcomes of the South and its progression as a resident. This reason alone gives purpose to the whole speech. After the reading of the speech I believe Washington wanted...

Words: 1137 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Jackie Robinson: Breaking The Color Barrier

...To understand the importance of Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier you need to understand where the United States of America was. At the time baseball was Americas pastime and most beloved sport. The year was 1947 and the President was Harry Truman. There were still lynching and riots over the promotion of black workers. Not only in the South but also states like Michigan and Pennsylvania. In 1944 a black woman was arrested for refusing to give up her bus seat and a man was lynched for not referring to a police officer as Mr. but instead his first name. “Lynching is when a mob kills someone, especially by hanging, for an alleged offense with or without a legal trail”. Despite the decline of some organizations like the KKK, racism...

Words: 401 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Civil Rights Movement

...Civil Rights Movement Since 1845, African Americans have struggled to find equal rights in America. Thus, African Americas have a long history of activism in America, from fighting for the right to vote to pushing for integration in public places. Activists like Stokley Carmichael organized the freedom rides, James Meredith fought to integrate blacks and whites at the University of Mississippi, and Rosa Parks instigated the Montgomery Bus Boycott. Although these protests were often legal and non-violent, the protests made a powerful impact on civil rights in the United States. With the bravery and help of activist like Carmichael, Meredith, Parks and many others, the country slowly worked to acknowledge the basic rights and contributions of African-Americans within the United States. Through it all, African American civil rights leaders risked and sometimes lost their lives in the name of freedom to end segregation, discrimination and isolation to attain equality and civil rights. With civil rights activists leading the fight for racial equality, America slowly but surely became a better place. Through the protests, marches, sit-ins and news articles; African Americans showed there was more ways to attain freedom and equality as opposed to violence. Even before Rosa Parks, on Sunday July 16, 1854, Elizabeth Jennings Graham boarded a street car of the Third Avenue railroad company at the corner of Pearl and Chatham streets. The conductor of the train ordered her to...

Words: 2613 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Ku Klux Klan Cause And Effect

...The Ku Klux Klan brought fear upon many people during the 1930’s, even though it started before then. The cause of the Ku Klux Klan instilling fear, people started lynching mobs because they felt threatened and not protected.” To be punished without legal process(especially by hanging) or authority.Putting a person to death by a mob action without due or process of law.”In america lynching took place from the late 18th century through the 1960’s and occurred mostly towards the southern and bordered states. It was basically a practice which was devoted to in the name of justice. African American The KKK (Ku Klux Klan) was founded on December 24, 1865 and originated from Pulaski, Tennessee. A group of confederate veterans convened to form a...

Words: 395 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How Far Were the Actions of the African Americans the Main Reason for the Advancement of the Civil Rights in the Period 1865-1980?

...How far were the actions of the African Americans the main reason for the advancement of the Civil Rights in the period 1865-1980? “Power concedes nothing without demand, it never has and it never will”[1]. Said by Fredrick Douglass in 1857, an escaped slave who had bearded the brunt of the slave years. He had come to the realisation that African Americans had a fountain of “power”; however that power that they possessed would never establish anything without a “demand”. Fredrick Douglass awoke the conscious of African Americans to make them realise that wanting to be free and wanting to achieve full civil rights was not enough, neither was enduring a life under white supremacy waiting for life after death to see a new dawn .Believing and hoping was not enough. “Power concedes nothing without demand” the solution is to be willing to work hard to establish it yourself by demanding what belongs to them. However using power in order to concede civil rights was a struggle which was acknowledged by Fredrick Douglass “Without struggle there is no success”. To achieve advancement in African American Civil Rights, African Americans had to undergo a process of struggle. A rainbow is not made without rain; you can not want rain without thunder and lightening being accompanied by it. To achieve full civil rights African Americans had to pay the price along the way which was persecution, de-humanisation and scrutiny. Martin Luther King being inspired by Fredrick Douglass said “Freedom...

Words: 4801 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Adff

...between past lynchings (1882 to 1930) and contemporary law enforcement responses to hate crimes in the United States. While prior research indicates a positive correlation between past levels of lynching and current social control practices against minority groups, we posit an inverse relationship for facets of social control that are protective of minorities. Specifically, we hypothesize that contemporary hate crime policing and prosecution will be less vigorous where lynching was more prevalent prior to 1930. Analyses show that levels of past lynching are associated with three outcome variables germane to hate crime policing and prosecution, but the effect of lynching is partly contingent on the presence of a minority group threat. That is, past lynching combined with a sizeable black population largely suppresses (1) police compliance with federal hate crime law, (2) police reports of hate crimes that target blacks, and in some analyses (3) the likelihood of prosecuting a hate crime case. Our findings have implications for research on law and intergroup conflict, historical continuity in the exercise of state social control, and theories that emphasize minority group threat. Steven F. Messner University at Albany-SUNY onflict theories of crime and criminal law posit that the state largely serves the interests of dominant groups in society (Quinney 1974; Turk 1969; Vold 1958) and this function can be expressed in two distinct ways. On the one hand, the legal apparatuses...

Words: 15783 - Pages: 64

Premium Essay

Arguments Surrounding Capital Punishment As Legal Lynching

...whether capital punishment should be retained or abolished worldwide. While the death penalty continues to be used today, most countries have eliminated it in their criminal justice systems. One substantial country that continues to use the death penalty is America. Capital punishment is significant because it permits individuals to be killed lawfully. The death penalty carries enormous power around the legal system in addition to the persons that are accused of serious crimes. The purpose of this paper is to find out the diverse arguments surrounding capital punishment that has led some countries against it and others for it? This will be done by...

Words: 1851 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

To What Extent Was the Lack of Support from Presidents and Congress the Main Reason Why Little Progress Was Made in the Development of African-American Rights Between 1896 and 1941?

...To what extent was the lack of support from Presidents and Congress the main reason why little progress was made in the development of African-American rights between 1896 and 1941? In 1896, politicians were still a direct way in which African-Americans could use to gain higher levels of civil rights in the United States of America. It is arguable therefore that the support from Presidents and Congress over the time period of 1896 to 1941 was crucial to progress and the development of African American rights. However whether there was a lack of support which caused “little progress” or other factors such as deep racist attitudes in the south which were the cause of no development between 1896 and 1941. The Presidents can be seen as a main reason for little progress being made with African American rights between 1896 and 1941. Firstly there is the Booker T Washington case. President Theodore Roosevelt paid very little attention to the growing African-American concerns. He did however make consultations with Booker T. Washington in 1901, but, these were very empty gestures as they produced no significant action on rights for african americans. Much of the general public was disgusted that the President had met with Booker T. Washington and this is much evidence of a strong racist under current which undermined much of all that happened in the USA, despite this Congressmen and Presidents did to try and help rights for blacks. Another example of were Presidents have hindered...

Words: 1336 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Jim Crow Laws In To Kill A Mockingbird

...One reason some people believed that the laws were necessary, is that almost everyone in every field believed that Blacks were socially, intellectually, and culturally inferior to the Whites (Pilgrim). Whites were also worried that by treating Blacks as equals they were risking a creation of a mutt race which would bring the fall of America (Pilgrim). If a person of color was to break any of these laws, they were to be cruelly punished (Pilgrim). A specific form of punishment appeared to be very popular around this time, and that would be the act of lynching. Between the years of 1882 and 1968, there were 4,730 known lynchings and out of these, 3,440 of them were people of African American ethnicity (Pilgrim). That is roughly three out of every four lynchings. Examples of these Jim Crow laws appear many times over...

Words: 988 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Race and Gender in Harper Lee's to Kill a Mockingbird

...Harper Lee demonstrates the racism of South in the 30's. Tom Robinson's trial represents the racist atmosphere of Maycomb's society. The racial bias of the people of Maycomb makes them blind to see the fact of Tom's innocence and this brings about his murder. Tom's murder echoes Aimé Césaire sarcastic statement in his Et les chiens se taisent, that "in the whole world no poor devil is lynched, no wretch is tortured, in whom I too am not degraded and murdered" (qtd in Black Skin, White Masks 61). Darren Felty in "An Overview of To Kill a Mockingbird", states: "Lee wants to make explicit the consequences of racism. She accomplishes this goal by employing Tom Robinson's trial to allude to different historical events such as the famous 'Scottsboro Boys' trials of the 1930s". According to Felty, in these trials nine black men were accused of raping two white women. Despite a lack of evidence, the men were sentenced to death by the white jury. Unlike Tom, they finally escaped death after a long time (2). Tom Robinson's trial mirrors these historical events to illustrate the racial binarity and segregation that the black people suffered throughout the colonial history. Racial binarity is prevalent in the novel. The narrow-minded people of Maycomb are in favor of segregation in their society and they consider sexual relationship as a threat to their segregation. According to Adam Smykowski in "Symbolism and Racism in To Kill a Mockingbird", For example, "the red geraniums that...

Words: 1944 - Pages: 8