...wasn’t always like this. From the mid-1550’s all the way up until the civil war, slavery was very prominent and was used to produce a lot of raw materials. Abraham Lincoln was able to bring an end to slavery and give freedom to African Americans. But why was he so focused on ending slavery? Abraham Lincoln was born in a log cabin in the backcountry of Kentucky. Lincoln attended very little schooling throughout his early years (Abraham Lincoln Historical Society). The total amount of schooling amounted to less than a years’ worth (Columbia University Press). He taught himself how to read and write under his father’s guidance (Abraham Lincoln Historical Society). He also picked up on how to read by listening to others and reciting what they had said (Abraham Lincoln Historical Society). While he bounced from job to job paying off debt, he also went to law school to further his studies (Columbia...
Words: 880 - Pages: 4
...and Linc Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass: The battle between Freedom and Slavery Kayla DeSherlia ENG/220 January 30, 2016 Alfred Badger Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass: The battle between Freedom and Slavery It was during the Civil War era that both Frederick Douglass and Lincoln fought to destroy a country that was filled with turmoil of slavery. It was then that some of the best speeches came to be. Both of these orators fought for the same thing but they were so different. Frederick Douglass was a African American that was fighting for African American civil rights through speeches such as “Why Is the Negro Lynched?” and “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?” while Abraham Lincoln was fighting for unity for all within the Union and Confederate states. Both of these speakers were able to captivate their audiences through their unique tones, methods, and diction to win over the audience and gain their support. Unique Tones, Methods, and Diction for Douglass Douglass was very clear and had one purpose when it came to making speeches and that was to gain rights for the African American community. He believed in equality for all, regardless of what color they were. He was a former slave that had in fact experienced the terror of being a slave, and he had gained sympathy (1852) and credibility from his audience during “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?” It was due to Douglass’ personal experiences that he was able to use pessimism and patronizing...
Words: 983 - Pages: 4
...Abraham Lincoln Lawrence Bays Axia The University of Phoenix HIS/115 Abraham Lincoln Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president for the United States of America. He was considered on of the greatest presidents because of his fight and success in getting rid of slavery. Before Lincoln was president he was a self-thought lawyer from Illinois. Lincoln was president from March 1861 until his assassination by Johns Wilkes Booth in April 1865. Abraham Lincoln had many views on slavery and not a lot of people know exactly what they were. Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count slaves for the purposes of representation in the federal government. In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system. Lincoln didn’t believe blacks should have the same rights as whites. Though Lincoln argued that the founding fathers’ phrase “All men are created equal” applied to...
Words: 693 - Pages: 3
...right fundamental principles for the future of America. After signing the Declaration of Independence it was a duty for the founding fathers to adhere to it. How did the founding fathers establish a government that would lead to the abolition of slavery? They did so by establishing a government that would follow the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence. As depicted in some of Thomas Jefferson’s writings, it was necessary to end slavery and he laid out why...
Words: 1552 - Pages: 7
...Abraham Lincoln: the supposed “Great Emancipator” who freed the slaves and won the civil war. That is how the story is told, but what is unknown is that slavery was never President Lincoln’s true priority. Just like any other President or Politician, during wartime (and the events leading up to war) his sole focus was keeping his country together. Slavery came second to this. While having this ideal, keeping the country unified, is not a bad priority, it definitely calls for a reevaluation of President Lincoln. He was not, truly, the Great Emancipator, but instead focused on his Presidential duties, just like another politician. First, it must be established that President Lincoln holding the unity of the country above slavery...
Words: 967 - Pages: 4
...personally was anti-slavery, but prioritized the sanctity of the union over ending slavery. Lincoln ended up ending slavery and saving the union, but it cost him his life. Lincoln often describes himself as a naturally anti-slavery man, but decides to do what he feels is right for the union rather than his personal views. His personal viewpoints sometimes differed from his public viewpoints. Lincoln’s stances on the preservation of the union often influenced his position on slavery. Lincoln's principal objective was to keep the Union together no matter what. In the Lincoln-Douglas discusses in 1858, Lincoln broadly expressed "A house separated against itself cannot stand." (Document 1) He goes ahead to clarify how this legislature must be altogether one thing - either all servitude or all free. Lincoln trusts that division is the thing that will part the Union. This view is coming from an anti-popular sovereignty standpoint - Lincoln was negating Stephen Douglas' popular sovereignty views , where the general population have the privilege to choose by vote of their territorial legislature regardless...
Words: 696 - Pages: 3
...States history. One of them is Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln is the 16th president in the history of the United States. Lincoln was at the head of the Republican Party and he was first elected by the Nation in 1860. His presidency is associated with many historic events that will mark the United States. More precisely, Lincoln’s presidency is characterized by the Civil War, which started in 1861. The Civil war was mostly composed of two opponents: The North and the South (Confederate States) of the United States. The North was in favor of the abolition of slavery while the South was not. Indeed, the South’s economy mostly relied on slavery. Specifically, Lincoln is well known because of the Emancipation Proclamation that he established during his...
Words: 801 - Pages: 4
...Abraham Lincoln Lawrence Bays Axia The University of Phoenix HIS/115 Abraham Lincoln Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president for the United States of America. He was considered on of the greatest presidents because of his fight and success in getting rid of slavery. Before Lincoln was president he was a self-thought lawyer from Illinois. Lincoln was president from March 1861 until his assassination by Johns Wilkes Booth in April 1865. Abraham Lincoln had many views on slavery and not a lot of people know exactly what they were. Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count slaves for the purposes of representation in the federal government. In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system. Lincoln didn’t believe blacks should have the same rights as whites. Though Lincoln argued that the founding fathers’ phrase “All men are created equal” applied to...
Words: 693 - Pages: 3
...Alex McKirgan DATE \@ "d MMMM y" 17 December 2014 Is Lincoln deserving of the title “Great Emancipator” In 1863, Abraham Lincoln passed both Emancipation Proclamations in Congress which saw the abolition of slavery. Many would refer to Lincoln as the “Great Emancipator” because of his role in the passing of such a profound bill and a common belief by many is that Lincoln was in favour of the abolition of slavery right from the beginning. However, there is much evidence to show that Lincoln was not opposed to slavery given his his support for the Crittenden Doctrine, which restricted the ability for Congress to ever intervene with slavery. In addition to this, Lincoln was paralysed as President as any substantive opposition to Slavery could see another wave of secession of the border and Southern states. Lincoln was not the only factor which lead to the Emancipation Proclamation being passed. There was the role of Congress in allowing the bill to pass and the role of the slaves themselves for making the abolition of Slavery a Union war aim. This essay will explore the roles played by these three factors and then deduce whether Lincoln is deserving of this title. It can be argued by many that the main reason why the thirteenth amendment was passed was because of the role of the slaves at the time. The civil war created a chaotic scene across the border and Southern states which allowed many slaves to flee to the North as refugees. Despite Northern racism and bigotry...
Words: 1595 - Pages: 7
...During the end of slavery in United States, Lincoln played a big role of the Great Emancipator but was not trusted and yet so energetically vilified by the party of abolition. He did not believe in Christian religion but preferred to believe human minds and law and order was the key. Also he was not open-minded but want do things on his own way. At least he did come to conclusion on how to end slavery using the Emancipation Proclamation Act. “He was Skeptical as to the great truths of Christian religion”, says Lincoln. He was very uncertain and did not believe about the Separates’ God, but believed that human minds is impelled to action that is held over by some power that has no control. All his life he continued to keep a vivid sense of a superintending and overruling Providence that will guide and control the operation of the world. In his midlife, Lincoln had an attitude towards some of early religious skepticism because of his political tax. He attended some churches due to his political appearance and for the sake of his family reputation that were Presbyterian. The abolitionists did not like Lincoln because he was a Republican who supported the slavery in the southern states. As he continued with his presidency he joined a political allegiance, which was the Whig party that showed how Lincoln was a liberal nationalists. Lincoln attacked a proposal that was criticized by Henry Clay how abolitionists have become enemies of the constitutional government. Once he disowned...
Words: 707 - Pages: 3
...History I Professor Frye December 12, 2014 Abraham Lincoln Abraham Lincoln praised himself in American history by the role that he played in abolishing the institution of slavery, but he arrived at this distinction only after a long career of opposition to abolitionism. This at first seems paradoxical, for he had always actively disliked slavery, and he came into national prominence as a politician by strenuously opposing its extension into the territories. However, in the 1850s, with the breakup of the Whig Party, Lincoln parted ways with some of his oldest political associates by deciding to make common cause with anti-slavery activists in the newly formed Republican Party. Lincoln was always aware that slavery, though morally wrong in his eyes, was allowed by law, and he acknowledged that the rights of slave owners, both to retain their slaves and to have fugitive slaves returned, were clearly guaranteed in the Constitution. Before the outbreak of civil war, he advocated nothing that would directly challenge those rights. This position sharply distinguished him from abolitionists, many of who were actively involved in supporting runaway slaves, and all of whom viewed the returning of fugitive slaves as unconscionable, whatever the Constitution might dictate. The most radical abolitionists openly condemned the Constitution for its protection of slavery and rejected its authority. Lincoln never put his hatred for slavery ahead of his allegiance to the Constitution. He admitted...
Words: 1127 - Pages: 5
...soon became the first person to assassinate an American president. On April 15, 1965, Booth shot and killed President Abraham Lincoln while he was attending the play Our American Cousin, at Ford’s Theater, in Washington DC. Shortly after, he jumped on stage yelling, “Sic semper tyrannis!”, meaning “the South is avenged” (History.com Staff 1). He managed to assassinate the president with the help of planning with his co-conspirators. Booth and his co-conspirators were found at a barn, yet Booth refused to surrender. John Wilkes Booth died three hours after being shot in the barn by an investigator.There are a few possible motives as to why he assassinated...
Words: 750 - Pages: 3
...Abraham Lincoln: A political Genius [Name of the writer] [Name of the institution] Abraham Lincoln: A political Genius Introduction In 1846, Abraham Lincoln was elected to federal congress. He was a resolute opponent of President Polk, fought the war against Mexico, summoning the president to declare in what place would have happened to the alleged violation of borders. He demanded the extension of rights of the Union against those particular States, abolitionists argued fiercely, calling for the abolition of slavery in the District (1849). He campaigned vigorously for candidates Whigs, presented himself unsuccessfully in the Senate (1849), and refused the governorship of Oregon. He made a brilliant campaign in 1855 and was presented by the State as candidate for vice-presidency of the republic, but not chosen. In 1858, Abraham Lincoln was carried to the Senate election against Stephen A. Douglas won. The debate focused mainly on the admission of Kansas into the Union as slave state or not slavery. The campaign was of utmost importance because Lincoln forced his competitor to speak out against the Dred Scott decision, which alienated some Democrats and then dividing this party, decided his defeat in the presidential election. For the Senate election, Abraham Lincoln had the majority (4000 votes) vote of the electors of the first degree, but the distribution of electoral districts secured eight-vote majority in which Douglas was re-elected. In 1859, he continued the...
Words: 2384 - Pages: 10
...Dr. Morgan HST 390 24 September 2012 Abraham Lincoln’s Political and Moral Slavery Dilemma The sixteenth President of the United States of America, the Great Emancipator, Abraham Lincoln casts quite a historical shadow over any other competing figure. Lincoln was brought into the world on February 12th, 1809 to an incredibly modest upbringing in which he would mold himself into a successful lawyer and later a politician. Abraham received little formal education during his childhood, eventually acquainting himself with the law through the apprenticeship system. After rising through the Illinois legislature structure, Lincoln went on to serve in the House of Representatives on behalf of the state of Illinois before gaining widespread recognition from his debates with competing Senate candidate Stephen A. Douglas in 1858.The expansion of slavery into the United States new territories was the hotly contested issue of these debates, Lincoln’s stance would eventually propel him into the national spotlight and later the Presidency. Abraham Lincoln’s views on slavery were split between his political obligations and his moral beliefs, his political actions were influenced by his desire to preserve the Union, and his moral stance on the issue largely stemmed from his deep-seeded belief in the power of the Constitution, not the political or social equality of another race. Abraham Lincoln’s view on slavery was segregated in itself, between how he perceived the issue on a political...
Words: 1471 - Pages: 6
...Lincoln’s viewpoints on slavery. Foner starts off by examining Lincoln’s early life from the day he was born in Kentucky in 1809. Lincoln spent 7 years in Kentucky until his family moved across the Ohio river to southwestern Indiana. Then by the time he was 21, Lincoln ended up moving again to central Illinois with his father and family. Lincoln would live in Illinois and became the United States president in 1861. Foner also gives background information that helps build the environment in which Lincoln was born into and grew up in. By the time, Lincoln was born about one-fifth of Kentucky’s population was accounted by slaves. Some of Lincoln’s relatives owned slaves such as his father’s uncle, Isaac, who owned forty-three when he died in 1834. Although Lincoln had some relatives who were slave owners, his parents didn’t support the institution of slavery and joined an antislavery congregation in their church. The white’s living in Kentucky all agreed that they didn’t want to have a free black population and so in 1808, a year before Lincoln was born, the legislature prohibited the migration of free blacks to...
Words: 676 - Pages: 3
