...He did not go to Congress to complete his agenda. He used his power to get everything he wanted done without the approval of the states’ representatives. He acted a sort of dictatorial manner that upset many people, including many judicial service workers. Moreover, Lincoln is not an isolated case. Many presidents after Lincoln like FDR and Theodore Roosevelt overstepped their boundaries in order to achieve their plans. In fact, this sort of presidential overreach could even be equated to today’s society in the regard...
Words: 727 - Pages: 3
...Essentially, it was Ulysses S Grant's 2 strategic masterpiece that brought President Abraham Lincoln's plan, to bring the states of America into one nation. Union army commander lieutenant Ulysses S. Grant's "partner in crime" was William T. Sherman. Sherman's role in the civil war was equally tremendous to Lincoln when it came to suppressing the confederate states in the South. Sherman's way of going about this plan was total war. Total war is defined as disregarding the laws of war and completely destroying towns or cities targeting citizens to make the confederate states sick of war...eventually surrendering. In this case, on November 15, 1864, Sherman and Grant followed a route East through Georgia towards the Atlantic Ocean, known as the March to the Sea, which became "the most destructive campaign against a civilian population". During that march to the sea, Sherman specifically targeted the cities of Atlanta and Savannah, Georgia leaving a trail of impeccable mass destruction. In the end, the plan of total war earned the Union a victory on December 21, 1864. Now that we have looked on the important leaders on the Union army, what about the Confederate...
Words: 858 - Pages: 4
...OF WAR Bull Run Ends the "Ninety Day War” Know: Bull Run, Stonewall Jackson 14. What effect did the Battle of Bull Run have on North and South? North (and South) expected a quick war – Union believed a quick move South to Richmond would end the war – South’s victory increased overconfidence • Soldiers deserted with trophies, many believed war was over • Enlistment rates decreased; preparations for long-term war slowed – North’s defeat was better (long-term) for the Union • Ended belief that war would be over quickly • Caused Northerners to prepare for long war "Tardy George" McClellan and the Peninsula Campaign Know: George McClellan, Peninsula Campaign, Robert E. Lee, "Jeb" Stuart, Seven Days' Battles, Anaconda Plan 15. Describe the grand strategy of the North for winning the war. Union turned to 6-part strategy of total war – Suffocate South by blockading its ports – Free the slave to undermine economy of South – Cut Confederacy in 1/2 by taking control of Mississippi River – Cut Confederacy into pieces by sending troops into Georgia and Carolinas – Take Confederate capital at Richmond, Virginia – Engage the enemy everywhere and grind them into submission The War at Sea Know: Blockade, Continuous Voyage, Merrimac, Monitor 16. What was questionable about the blockade practices of the North? Why did Britain honor the blockade anyway? Blockade began with leaks and was strengthened was war went on – At first, North concentrated...
Words: 621 - Pages: 3
...His orientation changed throughout his presidency. During inaugural speech, he repeatedly insisted that he wouldn't violate the doctrine of states' rights or “interfere with the institution of Slavery in the States where it exists.” He thought that preserving the Union was the most vital aim, and that emancipation could not be tackled because slavery was protected by the Constitution. However, he moved to the radical side of the party during the war as a means to further the Union’s objectives, and later used his political authority to garner support for the Emancipation Proclamation. David Potter believes that Lincoln’s leadership was one of the main causes of the Union’s victory, stating that “Had Lincoln been leading the Confederacy, the South might well have...
Words: 929 - Pages: 4
...autarky, bitterly opposed by the free-trading South. By deliberately provoking hostilities there, he accepted that most of the ‘upper eight’ slave states would secede or, like Kentucky, Missouri, and Maryland, adopt a hostile neutrality because of his policy. The length, cost, and ferocity of the war can also be attributed largely to him. He defined the conflict as between the USA and traitorous individuals in which the states had no standing, because to do otherwise would admit that the Union was not perpetual and that secession was constitutional. There could be no peace negotiations, no compromise, only unconditional surrender to a lawful police action. Lincoln's position predicated the grinding, exhausting struggle it was to become and from the outset, even when most believed in a prompt outcome, he implemented the ‘Anaconda Plan’ devised by army commander Scott for the slow suffocation of secession by sea and river. He was an ‘accidental’ president, virtually unknown nationally before 1860 and elected with only 40 per cent of the popular vote because the Democrat Party split. Far from being the unquestioned leader of his own party, he was a compromise candidate, expected to be dominated by powerful cabinet members and congressional leaders. His lack of a personal political base forced many undesirable compromises on him, perhaps the most damaging being the appointment of the corrupt...
Words: 758 - Pages: 4
...of the Confederate army, plotted an attack at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The battle started on July 1st, 1863 and continued on for three straight days. In just those three days, it turned the Civil War around. A turning point is an action or event that alters the outcome of a situation. Why was the Battle of Gettysburg a turning point? The Battle of Gettysburg was a turning point for three reasons; geographic advantage, the many losses and the change in morale. The geographic advantage was a reason why Gettysburg was a turning point. In (Document A), Lincoln created the Anaconda plan. His plan was three steps; blockade, control the Mississippi River and take the capital of the South; Richmond, Virginia. The blockade was to prevent any European imported goods. That way the Confederacy didn’t have any access to shipped resources. Next, was to control the Mississippi River. By dividing the south into two, Lincoln’s scheme went as planned. Last but not least, was to capture Richmond, Virginia. This was the Confederacy’s capital! If the capital were to surrender to the North, then the Union will have more power, while the south remains helpless. This evidence shows that geographic advantage was a reason why the Battle of Gettysburg was a turning point because it gave the North the upper hand in the Civil War. The numerous losses of the battle was a reason why the Battle of Gettysburg was a turning point. In (Document B), it describes the numbers that were lost in just that one battle...
Words: 721 - Pages: 3
...Chapter 11 Terms 1. Anaconda plan the Union plan to split the Confederacy in half in order to weaken it 2. Fort Sumter A fort in South Carolina where the first battle of the Civil War occurred and resulted in a Confederate victory 3. PGT Beauregard lead Confederates in the battle of Bull Run 4. 5 Northern Advantages larger population and troops, experienced government, better transportation, coal/more supplies because of more factories, and had navy 5. 5 Southern Advantages familiar territory, stronger military leaders, fought with passion, allies from cotton trade, and had better strategic plans 6. Union Naval blockade blocked supplies from getting to the south since Confederacy was too reliant on trade 7. Robert E. Lee one of the best military leaders in history, on Confederate side 8. Border States elaware, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri. D 9. Significance of Washington D.C. and Richmond, VA Washington DC is Union capital and Richmond, VA is Confederate capital 10. Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson Confederate general who refused to yield to Union armies, great leader but killed at Fredericksburg 11. George B. McClellan Union general who was very passive and often clashed with Lincoln, eventually fired and then lost to Lincoln in the election of 1864 12. 1st Bull Run in Manassas, VA; Union winning at first and then ended up losing 13. Ulysses S. Grant one of the best Union generals; known as a butcher and ...
Words: 1416 - Pages: 6
...Republican victory in the presidential election of 1860 led seven Southern states to declare their secession from the Union even before Lincoln took office.[1] The Union rejected secession, regarding it as rebellion. Hostilities began on April 12, 1861, when Confederate forces attacked a U.S. military installation at Fort Sumter in South Carolina. Lincoln responded by calling for a large volunteer army, then four more Southern states declared their secession. In the war's first year, the Union assumed control of the border states and established a naval blockade as both sides massed armies and resources. In 1862, battles such as Shiloh and Antietam caused massive casualties unprecedented in U.S. military history. In September 1862, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation made ending slavery in the South a war goal, which complicated the Confederacy's manpower shortages. In the East, Confederate commander Robert E. Lee won a series of victories over Union armies, but Lee's reverse at Gettysburg in early July, 1863 proved the turning point. The capture of Vicksburg and Port Hudson by Ulysses S. Grant completed Union control of the Mississippi River. Grant fought bloody battles of attrition with Lee in 1864, forcing Lee to defend the Confederate capital at Richmond, Virginia. Union general William Sherman captured Atlanta, Georgia, and began his famous March to the Sea, devastating a...
Words: 6578 - Pages: 27
...information is discussed in the following paragraph. According to Freehling, the events beyond the battlefields partially determined military verdicts. Furthermore, home front and battlefront unveiled defining aspects of civil war. The division within the south also helped pave the path toward the war and also, the division among the southern and home front dissensions determined battlefield verdicts. The outcome of the war was the collapse of the confederacy that was caused by the defeat in the military sphere, rather than dissolution behind the lines. Anti-confederate southerners piled on psychological, economical and geographical burdens that ultimately helped flatten white confederate’s resiliency. President Abraham Lincoln’s statecraft, the union’s anaconda military strategy, northern democrats and English men’s attitudes seemingly tangential matters bore vitally on southern anti-confederates capacity to influence the battlefields and to illuminate important characteristics of civil war. The tale of the southern house divided, highlights under appreciated gems of civil war lore, including revealing code words, colorful luminaries, key battles and vital military orders, this tells why the war came. In conclusion, the anti-confederate southerners in so many ways that are discussed in the paragraph above determined the course/outcome of the civil war. 2-North had the resources to win the war but the South had specific advantages that made it difficult to do so ...
Words: 1730 - Pages: 7
...faced with the daunting choice of allowing the Confederate’s to simply leave the Union, or to try and re-unite the country by military force. Of course the Federal’s and President Lincoln could not simply let the country split into two. President Lincoln ordered his top military leaders to come up with a tactical plan to conquer the rebels and bring the Confederacy back into the Union. One of President Lincoln’s top military leaders, General Winfield Scott, proposed a plan, called the Anaconda Plan, based upon three primary missions (procedures). First, a naval blockade of the Southern seaports, second to gain complete control of the Mississippi river, and third, the capture and surrender of Richmond, Virginia, the capital of the Confederate States of America.1 By blockading the Confederate ports, President Lincoln and General Scott hoped to deprive the rebel government of their main income supply, the export of cotton and other mainly southern type agriculture products to Europe, mainly Great Britain. The Confederacy was receiving payment not only in the form of cash for their exports, but in weapons and ammunition as well. The goal of the second part of the plan was to essentially isolate the western states of the Confederacy from the main military and logistical centers of...
Words: 1596 - Pages: 7
...Chickamauga, General Rosecrans Union Army of Cumberland routed back to Chattanooga, and General Bragg positioned his Confederate Army on the heights above the city, Lookout Mountain (south), Missionary Ridge (east), and on Raccoon Mountain (west). Next, the siege of Vicksburg was fought. The battle of Vicksburg, also called the Siege of Vicksburg, was a long land and naval campaign by Union forces to capture a position. The siege of Vicksburg was fought on May 18-July 4, 1863 in Warren County, Mississippi. The final major military action in the Vicksburg campaign was the Siege of Vicksburg. Capturing Vicksburg was the last major confederate stronghold on the Mississippi River, and completed the second part of the northern strategy of the Anaconda Plan. Grant decided to besiege the city beginning on May 25, when two major assaults (May 19 and 22, 1863) against the confederate fortifications were attacked with heavy casualties. Vicksburg Campaign successfully ended with a significant degraded the ability of the confederacy to maintain its war effort. Robert E. Lee’s defeat at Gettysburg by George G. Meade, a previous day was a turning point of the war. Cut off the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas from the confederacy, as communication with the confederate forces pin the Trans-Mississippi Department for a reminder of war. Union forces approached Vicksburg, Pemberton put only 18,500 troops, grant put over 35,000, with more coming. Pemberton made his defense nearly got broken into...
Words: 1079 - Pages: 5
...weathered tensions with France in the late 1790s, a second war with Britain in 1812–1815, and disputes regarding international boundaries. Political wrangling over economic issues such as the tariff, a national bank, and government-supported public works (called internal improvements in the nineteenth century) proved divisive but posed no serious threat to the integrity of the Union. Despite fissures along ethnic and class lines, the majority of Americans had much in common. They were white, Christian, spoke English, and shared a heritage forged in the crucible of the Revolutionary War. Questions relating to the institution of slavery set the stage for secession and war. Most men and women at the time would have agreed with Abraham Lincoln’s assertion in his Second Inaugural Address that slavery “was, somehow, the cause of the war.” Alexander H. Stephens, the Confederacy’s vice president, minced no words when he proclaimed in March 1861 that slavery “was the immediate cause of the late rupture and the present revolution” to establish southern independence.[1] The framers of the United States Constitution had compromised regarding slavery, creating a democratic republic that sought to ensure its citizenry’s freedoms while also reassuring the South that individual states would have the power to maintain and regulate slavery within their boundaries. The paradox of white liberty that rested in part on a foundation of black slavery was thus imbedded in the origins of the United...
Words: 2066 - Pages: 9
...McClellan’s Influence and Role During the Civil War Chad Hoskins 4446301 MILH 542 Professor Steven Sledge American Public University March 15, 2015 1 Many men during the Civil War made huge contributions that effected their respective sides cause. Some for the worse and some for the better. Battles can be broke down, strategic moves dissected, and even personnel moves debated. But individual men are examined on how they influenced armies, battles, and even their leaders. With that mentioned, George B. McClellan, a great military mind and strategist, perhaps is looked as one of the great leaders during the Civil War who could have made better decisions, change certain outcomes, and maybe even retained the confidence of President Lincoln. George B. McClellan came from a very prominent family who lived in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (1) George was born December 3, 1826 to Dr. George McClellan who had founded Jefferson Medical College. George’s mother was Elizabeth Sophia Steinmetz Brinton McClellan who came from a leading family in the Philadelphia area. George was the third of five children and had a passion for law. At the young age of 13 he attended the University of Pennsylvania. After just two years of studying law, McClellan changed his focus to military service. Now young George B. McClellan was only 15 at the time when he entered the United States Military Academy in 1842. It took a letter from his father to President John Tyler...
Words: 2695 - Pages: 11
...1. The Compromise of 1850 attempted to answer all of the contemporary issues pertaining to the institution of slavery. Describe the major positions on slavery and the contending issues about this institution in 1850. How did the terms of the Compromise of 1850 seek to resolve these issues? In 1850, there were five positions on the institution of slavery. The first position was anti-slavery. This was predominantly felt by those in the north. Those with this view felt slavery could exist in the south but could not be expanded into the new territories. They felt slavery should mostly for economic issues. Plantations with slaves produced higher quantities faster. This meant lower costs. The next position was the abolitionist position. This view was held by a very small minority in the north and almost none in the south. Abolitionists felt slavery should be ended everywhere, even in the south and should not be permitted to expand into the territories. There were two types of abolitionists. There were colonizers who not only wanted to end slavery in the south but they wanted people of color to be shipped to another country because they felt the different races would never get along. Colonizers thought black people could start their own colonies elsewhere. The second type of abolitionists was egalitarians. They, like colonizers, wanted slavery to end everywhere but they felt enslaved persons were Americans and therefore thought they were entitled to all the rights...
Words: 2726 - Pages: 11
...The Mississippi Stream has since quite a while ago had influence in the chronicled, monetary and private improvement of Vicksburg. Established in 1811 and consolidated on January 29, 1825, Vicksburg quickly developed as a middle for trade, agribusiness and stream activity. In 1859, the Mississippi state tradition received an official determination calling for prompt severance from the Union if an abolitionist was chosen president. Taking after Abraham Lincoln's decision, the state withdrew by a vote of 8415 on January 9, 1861. With this vote, Mississippi took after South Carolina into the Confederate Conditions of America. On February 9, 1861, delegates of these states met in Montgomery, Alabama and the temporary Confederate Congress chose...
Words: 2176 - Pages: 9
