Free Essay

M-Core

In:

Submitted By vandykedta
Words 4573
Pages 19
Running head: PROBLEM SOLUTION: M-CORE

Problem Solution: M-Core
Theresa R. Van Dyke
University of Phoenix

Problem Solution: M-Core [Triple click anywhere in this paragraph to begin typing your introduction.]

Describe the Situation
Issue and Opportunity Identification M-Core cannot expand without first dealing with the nonemployment disputes that have arisen as a result of their expansion project. The three holdout residents are similar in that they are steadfast in their beliefs to stay in their homes, although their reasons why are much different. Not only does M-Core have a responsibility to their parent company, Silatel Corp., they also have significant ties to the community leaders within the New Oxford City Council. A third party constituent, The Nature’s Gift Society, has also pledged funds to come to the aid of the holdout residents if need be. Addressing the conflict and resolving the disputes must be handled in an efficient and timely manner. Concerns over broken friendships, animosity, and lack of trust with the company and the Council are all valid concerns the company and community leaders have. By resolving the issue with the holdout residents first, the conflict or interference from the society should go away.
Stakeholder Perspectives/Ethical Dilemmas [Triple click anywhere in this paragraph to begin typing.]

Frame the “Right” Problem M-Core, Inc. will become the world leader in the development of the next generation of multi-core processing chips by resolving the nonemployment disputes that have arisen between the company, holdout residents, the city council, and a third party constituent. Senior management believes success hinges on the development of the land donated to them by Silatel, the parent company. Many solutions are available to M-Core as outlined in Wilmot & Hocker (2007) such as understanding the three approaches to change, the conflict containment model, and the five principles of conflict and emotion.
Describe the “End-State” Vision M-Core, Inc. is a world leader in multi-core processing chips employing the most creative minds in research and development of the next handheld supercomputer. M-Core is also a community advocate establishing a facility that has allowed New Oxford to prosper while showing empathy and compassion for residents by treating all with respect and dignity.

Identify the Alternatives and Benchmarking Validation Two companies have recently gone thorugh similar situations like M-Core dealing with scrutiny from the public and with their customer base. Below is a summary of the benchmarked findings.

Verizon Wireless hit the jackpot of public scrutiny when it announced in December 2011 they would be implementing the $2 fee for online payments. There was much disgrace and back lashing across social media sites along with domain set ups to protest the fee. The announcement came in between Christmas and New Year’s Eve and was to be effective on January 15, 2012 (Lieber, 2011). The public was truly against the fee and, in addition, the Federal Communications Commission decided to investigate. A few hours after that announcement, Verizon retracted the fee requirement and disclosed the following public announcement:

The company made the decision in response to customer feedback about the plan, which was designed to improve the efficiency of those transactions. The company continues to encourage customers to take advantage of the numerous simple and convenient payment methods it provides (Kelly, 2011).

“At Verizon, we take great care to listen to our customers. Based on their input, we believe the best path forward is to encourage customers to take advantage of the best and most efficient options, eliminating the need to institute the fee at this time,” said Dan Mead, president and chief executive officer of Verizon Wireless (Kelly, 2011).

Verizon recognized the conflict associated with their business decision, and acted upon it by altering the conflict conditions. By compromising with their customer base and reacting immediately to the backlash, they were able to save face and accept humility for what they thought was a competitive approach to doing business. Verizon is similar to the M-Core scenario not because of the scale of customers, but because they ended up doing the right thing due to public outcry. M-Core has a similar issue with their public outcry of support for the holdout residents.

Toyota is another corporation that has not weathered well during times of significant scrutiny from the media and press. In September 2009 Toyota announced a recall of 4.2 million units after a devastating crash killed a Lexus customer and his family in California. Toyota ended up publicly apologizing for the impact to the family and for anyone else involved in the recall (Motor Trend, 2010). Shortly thereafter, investigations uncovered that Toyota was covering up the known defects; this followed another rash of recalls in January 2010. Eventually the company stopped the production of eight of their bestselling vehicle lines to ensure it had the capability to fix the problem before anyone else was hurt (Motor Trend, 2010). Toyota is similar to M-Core because of the ethical dilemmas facing both companies. M-Core has an ethical problem with the holdout residents and whether or not they can continue with their project without impacting those residents. Toyota’s ethical dilemma was do they risk significant profit loss and production in lieu of the public scrutiny to minimize the chaos and concern that had overtaken the company. Toyota faced up to humility and tried to change the perceptions of the public by ceasing production and publicly vying to understand the problems they faced.

Based on these finds with Verizon and Toyota, M-Core would be better off implementng a conflict managemetn system that allows them to communicate openly with the residents and changes the perception of the company with those residents and the media. By resolving the dispute in small steps with each stakeholder each one has the ability to discuss their dispute on an individual basis. This is part of the conflict containtment model as outlined in Chapter 7 by Wilmot & Hocker (2007). With this model there are three apporaches to the exchange between M-Core and the key stakeholders, with the primary focvus being on the three holdout residents.

Evaluate the Alternatives [Triple click anywhere in this paragraph to begin typing.]

Narrowed List of Alternatives [Triple click anywhere in this paragraph to begin typing.]

Identify and Asses Risks [Triple click anywhere in this paragraph to begin typing.]

Make the Decision [Triple click anywhere in this paragraph to begin typing.]

Develop and Implement the Solution [Triple click anywhere in this paragraph to begin typing.]

Evaluate the Results

Conclusion [Triple click anywhere in this paragraph to begin typing.]

References
University of Phoenix. (2012). Scenario two: M-Core [Multimedia]. Retrieved from University of Phoenix, MMPBL 540/Conflict Management website.
Wilmot, W. W., & Hocker, J. L. (2007). Interpersonal conflict (7th ed.). New York : The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Lieber, R. (2011). An uproar on the web over $2 fee by Verizon. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/30/business/media/an-uproar-on-the-web-over-2-fee-by-verizon.html
Motor Trend. (2010). The Toyota recall crisis. Retrieved from http://www.motortrend.com/features/auto_news/2010/112_1001_toyota_recall_crisis/viewall.html

Table 1
Issues and Opportunities Identification
| | | |
|Issues |Opportunities |Reference to Specific |
| | |Course Concept |
|M-Core, Inc. has significant non-employment |Resolve the non-employment disputes in an |In Chapter 7 Wilmot & Hocker describe three approaches |
|related disputes to work through in before |efficient and timely manner. |to change. One of the approaches is: Try to alter the|
|they can complete their expansion. | |conflict conditions. M-Core, Inc. may be able to change|
| | |the conflict by making an alteration in the elements of|
| | |this situation, by altering the nature of a problematic|
| | |interdependence on the residents, or by changing |
| | |perceptions of incompatible goals. Another common |
| | |approach to ending conflict is: Change your own |
| | |communication and/or perceptions. As discussed in |
| | |Chapter 7, this approach is called the “the humility |
| | |option.” |
|Employees of M-Core, Inc. have significant |When resolving the conflict with the |M-Core, Inc., the Council, and the residents can use |
|ties to the community leaders within the New|holdout residents this may lead to broken |constructive communication to resolve this conflict. |
|Oxford City Council. |friendships, animosity, and lack of trust |There are five steps as identified in Chapter 7 by |
| |with the company and the city. |Wilmot & Hocker: |
| | |Explore different assumptions. Listen with respect, |
| | |without attacking the other's point of view. |
| | |Develop an objective view and description of the |
| | |conflict, as if you were outside the conflict. Practice|
| | |describing your opponent/partner's position. |
| | |Give up persuasion in favor of exploration of different|
| | |perspectives. Treat each person as intelligent and |
| | |worthy of attention. |
| | |Look critically at all sides to the controversy. All |
| | |sides have strengths and weaknesses that can add to the|
| | |analysis. |
| | |Express hope, belief in the goodwill of the other |
| | |person, and your intention to work out your |
| | |differences. |
|The Nature’s Gift Society is a third party |By resolving the issue with the holdout |As outlined in Chapter 7 by Wilmot & Hocker, the |
|constituent fighting for nature and the |residents first, the conflict or |conflict containment model offers guidelines for |
|rights of the holdout residents. |interference from the society should go |containing and regulating the exchange. It involves |
| |away. |three approaches: |
| | |Emphasizing a present orientation. The focus is on the |
| | |present, not the past. “Why” questions are replaced by |
| | |“how” questions. |
| | |Adopting a “conciliatory set.” This requires (1) |
| | |labeling the behavior of the other in the most positive|
| | |light and (2) planning moves to “resolve the issue |
| | |equitably” rather than by winning. |
| | |Seeking solutions in small steps. Address issues one at|
| | |a time and sequentially. |

Table 2
Stakeholder Perspectives and Ethical Dilemmas
| |
|Stakeholder Perspectives and Ethical Dilemmas |
| | | |
|Stakeholder Groups with Competing | | |
|Values |The Interests, Rights, and |The Ethical Dilemma Based on the Competing |
| |Values of Each Group |Values |
|List: Group X | | |
|versus Group Y | | |
|Holdout resident, Elva Burke, versus |Elva Burke: |Should M-Core, Inc. play the big bad company |
|M-Core, Inc. |Her home has sentimental value; she has strong family |and push a resident like Ms. Burke out who is a|
| |roots and raised her family here. She loves the |long-time resident? Can M-Core make the |
| |outdoors and her prize-winning garden. She values the |expansion work without interfering with Ms. |
| |simple life and being left alone. She has been honest |Burke's home life? Does Ms. Burke have an |
| |and forthright with M-Core, Inc. She believes it is |ethical obligation to the city to improve the |
| |only fair for her to be able to keep her home, a home |city’s footprint with this business venture? |
| |she has so many memories in. She is not influenced by | |
| |money. | |
| | | |
| |M-Core, Inc.: | |
| |M-Core wants to expand its business to become more | |
| |competitive in the processing of multi-core processing | |
| |chips. The company values its employees and wants the | |
| |best for them to inspire their creativity and visions. | |
| |The company is using a “big stick” approach to | |
| |influence the holdout residents. The company values | |
| |hard work and has become very pushy as competitors are | |
| |advancing quicker than they in the area of hand-held | |
| |processors. | |
|Holdout resident, Stephen Truman, |Stephen Truman: |Mr. Truman isn’t against selling out, but how |
|versus M-Core, Inc. |Mr. Truman has integrity, but is a divorced father |would it impact the other two holdout residents|
| |trying to operate his own successful business through |if he sells his home? Can M-Core make the |
| |hard work and expansion. He wants to make as much |expansion work if Mr. Truman eventually sells |
| |money as possible from the sale of his property, |out and the others don’t? |
| |however he prefers to holdout as greed has taken over | |
| |with him. | |
| | | |
| |M-Core, Inc.: | |
| |M-Core wants to expand its business to become more | |
| |competitive in the processing of multi-core processing | |
| |chips. The company values its employees and wants the | |
| |best for them to inspire their creativity and visions. | |
| |The company is using a “big stick” approach to | |
| |influence the holdout residents. The company values | |
| |hard work and has become very pushy as competitors are | |
| |advancing quicker than they in the area of hand-held | |
| |processors. | |
|Holdout resident, Tracy Little, versus|Tracy Little: |M-Core is in a dilemma with Ms. Little and the |
|M-Core, Inc. |Ms. Little appreciates hard work and family life. She |obligation she has with her mother. Is the |
| |is a simple person who wants to devote time to her |company so greedy that they can’t make the |
| |aging mother. She is respectful and mindful of her |expansion work without totally uprooting Ms. |
| |duty as the closest daughter to her mother. She |Little and the mother? Can Ms. Little find |
| |appreciates the flexibility she needs to take care of |another way to take care of her mother via a |
| |her. She has been honest and forthright also with |rest home or hospice care with the additional |
| |council member, Brenda Peterson, and prefers to wait to|funds she would get from the sale of her home? |
| |take the offer after the passing of her mother. | |
| | | |
| |M-Core, Inc.: | |
| |M-Core wants to expand its business to become more | |
| |competitive in the processing of multi-core processing | |
| |chips. The company values its employees and wants the | |
| |best for them to inspire their creativity and visions. | |
| |The company is using a “big stick” approach to | |
| |influence the holdout residents. The company values | |
| |hard work and has become very pushy as competitors are | |
| |advancing quicker than they in the area of hand-held | |
| |processors. | |
|Nature’s Gift Society versus M-Core, |Nature’s Gift Society: |M-Core does not have any moral obligation to |
|Inc. |The society is passionate about social responsibility |the society per se; their dilemma is with |
| |and fairness. The society thrives on nature and taking|nature itself and preserving the environment. |
| |care of the environment. It is not easily influenced |How far do they really need to go? |
| |by big business and will do what they need to do to | |
| |fight M-Core’s expansion into the wetlands. The | |
| |society does not trust easily, especially businesses, | |
| |and wants to support those holdout residents in need. | |
| | | |
| |M-Core, Inc.: | |
| |M-Core wants to expand its business to become more | |
| |competitive in the processing of multi-core processing | |
| |chips. The company values its employees and wants the | |
| |best for them to inspire their creativity and visions. | |
| |The company is using a “big stick” approach to | |
| |influence the holdout residents. The company values | |
| |hard work and has become very pushy as competitors are | |
| |advancing quicker than they in the area of hand-held | |
| |processors. | |
|Holdout residents versus New Oxford |Burke, Truman, and Little: |The Council is in place to support the |
|City Council |See above |residents and the businesses that bring in tax |
| |New Oxford City Council: |money and revenue. The ethical dilemma is how |
| |The mayor, Daniel Cruz, is easily influenced by |far do they need to influence M-Core and what |
| |businesses wanting to develop in his city. He believes|friendships may be broken as a result? Does |
| |he has a social responsibility to M-Core, Inc., but he |the city need bad publicity when it is trying |
| |also has his own agenda with political motivations and |to grow? What about Mr. Cruz’s future |
| |support expected from M-Core. He does not like bad |political agenda; does the city have an |
| |publicity and does care for his residents, however he |obligation to him to support him in the future?|
| |isn’t clear where his obligations are. With the | |
| |council itself, the council members have general | |
| |sympathy for the holdout residents, especially Ms. | |
| |Little, and value friendships. The council values | |
| |respect and social responsibility for the most part and| |
| |prefers to operate a simple city. | |

Table 3

Table 3
Analysis of Alternative Solutions
[Click Twice on Table to Change, see instructions on next page] [pic]
Table 4
Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|Risk Assessment and Mitigation |
|Alternative |Risks and Probability |Consequence and Severity |Mitigation Techniques and Strategies |
|Allow remaining holdout |Perceived as avoiding conflict- |Avoidance begets more avoidance |Show compassion and stay involved with |
|residents to stay in their |medium |(Wilmot & Hocker, 2007) and leads |the dialogue as long as they can and |
|homes; do not pressure further |Inability to expand the operation |to more unproductive conflict.- |know when to end it (Wilmot & Hocker, |
|to sell (disengage) |fully limits future potential of |high |2007) |
| |company- medium |M-Core may need to look for |M-Core shows restraint and does not act|
| |May cause unnecessary conflict with |additional space if it is |on vengeful feelings towards the |
| |those residents who already sold |absolutely necessary for expansion|holdout residents |
| |their homes. Did they really need |which means additional time, cost | |
| |to?- medium |and lag time to the market with | |
| | |their product- high | |
| | |Litigation may occur with | |
| | |residents who already sold causing| |
| | |bad press and additional cost to | |
| | |the company- medium | |
|Move forward to expand facility|Perceived as heartless company with |Litigation by holdout residents- |Arbitration, litigation, or negotiation|
|at any cost to the company and |no empathy to holdout residents’ |high |are all techniques that can be used to |
|the stakeholders |needs- high |Media follows the possible |resolve the dispute; M-Core will go as |
| |Media adds to public scrutiny- high |litigation, but at best, paints a |far as they want without fear of |
| |Delays product expansion and chief |picture of M-Core as a company who|reprisal from residents |
| |engineer, Nicholas Petros, decides |does not care about the | |
| |to leave the company for what he |communities they operate in- high | |
| |perceives are greener pastures |Because of the further delay in | |
| |(high) |expansion, M-Core loses their | |
| | |chief engineer who has already | |
| | |made comments that life is too | |
| | |short to be on a losing team- high| |
|Contain conflict by resolving |Will take additional time to |Further delays product expansion- |Implement the Conflict Containment |
|the dispute in small steps with|individually address each |high |Model- three approaches to regulate the|
|each individual stakeholder |stakeholder- medium |Holdout residents may be targeted |exchange between M-Core and the |
| |May label M-Core or the stakeholders|as greedy or M-Core may be |stakeholders: |
| |as greedy “villains”- low |targeted as mammoth company taking| |
| |Sequentially dealing with each |advantage of people |Ask “how” questions, searching for |
| |stakeholder one at a time may cause |Holdout residents may not know |solutions in the present |
| |one to get more than the other, or |what the other is “getting” from |Adopt a conciliatory set- an equitable |
| |less- low |M-Core |solution for all with positive behavior|
| | | |Sequentially address the conflict one |
| | | |at a time |

Table 5
Pros and Cons of Alternative Solutions
|Alternative |Pros |Cons |
|Allow remaining holdout residents to stay in |Holdout residents can stay in their homes |Holdout resident #2 (Truman) wanted a buyout |
|their homes; do not pressure further to sell |M-Core is perceived as an empathetic company |after all; sues M-Core |
|(disengage) |M-Core backs off and figures out how to make |Competitors gain more edge as M-Core figures |
| |the expansion work without continuing the |out how to expand the operation without this |
| |conflict with the holdout residents |additional land |
| | | |
|Move forward to expand facility at any cost to |Holdout residents may be offered more money for|Negative press |
|the company and the stakeholders |their homes |Large attorney fees due to litigation |
| | |Public image is frayed |
| | |Additional lawsuits may develop from holdout |
| | |residents #1 and #3 |
| | |Historic homes are demolished for big business |
| | |Unnecessary conflict with Nature’s Gift Society|
| | |expands to separate litigation |
|Contain conflict by resolving the dispute in |Each stakeholder has a chance to discuss their |Holdout residents may still not get what they |
|small steps with each individual stakeholder |individual dispute with M-Core |truly want |
| |M-Core is perceived as a company who has |May still lead to anger and resentment towards |
| |empathy and respect for the wishes of the |M-Core or vice versa with the holdout residents|
| |holdout residents |Media still gets involved |
| |Focuses on the present conditions, not what | |
| |M-Core has done in the past with other | |
| |residents | |
| |Allows for more timely resolve of dispute when | |
| |M-Core focuses their attention individually | |

Table 6
Optimal Solution Implementation Plan
|Action Item Deliverable |Timeline |Who is Responsible |
|Work individually with each holdout resident to |Close deals within 10 days with each resident, |Mark Marchant, Corporate Counsel |
|resolve conflict by offering more money |moving quickly; includes contracts and closure | |
| |of home properties | |
|Begin expansion of M-Core facility |Within 45 days |M-Core management |
|Open doors to new facility |Within six months |Naomi Mendoza |

Table 7
Evaluation of Results
|End-State Goals |Metrics |Target |
|World leader in multi-core processing chips; |Sales of computers |Within six months of opening new facility |
|successful delivery of handheld supercomputer | | |
|Employ creative minds |Attrition and hire rates |At full capacity within 90 days of opening; |
| | |aggressive employee value proposition including|
| | |salaries and benefits |
|Close out deals with three holdout residents, |Time of 10 days max on each |One month |
|including sale of properties, contracts, and | | |
|demolition | | |
|Establish facility |Time to open doors |Three months |

-----------------------

Instructions for the Stakeholder Perspectives/Ethical Dilemmas Section (Step 1, Part B):

You will want to write this section after you have completed Step 9 – the Instructions for Gap Analysis and Estimated Implementation Costs, Evaluation of Results Section.

In Step 1, Part B, you will discuss whether the solution you selected will actually resolve the ethical dilemmas you identified in Table 2. Explain either how these ethical dilemmas are addressed or why they were not addressed in a concise paragraph.

Delete this box of instructions before submitting your final paper.

Instructions for Narrowing the List of Alternative Solutions Section (Step 5, Part B):

Choose the best two or three alternatives. Keep in mind you should not have more than three second-tier solutions. Explain your logic in a paragraph or two.

Delete this box of instructions before submitting your final paper.

Instructions for Analysis of Alternative Solutions Section (Step 5, Part A):

In a concise paragraph, justify the relative importance (weight) that you gave to the goal you ranked highest in Table 3.

Delete this box with instructions before submitting your final paper.

Instructions for Risk Assessment and Mitigation Section (Step 6):

In this step, the two or three remaining alternatives are each evaluated to identify potential risks and negative consequences. Part of benchmarking is to identify potential risks associated with the best practice or process used by real companies. In one paragraph, qualitatively assess the probability and severity of the risks materializing and any mitigating tactics which you fully detailed in Table 4. Be sure to let the reader know how you went about researching the risks and mitigation techniques you are reporting. Use citations as appropriate.

Delete this box of instructions before submitting your final paper.

Instructions for Selecting the Optimal Solution Section (Step 7):

In Table 5 you identified the pros and cons of your various alternatives. Tell the reader what your solution looks like and describe how it will help the subject company to achieve its vision. Describe how your optimal solution will realize the desired end state and end-state goals. Justify your optimal solution using scholarly terms and concepts from the associated text. Use citations as appropriate.

It will be very important in the final paper to develop and explain a comprehensive solution. For example, you cannot just say “M-Core. needs a new system process.” You will need to define what that means from the benchmarking and text (probably a paragraph) and then you will need to detail what the solution looks like (a couple of paragraphs) and describe how it will help Intersect achieve its strategy and the end-state goals/desired end state. Use citations as appropriate.

Delete this box of instructions before submitting your final paper.

Instructions for Developing an Implementation Plan Section (Step 8):

You have now built your final recommended solution. Coming up with a great plan is only part of the challenge for leadership. A plan that looks great on paper but can’t be implemented is not a great plan. At least half the issue is getting the job done. Your next step is proving how your plan can be implemented and showing the value a successful execution can bring to the organization. Remember that neglecting to provide the organization with sufficient evidence that your plan has the ability to achieve success can diminish your credibility as a leader and inhibit your plan from entering the implementation phase.

As a skilled researcher you can also find articles on implementation, implementing initiatives, and project implementation steps that identify best practices and derailers. Investigate at least one article that includes implementation steps. Identify any derailers or risks from the article(s) as well. Use citations as appropriate. Refer back to Table 6 and remind the reader how your solution mirrors the established practice you identified from your research.

For example, when companies create a new system or process, what steps do they go through? • Identify major deliverables and milestones. • Develop a timeline • Determine who will do what • Determine what resources will be needed

Delete this box of instructions before submitting your final paper.

Instructions for Gap Analysis and Estimated Implementation Costs – Evaluation of Results Section (Step 9):

Detail for the reader how success will be measured to determine how well the end-state goals were met. Lay out your metrics for measuring success and address the strengths and weaknesses of the chosen metrics.

Important Note Regarding Research: In order to successfully research examples and or best practices of an implementation plan it will be important to stay on the correct path to obtain the appropriate research information. While conducting your research make a point to focus on the following: how companies have executed a successful implementation plan, what they did, what steps they took, how long it took to do them, what problems they ran into, and how they overcame them. In addition find out how they measured their success of the implementation along the way. Finally after you’ve completed your research, incorporate what you learned to improve your proposed final solution.

Delete this box of instructions before submitting your final paper.

Finally – Spelling, Grammar, APA, and Mechanics

As graduate students, you are expected to spell correctly, use correct punctuation, format paragraphs effectively, follow the directions in the APA manual for formatting your references and citations, etc. This is worth 20% of your overall grade assessment on papers. As a final note remember to run your papers through WritePoint to edit your paper for spelling, grammar and language errors. WritePoint provides you with detailed feedback in just a few minutes. You can find WritePoint and submit your paper by following this path:

1. Log onto your student webpage 2. On the left hand side under services click on the Center for Writing Excellence link 3. Under the Center for Writing Excellence paragraph click on submit your paper 4. Fill in your student information and upload your document by clicking browse 5. then click submit

Delete this box of instructions before submitting your final paper.

Instructions for the Conclusion Section:

This is the conclusion of your paper. It should be one or two paragraphs summarizing the topics in your paper. It should also contain your conclusions or findings.

Delete this box of instructions before submitting your final paper.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

M-Core

...Define positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, punishment, and extinction, and distinguish between continuous and intermittent schedules of reinforcement. Then give a practical example of one." In Positive Reinforcement a particular behavior is strengthened by the consequence of experiencing a positive condition. For example: My dog will get a treat when he sits on my command. Positive Reinforcement means that the subject is likely to repeat the behavior, or response, because stimulus (e.g. reward) is received directly after response. Negative reinforcement encourages employees to perform better so they can have an unpleasant condition removed from their work environment. Example, Constantly being reminded to be more productive, often seen as nagging or badgering by employees, is a negative reinforcement technique. It may be used intentionally or unintentionally, but it creates a negative condition in which the employees are subjected to an unpleasant situation. When they reach the productivity level desired, the nagging stops, which reinforces the desired behavior. While this type of negative reinforcement may get your employees to improve, it does not encourage them to strive beyond the minimum levels required to make the negative situation stop. A schedule of reinforcement is a rule that establishes the probability that a specific occurrence of a behavior will produce reinforcement. Two schedules of reinforcement—continuous reinforcement and extinction—provide...

Words: 4107 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

M-Core

...Macroeconomics Environmental Analysis Macroeconomic Environmental Analysis Google Inc. is the largest and best search engine. Google operates in the Internet industry. “The company primarily focuses on the areas, which include search, advertising, operating systems and platforms and enterprise” (Market Watch, 2011, para.1). Larry Page (CEO) oversees Google Inc. a public operating company. Keyword based advertising is how the business creates the majority of the company’s profits. “Google’s mission is to organize the world‘s information and make it universally accessible and useful” (Google, 2011, para. 1). In this paper, Google’s external environment will be discussed, which includes the industry environment and the operating environment. Industry Analysis The buyer’s hold a great deal of power in the Internet industry. Internet users without any high costs can use search engines. Google is replicable search engine used by the users of Internet industry because the organization is one of the best. Staying power is established by any business that has built a strong reputation. “The framework captures the complexity of power and proves useful for tracing changes in power status over time between value chain members in industrial relationships” (Akpinar & Zettinig, 2008, para. 2). Individuals who can develop new online services, website concepts, and technologies are considered the suppliers of the industry. Internet businesses have...

Words: 1066 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

M-Core Description

...SCENARIO: M-Core’s New Home COMPANY OVERVIEW M-Core, Inc. is a subsidiary of Silatel Corp., the world’s largest and most successful designer and manufacturer of computer processors. The company was created to develop the next generation of multi-core processing chips. This revolutionary technology intends to combine four or more processors on a single chip that is expected to provide 10 times the processing power of current high-speed models, while consuming only one-tenth of the energy. Application of this technology would make powerful pocket PCs an affordable reality for the public. As part of M-Core’s initial capitalization, Silatel donated a research facility in New Oxford, a small New England town. The facility sits on a picturesque four-acre plot near a lake, surrounded to the North and East by legally protected wetlands. Silatel believed the area’s beauty would attract and inspire top research talent, which could help ensure the venture’s success. M-Core management, however, believes that success hinges on the development of a 90-acre research and development campus that includes office, laboratory and research space. Plans also call for artistic landscaping, walkways and green areas, an open-air design that M-Core management believes will relax and inspire campus workers. To the West and South of the New Oxford facility are older homes, most built prior to World War II, some as early as the 1800s. The residents of New Oxford are proud of their homes and...

Words: 3595 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Problem Solution: M-Core

...Problem Solution: M-Core M-Core is an organization that expands and multiplies processor chips for computers. M-Core delights itself on its innovative technology and is trying to merge more than four processors on one chip. “If successful the processors will provide 10 times the processing power of current high-speed processors that are available on the market, while at the same time eating up less energy.” (University of Phoenix, n.d.) With the purpose of assist M-Core in the fabrication of the innovative processor chips Silatel has bought a research building in New Oxford a small town in New England, to use as a fabricating plant. New Oxford population is mostly hardworking, calm people who are very proud of their residences and area. A lot of of the people of New Oxford receive the new fabricating plant, as a new way to raise income for the town and generate employment. M-Core is trying to construct the new plant by buying the homes of the people who presently reside in the terrain for a cost higher than what the homes are valuable. The majority of the people have been content to get the corporation up on its offer but three residents have been indisposed to move and put up for sale their houses. M-Core has requested the mayor to assist convince the people to put up for sale their terrain. This paper will study the difficulty facing M-Core and several of the potential solutions to the dilemma. In the end I will suggest a solution for M-Core to employ to resolve the conflict...

Words: 4428 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

M-Core Problem Solution

...Running head: PROBLEM SOLUTION: M-CORE Problem Solution: M-Core Problem Solution: M-Core M-Core is at the head of their industry and has planned to move forward with developing their new facility in New Oxford, a green environment. In becoming a part of the New Oxford community, M-Core will have an opportunity to embrace and become involved with the community’s needs and the environment that has become protected, helping to secure the future of the people while working within the company’s estimated budgets and timeframes. Describe the Situation Issue and Opportunity Identification M-Core is having difficult y negotiating acceptable deals with the remaining homeowners causing delays towards the development of the new research and development facility. The opportunity M-Core has is to develop creative ideas to resolve the conflict with the resistant homeowners by creating an alliance with Nature’s Gift Society through the implementation of a green plan during planning, developing, and implementing phases of their new facility. By creating the alliance, Nature’s Gift may ease the negotiations with the homeowners, minimize the need for legal actions to take the properties from the remaining homeowners, and avoid need for the Mayor’s involvement. Stakeholder Perspectives/Ethical Dilemmas M-Core desires to gain additional acreage to develop their facility to create the “chip” and a better workplace, while developing on land that displays serenity to inspire...

Words: 3379 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

M-Core Problem Statement

...Running head: PROBLEM SOLUTION: M-CORE Problem Solution: M-Core Turkessa Amoah University of Phoenix Problem Solution: M-Core M-Core is a subsidiary of Silatel Corporation. M-Core is a company that develops and multi-core processing chips for computers. M-Core prides itself on its revolutionary technology and is attempting to combine four or more processors on a single chip. “If successful the processors will provide 10 times the processing power of current high-speed processors that are available on the market, while at the same time eating up less energy.” (University of Phoenix, n.d.) In order to facilitate M-Core in the production of the new processor chips Silatel has purchased a research facility in New Oxford to use as a manufacturing plant. New Oxford is a small New England Town. The people of New Oxford are mainly hardworking, laid back people who are very proud of their homes and neighborhood. Many of the residents of New Oxford welcome the new facility, as a way to increase revenue for the area and create much needed new jobs. M-Core is attempting to build the new facility by purchasing the homes of the residents who currently occupy the land for a price above what the homes are worth. Most of the residents have been happy to take the company up on its offer but three residents have been unwilling to relocate and sell their homes. M-Core has asked the local politicians, including the mayor to help persuade the residents to sell their land. This paper will...

Words: 4498 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

M-Core Problem Solution

...Running head: PROBLEM SOLUTION: M-CORE Problem Solution: M-Core University of Phoenix Problem Solution: M-Core Hoping to expand its operations to a new 90-acre facility, M-Core finds itself in conflict with local landowners who are unwilling to sell the homes necessary for the full expansion. According to Wilmot & Hocker (2007), “Conflict is an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from others in achieving their goals” (Chapter 1). M-Core and the homeowners are in conflict because they are interdependent. According to Wilmot & Hocker (2007), “Conflict parties engage in an expressed struggle and interfere with one another because they are interdependent. Each person’s choices affect the other because conflict is a mutual activity” (Chapter 1). M-Core has the opportunity to build strong community ties if this conflict can be resolved peacefully. The mayor of the small town hopes to see his community grow and feels that the M-Core expansion provides a great opportunity to do just that. Describe the Situation Issue and Opportunity Identification M-Core is having troubles resolving the conflict with the landowners that are holding out. This is having a significant impact on the progress of the expansion process. Amidst all of the negotiations and the surrounding tensions, M-Core has many opportunities at hand as well. First, M-Core can build community relations...

Words: 3037 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

M-Core Problem Solution

...OWNER’S GUIDE Ceramic Glass Cooktop Radiant Surface Elements Electronic Oven Control - ES III Self Cleaning Oven Feature READ AND SAVE THESE INSTRUCTIONS Contents Product Registration ......................................................... 2 Versión en español ........................................................... 2 IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS ............................... 3-4 Setting Surface Controls ................................................ 5-6 Setting Warm Zone Controls (if equipped) ....................... 7 Setting Warmer Drawer Controls (if equipped) ................ 8 Before Setting Oven Controls ........................................... 9 Control Pad Functions .................................................... 10 Setting the Clock and Minute Timer ............................... 11 Setting Oven Controls ............................................... 12-15 Self-Cleaning ............................................................. 16-17 General Cleaning ....................................................... 18-20 Customizing Your Oven Performance ............................. 21 Changing Cooktop and/or Oven Lights .......................... 21 Avoid Service Checklist .............................................. 22-23 Warranty ......................................................................... 24 ELECTRIC RANGE This Owner's Guide contains general operating instructions for your range and feature information for...

Words: 11172 - Pages: 45

Free Essay

Fin332

...PART 1 Company Allocation Ticker symbol | Company | | GICS Sector | GICS Sub Industry | Address of Headquarters | | BEN | Franklin Resources | | Financials | Diversified Financial Services | San Mateo, California | | FCX | Freeport-McMoran Cp & Gld | | Materials | Diversified Metals & Mining | Phoenix, Arizona | | The cost of capital of the aforementioned companies will be discussed in the following questions. The companies will be referred to by their Ticker Symbols henceforth. Question 1 BEN The book value of the company’s liabilities and equity can be deduced from a number of online sources. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (2013) provided the company filings data whereby BEN’s Form 10q, dated 29/07/2013, showed the following (included on page 2 of this report). The book value of long-term debt is $1,252.1 million, and the book value of equity is $10,402.3 million. The schedule of outstanding debt shows that this figure includes $54.5 million of FHLB advances and $1197.6 million of Senior Notes at various effective interest rates. The notes on Stockholders Equity and Non- Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests reveal that Franklin Resources Inc Stockholders Equity totals $9779.8 million whilst the Non- Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests (previously referred to as minority interests) totals $622.5 million. FCX The book value of the company’s liabilities and equity can be deduced from a number of online sources. The US Securities...

Words: 2672 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Sylvia Gregorio

...I. Problem statement What should Mr. M. Lacdao do with Sylvia Gregorio’s offer of resignation as analyst of Center for Energy Research and Development’s Solar section brought about by absence of organizational value system? II. Objectives: 1. To be able to establish camaraderie and rapport among employees of the center. 2. To be able to continue to attract the best and brightest employees. III. Analysis This is about the circumstances why Sylvia Gregorio wants out of CERD. It not just answer the question of job dissatisfaction but also the outline the steps to take in order to align employee values with that of the organization and what its visions are. It takes into account the recognition of talent, efficiency at work and the values that employees must develop in order to create an organization that encourages camaraderie, rapport and team success rather than being confined to few individuals or gender-equality, efficiency at work and recognition of job accomplishment. At the same time, her negative behaviors about her being unsatisfied with her work as an analyst gives away to complaints and other issues about job inefficiency. IV. Alternative course of solution 1. On promotion of Sylvia Gregorio as head of Solar section: Advantages: • Talent retention • Job satisfaction resulting in increased productivity and boredom at work. Disadvantages: • Resistance to authority due to masculine dominated workplace and lack of respect 2. On the reassignment of Sylvia Gregorio...

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Analysis Xyz Energy Management

...the sale to support the process and support each other. Although morale was not high, it was better than had initially been envisaged when the sales process was announced, the staff were extremely proud of the value they had built up for the company, and it was felt that Big Energy must see significant value in the existing processes and systems of XYZ Energy, as well as in their customer base. The core business structure of both companies was similar, not surprisingly given they both operated in the same energy retailing market. For example, both companies had marketing, commercial, operational and trading department, and each one of these areas was represented on the companies’ management teams. XYZ Energy also had a strategy department, which Sally Johnson managed. At the point of the sale, the chief executive and functional business members of the management team were immediately made redundant prior to any integration of XYZ Energy’s operations into Big Energy. Sally was retained post sale to facilitate parts of the integration or operations. With the removal of the core management team, it quickly became clear that Big Energy wished to remove the majority of...

Words: 606 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ikea Case

...What are the core competencies and end products of IKEA? How are they linked with each other? IKEA is capable to design its products in-house; therefore they can reduce their costs because outsourcing their product designing is much cheaper. Despite that they’re designing its product itself, people find it still attractive enough to buy IKEA’s products. Also their furniture and packaging is designed in such a way that it’s easily transportable (‘flat packaging’1) for both customer and IKEA. The assemble-it-yourself furniture, together with the flat packages, reduced space requirements in logistic operations, which lowered the costs either.2 To maintain their low-cost strategy they have to manage an international low-cost supplier network. By 2004, IKEA’s network of international low-cost suppliers had grown to the point where it had 43 trading service offices in 33 countries.3 By well thought allocation of their warehouses and stores they managed to reduce costs even further. So we can conclude IKEA is capable of sustaining its low costs, by managing, establish and designing its supplier network in such a way that IKEA achieves lowest costs in logistics. Even though they’re capable to establish a low-cost supplier network, IKEA is also capable of designing its furniture in such a way that it “fits the IKEA concept of form, function and price”4, “for example the OGLA chair which initially was made of wood but eventually is made out of hollow...

Words: 601 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

...Charles & Keith's greatest asset are its people. With this belief, the company requires a passionate team with the following values to govern the company: Unity Integrity, Respect and Openness Passion for Perfection Customer Focus Inspire & Empower People Core values form the foundation of the corporation’s management structure, while aspiring qualities which include an enterprising and a fighting spirit are needed to create a formidable formulae. What is more, we are characterised by our dedication and commitment to our work. Hierarchical barriers are kept to a minimum within the company structure, promoting, among other things, a more direct and respectful interaction between all collaborators. At Charles & Keith, we promote continuous sharing, exchanging and contributing of ideas. This basis forms the daily dosage of management, coupled with leading by example, and creating a unique and harmonious working relationship through a cohesive and family oriented environment. Besides the core values, Charles & Keith team is comprised of a group of specialists who constantly strive to improve in their respective professional fields. At Charles & Keith we want our professional staff to develop within the company and to gain more responsibilities over time. For these reasons, training is available for every position to endorse professionals in all fields within Charles & Keith. In this way, greater personal and professional satisfaction is achievable, added to the increasing...

Words: 269 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Glinia

...Growth strategies By the end of 2013, Lululemon owned 171 stores in the United States and 54 stores in Canada, which means the North America market was reaching maturity (Natalie, O.R. 2014); but this company has its own strategies to expand their home market of North America. Generally, market penetration strategy involves in additionally advertisements, sales and promotions.(Grewal et al., 2012) However, Lululemon takes organic growth strategy, which is being a part of community, and grow organically. For example, when Lululemon choose a local community as their target market, they will open a showroom to attract customers and stimulate customer’s ideas to open a new store in their local community. If Lululemon ensure the local community is profitable, then they will operate a new store. The process of opening a store seems slow, but the store will bring great benefits and strong customer loyalty(Natalie, O.R. 2014). Market development When the North America market reaching maturity, Lululemon started to seek opportunities to expand market internationally. Lululemon planned its expansion into England. Since London has 8.3 million of yoga enthusiasts, Lululemon has a great opportunity to expand into London(Natalie, O.R. 2014). Lululemon first opened one full-sized store in London, and this store brought huge benefits. In the future, Lululemon plans to open four new stores in London. Additionally, Lululemon already owned 29 full-sized stores in Australia and New Zealand...

Words: 374 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Finance

...stage of the application, it is vital that candidates can demonstrate the core competencies needed to be effective in the role to which you are applying to. You need to be able to demonstrate that you have the competencies in order for your application to be proceeded to the next stage. Please answer truthfully, as you may be asked to expand on these examples at assessment. Please pay attention to your spelling, punctuation and grammar, as these will be assessed. 1. British Transport Police Officers often have to work in partnership with other organisations to combat crime on the rail network. Who do you see as the key BTP partners in achieving this and why are they our key partners? (100 words max) 2. Are there any other organisations or people you think BTP do or should work with to combat crime? (50 words max) Please provide an example of an occasion when you have had to really understand what others have wanted, for you to help them solve a problem? 3. Tell us briefly what the problem was and how you became involved? (50 max words) 4. How did you know what was needed? (50 words max) 5. What exactly did you do and say? (200 max words) 6. What was the outcome? (50 max words) 7. What do you think the real cause of the problem was? (50 words max) Competencies - Part 2 At this stage of the application, it is vital that candidates can demonstrate the core competencies needed to be effective in the role to which you are applying...

Words: 884 - Pages: 4