...The merit system is the process of promoting and hiring government employees based on their ability to perform a job, rather than on their political connections. Federally, it was instituted by the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act. It is the opposite of the Spoils system | | | | |An example is hiring or promoting relatives solely because they are family members, with no consideration of the qualifications | |or merit of other job candidates or employees. | |Nepotism in the Workplace | |Workplace nepotism is not unusual, especially at smaller companies and non-profits in the private sector. | |The obvious reason aside, it's not unusual likely because there is no universal "nepotism law" at the Federal level that | |prohibits it in all states. Several state legislatures and city councils have passed nepotism laws (or anti-nepotism laws, as | |they're sometimes called), but typically only in regard to public-sector employment. | |However, the consequences of nepotism...
Words: 7141 - Pages: 29
...Brad Connor 2/5/14 SOC 350 Professor DeWitt What is Social Justice? In today’s society, people use the phrase “social justice” to form a basis of how individuals should act with one another. However, there is really no clear definition of the right “social justice”. People depending on diverse circumstances look social justice differently; for example race, economic status and gender can come into play. Michael Novak defines social justice as “the capacity to organize with others to accomplish ends that benefit the whole community. (Social Justice: Not What You Think It Is)” The definition of social justice seems to always circle around a few key words: fairness, equality, common good, merit and morals (What Is Justice?). These words form a foundation to allow society to function properly with free will and choice without totally controlling the people. As stated before, every person may have a different meaning to what social justice is and who deserves social justice, which presents issues around the world. The death penalty is a major issue that is problematic to the question of “what is social justice?” Society looks at criminals as outsiders, uncivilized and dangerous. So society decided to form the procedure of the death penalty, which sentences a person to death who has committed a capital crime. Some people find the death penalty just while others do not. Some individuals feel that the death penalty helps society. By killing the criminal you eliminate any further...
Words: 691 - Pages: 3
...In the United States, we notice workers constantly being assessed based not on hard work, but the ability to adhere to public desires.In America, there was a time when a hard working approach would earn one a decent paycheck that one could live off of, but since, times have made a complete turnaround. The shift goes from hard work getting you to the top, to pleasing people getting you to the top. A statement made by Victor Tan Chen in the article, Living in an Extreme Meritocracy Is Exhausting, published in The Atlantic, states, “Those further down the economic ladder are also learning that a good work ethic is not enough. They can’t just clock in at the factory anymore and expect a decent paycheck. Now they have to put on a smile and pray...
Words: 265 - Pages: 2
...The American Dream is the ability to access basic human freedoms like justice and free speech. I wouldn’t go as far as saying meritocracy exists as I see in reality that is not the way it works. For the most part, I think the stereotypical definition of the American Dream is an idea people cling to like the last ember on the fire after you have run out of wood to heat the house in the winter. You need it to go on. It helps validate that those crappy jobs you worked for 15 years meant something other than getting screamed at by your boss. It helps us believe that we can have material possessions and higher social status than those before us. I define it as the ability to access basic human freedoms. In America, we have The Constitution of Amendments,...
Words: 605 - Pages: 3
...Perceived Meritocracy: Structure, Stratification, and Life Chances at a Glance America as a Perceived Meritocracy America, like most other countries in the world, has a system of social stratification in place, which is the division of society into groups arranged in a social hierarchy. The most formal form of stratification is that based on wealth. Because of this and other devices of stratification, there is an unequal distribution of wealth and power among the members of society, known as social inequality (Ferris & Stein, 211). Though this social inequality is very real and Americans have to face it every day, this bitter reality seems less unpleasant as the idea of the American Dream is brought up. The idea of the American Dream is something which the majority of Americans clings to and is able to seek hope within. It is an idea that says as long as one works hard enough and has enough passion, work ethic, and gusto that they, too, can achieve a higher status in society than the current one in which they reside. Americans often bring up a spectacular example of this so-called dream, Oprah Winfrey, highlighting the fact that she went from immense poverty to wealth, and if she can do it, then so can anybody else. However, what these hopeful, blindsided American fail to realize is that Oprah Winfrey is the exception, not the rule. To assume that the American Dream is within the grasp of each American pursuing it would mean that America runs as a meritocracy. A meritocracy...
Words: 1175 - Pages: 5
...is the land of the free and its society offers the possibility of rising up the social ladder as far as their efforts take them. Being "free" means being able to control your own life, the directions you might take, understanding and determining choices. There are several social forces that limit our freedom. The main force, being able to make a difference in your own life. Education has helped me achieve a lot in life. For example, being in school has taught me how difficult it can be living on my own. It is a secure way of ensuring a steady paying job in the future. This has given me insight to inequalities by others not having the same educational opportunities as me. In class we discussed something called the "Myth of Meritocracy". The "Myth of Meritocracy" is the idea that peoples success and failures are a result of "merit"- if you work hard enough you will succeed in whatever you attempt to accomplish. Many Americans have managed to become socially mobile. James Loewen, social mobility is "the movement from one social class to another- becoming more wide-spread in America". This meant that people had a better chance to move upward in society". The stress on upward mobility is...
Words: 1424 - Pages: 6
...Welcome back to my blog! It seems so soon that I'm blogging again. Since the last time, I challenged myself to read at a faster pace than my previous novels. My current goal is 180 pages a week. Unfortunately, I spent half the time sick or in the hospital with a 103° fever unable to even get out of bed due to my vision being blurry because of the lack of contacts. However, I was able to finish my first book, Lost in the Meritocracy. Since then, I have started a second book called Chew on This: Everything You Don't Want to Know About Fast Food. It is a nonfiction book that talks about the side of fast food that the companies don't want to show the public like their advertising schemes or their meat slaughterhouses. I'm currently 280 pages into...
Words: 738 - Pages: 3
...I. INTRODUCTION Singapore has always taken pride in being a meritocracy and its embrace of meritocracy has been the cornerstone of the nation’s success story. Over the years, Singapore’s meritocracy has emphasised on “equality of opportunity” over “equality of outcomes”; shaping a relatively level playing field where the most capable and hardworking individuals regardless of ethnicity or social classes have an equal opportunity to rise to the top. While the State has always heralded the success of meritocracy, the systemic flaws and failures that were once side-lined in the public eye are becoming increasingly prevalent and visible today. This paper on “Examining Meritocracy and Elitism in Singapore” serves to explore the inherent contradictions within the concept of meritocracy and investigate the systemic failures arising from the dissonance caused by how meritocracy is practised in Singapore where the inevitable social and income inequalities results in an elitist system which perpetuates itself. The central research question is how meritocracy shapes the Singapore elite and in turn how the elite shapes meritocracy in the country. In this paper, the elite is defined as the class of English-educated Singaporeans who subsequently rises to the top as the political and bureaucratic elite, unless otherwise specified. This paper will discuss how the elite accumulates an increasing degree and concentration of influence which allows them to consolidate...
Words: 5135 - Pages: 21
...In the column, “How Merit-based College Admissions Became So Unfair,” George F. Will analyzes meritocracy and critiques that it is making life become regressive. He proves meritocracy, “while highly democratic in its intentions, has turned out to be colossally undemocratic,” through listing the downfalls of meritocracy. He focuses on logic in order to urge the reader to think with reason. He formally ridicules meritocracy and gets all people to think about the soundness of the education system’s admission process. George begins his column by comparing World War I chemist, James Conant’s, aid in developing to poison gas to him also advocating the adoption of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. He follows this with insight from Conant’s granddaughter...
Words: 724 - Pages: 3
...in all schools. This helps the children in education to feel a sense of belonging and can help develop role models. It can be argued that people from cultural sections in the USA may feel that paying loyalty to a flag which is not their culture, can cause conflict and negative sub-cultures as they may feel their culture isn't recognized and they may feel singled out. Functionalist’s believer meritocracy is true and that if students work hard enough they can achieve high grades and work their way up the social ladder based on how well they work. This will allow different abilities to be 'sifted and sorted' into their appropriate role in society. However, not everybody agrees with this consensus opinion. Marxists deliver a conflict theory on education. They gave the theory of 'the myth of meritocracy'. They believe education ensures that the working class remain the working class and the middle and upper class remain as that. Marxists believe education is a tool to help maintain social divisions. So the middle class could suppress the subject class. It can be argued that meritocracy does exist as people, such as Alan...
Words: 428 - Pages: 2
...legitimate rights to sovereign rule of a nation. The factors that result from the three elements of nationalism that contributes to the survival of the state are equality within people in the state in terms of the state being meritocratic and the administrative rights of the state. Nationalism results in two main factors that are essential for the state to survive, mainly, the administrative rights of the state and meritocracy. Hence, the state needs nationalism to survive. A nation, defined by Anthony Smith, is “[a] named population sharing a historic territory, common myths and historical memories [and] a mass public culture, a common economy and common legal rights,”2 For the purpose of this essay, all states will be referred to as modern states with a centralized power held by the state and a legal entity with sovereign rule over its people. This essay argues that nationalism is needed in unifying the nation with a common national identity in terms of linguistic and culture homogeneity, which is needed for the state to exercise its administrative right and practice meritocracy. 1 2 Ernest Gellner. Nationalism. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1997, p. 3 Wayne Norman, “Theorizing Nationalism (Normatively)” in Theorizing Nationalism, ed. Ronald Beiner (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999), p. 53 Language is no doubt one of the most essential aspects of nationalism because it is used by the state in administration and education. Education is a trait of modern...
Words: 1628 - Pages: 7
...Meritocracy is the holding of power by people selected on the basis of their ability. Pablo Picasso once stated, “Action is the foundational key of to all success.” In other words, he was explaining that meritocratic actions lead to success. Clive Crook, the author of the article “A Matter of Degrees,” used his writing to discuss various arguments about education. He constructed a brief case relating to the correlation between family finances and the ability for this generation of students to attend college affordably (Crook 28). I strongly disagree with Crook’s beliefs about the United States and its declining meritocracy. While concluding an argument about whether or not the percentage of students attending college immediately out of...
Words: 675 - Pages: 3
...increase racial bias among men and women, specifically among minorities and Caucasian employees Castilla, 2005; Miller, 2008). Miller also argues that merit-based performance systems reduce inequality; research performed in another of Castilla’s articles, Gender, Race and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers examined the link between performance appraisals and earnings increases based on personal data from a large service organization located here in the U.S (Castilla, 2005, p. G1). It highlighted that both white minorities (women and men) earned the same scores on performance appraisals but the women were being paid a lower reward than the men. Miller (2008) also stated that this type of biased can be overcome by increasing accountability and transparency company-wide (para. 9). Based on the research conducted, the results showed that decisions made regarding pay and performance appraisals were “performance reward bias” (Miller, 2008, para. 6). This type of biased presented false meritocracies, subjectivism, and unfairness presents challenges for employers who utilized performance appraisals within their organization. Furthermore, he stated that although merit-reward policies create the appearance of meritocracy; they create a greater opportunity for the employees and employer (para 7). Overall there is a positive relationship among performance, wage and wage growth. The result of the study shows that there is...
Words: 350 - Pages: 2
...The education system helps children in many ways. It has many functions, preparing children for work and secondary socialisation are just examples of some of the functions. However, different sociologists have different views on what functions the educations system provides, and their different ideas tend to be conflicting. Functionalists would say that a function of the education system is teaching role allocation; this was created by Parsons, and built on by Davis and Moore. Role Allocation is the process in education by which students are judged on aptitude and ability and suggested suitable career/work roles. This makes sure that the highest jobs, such as surgeons, lawyers, are undertaken by the most talented people. They said that inequality is necessary as it ensures that those that are talented fill the most important jobs. However there are many criticisms for this, Tumin criticised David and Moore for putting forward a circular argument, how do we know what is an “important” job? Marxists would criticise this function as it means those who can afford better education (middle class) have a higher chance of being the ones with the important jobs. Marxists would say that a function of the educations system is to reinforce class inequality and capitalist values. Althusser, a neo Marxist, would say that the education system is part of the Ideological State Apparatus. The ISA maintains the rule of the bourgeoisie by controlling people’s belief and ideas. They would say that...
Words: 622 - Pages: 3
...Is America really a land of opportunity? Is it really a place where one can transform their dreams into a reality? Technically, it can be described as a meritocracy. This means that anyone can do anything they wish to, given that they take the right steps. It is known as a land of opportunity; somewhere that aspirations are within reach if the right individual is willing enough. America continues in its meritocratic nature to this day by allowing driven individuals to become what they have always dreamed of through hard work and dedication. Taking beneficial classes and making good grades in those classes allows individuals to lay the foundation for their own success. By building a stellar transcript, determined students are setting themselves...
Words: 540 - Pages: 3