Premium Essay

Michael Shermer's How We Believe

Submitted By
Words 759
Pages 4
In the book, “ How we Believe” Michael Shermer creates a claim that the human brain is a “belief engine”. This belief engine creates a multitude of pattern recognition machines which makes connections to create the mean of patterns observed in nature. Shermer supports this claim saying “Humans are pattern seeking animals and we adept at finding patterns whether they exist or not”. When analyzing the ideology of human pattern seeking, we adapt to find at finding patterns using different methods to learn in order to avoid danger or conflict, recognize social relationship, and to understand the world around us. The human mind, being as complexed as it is, is given a enormous amounts of sensory data in which we decide to process them. When processed data is stored to our memory, we relay learned information to adapt to our environment. Adapting to our environment can be by means avoiding conflict. We avoid conflict or danger in order to survive. This humanistic instinct even allows us to self-correct mistakes made by yourselves or others. …show more content…
We seek to discover the world and finding out patterns helps us find these world mysteries. We use different ways to find patterns to unlock secrets of the world. One method includes the scientific method. The scientific method is philosophically best defined as discovering what is true to defer from what is lies and delusion. This means to question what we believe and find a reason or rationale to why it is real or not to avoid type I and type II errors. So we observe the universe and make decide by testing through repeated trials. René Descartes also called "Father of Modern Philosophy", rejected the idea that everything could be determined with logic, without observation or experiment. He believed to doubt everything, break everything into smaller ideas, solve simpler problems first, and be thorough. Using these ideas creates a pattern to identify the world’s

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Belief And Denial Of The Holocaust

...Brian Levin believes that the denial of the Holocaust pulls in people who are right-wing and anti-Semitic to conspiracy theories. People who are anti-Semitic are prejudice against Jews in every way. Do they truly believe the Holocaust did not happen because of insufficient evidence, or just because they do not like Jews? Elie Wiesel is not the only survivor to write a book about his experience. Anne Frank wrote a diary while in the Holocaust. Her diary was found later and then published. Extremists who deny the Holocaust believe Frank’s diary was a forgery, and they also believe the six million Jews who died was an exaggeration. Before the Holocaust began in 1933, there were approximately 9.5 million Jews living in Europe. If two-thirds of Jews were annihilated during the Holocaust, would not that equal out to nearly six million Jews that died? (USHMM). When the Holocaust ended in 1945, it caused a rapid growth of learning in fields such as history, philosophy, and literature. Holocaust denial in North America is important to extremists because it includes the study of these subjects, along with different governments and their political officials and also allows them to study how Jews are believed to have created the Holocaust for their own purposes. According to Brian Levin, “the Holocaust is largely or entirely a myth invented during...

Words: 1793 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Does Science Make Belief in God Obsolete?

...Keith Ward Victor J. Stenger Jerome Groopman Michael Shermer Kenneth Miller Stuart Kauffman 2 4 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 Does science make belief in God obsolete? irteen views on the question Online at www.templeton.org/belief INTRODUCTION T he John Templeton Foundation serves as a philanthropic catalyst for research on what scientists and philosophers call the Big Questions. We support work at the world’s top universities in such fields as theoretical physics, cosmology, evolutionary biology, cognitive science, and social science relating to love, forgiveness, creativity, purpose, and the nature and origin of religious belief. We encourage informed, open-minded dialogue between scientists and theologians as they apply themselves to the most profound issues in their particular disciplines. And, in a more practical vein, we seek to stimulate new thinking about wealth creation in the developing world, character is booklet neatly embodies our approach to the Big Questions: the contributors are education in schools and universities, and programs for cultivating the talents of the gifted. scholars and thinkers of the first rank, they address a perennial and much-disputed subject, and they bring to bear—in civil, elegant prose—a range of different perspectives. By assembling this “conversation” and inviting the public to join in, we intend to promote a dialogue that transcends familiar rhetoric and stock answers. We aim to turn discourse booklet will be a lasting...

Words: 13856 - Pages: 56