Free Essay

Milgram

In:

Submitted By anisahsshah
Words 963
Pages 4
Milgram, S. (1963)
Behavioural Study of Obedience
Case Study #2
Social Psychology
Important terms: * Obedience: The psychological mechanism which links individual action to political purpose, the dispositional cement that binds men to systems of authority. * GADH: The “Germans are different hypothesis” * Dispositional attribution: This is believing that a person's behaviour is caused by an individual's personality or disposition rather than the situation they are in. * Situational attribution: This explains behaviour in terms of aspects of the situation that a person is in rather than the person's internal characteristics such as personality

Background/Context:
Milgram’s study is an attempt to test ‘the Germans are different’ hypothesis. The Germans are different hypothesis states that German’s have a basic character deficit which means they have a readiness to obey people in authority regardless of the act they are being asked to carry out.
The Germans are different hypothesis is an example of a dispositional attribution as it is arguing that the cause of behaviour is believed to result from the persons own personality or characteristics.
However, Milgram set out to question this dispositional attribution of the Germans. He believed that the situation had led to the inhumane behaviour of the Nazis and therefore that anybody in the same situation as those committing such atrocities would have done the same in the same circumstances. Milgram argued that people would commit atrocities if required to do so by an authority figure. This argument is an example of a situational attribution as it is arguing that the behaviour resulted from the situation a person was in.

Aim: The aim of the experiment was to investigate what level of obedience would be shown when participants were told by an authority figure to administer electric shocks to another person.
Method: Lab experiment using controlled observation
Variables:
* Independent Variable: The prods and prompts provided by the experimenter to carry on administering shocks to the learner for wrong answers. * Dependant Variable: The degree of obedience shown; measured by how far up the shock scale the participants went
Controls:
* A rigged lottery draw was used for every participant * All participants were paid $4.50 just for showing up. * The prods and prompts used by the authority figure were the same for each participant and were used in the same order. * The same apparatus was used throughout the study.
Sample:
40 males aged between 20 to 50 years from the New Haven area. They were recruited through a newspaper advert which asked for volunteers to participate in a study of memory and learning (deception). The study took place at the formal confines of Yale University. The participants represented a wide range of professional and educational backgrounds. They were paid $4.50 for their participation.
Personnel:
* The role of the experimenter was played by a 31-year-old, Biology teacher; his manner was impassive and his appearance somewhat stern and emotionless throughout and he was dressed in a grey technician’s coat throughout. * The victim/learner (aka the stooge) was played by a 47-year-old accountant given the name of Mr. Wallace, trained for the role, whom most observers found mild-mannered and likable.
Shock Generator: * Milgram created a phony ‘shock generator’ which had 30 switches marked clearly in 15 volt increments from 15 to 450 volts. * To improve the authenticity of the shock generator written labels were also clearly indicated for groups of four switches: ‘slight shock’, ‘moderate shock’, ‘strong shock’, ‘very strong shock’, ‘intense shock’, ‘extreme intensity shock’, ‘danger: severe shock’. Two switches after this were marked XXX). * The phony generator also had buzzers, flashing lights and moving dials. Each participant was given a sample shock of 45-volts to convince them of the authenticity of the shock generator.
Procedure:
* One participant and one victim (a confederate) were used in each trial. In order to justify the administration of the electric shocks by the participant a cover story was used. A general introduction about the relation between punishment and learning was given to the participants. * The participant was asked to draw a slip of paper from a hat to determine which role he would play. The draw was rigged so the participant was always the teacher and Mr. Wallace (the confederate) was always the learner. * The teacher (participant) and learner were taken to an adjacent room and in full view of the teacher (participant) the learner was strapped into the ‘electric chair’. * The participant (teacher) was then seated in an adjacent room in front of the shock generator and asked to read a series of word pairs to the learner. The learner was asked to learn these pairs; if the answer was wrong the participant had to tell the learner the correct answer and then the level of punishment that they were going to give them. They would then press the first switch on the shock generator (15 volts). For every subsequent incorrect answer the participant was required to move one switch up the scale of shocks (15 volts higher than the voltage of the last shock delivered). * The learner/stooge would give an average of 3 wrong answers to every one that he got right. * No vocal response or other sign of protest was heard from the learner until the shock level of 300 volts was reached. At this point the learner (Mr. Wallace) pounded on the wall of the room and could be heard by the participant. * Participants were given a series of prods and prompts (by the authority figure) to keep them going when they showed signs of tension or wished to abandon the study. * A participant who breaks off at any point prior to the highest shock level (450 volts) is called a defiant participant, while one who obeys up to the 450 volts is called an obedient participant.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The Milgram Experiment

...The Milgram Experiment was one of the most influential experiments in social psychology. It was conducted by Stanley Milgram and was published in the 1960s. These laboratory experiments offer a powerful and disturbing look into the power of authority and obedience. Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying orders if it involved performing dangerous and even deadly action against another person and that violate their own personal beliefs and values. Simply put, Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII (Taylor, Peplau & Sears, 2006). Milgram selected participants for his experiment by advertising, through the newspaper, for male participants to take part in a psychology study of learning at Yale University. The procedure was that the volunteer was paired with another person and they drew straws to find out who would be the “learner” and who would be the “teacher.” The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was one of Milgram’s associates (pretending to be a real participant). While in another room, the "teacher" would deliver a shock, ranging from 15 to 450 volts, to the “learner" every time an incorrect answer was produced. While the participant believed that he was delivering real shocks to the learner, the associate was simply pretending to be shocked. As the level of shock increases, the learner’s reactions...

Words: 553 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Stanley Milgram

...domination in every aspect of life, and to challenge them; unless a justification for them can be given, they are illegitimate, and should be dismantled, to increase the scope of human freedom.” There is a true feeling of what authority can do if placed in situations that require someone to follow instructions. What happens to someone when they follow the orders of another person in authority? An experiment conducted by psychologist Stanley Milgram reveal how situationism applies to study results. How would this experiment differ if the participants were from various races, cultures, gender groups? A summary of the study and how it was conducted Stanley Milgram is a psychologist who conducted a study based on obedience during the 1960’s, and this experiment produced startling results. Questions still arise about the experiments validity, but the impact on psychology remains to be one of the best measures to assess how authority plays a role in obedience. In 1961 after the Trial of WWII criminal Adolph Eichmann, Milgram started his study. Stanley Milgram's experiment built on the idea of obedience, and the experiment would deliver a shock to participants who participated in the experiment. There were levels of voltage from mild to dangerous, and to a maximum voltage of 450, the highest level were labeled XXX. The role of a teacher who would deliver the shock to the student every time the student answered incorrectly. The student would only pretend to be shocked...

Words: 1162 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Milgram Experiment

...Milgram’s experiment is that the nature of the experiment caused many subjects to experience clear distress and discomfort during the process, and the effects of the experiment had the potential to be harmful in the future. This ethical issue violates the federal guidelines for human subject research, in which the guidelines state that an ethical experiment is one in which “risks to subjects are minimized” by “using procedures which are consistent with sound research design and which do not unnecessarily expose subjects to risks” (Basic HHS Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects, 1991). Milgram himself reported the emotional disturbances that his subjects experienced, explaining how the “mature” and “poised” businessman that started the experiment were “reduced to a twitching, stuttering wreck […who…] was rapidly approaching a point of nervous collapse” (Baumrind, 1964). Milgram also mentions that many of the subjects requested to stop the experiment, yet continued to go on even through “nervous laughing fits” and seizures in some cases (Baumrind, 1964). So even if two-thirds of the participants of the experiment emphasized the idea that authority figures influence obedience, many are still skeptical because the study clearly violates ethical guidelines that prohibit...

Words: 1197 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Milgrams Background

...consequences as well as having to notifying participants on all features of the study which could have an influence on their decision to take part (Hobbs, 1948). Throughout the psychological history many research studies have been conducted by various psychologists. There have been some which have been ethically critisied, with the lack of ethics taken into consideration. The most commonly discussed research study which has many ethical issues is known to be conducted by a behavioral psychologist Stanley Milgram (1963). Leading to many discussions Milgram (1963) purpose of his study was to investigate how far an individual would obey a figure of authority (Bernstein, 2011). Stanley Milgram (1963) introduced his well-known study on obedience within psychology. Milgram (1963) was a psychologist based at Yale University; he had based his laboratory experiments in a form to be able to study the occurrence of obedience to authority within humans. To be able to conduct the experiment Milgram (1963) advertised his experiment on a newspaper, which he then used to select 40 males age ranged from 20 – 50...

Words: 1546 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Milgram Experiment

...The Milgram Experiment The Milgram experiment took place in 1963 and was conducted by Stanley Milgram. Stanley Milgram who was a psychologist at Yale University performed this experiment to show the conflict between obedience to authority and personal ethics and morals. In 1962 Milgram wanted to investigate how the Nazis could terminate Jews during World War II without even the thought of human dignity. With this experiment he would show how the Germans were obedient to authority figures. To do this Milgram selected 40 males’ participants between the age of 20 and 50 to play 2 roles. The first role was the teacher and the second role was that of student. All the participants were teachers because Milgram rigged the selection process. With all the partisipants believing they were selected as teachers they were taken to a room where the students were connected to electrodes. The researcher asked a serious of health questions and the student would answer with some concerns but decided to continue with the test. Next the teachers were put in adjoining room seated in front of a shock generator. The shock generator was comprised of multipul switches ranging from 15 volts up to 450 volts. The researcher explained to the teachers that for every wrong answer given they were to administer a shock starting from 15 volts. For every wrong answer after that he was to increase to the next voltage and so on. The student which was a recording would show signs of pain and wanting to stop...

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Stanley Milgram

...Stanley Milgrams Experiment- Ethical or Unethical? February 16 2012 Stanley Milgram conducted a psychological experiment on the problem of destructive obedience and how it serves numerous productive functions in society. Although journalist Diana Baumrind questioned his experiment as to whether or not it was ethical, Stanley proved his case thoroughly by proving that all of his actions were well planned and very ethical. He did this by following the guidelines of ethics and social science research including protecting his participants from long lasting physical pain or psychological harm, informing all the subjects of potential risks and procedures involved, and also using necessary deception for the purpose of deceiving the participants so they are not influenced by the real purpose of the experiment. Stanley Milgram proves his case thoroughly and with the utmost confidence. Stanley ensured that all his participants were protected from long lasting physical pain and psychological harm. Although Diana stated that “It has become more commonplace in psychological laboratory studies to manipulate, embarrass and discomfort subjects...Milgrams study is a case in point”, she was clearly mistaken. Milgram ensured that post-experimental treatment was administered to all the subjects. Although some patients during the experiment experienced some very unexpected symptoms such as twitching, sweating, groaning and nervous laughter fits, four out of five subjects felt that this experiment...

Words: 576 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Milgram Experiment

...Abstract Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, performed one of the most famous studies conducted at the time, in 1963. Stanley Milgram was very interested in the effects of interactions on behavior. In his experiment, he wanted to test the limits of the participant's compliance and obedience, under conditions of extreme distress. Milgram wanted to have a better understanding of how far people would go to obey orders given by someone in an authority role; even if that meant that, the orders contradicted their personal beliefs. The subjects of the study believed they had to obey what the authority figure's guidance that was conveyed to them. The guidelines were to shock other participants ultimately if they answered incorrectly; even silence was an incorrect answer. The experiment, to this day, is one that is studied, because it showed how many people, no matter gender, economic stance, or race, would inflict pain, and even death, to obey someone who has more authority than they do. The subjects were given a set of rules to abide by. The study was to see how the subjects responded to the effects of punishment on memory. The Milgram Experiment There were two main pieces of this study; there was the "learner" and the "experimenter". There was a list of teachers, the teachers were told to give shocks to the learners, the shocks were not real, and however, the participants did not know this. The participants thought the students were being shocked...

Words: 1168 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Milgram Experiment

...The Milgram Experiment Why do people follow orders to carry out immoral acts even when they know it is wrong? Under what circumstances are normal everyday people obedient to authority? Research Aim: To find out if people would obey an unjust order to inflict pain on someone else. Research Hypothesis: That people would not be willing to inflict pain on one another simply because they were told to do so. Variables: IV, DV, Extraneous: Independent Variable Dependent Variable Extraneous Variable Proximity of the learner Amount of shock administered Closeness of the authority Duration of the shock Prestige of the setting Speed of the response Presence of rebellious peers Research Method: Forty male participants were selected after replying to a newspaper ad for an obedience experiment. At the beginning of the experiment they met a man called Mr Wallis, a mild-mannered man in his fifties; who was then hooked up to a charge generator. He was in fact a confederate. The participant sat in another room and tested 'Mr Wallis' on word pairs, when he got one wrong, the participant was to give him an electric shock. These increased as more incorrect answers were given from 15 to 450 volts. Each time a shock was given a pre-recorded sound played indicating Mr Wallis in varying degrees of pain, until after 315 volts there was an eerie silence. Each time they tried to stop Milgram himself encouraged the participant to continue (this was the authority figure). Subject...

Words: 523 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Milgrams Experiment-

...διαφωνία. Την υποταγή οριζοντάς την ως αλλαγή συμπεριφοράς με σκοπό την αποφυγή τιμωρίας ή την αποκόμιση κέρδους και τέλος την υπακοή που την προσδιορίζει σαν μία βαθιά γνωστική αλλαγή ακολουθώντας μία ρητή εντολή. Ο Milgram επηρεαζόμενος από τον ash(1951) (οπ.αναφ.Macionis,2007) που δημοσίευσε μία σειρά από πειράματα με θέμα την συμμόρφωση στο οποίο οι συμμετέχοντες προσαρμόζονταν σε λάθος κρίσης σε μία σειρά από ερωτήσεις επηρεαζόμενοι από την πλειοψηφία, προσπάθησε να αναπαράγει εκ νέου την μελέτη του Ash αλλά με ένα πείραμα που θα είχε σημαντικές συνέπειες στην απόφαση της συνέχισης η της μη συμμετοχής των συμμετεχόντων. Επίσης επηρεάστηκε σημαντικά από ένα ευρύτερο κοινωνικό ζήτημα, την σφαγή 6 εκατομμυρίων εβραίων από τους ναζιστές και το βιβλίο του Ardendt 1963 (Hogg & Vaughan 2011) με τίτλο Eichmann in Jerusalem που αναφερόταν στην δίκη του άμεσα υπεύθυνου αυτής της πρωτοφανούς σφαγής, τον Adolf Eichmann καθώς και τα ευρήματα αυτής της δίκης, ότι τα δικαζόμενα “τέρατα” δεν ήταν τέρατα αλλά συνηθισμένοι άνθρωποι που το έκαναν αυτό όχι επειδή μισούσαν πραγματικά τους Εβραίους αλλά γιατί υπάκουαν σε διαταγές ανωτέρων. (Hogg et al 2011) Με αφορμή λοιπόν τις φρικαλεότητες της ναζιστικής εποχής, σε ένα ακραίο πρωτοποριακό πείραμα ο Milgram θέλησε να εξετάσει την σύγκρουση μεταξύ...

Words: 1895 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Zimbardo and Milgram

...Critical Thinking Questions Zimbardo and Milgram Excelsior College SOC 101- Introduction to Sociology Module 2 - Assignment By: Tammy S. Wood Due Date: Sunday March 13, 2016 Professor: Charles Seagle Zimbardo and Milgram Experiments In this critical thinking assignment questions will be addressed that pertain to the Stanford prison experiment and the Milgram Experiment. The Milgram experiment participants were selected after responding to an advertisement to take part in a study at Yale University. The participants drew lots to find out who would be the "learner" and who would be the "teacher". Electrodes were placed on the learner and the teacher would ask questions, if question was answered incorrectly the learner would receive an electric shock. With each wrong answered the "learner" would receive a higher volt of shock("Milgram Experiment (Darren Brown),"n.d.). The Stanford Prison experiment participants were recruited by an advertisement placed in the newspaper offering male college students fifteen dollars a day to participate in a study of psychology of imprisonment. Participants were divided up into groups of two one group being the guards and the other group being the prisoners("Zimbardo shows how most evil comes from hierarachy," n.d.). The Stanford Prison experiment purpose was to understand the development of norms and the effects of positions, social expectations, and labels that are endured in a prison environment. Yes, this experiment is...

Words: 862 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Milgram Experiment

...Dustin Rim Mrs. Bartlett Psychology PY177M1 January 20, 2016 The Milgram Experiment: Obedience The Milgram Experiment were based on obedience to authority figures. A series of notable social psychology experiment conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram in the early 1960s. It measured the willingness of participants to obey an authority figure when put in unconformable position. Stanley asked himself “How far will a human being go if an anonymous authority orders him to torture or even to kill a fellow human”. As many of the participants were approached in the streets to become a part of the experiment. Many of the participants didn’t know what was going to go on during the experiment. As they were pulled into the area where the experiment was being performed. After the psychologist is done explaining the experiment they would start the experiment. Two participants were done at the same time but one of the participants was a part of the experiment which was the person that wasn’t the teacher in the experiment. The teacher would sit outside of this other room and read off a set of words and the person in the room had to answer them correctly or get an electric shock as a punishment. With ever answer wrong the shock went up in voltage. The voltage started about 15 volts and went up to 300 volts. If you reached 300 volts and the person wasn’t done answering all the question right, than the person would just kept getting shocked at 300 volts. As the experiment...

Words: 488 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Milgram Experiment Essay

...The Milgram Experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram who was a psychologist at Yale University. He invented this study to explore the issue of authority. Milgram wanted to understand obedience. Milgram asked the question, “What is there in human nature that allows an individual to act without any restraints whatsoever that allows us to act inhumane and not limited by compassion or conscience.” This experiment allowed insight into the topic of conflict between obedience to authority and conscience. How far would people proceed in obeying authority if it involved hurting another person? In order to conduct this experiment Milgram used male subjects from 20 to 50 years old. The authority figure told the subjects they were testing to see if people...

Words: 697 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethical Issues (Milgram)

...Ethical guidelines are now regulated by the British Psychological Society (BPS), or the APA in America and since 1978 has become much stricter than the previous years. Its main aim is to protect the human participant’s from psychological harm and this is done by rules that need to be adhered to. They should have fully informed consent, should not be deceived, debriefed after investigation, the right to withdraw from the investigation at any time and be assured of confidentiality. However, in some cases these rules can not be fully complied with and only after safeguards have been put in place, especially for children or those that have a disability, can deviation from the guidelines take place. However, there will always be conflict between participants and psychologists needs or expectations of the experiment. In some experimental situations the participant will not be fully informed of what they are taking part in so the psychologist can achieve a non-biased outcome from the results. This could be classed as harmful to the participants as the outcome of being deceived could lead to psychological harm. In Milgram’s (1963 cited in Hill, 2001 p24) study participants took part in the obedience to authority experiment. At this time the ethical guidelines were not as strict and this has brought outrage to some of his critics, Baumrind (1964) in particular is extremely critical of his approach and outcome of the experiment. Baumrind (1964) argued that the participants were not protected...

Words: 531 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Burger Vs Milgram

...representative of the general population in terms of age, sex, and ethnicity. In addition, it was more ethically conducted in a variety of ways. Many of the participants were given indicators that there would be no loss of money if they refused and no negative repercussions. It would seem that with the addition of these diverse variables that there would be more than a slight difference in results, but this was not the case. Burger concluded the same thing that Milgram concluded, which is that situational forces overrode the participants’ sense of morality. In addition, this experiment took into account personality traits such as one’s potential for empathy. Burger found that although those who were more inclined to be empathetic towards the suffering of the learner expressed concern earlier on in the process, this personality trait ultimately did not affect their refusal to cooperate. This elucidates the fundamental attribution error, or the mistake of focusing on individual traits rather than environmental....

Words: 546 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Eichmann's Milgram Experiments

...Milgram conducted an experiment directed on the differences in obedience to an authority figure and a person’s personal conscience. Milgram examined these traits by using people accused of crimes during World War II and Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Milgram found that the soldier’s defense was based on strictly obedience and that they were just following orders of their superiors. Milgram’s experiments began a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann who was being accused of coordinating deportations of Jews from killing centers. He also was the mastermind behind deportation plans down to the last detail. Milgram formulated his experiment to answer the question "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (Milgram, 1963). Milgram also wanted to...

Words: 637 - Pages: 3