ETHICS IN ACCOUNTING: THE WORLDCOM INC. SCANDAL
Conf.univ.dr. Lucian Cernuşca
“Aurel Vlaicu” University, Arad, str. Piaţa Sporturilor, nr. 10, bl. 25, apt. 7, 310167 Arad, Phone: 0730468534, luciancernusca@gmail.com What is ethics? What does ethics have to do with accounting? How does a scandal affect the business environment and the society? This article will explain just those questions by analyzing a
“famous” fraud scandal: WorldCom Inc. The article discusses the chronology of events that lead to the WorldCom Inc. collapse and explains how the figures were manipulated for the owners’ interest and what the accounting scam was. The article ends with the consequences of the scandal and what the effects were on the society and business environment in general.

JEL Classification: M4 Accounting and Auditing

Key words: ethics, accounting, bankruptcy, WorldCom Inc., expenses.
What is ethics? Why ethics in accounting?
Ethical values are the foundations on which a civilized society is based on. Without them, the civilization collapses. In business, the purpose of ethics is to direct business men and women to abide by a code of conduct that facilitates public confidence in their product and services. In the accounting field, professional accounting organizations recognize the accounting profession’s responsibility to provide ethical guidelines to its members.
Ethics must and should be taught. People are not born with the desire to be ethical or be concerned with the welfare of others. And contrary to all beliefs, one person can make a difference.
One of my favorite quotes says:
I am only one.
But still I am one.
I cannot do everything,
But still I can do something;
And because I cannot do everything
I will not refuse to do the something that I can do.
(Edward Everett Hale)

Accounting ethics is both a normative and descriptive discipline. Interest in business ethics and accounting ethics accelerated dramatically during the 1980s and 1990s, both within major corporations and within academia.
When we talk about accounting ethics, we always link the term with creative accounting, earnings management, misleading financial statements, securities fraud, insiders transactions, bribery, executive compensation and many more.
If you occupy a position of leadership, then your actions will profoundly influence those who follow your example. And the well known cases of fraud, WorldCom and Enron included, prove just that. The WorldCom Inc. Scandal – Bankruptcy Information
On July 21, 2002, WorldCom Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, according to
John Sidgmore, the company’s chief executive. The bankruptcy is the largest in US history, being twice as large as Enron’s record-setting filling in December 2001. WorldCom Inc. admitted on June
25, 2002, that it had falsely booked $3.85 billion in expenses to make the company appear more profitable. Arthur Anderson, the company’s auditor, accused Scott Sullivan, WorldCom Inc.’s financial officer, of withholding crucial information about the company’s bookkeeping. Sullivan was fired the same day.
But what is WorldCom Inc. and what’s its history? During 1983, Murray Waldron and
William Rector, both from USA, drafted a business plan to start a business offering long distance services at a discount. The company was created and was named “Long Distance Discount
Services” (LDDS). Bernie Ebbers became the CEO for LDDS in 1985. He grew the company through a series of acquisitions – Advantage Companies Inc., Advanced Telecommunications
Corp., Resurgens Communications Group Inc., Metromedia Communications Corp., IDSB
Communication Group Inc. and Williams Telecommunications Group Inc. – and changed its name to WorldCom in 1995. The acquisitions continued and the new named WorldCom took over MFS
Communications Inc. in 1996, UUNet Technologies Inc, in the same year, MCI Communications
Corp. in 1998 for $40 billion, Brooks Fiber Properties Inc. and CompuServe Comp., also in 1998.
The largest merger was in 2001 when WorldCom took over Intermedia Communication Inc., a provider of Internet and data services to businesses.

Figure 1 WordCom hits all-time high for market value
Source: Jake Ulick, 2002, WorldCom's financial bomb, at CNN Money , http://money.cnn.com/2002/06/25/news/worldcom/ , visited Friday, June 15, 2007

At the peak of the telecom boom, WorldCom Inc. was valued at $180 billion. But from this stage onwards, WorldCom started facing job cuts, credit ranking down grades and enquires. The stock price fell from $64 (all-time high for market value) to $2.65. As a result, Ebbers resigned on
April 30, 2002, right after the fall of stock price. Within 10 day from Ebbers’ resignation,
WorldCom’s long-term debt ranking was reduced to junk status. Ebbers started selling stocks to repay his personal loans and in order to stop him from selling the stock WorldCom gave him the loan to repay his bets. It wasn’t clear why that happened but the fact is with the ransom earned,
Ebbers has built a nice mansion in Florida.
After the damage has been done by SEC1 and the credit ranking companies, on June 26,
2002 WorldCom made a statement saying that improper accounting has shed light on $3.8 billion in expenses which will wipe away the profits declared in 2001 and for the first semester of 2002. As a result, within a day the stock price has fallen to $0.09.

Figure 2 WorldCom hits all-time low stock price
Source: Jake Ulick, 2002, WorldCom's financial bomb, at CNN Money , http://money.cnn.com/2002/06/25/news/worldcom/ , visited Friday, June 15, 2007

WordCom then started its own internal investigation. As a result, WordCom fired Scott D.
Sullivan –the chief financial officer – and accepted the resignation submitted by David Myers. The
CEO, John Sidgmore apologized to the investors for the accounting mistakes, while Scott D.
Sullivan told that he informed Ebbers about the book-keeping maneuvers that made the company look better than it really was.
On July 21, 2002, WorldCom have filed for bankruptcy which was the largest bankruptcy in
US history. Based on the investigation committee appointed by WorldCom and on an investigation conducted by the Auditors, few more facts have come to light. The Auditors have discovered some questionable accounting practices since 1999 in WorldCom. The internal auditors have uncovered an additional $3.831 billion in improper accounting, making the amount of WorldCom known accounting errors to more than $7.683 billion over the past 3-4 years, which makes WorldCom the

1

Securities and Exchange Commission

ultimate corporate accounting fraud in the world. Andersen, WorldCom’s auditor, declared that the internal audit report could not be relied on in the view of the accounting manipulations.
It is relatively easily for an auditor to detect error but earnings management can involve sophisticated fraud that is covert. The requirement for management to assert that the accounts have been prepared properly offers no protection where those managers have already entered into conscious deceit and fraud. Auditors need to distinguish fraud from error by identifying the presence of intention. Part of the difficulty lies in the accepted recognition that there is no such thing as a single “right” earnings figure and that it is possible for legitimate business practices to develop into unacceptable financial reporting.
Who paid for the frauds?
In the first instance, the employees who rapidly discovered that immediately after the bankruptcy announcement, 17,000 WorldCom workers got the push. Next in line were the investors as the shares dropped from over $60 to less than a dollar. But the scandal also blasted a huge hole through confidence in the telecom and technology sector and also hit the share prices in several other sectors. And of course, anyone with a pension would pay the price as well.
The White House saw the plunging stock prices as one of the most important threats for the economy. Right after the bankruptcy announcement, the stock plummeted in early trading reaction, followed by crawling back up and closing mixed. The Dow Jones industrial closed at 9,120.11, while the Standard & Poor's 500 Index closed at 973.53, after falling 6.71 and 2.61, respectively.
WorldCom Inc. –Chronology of Events
On February 8, 2002, WorldCom Inc. reduces the revenue and earnings projections for
2002 and announced second quarter expenses of $15-20 billion to write down some acquired operations. At the same time, the company’s CEO, Bernard Ebbers, owes WorldCom $366 million to cover the loans he took to buy his own shares. A week later, WorldCom suspends three star employees and stops commissions of 15 salespeople over a booking scandal in three of the branch offices.
On March 12, 2002, SEC launches enquiry into the WorldCom Inc.’s accounting practices.
Three weeks later, the company planned to layoff 7500 employees. At the end of April, WorldCom reduced at least $1 billion for its 2002 revenue projections and on April 30, 2002, Bernard Ebbers resigned. On May 9, 2002 a rating company reduced WorldCom’s debt to “junk” status and the company’s shares plunged to a new low.

Figure 3 WorldCom Inc. hits a new low in May 2002
Source: Jake Ulick, 2002, WorldCom's financial bomb, at CNN Money , http://money.cnn.com/2002/06/25/news/worldcom/ , visited Friday, June 15, 2007

At the end of the month, the company eliminated its MCI Group tracking stock, in hope of saving some money that would have gone to the dividends.
At the beginning of June 2002, WorldCom announced its intension to cut further 15000 employees while restructuring and planning to sell its wireless unit. On June 24, 2002, analyst Jack
Grubman wrote a negative report on the finances at WorldCom Inc. and the shares fell below $1
(see Figure 2).
At the end of June 2002, WorldCom Inc. announced that during the entire 2001 and first quarter of 2002, company’s revenue expenditure had been treated as capital expenditure and, as a result, there has been an overstatement of profits by $3.852 billion in the financial results. Another declaration was made on August 9, 2002 which doubles the fraud figure declared earlier to more than $7.6 billion, which makes WorldCom the company with the highest figure fraud in history!
WorldCom’s first announcement worked like a bombshell. Obviously investors were irritated, which resulted immediately in hitting down the Dow Industrials more than 140 points and
NASDAQ Composite Index by more than 3%. The investors sold the WorldCom shares at any price realizable. While in June 1999, the WorldCom shares were traded at $62/share, they collapsed to $0.09 in August 2002.
Not surprisingly, on August 9, 2002 another $3.8 billion fraud was unearthed at WorldCom by the same auditors. The company also announced that since an internal investigation was going on, they might find more accounting problems. WorldCom declared they would restate their financial reports from 1999 onwards, as a result of the new findings.
With the experience of Enron, another “resounding” accounting scandal in Corporate
America, SEC has immediately approached the court seeking orders prohibiting WorldCom and its affiliates from destroying, hiding or altering relevant documents and prohibiting the company to make any extraordinary payments.
How was the fraud carried out?

Let us take a look at some selected financial data, from 1997 to 2001. In the Appendix, we also listed the “Consolidated statements of operations” and the “Consolidated Balance Sheets” of
WorldCom Inc., for 1998 and 1999.

-$ in millionsRevenue
Operating Income
Total Assets
Operating Margin
(%)

1997
7384
1018
23596
13.78

1998
17678
(975)
86401
(5.51)

1999
35908
7888
91072
21.96

2000
39090
8153
98903
20.85

2001
35179
3514
103914
9.98

WorldCom inc. financial data
Adapted from: V.R.K. Chary,2004, Ethics in Accounting. Global Cases and Experiences, WorldCom Inc., The ICFAI
University Press, India, pg. 47

During 1990s, when WorldCom Inc. was marching forward with endless takeovers and merges sprees, the market conditions for their services slowly started to deteriorate. The data shown above was before restatement figures. The point is to show how the accounting manipulations changed the data. The operating margin –which indicates the company’s profitability
– was not satisfactory even in 1998. Since the mergers didn’t improve the margin either, the company realized during 1999 and 2000 that using accounting manipulations could lead to stable earnings. However, the planning was inadequate for maintaining the earnings by 2001. As a result, in 2001 the profit margin fell down to less than half when compared to the previous year’s earnings. During 2001, WorldCom Inc. split into two tracking stocks: MCI WorldCom Inc, the longdistance consumer carrier and WorldCom Inc, which sells voice and data services to corporations.
During January and February 2002 there were rumors about WorldCom’s stability. In the wake of the Enron scandal, followed by Global Crossing, which also declared bankruptcy, there were ongoing questions about WorldCom. Investors started believing the rumors that WorldCom might have off-balance-sheet finances and its investment-grade debt might be downgraded to
“junk” status. Looking back, all the rumors were indeed correct.
WorldCom’s new CEO explained that “the entire industry was experiencing severe problems which were unprecedented!” and “while many competitors were experiencing difficulties and surviving, many have gone out of business”. Indeed the economy went into recession during
2001, which lead to a fall in revenues and earnings for all companies, more so for the telecom industry. The rise of mobile phone culture during the end of 1990s also led to the fall of
WorldCom’s revenues. The company was at this point suffering from the ego of being a large organization combined with a quality of non-learning attitude for the changes of consumer’s styles and the neglect to go into mobile phones.
Here is a table containing a summer of the consolidation financial statements from 1999 to
2001. Notice that the cumulative loss appears to be $539 million for all three years.

-$ in millions1999
35,908
2,294
2,085
91,072
17,209
51,238
48%

Revenue
Net income
Net income-RESTATED
Total assets
Long-term Debt
Shareholders’ funds
Intangible assets to total assets 2000
39,090
2,608
(649)
98,903
17,696
55,409
47%

2001
35,179
1,407
(1,975)
103,914
30,038
57,930
52%

WorldCom’s Consolidated Financial Statements
Adapted from: V.R.K. Chary,2004, Ethics in Accounting. Global Cases and Experiences, WorldCom Inc., The ICFAI
University Press, India, pg. 50

WorldCom has commenced its manipulations right from 1999, as the company’s CEO declared, with the single purpose to obtain desired earnings to boost up stock market price. Before declaration of their intention to restate the earnings, Andersen, the Auditor, warned investors and others not to relay on the audit reports given by them earlier because the company was announcing accounting manipulations of transferring line costs to capital accounts. As per June 25,
2002 report, the quantum of such transfers were $797 million in 1Q 2002 and $3.055 billion during
2001.
As per the company’s “game”, it called certain revenue expenditure known as “line costs” as capital expenditure. Line costs are the amounts paid to a third party service provider whose telecommunication network will be used by WorldCom for getting a right to use the network for their activity. These payments are revenue expenses and NOT assets to capitalize. Every year, the company’s major expense was the “line costs” which accounted for 40-45% from the revenue earned. But the company developed a strategy to capitalize the expenses. Post manipulation, the quantum of the “line costs” paid during 2001 were $14.739 billion. During the same year, the report profit was $1.407 billion while the line costs capitalized ALONE were $3.055 billion. Therefore, the company had a loss of $1648 millions but by using the account fraud they kept the top showing a profit of $1407 million.
On the other hand, capital expenditure generally includes investments in assets like machinery and other long-term asset purchases. In other words, it’s an investment in an asset from which the company benefits for more than one year. The cost of the assets will be gradually deducted from earnings by depreciation2.
In other words, WorldCom capitalized line costs instead of expressing immediately and hence avoided a loss of about $7.6 billion in the financial statements. For several years, in such a way, billions of dollars worth of operating expenses started to appear in WorldCom’s accounting

2

N.A. Depreciation = The reduction in the balance sheet value of a company asset to reflect its loss of value through age and wear and tear. From www.scottish-newcastle.com/sn/investor/services/glossary/ , visited on Wednesday, July
18, 2007

books as assets. The company violated the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) by treating the operating costs as capital assets and created worthless assets.
Instead of a conclusion…
It is astonishing to note how Arthur Andersen could miss such an elementary fraud. It was maybe the simplest fraud that could have been detected easily by anyone who cared to look carefully at the accounts. WorldCom hired Andersen to perform a standard audit, BUT not a fraud audit. Although WorldCom fraud was a straightforward lie that would not have been possible without the involvement of the entire group, the fraud could have been missed. To save their skin,
Andersen blamed Sullivan for withholding information during the audit. However, when they discovered that certain expenses have been reported as investment, Andersen immediately announced that their reports on WorldCom’s financial statements for 2001 should not be relied upon. Ultimately, WorldCom Inc. had to go for bankruptcy, which was the biggest bankruptcy in the world. Immediately after bankruptcy, 17,000 employees were laid off –almost 20% of the company’s workforce. Sullivan was fired and ultimately arrested for the accounting manipulations.
Controller David Myers was also arrested on the same issue.

References:
Luisa Beltran, (2002), WorldCom files largest bankruptcy ever, at CNN Money http://money.cnn.com/2002/07/19/news/worldcom_bankruptcy/ , visited Friday, June 15, 2007
Jake Ulick, (2002), WorldCom's financial bomb, at CNN Money , http://money.cnn.com/2002/06/25/news/worldcom/ , visited Friday, June 15, 2007
V.R.K. Chary, (2004), Ethics in Accounting. Global Cases and Experiences, WorldCom Inc., The
ICFAI University Press, India, pg. 41-57.

Dr. Katerine T.Smith, Dr.L.Murphy Smith, Business and Accounting Ethics, at http://acct.tamu.edu/smith/ethics/ethics.htm , visited Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Sam Zuckerman, (2002), Bush promises investigation of WorldCom, San Francisco Chronicle, http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/06/27/MN180882.DTL , visited Tuesday, June 19,
2007
***, WorldCom, Inc., at http://www.scripophily.net/worldcominc.html, visited Monday, May 28, 2007

***, WorldCom: Why it matters, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2066959.stm visited
Tuesday, June 19, 2007

***, Financial: MCI WorldCom Q1 1999 Results, Earnings Per Share of $0.37, Compared with
$0.10, Operating Margins Improve on Revenue Mix and Merger Synergies - Company Financial
Information, (1999), at http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UNZ/is_1999_May_3/ai_54528477, visited on Wednesday, July 18, 2007
***, Glossary, at www.scottish-newcastle.com/sn/investor/services/glossary/ , visited on
Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Appendix
WorldCom Inc. and Subsidiaries

3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended March 31, 1998 and 1999
UNAUDITED, in $ millions, except per share data
Excluding Embratel
BEFORE CHANGES

Reported
1Q 1998
Revenues:
Voice
Data
Internet
International
Communication Services
Information technology and
3

Pro Forma
1Q 1998

1,162
496
392
230
2,280
40

Reported
1Q 1999

4,754
1,304
474
230
6,762
490

5,095
1,702
758
357
1,912
403

Source: Financial: MCI WorldCom Q1 1999 Results, Earnings Per Share of $0.37, Compared with $0.10, Operating Margins

Improve

on

Revenue

Mix

and

Merger

Synergies

-

Company

Financial

Information,

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UNZ/is_1999_May_3/ai_54528477, visited on Wednesday, July 18, 2007

(1999),

at

other
Total
Operating expenses:
Line costs
Selling, general and administrative Depreciation and amortization
Total
Operating income:

2,320

7,252

8,315

1,117
478
299
1,894
426

3,607
2,011
1,029
6,647
605

3,767
2,137
960
6,864
1,451

Other income (expense):
Interest expense
Miscellaneous
Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Distributions on subsidiary trust mandatorily redeemable preferred securities
Preferred dividend requirement Net income applicable to common shareholders
Earnings per commons share
–Net income applicable to common shareholders:
Basic
Diluted
Shares utilized in calculations:
Basic
Diluted

(102)
12
336
143
193

(276)
32
361
170
191

(260)
105
1,296
551
745

7

15
7

16
-

186

169

729

0.18
0.18

0.10
0.10

0.39
0.38

1,012
1,074

1,744
1,829

1,848
1,922

WorldCom Inc. and Subsidiaries4
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
UNAUDITED, in $ millions
Reported, Excluding Embratel

March 31, 1999
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, net
Other current assets
Total current assets

December 31,
1998

287
5,166
3,484
8.937

999
4,810
3,031
8.840

Property and equipment, net

19.852

19,259

Goodwill and other intangibles, net

45,815

45,468

4

Source: Financial: MCI WorldCom Q1 1999 Results, Earnings Per Share of $0.37, Compared with $0.10, Operating Margins

Improve

on

Revenue

Mix

and

Merger

Synergies

-

Company

Financial

Information,

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UNZ/is_1999_May_3/ai_54528477, visited on Wednesday, July 18, 2007

(1999),

at

Other assets
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’
INVESTMENT
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt Other current liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term liabilities, less current portion:
Long-term debt
Note payable –Embratel
Other liabilities
Total long-term liabilities
Mandatorily redeemable preferred securities
Total shareholders’ investment

7,160
81,764

6,626
80,193

6,507
10,095
16,602

4,628
9,886
14,514

12,186
927
4,108
17,221

14,345
1,315
4,226
19,886

798

798

47,143
81,764

44,995
80,193

Additional bibliography:
Joni J. Young and Marcia Annisette (2007) Cultivating imagination: Ethics, education and literature,
Critical Perspectives on Accounting

A. Craig Keller, Katherine T. Smith and L. Murphy Smith (2007) Do gender, educational level, religiosity, and work experience affect the ethical decision-making of U.S. accountants?, Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, Volume 18, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 299-314

Ken McPhail (2003) Relocating accounting and business ethics: reflections on a business ethics retreat in Scotland's National Park, The British Accounting Review, Volume 35, Issue 4, December
2003, Pages 349-366

Linda Thorne (2001) Refocusing ethics education in accounting: an examination of accounting students’ tendency to use their cognitive moral capability, Journal of Accounting Education,
Volume 19, Issue 2, Summer 2001, Pages 103-117

Steven M. Mintz (2006) Accounting ethics education: Integrating reflective learning and virtue ethics, Journal of Accounting Education, Volume 24, Issues 2-3

Mary Beth Armstrong, J. Edward Ketz and Dwight Owsen (2003) Ethics education in accounting: moving toward ethical motivation and ethical behavior, Journal of Accounting Education, Volume
21, Issue 1, Pages 1-16

Sivakumar Velayutham (2003) THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION’S CODE OF ETHICS: IS IT A
CODE OF ETHICS OR A CODE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE?
Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Volume 14, Issue 4, May, Pages 483-503

Teri Shearer (2002) Ethics and accountability: from the for-itself to the for-the-other
Accounting, Organizations and Society, Volume 27, Issue 6, August, Pages 541-573

Stephen E. Loeb (1999) Accounting ethics research, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,
Volume 18, Issues 4-5, Winter, Pages 333-334