...THE LAW ON NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS Definition of Terms CHAPTER 1 Form and Interpretation Section 1. Form of Negotiable Instruments Commercial Paper – a written promises or obligations that arise out of commercial transactions from the use of such instruments as promissory notes and bills of exchange. Maker – the person issuing a promissory note Drawer – person issuing bill of exchange Money - medium of exchange authorized or adopted by a domestic or foreign government as part of its currency. In literal sense, the term means “cash.” It also includes all legal tender. Legal Tender – that currency which a debtor can legally compel a creditor to accept a payment of a debt in money when tendered by the debtor in the right amount. Non-negotiable Instrument – an instrument which is not negotiable, which does not meet the requirements lay down to qualify an instrument as a negotiable one, or an instrument which in its inception was negotiable but has lost its quality of negotiability. A non-negotiable instrument may not be negotiated but it may assigned or transferred Negotiable Promissory Note – an unconditional promise in writing made by one person to another, signed by the maker, engaging to pay on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money or to bearer. It is commonly referred to as a note. Payee – the party to whom the promise is made or the instrument is payable. Bill of exchange – an unconditional...
Words: 827 - Pages: 4
...THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT AND THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS (AMENDMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT, 2002 Negotiable instruments are of great importance in the business world and by extension in banking. They are instruments for making payments and discharging business obligations What is a Negotiable Instrument? The Negotiable Instruments Act does not define a negotiable instrument but merely states, “ a negotiable instrument means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable either to order or bearer.” (Section 13). This section does not prohibit any other instrument that satisfies the essential features of portability. Justice K. C. Willis defines these as, “ one the property in which is acquired by anyone who takes it bonafide and for value notwithstanding any defect in title in the person from whom he took it.” Thomas defines it in his book “Commerce, Its theory and Practice “A negotiable instrument is one which is, by a legally recognized custom of trade or by law, transferable by delivery in such circumstances that (a) the holder of it for the time being may sue on it in his own name and (b) the property in it passes, free from equities, to a bona-fide transferee for value, notwithstanding any defect in the title of the transferor.” It : (1) entitles a person to a sum of money (2) is transferable (by customs of trade) by delivery, like cash, or by Endorsement and delivery and delivery, and (3) ...
Words: 22787 - Pages: 92
...dollars in phony checks. Frank's increasingly audacious work soon attracts the attention of Carl Hanratty (Tom Hanks), an FBI agent who is determined to put Frank behind bars. Frank seems to enjoy being pursued by Carl, and even goes so far as to call Carl on the phone to chat every once in a while. While posing as a doctor, Frank falls in love with Brenda Strong (Amy Adams), a sweet girl working as a candy striper. When Frank asks Brenda to marry him, he decides to assume a new identity to impress her father, Roger (Martin Sheen) -- who happens to be the District Attorney of New Orleans, LA. Catch Me If You Can was based on the autobiography of the real Frank W. Abagnale Jr., who has a cameo in the film and today works on the side of the law as a top consultant on preventing forgery and designing secure checking systems. Catch Me if You Can deals with themes of broken homes and troubled childhoods. Spielberg's parents divorced when he was a teenager, similar to Frank Abagnale's...
Words: 429 - Pages: 2
...Short essay on the negotiable instruments in business law The law relating to “negotiable instruments” is contained in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Act extends to the whole of India. The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, has been amended for more than a dozen times so far. The latest in the series are: (i) the Banking, Public Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 (effective from 1st April, 1989), and (ii) the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 (effective from 6th February, 2003). The provisions of all the Amendment Acts have been incorporated at relevant places in Part IV of this book. The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as amended up-to-date, deals with three kinds of negotiable instruments, i.e., Promissory Notes, Bills of Exchange and Cheques. Definition: The word negotiable means ‘transferable by delivery,’ and the word instrument means ‘a written document by which a right is created in favour of some person.’ Thus, the term “negotiable instrument” literally means ‘a written document transferable by delivery.’ According to Section 13 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, “a negotiable instrument means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable either to order or to bearer.” “A negotiable instrument may be made payable to two or more payees jointly, or it may be made payable in the alternative to one of two, or one or some of several payees”...
Words: 1111 - Pages: 5
...Assignment on Negotiable Instrument Course Title: Legal Environment of International Business Prepared by: Farha Fatema Date of Submission: 28/04/2011 Executive Summary Negotiable instruments are written orders or unconditional promises to pay a fixed sum of money on demand or at a certain time. Promissory notes, bills of exchange, checks, drafts, and certificates of deposit are all examples of negotiable instruments. Negotiable instruments may be transferred from one person to another, who is known as a holder in due course. Upon transfer, also called negotiation of the instrument, the holder in due course obtains full legal title to the instrument. Negotiable instruments may be transferred by delivery or by endorsement and delivery. One type of negotiable instrument, called a promissory note, involves only two parties, the maker of the note and the payee, or the party to whom the note is payable. With a promissory note, the maker promises to pay a certain amount to the payee. Another type of negotiable instrument, called a bill of exchange, involves three parties. The party who drafts the bill of exchange is known as the drawer. The party who is called on to make payment is known as the drawee, and the party to whom payment is to be made is known as the payee. A check is an example of a bill of exchange, where the individual or business writing the check is the drawer, the bank is the drawee, and the person or business...
Words: 2594 - Pages: 11
...person can sue on a negotiable instrument unless he is named therein as the payee or unless he becomes entitled to it as indorsee or becomes the bearer of an instrument payable to bearer. In the Full Bench case reported in Subba Narayana Vathiyar v. Ramaswami Aiyar,1 it has been held that in a suit on a negotiable instrument by the payee or indorsee, it is not open to the defendant to plead that the plaintiff is a mere benamidar not entitled to payment with a view to show that the note has been discharged by payment to real owner. Again in the Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in Bacha Prasad v. Janaki,2 it has been held that a person who is not a holder of a negotiable instrument cannot maintain a suit for recovery of money due under it even though holder is admittedly the benamidar and is impleaded in the suit. In the said decision, it has also been held that "a beneficiary cannot be called a holder of the instrument and payment to him cannot discharge the maker thereof unless the case falls under section 82(c) of the Act". So also, it has been held in the decision reported in Subharaya v. Abiram,3 that a beneficiary does not become a holder of the instrument even upon getting a declaration that he is the beneficial owner and the payee is only a benamidar. In this connection it has to be noted that Allahabad and Rajasthan High Courts have taken a slightly different view and held that in certain cases a beneficiary may maintain a suit on a negotiable instrument "if holder...
Words: 16119 - Pages: 65
...November 11, 2013 Grantham University BA 265 Business Law II Week 6 Assignment Negotiable Instruments On the back of an envelope, Phoebe writes, “I promise to pay Quint or bearer $600 on demand. [Signed] Phoebe.” The type of instrument that is used in this scenario is a promissory note. When a promissory note is present, this is a written promise which involves two parties (Miller & Hollowell, 2011). The two parties that are present in a promissory note is the maker (payer) and the payee and the note may be made with a specific date mentioned or on demand-when the payee requests the money (Miller & Hollowell, 2011). In the scenario above, the maker is Phoebe and the payee is Quint and it the note is written to indicate that when Quint asks for the $600, Phoebe is to pay it at that time. In order for a note (or any other instrument) to be negotiable it must meet all six of the following requirements. These requirements are (Miller & Hollowell, 2011): 1. The instrument must be in writing-Phoebe wrote the promissory note on the back of an envelope. 2. It must be signed by the maker (payer) or the drawer-Phoebe signed the note 3. It must be an unconditional promise to pay-there were no conditions set by Phoebe that may hinder Quint from requesting payment (i.e.-I, Phoebe, will pay Quint the $600 if he calls me no later than noon on the day he requests payment) 4. The note must state a fixed amount of money-Phoebe’s promissory note listed...
Words: 572 - Pages: 3
...SUMMARY JUDGMENT The above case came before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed on August 1, 2006, in response to the debtor-plaintiff’s complaint alleging the creditor-defendant violated the automatic stay [i.e. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)] by cashing the plaintiff’s check after she filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The defendant avers it did not violate the automatic stay because of the exception provided in 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(11). The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. The Court heard oral arguments on September 12, 2006 and directed the parties to file additional briefs dealing with whether the check at issue qualified as a negotiable instrument. For the reasons stated below, the 1 Case 06-40087-JJR Doc 31 Filed 10/26/06 Entered 10/26/06 08:56:27 Document Page 1 of 10 Desc Main Court finds the motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED. Background On April 15, 2006, the plaintiff received a “payday loan” for $500.00 from the defendant. In exchange for the $500.00 loan, the plaintiff gave the defendant a check for $587.50, which was intended to pay the principal of the loan plus interest and fees. The defendant agreed to hold the check until April 29, 2006. On May 9, 2006, the debtor-plaintiff filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy relief. For purposes of this summary...
Words: 3439 - Pages: 14
...India commercial activities increased to a great extent. The growing demands for money could not be met be mere supply of coins; and the instrument of credit took the function of money which they represented. Before the enactment of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, the law of negotiable instruments as prevalent in England was applied by the Courts in India when any question relating to such instruments arose between Europeans. When then parties were Hindu or Mohammedans, their personal law was held to apply. Though neither the law books of Hindu nor those of Mohammedans contain any reference to negotiable instruments as such, the customs prevailing among the merchants of the respective community were recognised by the courts and applied to the transactions among them. During the course of time there had developed in the country a strong body of usage relating to “hundis”, which even the Legislature could not without hardship to Indian bankers and merchants ignore. In fact, the Legislature felt the strength of such local usages and though fit to exempt them from the operation of the Act with a proviso that such usage may be excluded altogether by appropriate words. In the absence of any such customary law, the principles derived from English law were applied to the Indians as rules of equity justice and good conscience. The history of the...
Words: 8689 - Pages: 35
...NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT,1881 Definition of a Negotiable Instrument. The law relating to negotiable instruments is contained in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It is an Act to define and amend the law relating to promissory notes, bills of exchange and cheques. The Act does not affect the custom or local usage relating to an instrument in oriental language i.e., a Hundi. The term "negotiable instrument" means a document transferable from one person to another. However the Act has not defined the term. It merely says that "A .negotiable instrument" means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payab1e either to order or to bearer. [Section 13(1)] A negotiable instrument may be defined as "an instrument, the. property in which is acquired by anyone who takes it bona fide, and for value, notwithstan~ing any defect of title in the person from whom he took it, from which it follo~s that an instrument cannot be negotiable unless it is such and in such a state that the true owner could transfer the contract or engagement contained therein by simple delivery of instrument" (Willis- The Law of Negotiable Securities, Page 6). According to this definition the following are the conditions of negotiability: (i) The instrument should be freely transferable. An instrument cannot be negotiable unless it is such and in such state that the true owner could transfer by simple delivery or endorsement and delivery. (ii) The person who takes it for value...
Words: 15663 - Pages: 63
...A negotiable instrument is a document guaranteeing the payment of a specific amount of money, either on demand, or at a set time, with the payer named on the document. More specifically, it is a document contemplated by or consisting of a contract, which promises the payment of money without condition, which may be paid either on demand or at a future date. The term can have different meanings, depending on what law is being applied and what country it is used in and what context it is used in. Examples of negotiable instruments include promissory notes, bills of exchange, banknotes, and cheques. Because money is promised to be paid, the instrument itself can be used by the holder in due course as a store of value. The instrument may be transferred to a third party; it is the holder of the instrument who will ultimately get paid by the payer on the instrument. Transfers can happen at less than the face value of the instrument and this is known as discounting; this may happen for example if there is doubt about the payer's ability to pay. Common prototypes of bills of exchanges and promissory notes originated in China. There, in the 8th century during the reign of the Tang Dynasty they used special instruments called feitsyan for the safe transfer of money over long distances.[1] Later such document for money transfer used by Arab merchants, who had used the prototypes of bills of exchange – suftadja and hawala in 10–13th centuries, then such prototypes had been used by Italian...
Words: 3090 - Pages: 13
...Negotiable Instruments (Writing Assignment 6) BA 265 Business Law December 11, 2013 Negotiable Instruments Negotiable Instrument is the name of a document that promises to pay a sum of money. The document states that the singer of the document agrees to pay the owner of the document a set amount of money which is also stated on the document. On the back of an envelope, Phoebe writes, “I promise to pay Quint or bearer $600 on demand. [Signed] Phoebe.” This instrument is a promissory note and a bearer note, and it is negotiable. A promissory note is a written promise made by one person (the maker) to pay a fixed sum of money to another person (the payee) on demand or at a specified future time. The maker of this note is Phoebe. The payee is Quint or bearer. A note that is payable to a specific payee or bearer is a bearer note. A bearer is anyone holding something such as a check, promissory note, bank draft, or bond. This is important when the document states it is payable to bearer which means whoever holds this paper can receive the funds due on it. A negotiable instrument that is payable to bearer or to cash or to the order of cash that is not naming a payee, is a bearer instrument and is called bearer paper. To be negotiable, an instrument must be written, be signed by the maker or drawer, be an unconditional promise or order to pay, state a fixed amount of money, be payable on demand or at a definite time, and be payable to order or to bearer unless it is a...
Words: 422 - Pages: 2
...Question 1: Explain the term negotiable instruments and briefly state its types. Negotiable instrument is a document that constitutes an obligation to pay a sum of money at a future date or on demand. According to Justice Willis, “a negotiable instrument is one, the property in which is acquired by anyone who takes it bona fide and for value notwithstanding any defects of the title in the person from whom he took it”. Any document is capable of being called a “negotiable instrument” if the following conditions are met: 1. The holder of the instrument may sue in his/her own name. 2. Title to the instrument must pass on delivery, or on delivery and endorsement. 3. A "holder in due course" takes the instrument free from the defects in title of his/her predecessors. Essential Features of a Negotiable Instrument: 1. A Negotiable Instrument is a written instrument 2. Signed by the maker or drawer of the instrument A signature may be any symbol made by the maker or drawer with the present intention to be a signature. 3. It must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay A mere acknowledgment of a debt is not sufficient without evidence of an affirmative undertaking on the part of the debtor to repay the debt. 4. An exact sum of money (with or without interest in a specified amount or at a specified rate) must be stated. Fixed amount means an amount that can be determined from the face of the instrument. Payable in money means the medium of exchange authorized or...
Words: 2141 - Pages: 9
...Ninth Edition CPA Preparatory Program Regulation Negotiable Instruments Sample Brian Hock, CMA, CIA with Dave Fairchild, CPA, CMA HOCK international, LLC P.O. Box 204 Oxford, Ohio 45056 (866) 807-HOCK or (866) 807-4625 (281) 652-5768 www.hockinternational.com cma@hockinternational.com Published August 2011 Acknowledgements Material from Uniform CPA Examination, Selected Questions and Unofficial Answers, Copyright © 1990-2011 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., is reprinted and/or adapted with permission. Acknowledgement is due to the Institute of Certified Management Accountants for permission to use questions and problems from past CMA Exams. The questions and unofficial answers are copyrighted by the Certified Institute of Management Accountants and have been used here with their permission. © 2011 HOCK international, LLC No part of this work may be used, transmitted, reproduced or sold in any form or by any means without prior written permission from HOCK international, LLC. Thanks The author would like to thank the following people for their assistance in the production of this material: Kevin Hock for his work in the formatting and layout of the material, Lynn Roden, CMA for her assistance in the technical elements of the material, All of the staff of HOCK Training and HOCK international for their patience in the multiple revisions of the material, The students of HOCK Training in all of our classrooms and...
Words: 11083 - Pages: 45
...a few months, Rogers and Blythe stopped paying their loan to Charter. Charter sued to recover from Holly Hill’s note and mortgage. Negotiable instruments are an important component of transactions between unrelated parties when doing business. Negotiable instruments are regulated by Article 3 of the UCC. Article 3 requires a document must meet certain criteria in order to be classified as a negotiable instrument. The instrument must be in writing, permanent and portable, signed by the maker, and it must be an unconditional promise to pay. It has to state a fixed sum of money and not require any additional undertaking besides the payment. It also has to be payable on demand or at a definite time and be payable to order or bearer. If these conditions are met, the holder of the negotiable instrument can transfer their interest in the instrument to a third party. The third party taking the negotiable instrument from the holder becomes the holder in due course. The promissory note in this case stated above contained language that referenced the other mortgage. Because the note referenced the other mortgage, it does not pass the test for not requiring any additional undertaking besides payment and is therefore not a negotiable instrument and not enforceable under Article 3 of the UCC. Because the document is determined to not be a negotiable instrument, the holder...
Words: 413 - Pages: 2
