Premium Essay

Obergefell V. Hodges Case Analysis

Submitted By
Words 767
Pages 4
The family dynamic in the United States has evolved significantly in recent years. The restructuring of the family unit means that policies and attitudes need to adapt to support those changes. When policies and attitudes don’t shift with the changing structure, people suffer and specific populations find themselves at-risk through no fault of their own. Families compromised by lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) individuals are one population that continuously finds themselves at-risk socially and economically. According to Gates (2013) an estimated 6 million children and adults in the United States have a LGBT parent. When dealing with such a large population that is subject to discrimination and prejudice, it is imperative that …show more content…
The 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges case ruled that state-level bans on marriage were unconstitutional. However, there are several states that implicitly and explicitly deny non-traditional families, including LGBT families, the right to foster or adopt children. In Michigan alone, there are currently 13,000 children who are waiting for a foster or adoptive family and the current laws allow agencies to turn families or couples who are headed by homosexual parents based on religious objections (Cooper, 2017). Cooper (2017) goes on to explain that there are similar laws in Alabama, South Dakota, Texas, North Dakota, Virginia and …show more content…
No matter the specifics of a given situation, the most important step is to approach the client’s problems in relation to their environment. Rogers (2016) explains that the person-in-environment approach is the cornerstone of social work practice because it views client problems in the environmental context in which they occur. Sexual orientation is not a stand-alone risk factor. It intersects with other issues that affect different genders, ethnic backgrounds, religious affiliations and races. Address legal issues and advocate change. Social workers must be ready to advocate for their clients in regard to providing testimony, compiling research and assisting with hearings. A social worker must also be an advocate for fair and equal practices by initiating and supporting policy change when it is not meeting the needs of the people. It is the role of the social worker to participate in changing the political and social climate when it is not upholding fair and equal standards for all minority

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Obergefell V. Hodges Case Analysis

...the conversation about the interpretation of Constitutional rights that runs parallel with it. This history has most recently culminated in the Obergefell v Hodges case, in which the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage across the entire nation. This paper begins with a brief glimpse at the history of the topic of same-sex marriage in the United States. The paper will then focus on the case of Obergefell v Hodges, and will specifically analyze the contentious role of the interpretation of the Constitution involved in the final decision. Cleary the Supreme Court, an extremely high authority in the United States, found that that the nationalizing of same-sex marriage was constitutional. However there were dissenting opinions that opposed the decision on the grounds that the Constitution specified that such rights were up to the state legislature. Lastly,...

Words: 424 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Yoshino

...A NEW BIRTH OF FREEDOM?: OBERGEFELL V. HODGES Kenji Yoshino The decision in Obergefell v. Hodges1 achieved canonical status even as Justice Kennedy read the result from the bench. A bare majority held that the Fourteenth Amendment required every state to perform and to recognize marriages between individuals of the same sex.2 The majority opinion ended with these ringing words about the plaintiffs: “Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”3 While Obergefell’s most immediate effect was to legalize same-sex marriage across the land, its long-term impact could extend far beyond this context. To see this point, consider how much more narrowly the opinion could have been written. It could have invoked the equal protection and due process guarantees without specifying a formal level of review, and then observed that none of the state justifications survived even a deferential form of scrutiny. The Court had adopted this strategy in prior gay rights cases.4 Instead, the Court issued a sweeping statement that could be compared to Loving v. Virginia,5 the 1967 case that invalidated bans on in–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––  Chief Justice Earl Warren Professor of Constitutional Law, New York University School of Law. I gratefully acknowledge receiving financial support from...

Words: 15849 - Pages: 64