...Open Carry Gun Laws By Ryan Hanson In this research paper we will attempt to answer the question, what is “OPEN CARRY”? And the laws and regulations that pertain to open carry, as well as what they mean to you should you decide to purchase a firearm or if you already own one. Open carry is defined as the practice of openly carrying a fire arm on one’s person in public, many people living in the United States already do and this also scares many others. There are a few questions that come to mind when discussing open carry laws such as Who? What? Where? When? Why? And How? When talking about open carry laws, you have to think of who around you that you may or may not know owns firearms? In most states anyone 18 or older may purchase shotguns, and you must be 21 to purchase high powered rifles and pistols or revolvers and all it takes is a simple background check and you’re in and out the door in 20 minutes or less although many people prefer private sales to avoid the background check process and this arises some concern, what kind of people are out buying guns? With an estimated 300 million privately owned guns in the U.S. it’s safe to say that most of the people you know own or at one time or another have owned a firearm. That being said you have to kind of think to yourself with all of the burglaries and such that go on in our country how many of those 300 million firearms are out on the streets in the hands of criminals and that’s scary if you think about the numbers...
Words: 402 - Pages: 2
...I think the open carry law should be allowed because if you are carrying a handgun, somebody attacks you, and you shoot them then you are stopping crime at its peek. The open carry law of Texas states that you are allowed carry any handgun as long as you have a license, but the handgun must be carried in a shoulder or belt holster, and you must be 21 years of age or older to get a license. This means handguns will be in the hands of an adult, and not a kid which is one good thing. Another good thing about the open carry law of Texas is that if someone sees that a store is getting robbed then that person can stop the robber with his handgun from stealing from the store. That way the other people that was in the store is safe from the robber,...
Words: 700 - Pages: 3
...Being able to carry a gun openly means that a person is able to carry an unconcealed weapon. This open carry gun law is a new law being applied in several states. This handgun law varies state to state. Thirty one states allow open carry without any permit or license, but fifteen states require some form of permit or license. Open carry is a fresh topic that promotes a tremendous amount of controversy. Open carry should be allowed because it is a constitutional right, it provides protection, and allows others to be protected by those carrying. First of all, bearing arms is a constitutional right. The second amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right of every American citizen to keep and bear arms. This means that every registered citizen of the United States of America can keep guns in their house or on their person. With this constitutional right, it is a person’s choice whether they want to carry a gun or not. If a citizen of the United States wants to have a gun and carry it on their person, that person has the constitutional right to do so. On the other hand, if a person does not want a gun, they have the right to not carry or own a gun at all. The second amendment is a very arguable subject...
Words: 1238 - Pages: 5
...The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the Americans right to keep and bear arms. Gun control is a law suggesting regulation and restriction of the possession of guns. But is it really protecting society? Gun control only keeps law abiding citizens from obtaining firearms. Criminals will always have ways of getting weapons; whether it be from the black market, across borders, or illegal street sales. If a person cannot follow the sacred laws of the land, new gun laws won’t do much to stop them. After all, they are known to break the laws. As the saying goes; where there’s a will, there’s a way. Gun control laws should not be implemented because they will not stop crime, they will only disarm those who are not inclined or determined to commit crimes. The Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791. The 2nd amendment states “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed“ (Mount 1). Why would the founders of our country go through the trouble of adding an amendment to the Constitution, the governing document for the country, if they didn't intend for it to effect government action? The whole point of the Bill of Rights was to limit government action and power. Those who support gun control laws are interpreting the 2nd amendment in their own way, while firearm enthusiasts think that their freedom is being attacked (Mount 2). In 2008 in the District of Columbia, The Supreme Court ruled that the amendment explicitly protects Americans’ right...
Words: 2444 - Pages: 10
...The issue of gun control is a very serious matter because of the danger that can come with firing a gun. Guns are weapons, and although they can be used for protection, accidents can happen. This is one of the reasons that there should be some form of restriction on the use and carrying of guns in public places. Texas should not become an Open Carry state. This is not to say that citizens and licensed gun holders should not be allowed to carry their weapons, but concealed carry is a better plan of action in my opinion. Personally, I am not comfortable with seeing someone, other than a police officer, with a gun in public. Bad decisions and gun related accidents can happen in an instant. I think there is not a lot that Congress and the Texas...
Words: 438 - Pages: 2
...Gun users For the gun issue Boycott A Los Angeles Times report suggested that the most visible result of this week's boycott was the contrarian buycott, which included Ohio State University students rallying outside an Ohio Starbucks holding signs, including one that said, “Because I CAN'T carry a cop!” Once learning of the boycott, gun owners sprang into quick action, organizing a "reverse boycott" and taking a page from the NGVAC by coordinating through Facebook. Support for the "reverse boycott" was so successful that, before Valentine's Day arrived, the NGVAC was reportedly forced to remove the list of boycott participants from public view on its Facebook event page after the tiny number was dwarfed by more than 24,500 Facebook users committing to participate in the "reverse boycott." (What they cannot hide, however, is the tiny number of followers on this supposedly national anti-gun groups' Facebook page - just 258. By comparison, Buckeye Firearms Association has over 11,700.) Many participants agreed to pay and/or tip with $2 bills to signify support for the Second Amendment. And while it is impossible to measure the exact financial boost the reverse boycott had on Starbucks' bottom line, the anecdotal evidence posted at the Facebook event page for the 'BUYcott' suggests it was substantial. The comments also suggest that most store managers weren't aware of the NGVAC boycott, but they were definitely aware of the increased business thanks to gun owners! In case you...
Words: 519 - Pages: 3
...Defender of the State, Not Enemy Smith & Wesson Smith & Wesson may be the most popular and is arguably the largest manufacturer of handguns in the United States. Established in 1852 and based out of Springfield, Massachusetts, Smith & Wesson’s firearms are standard issue to armed and police forces in the United States and Worldwide. The firearms manufacturer has been glamorized in movies such As Dirty Harry and their products have subsequently been utilized by sport shooters. As well as creating some of the most iconic names in firearms they are also responsible for developing many ammunition cartridges, many cartridges bear the company's name. Traded under SWHC on the NASDAQ, Smith and Wesson gained most of its notoriety and sales success with the invention of the .38 special, at one time used by most of the United Stats police forces (citation). Continuing into the 20th century, Smith and Wesson obtained success with the invention of the .357 magnum and the highly popular .44 magnum. In fact, Smith and Wesson’s accomplishments are so numerous that it would be difficult to study the history of the firearm without first studying the history of Smith and Wesson. With the inauguration of Democratic President Barack Obama and a current Democratic majority in the US Congress, Smith and Wesson is concerned over the inception of new laws and regulations governing their civilian consumer purchases. According to CBS news article...
Words: 3152 - Pages: 13
...Kairotic Moment of Gun Control On July 20, 2012, The Dark Knight Rises was formally released in the U.S. It could have been a grand festival for Batman fans, unfortunately, the tragedy happened. In the cinema of Aurora, Colorado, a man named James Holmes, who wore a gas mask and dressed up as the super villain in the movie, threw tear gas into the theater and shot at people during the showing of the film. Twelve people were killed and fifty-eight people were injured in the incident. As one of the most serious shooting cases in the U.S., the issue of gun control has once again attracted public attention, rushing people into pro and con camps. The controversy around the issue is whether it is better to strengthen the laws for gun control or not. Major media around the world have made extensive covers and reports of the Denver shooting case; they also joined the discussion of gun control because it has significant effects for people’s lives and safety. There are three articles from different media responses to the hot topic. The article titled “Gun-control, gun-rights groups’ ready for renewed debate after Colorado shooting” by Michael Martinez was published on CNN.COM. CNN is one of the most influential global media and authoritative news sites, which can be seen or read by over 100 million U.S households and viewers in over 212 countries. This article notes that both sides were engaged in a renewed debate about the issue of gun control in the aftermath of the shooting tragedy...
Words: 987 - Pages: 4
...avoid making hasty assertions. Wilson argues in his essay that not allowing people to buy guns will have no effect on the illegal use of guns, which in essence, is the sole reasoning for wanting to eliminate guns in the first place. He makes the claim that about two-hundred million American citizens own a gun. These guns, though, are not the ones that are generally used for unlawful acts, but rather those that are stolen, borrowed, or privately purchased. Wilson then makes the point that an increase in these control regulations would take a toll on none other than those law abiding citizens that own these guns more for self-defense purposes. Wilson first extends the argument that, “Our goal should be to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully, especially in places- in streets, in taverns- where the mere presence of a gun can increase the hazards we all face.” By beginning his argument with a clear, concise thesis such as this, Wilson begins to setup an organized structure for his argument. Through a clearly planned construction consisting of claims followed by data and counterclaims followed by rebuttals, Wilson makes his ideas easy to follow by this systematized set up. This flow makes his ideas more sinuous which contributes to the cohesiveness of his overall argument. This structure makes an argument that easily understood and followed by his target...
Words: 825 - Pages: 4
...Bibliography BLOCHER, JOSEPH. "Gun Rights Talk." Boston University Law Review 94.3 (2014): 813-833. Academic Search Complete. Web. 17 Nov. 2014 "Comparisons of Crime in OECD Countries." Comparisons of Crime in OECD Countries (n.d.): n. pag. Http://www.civitas.org.uk. Harrendorf S, Heiskanen M, Malby S,International Statistics on Crime and Justice, European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, Affiliated with the United Nations, 2010. Web. 22 Nov. 2014. Faria Jr., Miguel A. "Shooting Rampages, Mental Health, and the Sensationalization of Violence." Surgical Neurology International 4.1 (2013): 85-92. Academic Search Complete. Web. 20 Nov. 2014. FLEMING, JAMES E., and LINDA C. MCCLAIN. "Ordered Gun Liberty: Rights with Responsibilities and Regulation." Boston University Law Review 94.3 (2014): 849-892. Academic Search Complete. Web. 21 Nov. 2014. Isaacs, David. "Children and Guns: A Call to Disarm." Journal of Paediatrics & Child Health 49.9 (2013): 699-700. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Nov. 2014. Kopel, David B. "The Great Gun Control War of the Twentieth Century-And Its Lessons for Gun Laws Today." Fordham Urban Law Journal 39.5 (2012): 1527-1616. Academic Search Complete. Web. 16 Nov. 2014. Mehalko, Laura. "This Is Gun Country: The International Implications Of U.S. Gun Control Policy." Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 35.1 (2012): 297-330. Academic Search Complete. Web. 18 Nov. 2014. Moorhouse, John C., and Brent Wanner. "Does...
Words: 325 - Pages: 2
...contend that great gun possession builds the risk of firearm roughness. Rivals argue that firearm control does not lessen wrongdoing and disregards individual freedoms Gun control is an issue that has been utilized as a part of constituent battles for a considerable length of time, yet in the most recent 20 years, has turned into an incredibly warmed level headed discussion. It is vital to cover the majority of the parts of the issue of gun control, from the history, to the impacts of firearm control, to the consequences for families (Gun Policy, 2012). Gun control laws were passed prohibiting the offer of guns to Local Americans, overlooking the Second Change. These laws were regularly passed when the administration responded to a mental open requesting activity after perusing great daily paper records of abominations professedly dedicated to rouge groups of Indians. Local tribes were compelled to exchange with runners and offenders who requested unbelievable costs for old and new scarcely working guns. Tribe individuals took to attacking white settlements in endeavors to acquire guns to shield themselves from a legislature. After the constant war, the white individuals in the South passed a few several gun control laws intended to keep guns out of the hands of the as of late liberated African Americans....
Words: 2622 - Pages: 11
...can promote a safety environment, decrease crime and save the life of people. When people are done listening to my persuasive speech on gun control, I want them get a thrall background check to ensure as a citizen, they are equipped to carry a firearm. I want them to adhere good training of a gun and seek understanding on how to properly use one. If need be, maybe go to 4 to 8 week course on gun control and safety. I want my audience to seek help if they are amongst the few people that use guns as a weapon instead of a self-defense tool. Those that have a gun invest in a safe storage and trigger lock if they have not already to ensure safety. 2. What characteristics, beliefs, attitudes, or values of the audience are significant to consider when persuading them on this issue? * While trying to persuade someone that stricter law regulations, laws and licensing of gun control can guarantee that individual’s environment is nonviolent, crime is decreased and lives are saved; I would have to adhere to people feelings, gender, age, socioeconomic status and values. Everyone carrying a gun is not using it as a weapon or to kill. There as some people that have access to a gun to ensure protection and to use as a defense mechanism. Others carry a gun out of fear. The youth in particular are purchasing or having someone purchase a gun for them for popularity because of peer pressure. Generally,...
Words: 766 - Pages: 4
...http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/docview/1240665839?accountid=458 Gun control: Chinks of light This article I read makes me feel like there is too much Bias, in our world today. Especially in the last recent years of Gun Control or lack there of. The information in this article is very unclear, I see that the Author is just stating his own opinion and no true facts. “Under these conditions, it may be possible for more politicians to take a modest step. It is to dissociate gun ownership for hunting from semi-automatic weapons and large ammunitiion magazines. As Mr Manchin said, you do not need 30 rounds to go hunting.” In this quote above just the author forming his opinion about what he thinks the laws should be, I really personally believe it really doesn’t matter what capacity the magazine is, is the person in there right frame of mind is what we need to ask. I really disagree with the authors opinion based not on fact but there own illusion of what topic such as gun control is based on. There could’ve been a lot more easier ways for them to defend Obama and his laws on gun control. They should’ve done more research into the Newtown shooting before they use in opening the article. “This time, maybe, something will happen. If oratory ever changed the world, then President Obama's speech in Newtown, Connecticut, hailed as one of his finest, might signal a fresh determination to tackle America's epidemic of gun violence. “ I just strongly disagree...
Words: 356 - Pages: 2
...ARTICLE REBUTTAL – GUN CONTROL 1 Article Rebuttal – Gun Control Xxxxxx Xxxxx BCOM 275 20 Mar 14 Ceasar I Elpidio Article Rebuttal – Gun Control For this assignment I chose an article titled “Data suggest guns do in fact kill people” (M.S., Sep 2013). The author of the article tries to use data to show a correlation between the prevalence of firearms with the amount of homicides committed by them. To support his stance he uses crime statistics from the United Kingdom compared to the United States. I believe this use of statistics from two different cultures is flawed and will attempt to show why. First of all, the UK has some of the most stringent gun laws in the world. Even the police officers there don’t all carry firearms. Firearms are usually only used by special response units. Now don’t get me wrong the UK still has crime that involves firearms but at nowhere the rate the US has. I believe part of the reason for this is the culture difference. The UK first began regulating firearm ownership in 1903 (Wikipedia, 2013). That is over 110 years of controlling the purchase of firearms. If some of the same laws were used here in the US would it take us 110 years to get to the point the UK is at now? Also, what happens to the some 270 – 310 million firearms that are already in the US (GunPolicy.org, 2014)? Literally, there are more firearms in this country than people! He also tries to make light of information given by Ben Shapiro of Breibart...
Words: 580 - Pages: 3
...GUNS!!!! One of the scariest, violent object a man could have invented. They are Dangerous, Tempting and effusion of blood. While many people agree over the fact that open carry law would keep the public safe, others believe that more distraction and lives will be lost each and every day. As the federal government estimated that there were well over 65 million gun owners in the U.S. To begin with, imagine eating a meal at McDonalds with your family, enjoying a movie at the cinema or even attending a class at your collage while almost everyone around you is carrying loaded guns! Although this may seem unrealistic, however the 2nd amendment of the United Sates Constitution approves citizens the right to carry and possess guns. It is justifiable...
Words: 462 - Pages: 2