...ABSTRACT Trans- Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) is now sound familiar to Malaysia, this is because that countries is one out of the twelve countries that involve in that agreement. The goals of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a much-delayed but significant trade agreement between 12 countries in Asia-Pacific and the Americas pushed by the US are increasingly becoming clearer after ongoing talks reveal some of the intentions Washington is pursuing with this pact. The highlighted of the agreement is to increase in import growth is projected to outpace increase in export growth, as the reductions in import tariffs and non-tariff measures (NTM) are larger for Malaysia relative to the other TPPA countries. According to The New York Times, economists are sharply split over the positive and negative effects of TPP, and both "opponents and supporters of the trade accord have quickly seized upon whichever analysis buttressed their own views. ECIPE has said in 2014 that TPP "will be the first ‘competing’ economic integration that is large enough to have a considerable negative impact on Europe. In the long-term, the negative effects will come from dynamic impact, e.g. on investment, productivity and competitiveness". Pascal Lamy called the TPP ‘the last of big old-style trade agreements’. It has said to be a negative impact on the oil and gas sector whose share of GDP is 12 per cent. PETRONAS stands to benefit very little from TPPA as 74 per cent of its exports are to non-TPPA...
Words: 7586 - Pages: 31
...North C arolin a Polic y Wa t c h Cru cial Co nv ersa tion The Trans-Pa cific Partnership: Worse than NAFTA? Septemb er 2013 Lori Walla ch Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch Outcomes of 20 Ye ars of NAFTA, WTO, FTAs… Crushing of Americ an Middle Class: more than 5 million US manufa cturing jobs (1 out of 4) & 60,000 US manufa cturing fa cilities gone. Millions of service sector jobs offshored: c all centers, computer, programming, engineering, a cc ounting. Wage “arbitrage” in a ra ce- to-the- bottom. U.S. re al median wages at ‘70s levels. Income inequality at Robb er-Baron-era levels. When manufa cturing, good jobs go tax bases shrink – and schools, public services, infrastructure cut, and construction sector unemployment soars. Floods of unsafe imported food, products. Financial deregulation, instability and repe ated financial crises. He alth, labor, land use, other public interest laws around world atta cked in foreign tribunals. Some dump ed. Initiatives chilled. Billions extra cted from taxpayers and paid to corporations for violations of new “rights.” Drug prices up. In poor nations, de adly cut in a cce ss to meds. Rich nation higher prices slam poor consumers, govt budg ets as Big PhRMA profits soar. U.S. loses 170,000 family farms. In ‘12, volume of U.S. food exports only 1% higher than ’95 (when NAFTA-WTO started). Imports of food now 97% above ‘95 level. Livelihoods of tens of millions of pe asant farmers destroyed, mass migrations...
Words: 4495 - Pages: 18
...opportunities for cooperation exist. Overall transparency restricts efforts to properly identify and report on the regulatory framework of China‟s ports. Regulation and Incentives The Shenzhen Free Trade Zone offers tax incentives as well as freedom in negotiating and entering into trade contracts. Local governments are empowered to issue incentives on top of central government initiatives. While incentives have traditionally focused on the manufacturing sector, Shenzhen is now encouraging the development of the services and logistics sectors. Incentives provided during the global downturn highlight the existence of a responsive and proactive approach to improving the Port of Shenzhen‟s competitiveness Closer Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) CEPA is one of Hong Kong‟s key attributes in taking advantage of China‟s rise. Numerous provisions of CEPA including supplements to the original text have enabled Hong Kong‟s marine sector to penetrate the Chinese market, especially in Shenzhen and the wider Guangdong Province. Future expansion of CEPA and introduction of further maritime-specific provisions will no doubt improve cooperation and benefit Hong Kong‟s maritime businesses. A Shift...
Words: 412 - Pages: 2
...India-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: Gains and Future Prospects Preface India signed a two-way Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (‘CEPA’ or ‘the Agreement’) with Japan on 16 February 2011. CEPA would provide a framework for enhanced cooperation between the two countries and is aimed to facilitate trade in goods and services and increase investment opportunities, besides protecting intellectual property rights. The Agreement is likely to be implemented from 1 April 2011. The highlights of CEPA have been provided below. CEPA The CEPA aims to reduce or eliminate tariffs over next 10 years on over 90 per cent of goods traded between the two countries. The Agreement inter alia provides ‘schedule for India’, a list detailing product wise plan for reduction/ elimination of duties for imports into India and a similar ‘schedule for Japan’. The quantum of duty reduction under CEPA will vary from product to product. Therefore, some products may see a complete elimination of duties on 1 April 2011 itself (or any other day on which the Agreement comes into force) while others may see a gradual reduction over years. Sensitive sectors for India and Japan are fully protected and will not see any tariff change. An illustrative list of goods for import into India and the time period over which basic customs duty would be eliminated is given below: |Description of goods |Period in which tariff to be reduced...
Words: 11812 - Pages: 48
...Part 1 Business Enterprises in China 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Proprietorships 3.0 Partnerships 4.0 Corporates 1.0 Introduction In the People’s Republic of China, business organizations may be classified in to three main classes: individual proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. The laws that effect these forms of business enterprises are diverse. There is no single code or statute that governs the PRC law of business enterprises. According to the sources of capital, there are domestic capital enterprises which are regulated by Sole Proprietorship Enterprise Law of the People's Republic of China , Partnership Business Law of the People's Republic of China, and Company Law of the People's Republic of China and foreign capital enterprises which are regulated by The Measures for Administration of the Establishment of the Partnership by Foreign Enterprises or Individuals within the Territory of China, Law of the People’s Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign Con-Tractual Joint Venture, Law of the People’s Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign Equity Joint Ventures, and Law of the People’s Republic of China on Foreign – Capital Enterprises. The relevant laws are the Security Law , the Fair Competition Law and the Antitrust Law. 2.0 Proprietorships 2.1What is a sole proprietorship enterprise A sole proprietorship enterprise means a business entity established within China with its capital contributed by one individual and its assts owned personally by the sole proprietor...
Words: 12251 - Pages: 50
...Bin No. Box No. *, y : R0 Z.; Partnership Act, 1890. Year. [53 & 54 VICT] [CH. 39.] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Nature of Partnership. Section. Definition of partnership. 2. Rules for determining existence of partnership. 3. Postponement of rights of person lending or selling in consideration of share of profits in case of 1. insolvency. 4. Meaning of firm. Relations of Partners to persons dealing with them. 5. Power of partner to bind the firm. 6. Partners bound by acts on behalf of firm. 7. Partner using credit of firm for private purposes. 8. Effect of notice that firm will not be bound by acts of partner. 9. Liability of partners. 10. Liability of the firm for wrongs. 11. Misapplication of money or property received for or in custody of the firm. 12. Liability for wrongs joint and several. 13. Improper employment of trust-property for partnership purposes. 14. Persons liable by "holding out." 15. Admissions and representations of partners. 16. Notice to acting partner to be notice to the firm. 17. Liabilities of incoming and outgoing partners. 18. Revocation of continuing guaranty by change in firm. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Relations of Partners to one another. Variation by consent of terms of partnership. Partnership property. Property bought with partnership money. Conversion into personal estate of land held as partnership property. Procedure against partnership property for a partner's separate judgment...
Words: 6235 - Pages: 25
...people to create a partnership unintentionally? A partnership also may be created when two or more parties who do not have a written agreement or even an intention to form a partnership act in such a way as to lead third parties to believe that a partnership exists. 2. How can a person overcome prima facie evidence of a partnership? By showing that the share of profits received represented wages or payments of a debt, interest on a loan, rent, or the purchase price of a business or goods. 3. Under the Uniform Partnership Act, is partnership property owned in the name of the partnership or in the names of the partners? Under the Uniform Partnership Act, any partnership property, whether real or personal, may be owned either in the names of the partners or in the name of the firm. 4. What can personal creditors of one partner do to try to collect the partners debt form the partnership? The personal creditors of one partner can ask a court to order that payments due the debtor partner from the partnership be made to the creditors. They also can force the sale of a debtor partner’s interest in the partnership. 5. How will partnership profits and losses be share if the partnership agreement does not fix the ratio? If the partnership agreement does not fix the ratio of sharing the profits and the losses, they will be shared equally, not in proportion to the contribution to the capital. 6. If no date for the dissolution of a partnership is fixed at the...
Words: 1099 - Pages: 5
...BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS INTRODUCTION This unit introduces students to the most common forms of business organizations, namely sole proprietorship, partnership and limited liability companies. However, emphasis is placed here on partnership and the legal consequences which flow from the formation of such a method. The main advantages and disadvantages of these forms of business organizations are also discussed. Important Concepts in Business Organizations The following are some important concepts in business organizations: Incorporation The law permits the creation of artificial or legal persons. An example of such is an incorporated company. This means that such an organization has a legal personality separate from its members. Legal Personality Under The English Law, all human beings have a legal personality. A legal personality is made up of a person’s legal rights and duties. However, the extent of these rights and duties is dependent on whether the person is an adult or a minor. A minor has limited rights and few duties. By operation of the law, an incorporated company has a legal personality Limited/unlimited Liability As a result of an incorporated organization having its own legal personality, its members are not generally liable for the debts of the organization. This however is in contrast to a partnership which does not have a legal personality separate from the partners. Here, partners have unlimited liability for partnership’s debts. Also, a sole proprietor...
Words: 3835 - Pages: 16
...resale...Dale denied any intent to form a partnership; Shady testified that before the meeting with Harv: (1) Dale indicated “that she was interested in partnering up with me” and that they “needed to get rolling”, and that she would “hire an atty to legalize the agreement,” and (2) Dale and Shady “came to an agreement that Shady would deliver the spoil and Dale would pay the MSD invoices if Shady had trouble getting a loan,” and that “whatever monies we put into the operation to make it go, we’d get it back when we sold the spoil, and then we’d split the profits 50/50.” Whether the appellate court should affirm the trial court’s ruling that Dale and Shady had entered into either a partnership or a JV? A partnership may be formed pursuant to RUPA §202 if the parties merely have the intent to carry on a business for profit. There are no formal or legal requirements to form a partnership, and the subjective intent of the parties is unavailing. As in Byker v. Mannes, in ascertaining the existence of a partnership, the proper focus is whether the parties intended to, and in fact did, “carry on as co-owners of a business for profit,” not whether they intended to form a partnership. Pursuant to RUPA §202(a) all that is needed is for the parties to agree to jointly own and manage a business for profit as co-owners. Therefore, in the lack of a formalized partnership agreement, a court may still find that parties had entered a partnership for the purpose of owning and managing a...
Words: 1416 - Pages: 6
...Definition of Partnership A partnership is an arrangement in which two or more individuals share the profits and liabilities of a business venture. Various arrangements are possible: all partners might share liabilities and profits equally, or some partners may have limited liability. Not every partner is necessarily involved in the management and day-to-day operations of the venture. In some jurisdictions, partnerships enjoy favourable tax treatment relative to corporations. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/partnership.asp#ixzz49Y975kkP Types of Partnership A partnership is a business owned by two or more people. In most forms of partnerships, each partner has unlimited liability for the debts incurred by the business. The three typical classifications of for-profit partnerships are general partnerships, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships. 1. General Partnership: Partners divide responsibility for management and liability as well as the shares of profit or loss according to their internal agreement. Equal shares are assumed unless there is a written agreement that states differently. A general partnership involves two or more owners carrying out a business purpose. General partners share equal rights and responsibilities in connection with management of the business, and any individual partner can bind the entire group to a legal obligation. Each individual partner assumes full responsibility for all of the business's debts and obligations. ...
Words: 8398 - Pages: 34
...Part A (the report) SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP: This business entity is the most common business used in the United States. This entity is owned and ran by one individual where there is no legal distinction between the owner and the business. This legal name of the business is the owner’s name; however, the business may operate under a fictitious name by filing a DBA. This person is legally accountable for all elements of the business including finances, loans and debts. One of the advantages of doing business as a Sole Proprietorship is that it’s easy to create. Another key advantage is the autonomy. Since the owner or individual is the business, he or she may decide for themselves whatever business decision they feel is needed to make, including the business finances. Some disadvantages would be that it is impossible to bring in others to do business being there can only be one owner. This also makes it difficult to raise capital in terms of seeking investors. Tax planning can also be challenging for the sole proprietor. Since there is no legal distinction between the owner and the business, all the income generated by the business is treated as ordinary personal income to the owner. • Liability: Sole Proprietors have unlimited liability. There is no difference between the owner and the business. Therefore, the owner is personally liable and responsible for all the business obligations and debt. Doing so makes all of the owner’s personal assets reachable to creditors. • Income...
Words: 2598 - Pages: 11
...Organizational Forms of Business Legal issues for Business Organizations LIT1 July 23, 2012 * * * * * * * * * * * * * There are different types of business organizational structures. These structures include sole proprietorship, general partnership, limited partnership, C-Corporations, and S-Corporations. These structures each have advantages and disadvantages, depending on the particular situation or desired effects the business owners may have. It is imperative that owners understand the differences so they can choose the best organizational structure that fits their business needs. * Sole Proprietorship * One of the most common, easiest, and cost-effective organizational structures is a sole proprietorship. This form consists of one owner, and does not have any distinction between the business and the owner. Although sole proprietorships may seem less complex, it has disadvantages as well. * Sole proprietorships have several advantages and disadvantages as listed: * Liability – Sole proprietorship does not differentiate between the business and the owner. Sole proprietorships are liable for all losses. If the company were to get sued, the owner’s personal assets would also be at risk. The owner must file as a business if they are using a fictitious name; even if a company files a doing business as, also known as DBA, there is no legal separation of assets * Income Taxes – The...
Words: 2312 - Pages: 10
...Lit1 Task 310.1.2-01-06 Part A Determining whether to start or invest in a business endeavor and what kind of business endeavor to choose can be challenging. Through this report the numerous types of business organizations will be assessed. By the end of the report you should have a greater comprehension of the different choices available. * Sole Proprietorship: To start off it is essential to have a clear understanding of what sole proprietorship means. As the sole proprietor you are the owner and the operator of that business. In more detail, the sole proprietor manages everything including setting up the business. An attorney is only needed if the sole proprietor plans to report the name of the business under a name other than their own. In that instance they would need to register the business with the government. * Liability: A full understanding of all liability and where it falls is very important. All liability falls on the owner on the company. This means that not only all of the company’s assets but also the owner’s personal belongings possibly will be occupied in any scenario where the company fails. More specifically, in the event that the company flops because of unfortunate market settings, poor business policy or if there is an injury suffered implicated by company products. The liability falls on the owner of the company including all characteristics of the business and can be brought into any legal actions. * Income Taxes: As a sole proprietor...
Words: 2781 - Pages: 12
...and operated by one person. * Profit Retention – At the owner’s discretion if funds are spent or re-invested back into the company as long as debt and obligations are paid. * Location – Sole proprietors need to comply with licensing requirements in the state in which they‘re doing business as well as local regulations and zoning ordinances. * Convenience/Burden – A convenience of sole proprietorship is that the owner pays taxes on income from the business as part of his or her personal income tax payments. A sole proprietor might consider it a burden when investors hardly invest into their company. GENERAL PARTNERSHIP General Partnership is a business organization consisting of two or more persons that have entered into a contract known as articles of partnership and share profit gains as well as losses. A major advantage of general partnership is that you have someone to share equal responsibility of the...
Words: 2321 - Pages: 10
...person. They are also the most common. They are inexpensive and easy to operate. They are great for small businesses that do not require large capital needs. All profits and losses are figured into the owners personal taxes. These advantages however do not outweigh the disadvantages. The business owner is responsible for all business debts. Sole proprietors are also personally liable if they cannot pay suppliers or somebody gets hurt in the business. If something were to happen the sole proprietor could lose everything they have to pay the debt. These are easy startups in almost any state with just a business license. When the owner retires or decides to do something else the business is finished. General Partnerships These are unincorporated partnerships where two or more co-owners carry on business for profit. Each co-owner is considered a partner. This organization is risky especially if the group of owners is large and they do not know each other. Each partner is personally liable for the debt of the enterprise whether caused by themselves or the other partner or partners. They are also liable for any injury a partner or employee may sustain while on business. They are also liable for any contracts signed for on behalf of the business. Like a sole proprietorship they are easy to form and not...
Words: 1121 - Pages: 5