Free Essay

Patent Trolls

In:

Submitted By syhosain
Words 631
Pages 3
Patent Trolls

Patent Trolls as defined by Investopedia is a term used to describe companies or people that

misuse patents as a business strategy. These patents are bought by Non-Practicing Entity’s (NPE)

who buy these patents from bankrupt companies and auctions and have no intentions of

developing it. Their business strategy is to do some research and file lawsuits against infringing

companies. These Patent trollers cost the US Company billions of dollars each year. They disrupt

the productivities of many companies and affect the whole idea of creativity and innovation in

the United States. Patent trolling cost the companies $29 Billion in 2011 in direct costs and up to

$80 Billion in other ancillary costs. Add to that the incalculable costs in terms of productivity

and disruption of innovation and entrepreneurship. Among the ones that are most affected by this

are the small and start-up companies. To give a comparison, the terrorist attack of 9/11 had an

economic impact of $123 Billion whereas, patent troll lawsuits amounted to $500 Billion in lost

wealth to defendants. The next question that needs to be answered is why there is a rise in this

sort of unethical business. This business has a very low start-up cost which usually requires

buying out junk patents or acquiring patents from bankrupt companies. This business also has a

very low overhead cost Furthermore, the cost of running these sort of businesses are very low as

legal fees are minimized through contingency arrangements ad there is a very low risk of

countersuit as they have little or no assets other than the junk patents. Taking the above points

into consideration and the fact that this business has guaranteed returns makes it a very lucrative

business for a few. These patent troll companies mainly target the small companies and had

revenue of $ 10.8 Million, 90% of which were from small-medium sized businesses alone. For

example patent troll MPHJ Technology investments sent small and medium sized companies

hundreds of letters to small- medium sized companies telling them that they violated a patent if

they used a type of scanner typically found on office copiers and demanded $900-$1200 per

employee. This is a simple example of how small businesses are targeted by these patent trolls.

More often than not these small companies end up paying what is demanded from them by the

patent trolls since they do not have the money to fight back or pay legal fees which are incurred

if the case is taken to court. These lawsuits have been on the rise since 2004 where it currently

stays at 3174 law suits in United States by the end of 2013. This is a serious issue, because the

small businesses and innovations which could be the next generations Apple or Google are

brought to a halt by these patent trolls. Many ideas and small businesses have been cut off or

totally shut down due to this. Furthermore, many of the Hedge Funds also have started investing

in this business along with lawers. In an innovative age, these ideas that could have benefitted a

lot of people are being stopped. This issue was so serious that White House had to intervene and

take some steps. In October of 2013 the House Judiciary Committee introduced the Innovation

Act to update the American Invents Act to better protect the legal patent holders. This bill

requires losing party to pay the other party’s legal fees and allows manufacturers or suppliers to

intervene on behalf of customers who find themselves targeted by patent troll. This bill has

somewhat eased the pressure but the danger still remains out there. Patent troll is a very unethical

business strategy and affects employment and creativity and it needs to be eliminated.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ip, Patent Trolls and Innovation

...IP, Patent Trolls and Innovation. If you were privy to the early years of file sharing you may remember waiting happily hours for your favorite music to download. In the end, you might have found that it wasn’t the right song after all or that the quality was less than stellar. Nonetheless, the explosion of Napster in the late 90’s was an exciting time for music enthusiasts since it opened a new technology forum to access music. While the initial firestorm about Napster was related to copyright infringement, a deeper dilemma was unfolding along with this new technology. Napster’s story demonstrates what can happen when an established, powerful industry faces a threat from a new technology that offers more services for a lower cost. Furthermore, it depicts the struggle of burgeoning technologies with established institutions’ copyrights, patents, and intellectual property. Our society continues to explore how to balance the rights of intellectual property while not dampening the emergence of needed disruptive technology. Innovation is the fuel that stokes our economic fire. Yet, with a perceived threat of lawsuits or the attacks of patent trolls, start-ups and venture capitalists may be deterred from investing in areas that are deemed too risky. In the aftermath of Napster, venture capitalists were much less likely to invest in digital music as a result of the decision. In the late 1990’s, the music industry was less than thrilled about Napster. The music industry...

Words: 1688 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

History

...Running head: PATENT TROLLS Outline: Patent Trolls Tadeh Grigorian, Sara Lovdahl, Linsey Mounsey, Melony Whitecloud, University of Phoenix COM/440 Learning Team C Facilitator: Chad Schatzle Patent Trolls References Bessen, J., Ford, J., & Meurer, M. J. (2012). The private and social costs of patent trolls. Regulation, 34(4), 26-35. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/920096721?accountid=458 Catelli, A. (2014). Patent trolls get greedy across the globe. Inside Counsel.Breaking News, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1500277849?accountid=458 Catelli, A. (2014). The top 10 businesses targeted by patent trolls. Inside Counsel.Breaking News, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1503758911?accountid=458 Common Sense Solutions to the Patent Troll Problem. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.patentprogress.org/patent-troll-reform/common-sense-solutions-to-the-patent-troll-problem/ Intellectual Property: The Assessment OXF REV ECON POLICY (2007) 23 (4): 529-540 LaFuze, W. L., & Ruble, R. R. (2007). Patent trolls. The IP Litigator : Devoted to Intellectual Property Litigation and Enforcement, 13(2), 31-36. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/219970937?accountid=458 Lemley, M. A., & Melamed, A. (2013). MISSING THE FOREST FOR THE TROLLS. Columbia Law Review, 113(8), 2117-2189. Lu, J. ". (2012). The myths and facts of patent troll and excessive payment: Have nonpracticing entities (NPEs) been overcompensated? Business...

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Advance Biomedical Devices: Assessing Readiness to Expor

...When Patents Attack The podcast, “When Patents Attack” is about the patent process in the United States and why the program was initially developed. Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution authorizes the federal government to allow patents on inventions in order to inspire scientific and technical progress. The US Patent and Trademark Office defines a patent as "the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale or selling" a patented item. If anybody uses your idea you get paid, a patent makes it safe to share and innovate. However there are patent trolls out there. A patent troll is when companies don’t make any products, but go around suing other companies that do make products over supposed patent infringement. After listening to the podcast I think patent trolls slow innovation, make it harder for companies to grow, and hurt global competitiveness because of the fear of being sued. The podcast mentions Nathan Myhrvold and the company Intellectual Ventures. Peter Detkin states that the mission of Intellectual Ventures “is to help inventors bring great ideas into the world. That lot’s of inventors, they’re like great artists, brilliant but not brilliant at business. So their patents languish. IV gets their ideas into the hands of companies who’ll actually build what they’ve invented.” It’s ironic that Peter Detkin the guy who created the term patent troll is now a founder and vice chairman of Intellectual Ventures, because from what was in the interview...

Words: 524 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Patent Warfare

...Patent Warfare Per your request I reviewed the lawsuit notice and believe our company can handle the matter without litigation saving us time and money. Our first course of action should be to propose collaboration with the accuser in order to continue innovation. If the accuser turns out to be a patent troll or in other terms in the business of strictly making money on infringement cases we will have the case arbitrated by a subject matter expert. I recommend we offer the accuser a chance to collaborate with a business which recently launched a great new product supported by Apple iOS and Google Android platforms. Instead of being a killer of creativity the accuser might be a legitimate technology developer such as our company. The accuser may be more interested in developing newer and better versions of its product instead of getting a onetime payout. Collaboration will save both parties time and money by avoiding a long and expensive court case. It will also benefit both parties to share research and new ideas (Laudon, 2012). Nokia and HTC are a recent example of collaborations as they entered “into a collaboration agreement to provide access to each other’s patented technology to explore future projects” (Shankar, 2014). Working together will provide our business with new innovations making us more competitive. New innovations will develop an opportunity for new registered patents to our company, providing a defense system for possible future law suits. Licensing...

Words: 856 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Patent Pledge

...realized recently that we may be able to solve part of the patent problem without waiting for the government. I've never been 100% sure whether patents help or hinder technological progress. When I was a kid I thought they helped. I thought they protected inventors from having their ideas stolen by big companies. Maybe that was truer in the past, when more things were physical. But regardless of whether patents are in general a good thing, there do seem to be bad ways of using them. And since bad uses of patents seem to be increasing, there is an increasing call for patent reform. The problem with patent reform is that it has to go through the government. That tends to be slow. But recently I realized we can also attack the problem downstream. As well as pinching off the stream of patents at the point where they're issued, we may in some cases be able to pinch it off at the point where they're used. One way of using patents that clearly does not encourage innovation is when established companies with bad products use patents to suppress small competitors with good products. This is the type of abuse we may be able to decrease without having to go through the government. The way to do it is to get the companies that are above pulling this sort of trick to pledge publicly not to. Then the ones that won't make such a pledge will be very conspicuous. Potential employees won't want to work for them. And investors, too, will be able to see that they're the sort of company...

Words: 593 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Rim Case Study

...Case 2 – Research in Motion - RIM TM583 1. What were some of the challenges RIM faced to protect its Intellectual Property and how did RIM handle those challenges? There was a legal action between NTP and RIM over the intellectual property. RIM resolved the action. To protect its intellectual property, RIM agreed to pay $612.5 million to NTP Inc. to settle the fight. The dispute had threatened to end RIM's BlackBerry e-mail service to millions of users in the U.S. and has been the subject of an four-year patent battle between the two companies. Under the agreement, RIM received rights to NTP's patents going forward. RIM made a one-time payment to NTP. Even if the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office eventually overturned NTP's patents, NTP would not have to repay the $612.5 million. "There is no provision for the PTO re-exam. This is a full and final settlement," he said. RIM and NTP briefly agreed to settle the case for $450 million in March of 2005, but that deal later fell through. RIM thought the companies had come to a final agreement, but NTP believed the matter had never been finalized, and the litigation continued. 2. What were some of the industry factors that influenced RIM? 1. Help Organizations Reduce "Information Squandering" 2. Balance Technology with Information 3. Contribute to and Shape the Discussion of Information Worker Productivity 4. Support the Evolution of the Role of CIOs 5. Facilitate Development...

Words: 492 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Dcdc

...much that they allow it to run their lives. It can only take one troll to make a users life miserable. Although online anonymity has a lot of negatives, it can be somewhat beneficial to users. It can allow the anonymous person to express his or her beliefs and opinions for everyone to see. Having said that, people don’t always use the privilege to speak anonymously. By allowing anonymity anyone can literally write whatever the user wants without any repercussions. Majority of the people are normally just being facetious when commenting on blogs just to get a rise out of some people and gain attention even if it may be negative attention. Cyber bullying can be very dangerous and illegal for the most circumstances poses as a threat. Threatening someone via online anonymously can still get the user in some trouble with the law. It is still considered assault or harassment on someone even when it is anonymous. Law enforcements have a way to track the anonymous attacks down and hit you with some charges. The head of the social media sites should have a higher punishable Consequence to users who do not follow the code of conduct when it comes to privacy terms. Social media needs to come up with a program specifically for online bullying. The amount of attacks will decrease with better enforcement of the policies. It will deter the trolls...

Words: 400 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Alt Right Analysis

...Many people believe what they see or read on the Internet. It can change how they view topics and can alter their beliefs. This is one of the many ways the Alt. Right, an emerging white supremacy group can recruit new people into their party. Many Alt. Right supporters come from the internet and often just call themselves “trolls”. Before the term Alt. Right gets used more thoroughly, it must be defined. The article on Teaching Tolerance titled What is the Alt-Right and written by Cory Collins defines the term as “an umbrella term encompassing right-wing ideals at odds with establishment, conservatism, and multicultural society” (Collins). This boils down to that the Alt. Right hates any race other than Caucasians and believes that they...

Words: 1310 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Calliope Is A Hero

...set off for the field of pixie fairies. Ezra trudged through the petunia filled fields where the pixie fairies play. He thought, “These are the most annoying creatures in The Great East, even worse than the trolls!” As they pulled his ears and flicked his nose he scrunched his face and just kept walking. He left the fields and the last stop on his way to the Kingdom was the haunted forest. It was said to be filled with the scariest creatures in all of The Great East Kingdom. Ezra marched through the forest ready for anything. He fought off ghouls, goblins, and even evil monkeys. It took him eight straight hours to walk through it even without a rest break! But he made it through and standing before him was the glorious Great East Kingdom...

Words: 1209 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Bba Bahria University Islmabad

...August 2011 I realized recently that we may be able to solve part of the patent problem without waiting for the government. I've never been 100% sure whether patents help or hinder technological progress. When I was a kid I thought they helped. I thought they protected inventors from having their ideas stolen by big companies. Maybe that was truer in the past, when more things were physical. But regardless of whether patents are in general a good thing, there do seem to be bad ways of using them. And since bad uses of patents seem to be increasing, there is an increasing call for patent reform. The problem with patent reform is that it has to go through the government. That tends to be slow. But recently I realized we can also attack the problem downstream. As well as pinching off the stream of patents at the point where they're issued, we may in some cases be able to pinch it off at the point where they're used. One way of using patents that clearly does not encourage innovation is when established companies with bad products use patents to suppress small competitors with good products. This is the type of abuse we may be able to decrease without having to go through the government. The way to do it is to get the companies that are above pulling this sort of trick to pledge publicly not to. Then the ones that won't make such a pledge will be very conspicuous. Potential employees won't want to work for them. And investors, too, will be able to see that they're the...

Words: 679 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Case 2 Research in Motion

...involved on several Patent Litigation with the different competitors. On 1999 Glenayre Technologies (formerly known as Glenayre Electonics) filed a patent infringement suit against RIM claiming that the Inter@ctive pager line used Glenayre’s power-generation from dual battery process. This litigation caused a delay on RIM’s contract renewal with the BellSouth company and also their quarterly earnings report came with lower than expected results. In order to get new customers RIM signed an agreement with Dell Computer and Dell started selling Blackberry to large corporate accounts. On 2001 RIM replied back to Glenayre filing a suit against them for infringing on RIM’s “Single Mailbox Integration” patent. Research in Motion won this patent and allowed them to collect royalties from other mobile device makers that were planning on utilizing this technology. On 2002 Research in Motion filed the first of four suits against Good Technology for misappropriation of trade secrets, this dispute continued until 2004 where they settled an agreement. Good Technology agreed to pay a sum of money and quarterly licensing fees. Another legal dispute was the patent for the keyboard design against Handspring for its Treo device but the dispute ended with Handspring agreeing to license RIM’s patent. One of their biggest patent infringement litigation was against the company NTP which tried to send a notice to a number of companies and tried to license the wireless email patent to them. None...

Words: 793 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Mixture of Markets

...Market Mix: The Best Bang For Your Buck American InterContinental University April 5, 2012 Donald Buehrig Busn105-1202A-269: Introduction to Business Unit 3 Individual Project Abstract In this paper you will see how you can use the market mix to do research on a particular product. Using the four p’s to narrow down your choice in a flooded market makes you realize that everything that we buy has been thru some sort of research on how to appeal to the consumer. Choosing a product is easy, but choosing the right product takes some time to pick what would work best for the situation. This paper shows you that when marketing a product know the environments the surround your customer. For this paper the product was priced with in the budget, had a reliable product, placed in the right graphic area and promoted to the need of the customer. When choosing a product you must consider what the product means to you. I ask myself this question, “why do I want or need this product” before I purchase any large product. Once I answer this question then I start shopping around looking for the product that fits best. I have been in the market for a new trolling motor and decided on the Minn Kota riptide. Let me explain how I used the market mix in making my decision. First I put a limit on the price I was willing to pay for a trolling Motor. I was willing to pay a descent price for a descent product. Now what makes this product a descent product or is it worth the price is...

Words: 666 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Internet Trolls

...Internet Trolls In the past, bullying could be found in schools, in the workplace, and in sports. Nowadays, there is a new form of bullying called Cyber Bullying. Cyber bullies are also known as Internet Trolls. Lisa Selin Davis, an internet blogger, writes about her personal experiences dealing with internet trolls. She states in her blog that all kinds of people can become trolls, according to sociologists and psychologists who have studied online behavior. Three major types of trolls are, The Moral Crusader, The Hater, and The Debunker. All three spend time and energy engaging in virtual hate. A Moral Crusader is a person who thinks his or her way is the right way. They use their beliefs and morals to put others down. They try to convince others that their beliefs are better and superior then that of others moral beliefs. Some examples of moral crusader groups are called, “The Anti-Tobacco Lobby,” “Gun Control Lobby,” “Anti-Pornography Group,” “Pro-Life/ Pro-Choice Movement.” These are all examples of places crusaders like to project their strong opinions onto others. They are social movements which campaign around a symbolic or moral issue. The Hater finds other users with similar views to form a group. It shares views to bond itself. They destroy and attack their target. Haters seek to attract attention by making provocative comments that are aggressive or offensive. They are usually people that greatly dislike a specific person or thing. An example of an internet...

Words: 380 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Trolls

...this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper v this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is a troll paper this is...

Words: 321 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Law 421

... and sponsor links. The article goes into more detail about a specific case that took place in a United States Court of Appeals, where the plaintiff, “Hyperphrase held two business patents related to some systems and methods that linked online records.  The technical process used by these systems and methods is similar to the one used by Google through its "AdSense" and "AutoLink" methods.” (Google v. Hyperphrase, 2007) The Issue The legal business issue raised in the article is that of trademark infringement that would also be considered a theft of intellectual property. Being that Hyperphrase feels that Google has demonstrated deceptive business practice they feel resolving the matter in a court of law is the only to prevent further damages. “This intriguing case so far has two significant juridical teachings.  First, we learned that business patents and its electronic use are slowly but steadily becoming the object of intellectual property litigation.  For the time being, this litigation is centered at a domestic level; but, the legal community must be vigilant of how transnational litigation and jurisprudence on e-business patents evolves.  Second, we also learned that business patents, especially e-business patents, create extremely complex litigation cases.  E-business patent infringement cases involve highly technical computer methods and systems (some related to mathematical...

Words: 455 - Pages: 2