Premium Essay

Performance Evaluation and Feedback System

In:

Submitted By jaylamcf
Words 324
Pages 2
Performance Evaluation and Feedback System (PEFS)

Objective: Introduce the difference of PEFS between Japan and the west
Goal: Understand the reason and result of adoption of different PEFS
Expected result: Able to work in a company with the PEFS which is suitable for them.

Japan:
Staff performance is evaluated as a whole, based on company profit, department contribution. Feedback and future direction is provided to all staff in company / department through group meeting (e.g., morning assembly).
The reason of using this PEFS is that Japanese pays attention to relationship, and their career goal is group/company success. When compensation is based on individual performance, staff becomes focus on individual success. This hampers team working and company success.
As a result, staff works under strain of the working environment (self-control), strives to maintain good relationship with others (focus on harmony), follows custom and finds a middle way to solve any problems (avoid conflict). As it is difficult for staff to express his own opinion in working environment, building relationship becomes more important for personal success. This creates the “after work drinking” culture.

The West:
Staff performance is evaluated as a whole and individual basis, based on company profit, department contribution, and individual performance. Feedback is provided to individual. One on one meeting is held to discuss career goal and development plan.
The reason of using this PEFS is that the West pays attention to rules, objects and attributes, and their career goal is individual success. When compensation is based on individual performance, staff is motivated to strive his best and extend his potential. Workflow is established to enforce teamwork, which leads to group/company success.
As a result, staff is encouraged to express his own idea (freedom), think and

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Recruiter

...advantages and disadvantages of the 360-degree assessments in succession plans. 360 –degree assessments is comprehensive performance evaluation tool that allows multi-raters, peer groups, co-workers, supervisors to provide feedback regarding an employee’s performance. This information is typically requested by a next level supervisor or manager of whom the employee reports to. 360 reviews emphases on the skills and contribution that an employee makes. The goal is to provide a balance of how others view the employee’s contribution, which includes performance, leadership, interpersonal communication, teamwork and management skill, personal vision and accountability (Heathfield). We will determine if it’s beneficial for Bank of America to use the 360- degree assessments based on this week’s findings. Analyzing 360-Degree Assessments There are many positive aspects to 360-degree assessment feedback such as improved feedback from more sources, promotes team development, it helps teams work more effectively together. 360-degree assessments also promote improved customer service. 360 degree feedback has been known to be one of the best methods for understanding personal and organizational development needs. Furthermore, various employees feel 360 degree feedback is more accurate, more reflective of their performance, and more validating than previous feedback from the supervisor or manager alone. This makes the information more useful for both career and personal development. According...

Words: 1606 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Hr Foundations

...Performance Review Takes a Page from Facebook HRM500 – HR Management Foundations May 12, 2013 Today’s workforce has evolved just as technology. The dynamics of the labor force consist of generational differences. These differences can support organizational success as well as cause its failure. What constitutes as a productive workforce are the tools provided by the employer. Performance management systems have become essential to the development, productivity and retention of top producers. It is imperative that employers understand the needs and listen to the concerns of their employees. The old way of conducting performance appraisals are no longer efficient because they are seen as outdated and cumbersome. Organizations should use technology especially the widespread acceptance of social networking as their new found way to communicate and provide feedback. This style of communication promotes comradery, supports inclusion and allows managers to perform better. It also supports the notion of 360 degree feedback but also provides the entire workforce an outlet to recognize accomplishment and seek guidance. I will attempt to explain and show how social media network performance systems are beneficial to the organization and their employees. Keywords: Social network, performance management, communication, generational workforce. Performance Review Takes a Page from Facebook Agree or disagree with this statement and provide reasons for your response....

Words: 1620 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

360 Degree Evaluations

...2013 360 degree Evaluations, Are they worth the time? Business leaders have a lot of options when it comes to evaluating their staff. Many choose the easiest path and more traditional way where the superior will evaluate subordinates either by metrics, behaviors or a combination of both. There are many variations of the performance evaluation and they are conducting at varying times of the year depending on industry and company. Since the late 90’s, the 360 degree review has started to gain popularity, as a matter of fact In 2002, 360 degree feedback were used by 90% of Fortune 500 Companies (Linman, 2006). Before we can accurately assess if the 360 degree review is effective we must understand what it is and how it works. What is a 360 degree review? 360 degree feedback is an evaluation method that incorporates feedback from the worker, his/her peers, superiors, subordinates and customers (Linman, 2006). This multi rater feedback tool originated in the 1950s and 1960s when organizations saw a need to improve processes and communications. The point of the evaluation is to receive feedback from many sources in an effort to get as accurate information as possible based on the working relationship to the individual (Thompson, 2012). The result should be that the employee receives enough feedback to help them improve performance or build a development plan. Many believe that this evaluation is best suited for development rather than an evaluation that will impact the...

Words: 2261 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Morgan

...The Firmwide 360˚ Performance Evaluation Process at Morgan Stanley Case study Team no.2: Jana Baková Júlia Birčáková Eva Flaková Tomáš Szabo Martin Valdner 5th December 2005 CONTENTS The Firmwide 360˚ Performance Evaluation Process at Morgan Stanley 1 CONTENTS 2 Introduction 3 What is the 360˚ Performance Evaluation Process? 3 What is the problem? 5 Evaluation Criteria 5 Telling the truth / how to achieve correctness of the questionnaires? 5 Fighting for points 6 Possible solutions for our problems 7 Problem no. 1 – how to set evaluation criteria 7 Problem no. 2 – Telling the truth / how to achieve correctness of the questionnaires? 8 Problem no. 3 – Fighting for points 9 Conclusion 10 Introduction Morgan Stanley (MS) is a leading U.S. investment bank. It was founded in New York on the 5th September 1935 by Henry S. Morgan, and Harold Stanley. Since its inception it was transforming itself into a “One-firm company” under the leadership of John Mack (the president of Morgan Stanley since 1993). Morgan Stanley changed the presentation of itself towards its clients in a more unified way. Employees have become the main source that helps Morgan Stanley to achieve it. Organizations are changing fast - diversity is valued as a critical component of a business environment that encourages new and innovative approaches to accomplishing organization’s mission. Morgan Stanley has a target to be the best investment bank...

Words: 1847 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Deepn

...Fast, Flexible and Affordable 360° Feedback 13 Common Mistakes Using 360-Degree Feedback Here’s how to avoid some common mis-steps when implementing multirater feedback  By Scott Wimer & Kenneth M. Nowack ____________________________________________________________ ____ Imagine having returned from a conference where you heard reports on the power of 360-degree or multi-rater feedback. Excited by the Prospect of introducing it in your organization you start sharing your enthusiasm and find that others are interested and receptive. After much discussion, you receive the go-ahead from your manager. Now, your challenge is to figure out the best way to implement it. First, you decide to do some informal benchmarking. As you read about multi-rater feedback, talk with colleagues and attend workshops, it becomes apparent that it’s a complicated subject with many options for design and implementation. At times you even wonder whether 360-degree feedback is the potent tool for performance management and organizational change it’s hyped to be or just another management fad. Your initial research reveals varied results. In some organizations, people rave about multi-rater feedback, claiming it’s the cornerstone intervention for individual and organizational change; others say it has left people feeling betrayed, broken confidences, and heightened cynicism. There are commonalities in the successes stories and in the failures. Most organizations using the best practices anticipate...

Words: 5064 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Human Resource

... Introduction: What is Performance Management? II. Purpose of Performance Management System III. Problems identified in Dubai Caterers Performance Management System IV. Advantages and Disadvantages of the current rating scale V. Ten Steps to Solve the current crisis VI. Conclusion and Identification of other problems I. Introduction: What is Performance Management? Performance Management is known as activities that focus on the job performance and evaluates it, precisely it has been defined as “strategic and integrated approach to increasing the effectiveness of organizations by improving the performance of the people who work in them and by developing the capabilities of teams and individual contributors” (Armstrong and Baron,1998). Performance Management is important for any organization as it aids in accomplishing organizational goals because through it employees can only be provided by appropriate and specific feedback to assist their career development and job performance. In addition to that it effectively evaluates employee behaviors with performance of specific objectives consistent with the work unit and organizational strategy. Moreover, performance deficiencies that may hinder accomplishing of organizational goals are addressed through employee development programs that meet the needs of the organization and the market. II. Purpose of Performance Management System Effective Performance Management Systems are hard to implement, manage...

Words: 2915 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Morgan

...The Firmwide 360˚ Performance Evaluation Process at Morgan Stanley Case study Team no.2: Jana Baková Júlia Birčáková Eva Flaková Tomáš Szabo Martin Valdner 5th December 2005 CONTENTS The Firmwide 360˚ Performance Evaluation Process at Morgan Stanley 1 CONTENTS 2 Introduction 3 What is the 360˚ Performance Evaluation Process? 3 What is the problem? 5 Evaluation Criteria 5 Telling the truth / how to achieve correctness of the questionnaires? 5 Fighting for points 6 Possible solutions for our problems 7 Problem no. 1 – how to set evaluation criteria 7 Problem no. 2 – Telling the truth / how to achieve correctness of the questionnaires? 8 Problem no. 3 – Fighting for points 9 Conclusion 10 Introduction Morgan Stanley (MS) is a leading U.S. investment bank. It was founded in New York on the 5th September 1935 by Henry S. Morgan, and Harold Stanley. Since its inception it was transforming itself into a “One-firm company” under the leadership of John Mack (the president of Morgan Stanley since 1993). Morgan Stanley changed the presentation of itself towards its clients in a more unified way. Employees have become the main source that helps Morgan Stanley to achieve it. Organizations are changing fast - diversity is valued as a critical component of a business environment that encourages new and innovative approaches to accomplishing organization’s mission. Morgan Stanley has a target to be the best investment...

Words: 1843 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Morgan Stanley Becoming a One-Firm Firm

...culture was riddled with tension and starting to affect the firm’s performance. The firm’s divisions operated independently and there was internal conflict between business units, with each focusing on their sole profit maximization & loss limitations. Concurrently, even as Morgan Stanley was expanding its operations globally, the firm’s performance dropped due to delayed decision making and bitter battles over resources. Morgan Stanley was lacking from strong divisional focus, lack of future leaders, and poor career development & haphazard performance evaluation which resulted in employee dissatisfaction with promotion procedures and compensation schemes. John Mack’s vision and goal for the firm was to become a “one-firm firm”. Mack wanted to change the culture and values at Morgan Stanley, in order to attract and retain top talent. He recognized the fact that Morgan Stanley’s competitive advantage is its people, and was willing to implement changes in order to develop and retain their best employees. Along with Tom DeLong, the newly appointed Chief Development Officer, they started implementing a new 360o performance evaluation system which was critical to achieving their goal. The new 360o performance evaluation system The new performance evaluation system was critical to implementing the new culture and values in the firm as it brought in a new set of criteria & objectivity into the evaluation process, also helping to boost employee’s development and morale....

Words: 722 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Human Resource Management Project

...HRM Project Performance Appraisal System in Accenture A critique of the performance appraisal system in Accenture 2011 Santanu Chowdhury (PGP14/297), Abhijeet Yadav (PGP14/256), Kulbhushan Baghel (PGP14/278), Gaurav Patil (PGP14/272), Udit Kapoor (PGP14/309, Pranay Khera (PGP14/320) Section E Group 5 3/14/2011 Contents Acknowledgment 3 Introduction 3 Importance of the issue 3 Performance Appraisal System in Accenture 4 Interview and Survey 6 1. Set the performance objectives and standards 6 2. Communicate the objectives, standards and expectation to the employees 7 3. Measuring the performance 9 A. Self Input of performance by the employee 10 B. Supervisor input on employee performance 11 C. Supervisor’s Qualitative Assessment 13 4. Feedback by supervisor 15 5. Feedback is stored in the system 16 Recommendation 18 Appendix 18 Acknowledgment We, gratefully acknowledge the guidance, help and valuable suggestions received from Prof. T N Krishnan. We would like to thank him for his valuable advice and guidance. We would also like to thank the employees and ex-employees of Accenture India who has given us interview and have taken part in our survey of Accenture performance appraisal system thereby aiding us in the successful completion of the project. Introduction Accenture is a global management consulting, technology consulting and outsourcing firm with a workforce of 177000 employees around the world. In India, Accenture...

Words: 2336 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Performance Appraisal

...Performance Appraisal Performance appraisal is concerned with determining how well employees are doing their jobs, communicating that information to employees, agreeing on new objectives and establishing a plan for performance improvement. Performance appraisal, by providing a dynamic link to employee recruitment, selection, training and development, career planning, compensation and benefits, safety and health, and industrial relations, is a vital tool for strategy execution. It signals to managers and employees what is really important; it provides ways to measure what is important; it fixes accountability for behaviour and results; and it helps to improve performance. Finally, it’s necessary to defend the organisation against individuals who legally challenge the validity of management decisions relating to promotions, transfers, salary changes and termination. Performance appraisal may be viewed as an overall measure of organisational effectiveness: organisational objectives are met through the effort of individual employees. If employee performance is improved, the organisation will lift its performance. However, it should be noted that some experts do not accept these assumptions. Performance appraisal typically involves measuring how well an individual employee is doing their job against a set of criteria, providing feedback and creating development plan. The performance process generates information that may be used for administrative purposes and/or developmental...

Words: 2290 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Hr Manual

...Summary of practices 1. Safe, Healthy And Happy Workplace 2. Open Book Management Style 3. Performance Linked Bonuses 4. 360-Degree Performance Management Feedback System 5. Fair Evaluation System For Employees 6. Knowledge Sharing 7. Highlight Performers 8. Open House Discussions And Feedback Mechanisms 9. Reward Ceremonies 10. Delight Employees With The Unexpected [pic] 1. Safe, Healthy and Happy Workplace Creating a safe, healthy and happy workplace will ensure that your employees feel homely and stay with your organization for a very long time. Capture their pulse through employee surveys. [pic] 2. Open Book Management Style Sharing information about contracts, sales, new clients, management objectives, company policies, employee personal data etc. ensures that the employees are as enthusiastic about the business as the management. Through this open book process you can gradually create a culture of participative management and ignite the creative endeavor of your work force.. It involves making people an interested party to your strategic decisions, thus aligning them to your business objectives. Be as open as you can. It helps in building trust & motivates employees. Employee self service portal, Manager on-line etc. are the tools available today to the management to practice this style. [pic] 3. Performance linked Bonuses Paying out bonuses or having any kind of variable compensation plan can be both an incentive...

Words: 901 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Wgu Human Resources

...First, we need to ask what performance appraisals are. They are “The identification, measurement and management of human performances within an organization.” (GOMEZ-MEJIA, 2010) Performace appraisals are popular and used world wide to measure personal and team performace. Performance management has increased with the gripping economy and having less to do more. Managers have always thought of optimal performance, yet a poorly written performce appraisal has a devistating impact on the employee, the manager, and the company. Today we will discuss the negative affects of a poorly written appraisal and the positive affects of an effective written appraisal. We will cover the steps to take, the information to include, and the expected end results of the appraisal. Covering the core competencies is critical, they include: Inclusiveness, Stewardship, Problem solving and Decision Making, Strategic Planning and Organizing, Communication, Quality Improvement, Leadership, Service Focus, and Teamwork. So, are apprasials needed? Absolutly…the appraisal system identifies and ensures we retain the best employees. It gives an outlook of who can best do what, and where best to utilize them. It ensures they reach their highest potential within the company. It allows managers to provide coaching and feedback to the employees so they can improve performace levels in identified areas. Affective appraisals inhibit...

Words: 5469 - Pages: 22

Free Essay

360 Apprisal Process

...is called 360 Degree Appraisal. Here, the performance of the employee or manager is evaluated by six parties, including himself. So, he gets a feedback of his performance from everyone around him. This method is very reliable because evaluation is done by many different parties. These parties are in the best position to evaluate the employee or manager because they are continuously interacting and working with him. This method is mostly used to evaluate the performance of the employees. However, it is also used to evaluate other qualities such as talents, behaviour, values, ethical standards, tempers, loyalty, etc. 360 degree appraisal was first developed by General Electric (GE), USA in 1992. Today it is used by all major organisations. In India, it is used by Crompton Greaves, Wipro, Infosys, Reliance Industries, etc. Six Parties In 360 Degree Appraisal The six parties involved in 360 degree appraisal are :- 1. Top Management The top management normally evaluates the middle level managers. However, in a small organisation, they also evaluate the performance of the lower level managers and senior employees. 2. Immediate Superior The immediate superior is in a very good position to evaluate the performance of his subordinates. This is because they have direct and accurate information about the work performance of their subordinates. 3. Peers / Co-workers Peer or colleagues also evaluate each other's performance. They work continuously with each other, and...

Words: 2631 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Performance Management

...Performance Management Performance Management – The means through which managers ensure that employees’ activities and outputs are congruent with the organization’s goals. Three Parts of Performance Management: a) Job Analysis - refers to the process of getting detailed information about jobs. b) Performance Appraisal – the process through which an organization gets information on how well an employee is doing his or her job. c) Performance Feedback – the process of providing employees information regarding their performance effectiveness. Model of Performance Management in Organizations Performance Planning and Evaluation (PPE) System – any system that seeks to tie the formal performance appraisal process to the company’s strategies by specifying at the beginning of the evaluation period the types and level of performance that must be accomplished. Purposes of Performance Management: Strategic Purpose – a performance management system should link employee activities with the organizations goals. a) Administrative Purpose – organizations use performance management information (performance appraisals, in particular) in many administrative decisions: salary administration (pay raises), promotions, retention-termination, lay-offs, and recognition of individual performance. b) Developmental Purpose – to develop employees who are effective at their jobs. ...

Words: 1313 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Hsm/220

...Developing a Performance Appraisal System Developing a Performance Appraisal System All organizations must have some staff in order to operate. These employees, paid or unpaid, need to be evaluated from time to time for pay raises, advancement, or rewards. The tools and evaluation techniques for performance appraisal are important and need to consider all aspects of an individual’s job position, attitude, and effectiveness in interactions with clients. Deciding which method is best suited to the specific organization, designing forms for evaluation, and distributing these tools often falls to the human resources department since their primary job duties are directly tied to employees. What is a performance appraisal system? Loosely defined, a performance appraisal system is the method by which an individual’s employment is evaluated by supervisors or management personnel to define how well or how poorly job duties are being performed. Additionally, the information gained can be used to counsel employees, document problems, or show what areas of training may need to be reviewed. Feedback for employees is one of the primary reasons appraisals are performed; however, they are equally important to the operation of the organization. Without some form of evaluation, there would be no way to know how well specific employees are doing their jobs and what aspects of employment may need to be changed to allow the agency to function more efficiently. Humans have an inherent need...

Words: 1369 - Pages: 6