Free Essay

Personal Worldview and Business Ethics

In:

Submitted By Jaylen14
Words 4912
Pages 20
“Worldview, Philosophy, Faith and Ethics” Reading

ARTICLE 1: What Is a Worldview and Why Is It Important to Me?

The first set of questions in part 1 asked you to evaluate the extent to which you seek to apply faith, values, and philosophy to your personal and business decisions. To really have a sound foundation for ethical decisions, we have to have an understanding of how our worldview influences the decisions we make and how we perceive reality.

Too often, we barely understand what our worldview is all about and how it impacts decisions. As such, our decisions in life may or may not be informed by sound principles. This is true even for Christians, who may even have unbiblical ideas influencing their worldview. The non-Christian faces a different challenge: trying to make sense of life in a meaningful way without a Biblical, theistic starting point. All of this will be discussed in the series of article for this assignment.

Defining Worldview

• A worldview is the intellectual, emotional, and perhaps even spiritual framework by which we apprehend reality and assign meaning to life.

• Everyone has a worldview; it may not be very developed, but nevertheless, everyone is approaching life based upon one.

The Worldview “House”

• To speak metaphorically, our worldview is the intellectual, emotional, and spiritual “home” in which we live all of our lives. It may change drastically, undergoing serious renovations or damage as we go through life, but it is always with us nevertheless. Furthermore, regardless of how nice the house is on the inside (furniture, upholstery, decorations, etc., etc.), if that worldview home is not built upon a solid foundation, or a strong skeletal framework, it will not be a very safe or suitable home in which to live.

• Ironically, the two most important things of any house—the foundation and the framework—are the components that most people don’t think about when they look at a house, because these two components are unseen and therefore often ignored.

• Likewise, though people are quite comfortable articulating their beliefs about politics, religion, business, relationships, the meaning of life, etc., etc., they rarely look at the crucial assumptions underneath those beliefs, because by their nature, these beliefs are assumed and therefore taken for granted.

Defining Presuppositions

• Presuppositions are the crucial, yet often unspoken assumptions about the origin of life, truth, individuality, and values that serve as the foundation and framework for one’s worldview.

• As we’ll see throughout the assignment, everyone has certain assumptions that they make about life. These presuppositions must be evaluated if we are going to have a sound worldview for ethical soundness, because they pertain to the foundation and framework of our worldview house.

Presuppositions and the Worldview “House”

These key presuppositions can be assigned to two categories: foundational presuppositions and framework presuppositions. Again, think of these two terms in the context of a home. Obviously, a home needs a solid foundation and skeletal framework. The same is true for one’s worldview.

First, we will discuss the importance of foundational presuppositions. The case will be made here that to have a sound worldview “home”, only a certain type of foundation can be in place. Just as an actual house couldn’t be built upon a foundation of banana pudding and expect to be sound, so a worldview cannot be based upon faulty presuppositions.

In reality, there are only two choices for foundational presuppositions, and as will be discussed below, only one of those two options can actually support the full weight of one’s worldview home through trying times.

CHOOSING YOUR FOUNDATION

Foundational Presuppositions: An intellectual starting point or “foundation” of the worldview home. There are only two options:

• The presence of eternal, impersonal, non-living, infinite matter, (this option includes both the secular atheistic adherence to non-living matter as well as more Eastern approaches, in which some cosmic force, though eternal and spiritual, is not personal)

• A eternal, personal, living, infinite creator being

Why these two?
We have to start with the question of how life started because that is the source of all meaning. We may claim to derive our sense of right and wrong from our family upbringing, or society or culture, or the laws of the land, but all of those are not original determinants—they came into being and are determined by whatever it was that brought life and meaning into existence in the first place. We therefore have to back to the very beginning. That is why we are only focusing on the two starting points mentioned above.
We have to assume that our metaphysical starting point must be eternal in origin, or else it is not a starting point, since something else would have come before it. Therefore, the fact that both starting points are eternal is valid, and as such, the eternal requirement would negate any type of mythology in which the gods were created.
On the possibility of a sentient, personal and infinite creator being or beings, certainly this passes as a possible starting point. We cannot surmise as to whether or not it would only be one entity, or multiple entities, but we know that regardless of number, they must be eternal.
The other possibility, which is totally opposite, is that of eternal, non-living matter. Besides the fact that it is eternal, which is a prerequisite for any starting point, there is nothing else in common with the personal, infinite creator being. Following is an explanation of how these two possible starting points are both mutually exclusive and exhaustive of all possibilities. 1. One is living, the other is non-living. These two attributes are totally opposite of one another; as an entity cannot be both, or partial of these two extremes. No other possibilities exist. 2. One is personal, and the other is non-personal. Again, there is no room for an intermediary position here. One cannot have both personality and non-personality. 3. It follows that creation deriving from the former is predetermined, whereas creation from the latter is a chance happenstance. Non-living matter cannot plan to initiate a new development in itself; all processes must be random. On the other hand, it is appropriate to conceive of an intelligent creator being planning creation.
Simply stated, there really are no other possibilities other than these two, which is to say that they are mutually exclusive. They embody the full range of possibilities. A major theme of these articles is that only the God of the Bible—and no other religious starting point—will suffice, but that argument will be made later. For now, it is important to note that whoever this God is, he/she/it must be eternal, personal, and sentient, or else this “god” starting point will be no different from the impersonal, eternal starting point.
CONCLUSION
Some might argue that they do not make any decisions—or at least very few—while thinking about what they believe about God or random chance. They would claim that they make decisions based upon circumstances, past experiences, legal ramifications and other types of consequences, and in the end, what works best for them. These same people might even claim to believe in some type of God. But when people make this argument, they are in reality being influenced by their views of God in ways of which they are not quite aware, and as the case will be made in subsequent articles, the foundation of their worldview home may very well be something akin to banana pudding—which tastes great with vanilla wafers, but is less than satisfying for a sure foundation.

ARTICLE 2: Adding the Framework—Ontology, Epistemology, & Axiology

What are the implications for having a foundation based solidly upon a belief in an intelligent Creator being versus a foundation based upon a non-theistic, random chance starting point? This article will provide an answer to that question by looking at our framework presuppositions—those key assumptions about who we are as humans (ontology) and whether or not there is absolute truth (epistemology) and values (axiology).

These framework presuppositions, like the skeletal framework of a house, are built directly upon the foundation of the home. If the foundation is bad, the framework will be flawed, and the entire structure will be damaged. So it is with our worldview homes. If our framework presuppositions are based upon an unbiblical theistic foundation, our beliefs about ontology, epistemology, and axiology will be flawed and therefore, our decision-making will in turn be flawed.

In each of these framework categories, we will discuss the implications that exist for building one’s worldview “home” on a foundation other than the God of the Bible. To do so, we will start with ontology, since individuality (and the responsibility that comes with it) is the basis for how we perceive truth and values.

ONTOLOGY

Ontology—who are we? Are we individuals or are we totally a product of our environment?

• Determinism: the environment and its processes determine the actions and reactions of every organism found therein.

• Free Will: Organisms have some measure of free will, sentience, and individuality, even if they are to some degree determined by their environment and/or Creator.

If our starting point is the God of the Bible, we will see that because we are made in his image, there is the opportunity for free will, as well as the ability to think and communicate with others in meaningful ways. The basis for ethics is the ability to think and reason. In a world ordered by random chance and/or an impersonal “mystical” force, there is no personality at all—human beings are solely caught up in the impersonal forces that rule the universe—chaos, randomness, feedback-stimulus-response. This is one of the reasons why, as mentioned in article 1, we are focusing on the God of the Bible as are starting point and not another type of god.

There can be no basis for ethics or moral responsibility if there is no individual responsibility. Without individual responsibility, the motivations for doing anything are viewed as being based upon circumstantial (environmental, socio-economic exploitation, etc.) factors, or hormonal, biological urges. In that sense, the attitude that says, “I’ve got to do what is best for me” is more motivated by the “survival of the fittest” notion that comes with a Darwinist worldview or a worldview that embraces ultimate meaningless than the promises of God’s Word, which says that God is faithful to preserve those who obey him and put their hope in the promises and commandments of his Word.

EPISTEMOLOGY

Epistemology—how do we know what is truth, if there even is truth?

If our foundation is a non-theistic starting point based upon random chance or a mysterious, impersonal cosmic force, the logical outcome will be a belief in moral relativism, because there is no God communicating what is true and what is right and wrong. Everything is just the product of random chance or cyclical forces in the universe (the interplay of ying and yang, for instance).

If we believe that truth is relative—that people can basically decide what works best for them as they go—then we are doing the following things to our worldview:

1) We are de facto saying that our foundation is that of random chance. Only in a world ruled by random chance would there be no basis for absolute truth. 2) Moreover, we have no basis for ethics or personal understanding of life. Everything we feel or believe is subject to our own emotional whims and experiences and the emotional whims and experiences of others. 3) Nothing we perceive can be trusted. To be sure, Scripture tells us that we are not to rely on our own understanding, but a belief that truth is relative basically undermines our understanding altogether.

In the business world, the question of absolute truth and right and wrong comes up all of the time. But because the current legal paradigm is based upon a non-theistic starting point, “right and wrong” is all about what the law says, and what legal loop holes can be created to get around any laws. Businesses, being motivated solely by profit, will then find whatever excuses they can do to whatever they want to do.

Individual people do the same. Instead of the absolute truth of God’s word, people are pushed by expediency, fear, and selfishness in making personal decisions.

AXIOLOGY

Axiology—how do we arrive at values? Is there such a thing as absolute good and evil? There are really only two options here and they derive entirely from what one believes about God:

• Absolute values: good, evil, justice, love, etc. which are immutable and which transcend cultural and social boundaries.

• Socially constructed values: people in various cultural groups determine what is good and bad for their group

In a non-Christian worldview, there can be no true values or right and wrong, or love and justice. If one believes that we live in a physical-only universe, then all that happens is the result of random chance and stimulus-response actions. Survival is the sole criterion for doing anything, and that engenders moral relativism because people will always have differing opinions of who needs to survive and how. Likewise, if one views God as more of a mystical, impersonal force, there can be no hope of truly understanding right and wrong, and in fact, in an Eastern mystical perspective, good and evil are often viewed as two sides of the same coin.

In conclusion, all of the key assumptions about who we are as human beings and what truth, love, and justice are all about depend upon the nature of our foundational presuppositions. If we believe in the presence of a personal, intelligent Creator being, we have the possibility for things like true meaning in life because we humans will have free will. With that free will comes moral obligation, but the good news is that there are in fact real values like love and justice to pursue, to live for, and if need be, even to die for. Without the presence of this eternal, Creator-being, all we have is random chance or an impersonal cosmic force. With either of those two options (and really, they ultimately fold into one another so that there is no meaningful difference), we as humans have no free will, because we are either the product of our physical, random environment or we are caught in the cosmic trap of fate, and a view of history that is cyclical rather than linear and driven towards the ultimate victory of good over evil.

In this context what hope do we have of doing the right thing for the right reason, of experiencing true meaning, love, justice, and beauty? And if those are not options for us, than what do we have left but to do whatever we can to survive and enjoy life in a meaningless world? In this context, there is really not much reason for personal ethics, much less business ethics.

If on the other hand, there is a true eternal God who has made us in his own image and called us to an eternal plan—one that, though marked with struggles and trials, is full of eternal significance, then suddenly we have the basis for personal meaning and experience. Moreover, everything we do—including our business decisions—now has eternal significance.

ARTICLE 3: If a God, then which God?

The case has been made that only a God-centered starting point can provide a true foundation for sound personal and business ethics. If so, what type of God is needed? This is a question that transcends personal religious preferences. We may want God to be a bit distant from us so that we can do as we like, but that same type of God would also be guilty of allowing evil to run amok in the world. We may want a God who instantly punishes all forms of evil, but if so, then we would all be smitten about a half second after we woke up on any given morning as soon as we had one less than pure thought.

The point will be made here that only the God of the Bible, and specifically, Jesus Christ, can provide the meaning that we need in life. Let us consider how Christ fulfills each of the framework presuppositions, as opposed to other religious preferences.

Ontology

The Bible claims we are made in God’s image. Christ affirmed this message by taking on flesh, walking among us, caring for the downtrodden, and above all dying on the cross for our sins, so that we might be saved and finally live for eternity in all that we do. Furthermore, the notion of people fellowshipping with one another is in fact affirmed through the Trinity, where God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit have prefect fellowship with one another and have done so since before the dawn of time. The God of the Bible is a joyful, personal being, and we are to be the same. In making us in his image, God intended us to enjoy fellowship and live with meaning in a similar manner. We were called to be in fellowship with God through Christ and with one another.

Part of the free will perspective is the notion that we have been enabled to choose to obey God—there will be no coercion. While this has sadly allowed for the presence of sin and much evil in the world, it also allows us to live noble and epic lives through the power of Christ, and for the glory of Christ, in a manner transcends the myopic ways we typically pursue when living for ourselves.

In other religious perspectives, “god” is either not very personal at all or would never deign to view humans as being made in his image, thus denying true fellowship. Remember that in Eastern mystical perspectives, the highest goal is to escape the pain and sorrow of individuality. In Buddhism and Hinduism, individuality is nothing but an illusion that must be overcome to likewise escape the personal suffering of this meaningless, cyclical life we live. In Islam, the notion of being loved like a child by God is practically blasphemous, and even the most devoted followers of Islam can never quite be sure of where they stand before their god. These differing perspectives create unease at best and meaninglessness at worst.

Epistemology

God spoke the universe into existence with words and meaning. In fact, Jesus Christ became the living Word of God to die for us and to communicate the truth of both God’s love and justice. The God of the Bible affirms absolute meaning, absolute destiny, and absolute purpose. The logical implications of other worldviews—be they secular or religious, ultimately deny such absolute truth. God pursued us with his truth, specifically by sending his Son to die for us. We live in a world, therefore, ordained by absolute truth and meaning.

Axiology

As mentioned above, the God of the Bible is perfectly good—perfectly loving and perfectly just. The Gospel affirms these absolute values. According to the Gospel, we all deserve death because we are less than good—we are evil. Those who wish God would intervene more quickly to remove evil forget that if he were truly as swift as he could be in fulfilling justice, we all would die the first instant we were less than good. There can be no compromise, no bending of righteous laws to let unrighteous people off the hook, because the very act of bending the rules would be an act of unrighteousness and injustice.

On other hand, because God loves perfectly, he cannot not allow his creation to die and suffer eternal damnation. So how can he fulfill both his love and his justice? By taking on flesh and dying for us all, Christ fulfilled both God’s sense of justice and of love. Jesus was fully man, and so as a man he died and experienced God’s rejection of him; therefore, God’s justice was fulfilled. But since Christ was and is fully God, he never sinned and so his sacrifice was sufficient for us all (remember that even if we wanted to, none of us could die for mankind because we are guilty of our own sins). So, we see in Christ a wonderful fulfillment of love and justice fully embodied.

No other religious perspective describes a God who would pursue man—who would come to us and deign to interact with us, much less save us. In every other religious perspective, the god or gods must be appeased through sacrifice and obedience. But since we have been saved by grace—to wit, since we can do nothing to earn God’s favor, save humbly acknowledge our need for him, we are unable to be selfish in our obedience to God, even if we wanted to! Now, everything we do to worship and please God is done for selfless reasons—we are truly being good for goodness sake! That is not to say that we do not try to manipulate God into blessing us due to good behavior, but rather that such efforts, due to God’s absolute goodness and grace, and our utter failure in ever being good enough, are vain—in more ways than one!

One argument against the God of the Bible is that he is petulant and insecure—that he needs our worship of him to stroke his cosmic ego. That may true of other gods, but remember that God of the Bible—the triune God, in fact—had perfect fellowship among himself before man was ever created. He did not need to create us for his own self-satisfaction; rather his selfless love was the basis for our existence, that love further culminated in his deigning to take on flesh and dwell among us in this dreary and dusty world. Moreover, to worship God is not to debase ourselves by kissing the hand of God; rather it is about getting past our myopic ways of thinking, getting out of the squalor of our own agendas in order to experience true and intimate fellowship with absolute goodness, absolute love, and absolute beauty. A God who loves selflessly would want nothing less for his creation, which is why he wants us to worship him for eternity. If he is perfectly good, then he cannot be a prideful God. He is love, power, and humility all in one, and he is all of these things personified. What would we not give to experience this?

At this point, some may cringe at the notion of talking about religion at all in a graduate business program. Some may want to merely acknowledge in passing the importance of “Judeo-Christian values” while at the same time maintaining some separation from God. We want this because we like the notion of self-sufficiency—even those of us who have walked with the Lord all of our lives.

But the fact is, there are no options for us but these: either we are totally the product of a random environment, such that every thought we have and every action we take are merely the result of past atomic and chemical reactions, rendering individuality as a mere illusion, or we are beholden to the Creator God, who while giving us every strength, gift and opportunity we currently possess, also gives us the choice on whether or not we will follow him. So here we are—we have the opportunity to follow the path of logic and fully surrender ourselves to God through Christ. In so doing, we do not empty and deny ourselves so much as we fill ourselves with the presence of Christ such that as individuals we truly live and move and have our being. And yes, in doing so, everything else in our lives—every room in our worldview home and every bit of furniture and scrap of carpeting, paint, etc. along with it—must be centered on Christ, and Christ alone.

Or, because God does allow for free will, we can choose to buy into the illusion that somehow we are sovereign, that the strengths, opportunities and gifts that we possess due to God’s kindness are our own and the result of our own volition (as if that volition were something we created for ourselves and not something that was given us!), and we can seek to live a fractured life—living for ourselves but ultimately being a slave to our own selfish and myopic desires. This is a choice we can make as well, but it would be the wrong choice, both emotionally and logically.

In making a final comment about axiology, it should be pointed out that making qualitative comparisons among various religious and non-religious ideologies is not in and of itself a mean-spirited or self-righteous thing to do. Rather, logic compels such qualitative comparisons. Some may be content and quite desirous of a so-called non-judgmental approach to life in which no comparisons are made among competing worldviews and everyone is encouraged and allowed to live as they best see fit. This is a sad way to live, because it ultimately undermines true meaning and purpose in life. If no qualitative comparisons can be made about life and various theories of what is true, then how can there be any meaning at all? In this type of world, people are, at best, guessing their way through life with little hope that anything they do will have any meaning. But if, on the other hand, there is in fact a grand narrative that involves us all and will unify any and all who allow themselves to be embraced by a loving God through Christ, there is hope of such things as justice, beauty, love, and an eternal destiny that shines brighter than any star in the universe.

The real concern regarding such discussions about worldview, religion and ideology should not be that qualitative comparisons are being made, because the ability to make such comparisons is evidence of absolute truth, and therefore absolute meaning. No, the real concern is that such discussions not be done in a self-righteous, divisive manner. It is true that would-be religious zealots would only want to convert others, not to listen, would only want to diminish other perspectives not to explore, and in doing all of that, would end up creating a way of living that is myopic, rigid, and above all, self-righteous and petty.

But what if such conversations about the meaning of life could be done in both a way that is logical and humble? In fact, doesn’t logic require humility? Remember that being logical requires an acknowledgement that personal experience and what one sees or observes is insufficient to make sense of life. True learning begins when people are willing to let go of their emotional attachment to what they believe so they can truly reason and discover.

If the above ideal is a true and good one, consider yet again the God of the Bible, who from the very beginning of creation, allowed his most prized creations to disobey him and turn away from him. Consider that he himself took on flesh to pursue us and save us, but at the same time, disavowed the use of any military or political coercion in doing so. People must come into fellowship with God via free will or not at all. Consider the implications of a God who would allow us to question everything he claims to be and discover through a process of logic and outward looking, discover who he might be. Consider, in all of this, that the most powerful entity in the universe—indeed the entity that holds the entire universe together—would gently allow us the space to choose him. Consider also the message of Scripture that while we were still enemies, God came looking for us. When we wanted nothing to do with him, the gentle persuasion of the Holy Spirit drew us to repentance, or would do the same with those of us who do not yet know him. In a worldview where God allows for free will, in a worldview which acknowledges that unless we are saved by grace, we cannot know truth or embrace true life, in a worldview where time and time again, people are asked to put aside their own narrow agendas and preconceived notions to trust a wild God who bows to no man, how can there be one shred of self-righteousness?

In reality, self-righteousness only belongs in worldviews where there is no God at all or where religion is defined in being “good enough” to earn God’s favor. The Gospel refutes that any of us were ever good enough to earn God’s favor apart from his saving grace through Christ. But in religious perspectives where God has not come to man, but man must come to God, where “good works” earns God’s blessing, then yes, self-righteousness can exist, and does exist. It is true that many so-called followers of Christ have embraced self-righteousness—indeed, that is a natural human tendency—but in doing so, they refute the very message of the Gospel and the God who ordained that Gospel message.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Personal Worldview & Business Ethics Paper

...Personal Worldview & Business Ethics Paper Liberty University BMAL 560 January 25, 2015 STEP 1 To what extent should personal religious beliefs impact our decisions about business ethics? Personal religious beliefs should impact all decisions about business ethics. If your beliefs are truly mandated in your life, then you have no choice but to be fair and honest about your business decisions. Business decisions can sometimes be difficult and harsh, but that is no reason to comprise the integrity of what you believe in. In 2012, Summers & Summers concluded that from the “Christian worldview”, God is the source and creator of all things. This means that God has provided all the resources we need in order for those needs to be satisfied. Our task is to use these resources properly. (pp. 30). Psalms 24:1 tells us “The earth is the Lord’s and everything in it, the world, and all who live in it; for he founded it upon the seas and established it upon the waters” (NIV). To what extent do your personal religious (or non-religious) beliefs about life impact your sense of business ethics and personal decision-making? The extent of my owm personal religious beliefs about life impacted my sense of business ethics and personal decicion-making. As a new Revenue Agent for the Internal Revenue Service, my on-the-job trainer told me to always assume the taxpayer was a liar. I was not able to do that. I always let the records speak for themselves and I counted on my good...

Words: 1819 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Chritianity vs. Naturalism

...LCMP 303 OL July 28, 2012 The Worldview Conundrum in Business; Christianity vs. Naturalism In a society that is increasingly hostile to the Christian worldview, one must understand that that hostility is forming changes in the culture. Many businesses in America have operated under the presupposition that Business’ only mandate is to make money with no further responsibility to society. It is the philosophical belief of Naturalism that society owes business the framework upon which to operate with no corresponding obligation to benefit society in return. As America continues to struggle economically it is fair to wonder why. In Business, the conflict between differing worldviews is paramount to the health and sustainability of the economy. Understanding the differing beliefs between the Christian worldview and the worldview of Naturalism, as they pertain to business, will help people see the affect those views have, and potentially have, on the economy of the United States. It is important to define these two worldviews philosophically in order to fully grasp their intent and scope. The metaphysical, epistemology and axiological beliefs of Naturalism will introduce a deeper understanding of this particular worldview. The metaphysical belief of Naturalism is that the natural order is eternal, self sufficient and uncreated. The epistemological belief of Naturalism is that knowledge is gained through human experience and scientific method. Finally, the axiological...

Words: 1434 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Busi 560

...Business 560 Worldview Questions" . To what extent should personal religious beliefs impact our decisions about business ethics? My personal view on how much impact should my believes influence my business, or whatever decision I make is that it should be fully Involved. My decisions that I make should constantly reflect in what I claim to believe in.  To what extent do your personal religious (or non-religious) beliefs about life impact your sense of business ethics and personal decision-making? Again my personal view about my beliefs in life should be fully involve to where it is the foundation of business ethics, and decision making. Those things need to reflect in what I claim to believe in. 2. Does it seem odd to connect every belief we have about life back to what we believe about God? To me it does not seem odd to connect what I believe in with life, because knowing who the author of life allows me to connect my believes with life.  Questions from article, What is a Worldview, and Why Is It Important To Me? 3. Has your answers to either of the first two questions changed after reading Article 1?My answers have not change from reading article I, because I do know understand my worldview. It has been influence through my own personal reading of scripture, that's the blueprint of my life, so I can see the meaning of the laws that make society. Referring to the meaning of the law means referring to its origins. Thats why this...

Words: 1432 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Sun Zhi

...Development Abstract Purpose - The paper offers a dynamic theory of leadership development. Design/methodology/approach – The paper examines selected leadership literature through the lens of theory building blocks. It identifies the role of the ideal goal in leadership and its importance in developing the psychological aspect of leadership. Findings – The paper posits that leadership is a developmental process, which is based on the type of choice a leader makes. While choice implies that two good options are always available from which to select, one should make choices in accordance with his worldview, looking for affiliation (i.e. the Theta worldview), or looking for achievement (i.e. the Lambda worldview). Consequently, leaders need to recognise that the choices they make for organisational activities have to fit their own worldview. Pursuing the fit between one’s worldview and planned organisational activities ensures that leaders continuously improve their ethical behaviour. The paper concludes with the presentation of a dynamic theory of leadership, which is based on the assumption that one can only strive toward truly ethical leadership with the knowledge that this goal is beyond human capacity. 1 Research limitations/implications – Being a theory-based exploration, the paper does not provide empirical examples of how this theory might be applied in practice. Originality/value – The...

Words: 6701 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Refitting the Pieces

...Refitting the Pieces The three components that make up my worldview are God, Knowledge and Ethics, because they shaped my thoughts, experiences, and education and life decisions. Believing in God can gives me the knowledge and the ethics that are needed to succeed in life. Believing in God gives me the inner strength to overcome the adversities that this modern world throws at me on a daily basis. Knowledge is never ending, and can help me obtain the information that is necessary to get through difficult times throughout my life. Knowledge is the key to understanding Gods word. Having ethics will help me when I am communicating with others whether it is in school, business or my personal life. In a world full of different cultures and races, ethics are an important part of communicating and understanding others. My comparison between Naturalism and Christianity is that Naturalist believes that there is no supernatural, only material and matter. They also believe they control their own destiny and that God has nothing to do with it. The Christian view is that everything we do is influenced by God and that everything we do is influenced by God. Christians also believe there is more to life than matter and materialism. My comparison between Secular Humanist and Christianity is that Secular Humanist believes that God doesn’t exist. My Christian worldview believes that God is the highest entity. Secular Humanist believes that people are basically good, and that they should...

Words: 1007 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Worldview Assignment

...What is a Worldview? I. A worldview is our way as humans to react to the world around us. In our book The Popluar Encyclopedia of Apologetics, Hindson and Caner define worldview as “the framework of beliefs by which a person views the world around him.” I think this is a spot on and accurate definition. In turn, I came up with my own; individual opinion and reaction on various subjects based on background experiences and upbringing. II. The Christian worldview is based around our Holy Bible and the belief that Christ is our Savior. We believe that he died for our sins so that one day we can live eternally with him in heaven. Our worldview can sometimes be deemed the conservative view, but each and every individual is different. The bible gives us answers to the big questions of life and as Christians we choose to follow and believe. Examples are as follows, 1. The Question of Origin: How did we (humans) get here and where did we come from? Biblically, it is written in Genesis that we were made from God’s hands to be a direct reflection of Him. Genesis 1:26-27. Also written in the bible is that he is the creator of ALL things. The tallest mountains, the deepest oceans, animals, plants, is it all his creation. Genesis 1:1-25 2. The Question of Identity: What did God create humans to be? Where did I come from? These are questions that come to mind when thinking of this topic. Many people without a biblical view struggle with these questions and have trouble finding...

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Community Profile Presentation

...a community stronger and happier in the essences that change is good and resources that are more possible are created overtime. All communities have their own way of conducting business, they have their own rules and regulations and most importantly, the people of the community help to keep their community safe, clean and united. However, when conducting a group study it was discovered that most communities have the same wants, needs and values. To illustrate the diversity between communities we will compare five different community profiles prepared by the members of Team C and use these profiles to discuss the similarities, differences and social responsibility of each community. The purpose of this paper is to reveal that communities are very different yet very much the same. Similarities among the Communities Each member in Team C submitted information about their particular community, which included the population size, information about employment among residents and intricate details about what their community has to offer. All five community profiles are unique however as we compare them you will see how similar they are in the fact that each community shares the same values. The similarities that are evident between each community is that they all have a high regard for ethics and morality. Each community has the same feelings towards the responsibility of child...

Words: 761 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Final Exam

...self-interest. | | 2. Deontology is a moral theory that emphasizes one’s duty to a particular action because it is inherently correct. | | 3. Most people expect fair play in their interactions and will even forgo economic benefits in order to maintain a fair system. | | 4. An organization can be convicted of a crime even if only one employee breaks the law. | | 5. Absolute good is a concept most aligned with utilitarianism. | | 6. The more a firm demands unquestioning obedience to authority, the more likely the firm will experience higher levels of unethical conduct among employees. | | 7. Key elements of the shared community worldview imperative include the exhortation to create a common body of knowledge, the destruction of social institutions, and realignment when society veers too far from the worldview. | | 8. Traditionally, European colonizers believed cultural relativism was legitimate. | | 9. According to Aristotle’s theory relation to habits of character, one should be judged by one’s “great actions.” | | 10. Utilitarianism suggests that an action is morally correct when it produces more total utility for the individual. | | 11. Ethical issues are always legal issues. | | ------------------------------------------------- Fill-in-the-Blank Click in the blank area and type your answer. 12. Our forms the basis for all of our normative and factual judgments, and it is inseparably linked to our ability...

Words: 1354 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Eth/316

...self-interest. | False | 2. Deontology is a moral theory that emphasizes one’s duty to a particular action because it is inherently correct. | | 3. Most people expect fair play in their interactions and will even forgo economic benefits in order to maintain a fair system. | | 4. An organization can be convicted of a crime even if only one employee breaks the law. | | 5. Absolute good is a concept most aligned with utilitarianism. | | 6. The more a firm demands unquestioning obedience to authority, the more likely the firm will experience higher levels of unethical conduct among employees. | | 7. Key elements of the shared community worldview imperative include the exhortation to create a common body of knowledge, the destruction of social institutions, and realignment when society veers too far from the worldview. | | 8. Traditionally, European colonizers believed cultural relativism was legitimate. | | 9. According to Aristotle’s theory relation to habits of character, one should be judged by one’s “great actions.” | | 10. Utilitarianism suggests that an action is morally correct when it produces more total utility for the individual. | | 11. Ethical issues are always legal issues. | | ------------------------------------------------- Fill-in-the-Blank Click in the blank area and type your answer. 12. Our forms the basis for all of our normative and factual judgments, and it is inseparably linked to our ability...

Words: 1336 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Eth 316

...color-code, etc.). Color-code the entire answer, not just the letter. 1. A stakeholder is an individual or group that can affect or be affected by business decisions or undertakings. a. True b. False 2. Groups or individuals with whom an organization has a formal, contractual relationship are a. Primary stakeholders b. Secondary stakeholders c. Neither 3. The personal worldview includes all of the following EXCEPT a. connection to a theory of the good b. a requirement of personal action c. coherence d. none of the above are exceptions 4. Those who only want to accept the benefits of society and let others pay the bill are called free riders. a. True b. False 5. Absolute good is a concept most aligned to a. Deontology b. Virtue Ethics c. Utilitarianism d. None of the above. 6. John Locke’s ethical approach reflects a. Utilitarianism b. Ethical Contractarianism c. Deontology 7. Virtue ethics is also sometimes called agent-based ethics. a. True b. False 8. __________________ means achieving the telos of personhood. a. Actualization b. Habits of character c. Neither 9. In regard to executive ethical leadership, being a moral person is enough to be perceived as an ethical leader. a. True b. False When designing ethics communication for a typical employee population, organizations need to consider three kinds of people: good soldiers, loose cannons, and grenades...

Words: 425 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ethics

...(by color-code, etc.). Color-code the entire answer, not just the letter. 1. A stakeholder is an individual or group that can affect or be affected by business decisions or undertakings. a. True b. False 2. Groups or individuals with whom an organization has a formal, contractual relationship are a. Primary stakeholders b. Secondary stakeholders c. Neither 3. The personal worldview includes all of the following EXCEPT a. connection to a theory of the good b. a requirement of personal action c. coherence d. none of the above are exceptions 4. Those who only want to accept the benefits of society and let others pay the bill are called free riders. a. True b. False 5. Absolute good is a concept most aligned to a. Deontology b. Virtue Ethics c. Utilitarianism d. None of the above. 6. John Locke’s ethical approach reflects a. Utilitarianism b. Ethical Contractarianism c. Deontology 7. Virtue ethics is also sometimes called agent-based ethics. a. True b. False 8. __________________ means achieving the telos of personhood. a. Actualization b. Habits of character c. Neither 9. In regard to executive ethical leadership, being a moral person is enough to be perceived as an ethical leader. a. True b. False When designing ethics communication for a typical employee population, organizations need to consider three kinds of people: good soldiers, loose cannons, and grenades. For Questions...

Words: 427 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Rejuv Travel Inc.

...Case Study Assignment – Business Ethics Rejuv Travel INC, a sophisticated travel agency has had great success in the North American market by offering highly specialized travelling experiences to an elite feminine clientele. By means of its two star travel products, “Girl Power” and “Grey Lady, RTI has positioned itself as a highly profitable company through a strong word of mouth promotion that is currently attracting large numbers of new clients. Leading its success is CEO Joe Ryan, a very energetic and charming entrepreneur that has built the company from bottom towards a highly profitable IPO that has made both its shareholders and employees highly motivated. RTI is now seeking to open new agencies across the world with a very aggressive campaign that seeks to position its brand globally in just a year and a half. The above mentioned description sets the stage for a company that in its intent of going global has found itself blinded due to its success from a potentially critical ethical dilemma that if not dealt might cut short its global ambitions. 1. Reputational Capital Perspective & Forces At Work To start with, there is a blatant mixed message in RTI’s image that is rooted on an unintended negative signal source has been its very own CEO. The negative signal is that a travel agency focused on specialized tourism for women, is now facing public exposure through its CEO´s rock star and libidinal personal life. In terms of the agency’s reputational image, this...

Words: 1734 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Ethics on a Global Basis

...Purchasing Ethics and how it Changes the Global Marketplace Assignment 3.4 Mike Wooddell ERAU LGMT 536 – Purchasing for Logistics and Supply Chain Management June 17, 2015 Abstract As organizations increase their global footprint, the need for reliable, ethical, and sustainable suppliers also increases. Understanding this need, more businesses are engaging suppliers that are the most cost effective and not necessarily the most ethical. This brings me to the research of purchasing ethics. Specifically how do ethics change the landscape of today’s global market? This paper will look at several factors that include the cross cultural understanding of ethics, the personal and professional responsibility, and several ethical challenges such as environmental responsibility and human rights and the impact it has on the global market. Key Words: business ethics, global market, cultural factors, professional responsibility, ethical challenges I. WHAT IS ETHICS – DEFINITION AND UNDERSTANDING Clearly define what ethics mean in the global market and the domestic market and how it is interpreted in each. II. CULTURAL FACTORS IN GLOBAL MARKETS Identify how cultural factors such as religion, sexual orientation, and accepted standard practices influence or hinder international and domestic business. III. PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TO BUSINESSES Identify the responsibility and moral obligation when ethical dilemmas occur, your personal code...

Words: 3467 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Naturalism

...NATURALISM _______________________________________________ Research Essay _______________________________________________ In partial fulfilment of the requirements in Introduction to Philosophy and Worldviews at Cornerstone Institute _______________________________________________ by Leeandri Smith 32156 28 April 2013 Contents Describing Naturalism according to Naugle, Stone and Danto 1 Introduction 2 History of Naturalism 2 Ancient Greeks 2 The Enlightenment 3 Modern World on Naturalism 3 Naturalism in the 20th Century 4 The start of Naturalism 4 The Basic philosophical questions 5 Effects on society due to the naturalistic worldview 8 Dangers of naturalism to society 9 Conclusion 10 Bibliography 11 Describing Naturalism according to Naugle, Stone and Danto. “Naturalism is an impression determined by the subjugation of the intellectual facts to the mechanical order of things” (Naugle 2002:96) “This is a set of beliefs and attitudes that focus on this world on the negative side it involves the assertion that there seems to be no ontologically distinct and superior realm (such as God, soul or heaven) to ground, explain, or give meaning to this world. On the positive side it affirms that extension should be focused on the events and processes of this world to provide what degree of explanation and meaning...

Words: 3214 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Midterm Review Questions

...MGT 300 Midterm Review Questions Chapter 1 1. What is organizational performance and what is its relationship with efficiency and effectiveness?  Organizational performance: a measure of how efficiently and effectively managers use organizational resources to satisfy customers and achiever organizational goals. Efficiency: A measure of how well or productively resources are used to achieve a goal Effectiveness: A measure of the appropriateness of the goals an organization is pursuing and the degree to which the organization achieves those goals. 2. Explain the following terms: strategy, low-cost strategy, and differentiation strategy Strategy: A cluster of decisions about what goals to pursue, what actions to take, and how to use resources to achieve goals. Low cost strategy: a way of obtaining customers by making decision that allow an organization to produce goods or services more cheaply than its competitors so it can charge lower prices than they do Differentiation strategy: To deliver to customers new, exciting, and unique products 3. What does the managerial function of organizing involve? What is its outcome?  Organizing: structuring working relationships so organization members interact and cooperate to achieve organization goals. Outcome: The outcome of organizing is the creation of organization structure Organization structure: a formal system of task and reporting relationships that coordinates and motivates organizational members so they...

Words: 3544 - Pages: 15