Free Essay

Peter Singer Famine

In:

Submitted By brabb
Words 1782
Pages 8
Peter Singer – “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”
Dora Crawford
Prof. David Tredinnick
12/19/2012

When it comes to the article "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" mostly argues about not one but more than several things. In some point most people can agree with his arguments unlike others whom may not see his point of view. One of these arguments was lack of food. This was brought up or inspired by the starvation of Bangladesh his main focus was that if one can use one's wealth to reduce suffering for example, by aiding famine-relief efforts without any significant reduction in the well-being of oneself or others, it is immoral not to do so. According to Singer, such inaction is clearly immoral. If a child is drowning in a shallow pond and someone can save it but chooses not to; nor does placing greater geographical distance between the person in need and the potential helper reduce the latter's moral obligations. “It makes no difference whether the person I can help is a neighbor's child ten yards away from me or a Bengali whose name I shall never know, ten thousand miles away. The moral point of view requires us to look beyond the interests of our own society. Previously, this may hardly have been feasible, but it is quite feasible now. From the moral point of view, the prevention of the starvation of millions of people outside our society must be considered at least as pressing as the upholding of property norms within our society.” Singers main issue was can you be helpful without wanting too or can you help someone without wanting but still can help a very good example was the kid in pond, you can be at near inches but not wanting to help the kid is a big difference from wanting to help the same kid miles away. If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it. It is in our power to prevent this bad thing. We can prevent it without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance. The only way to prevent lack of food & shelter without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance is to give maximally (or at least very much more than we currently do). When it comes to doing the right thing, it is more than reasonable if you see that someone is struggling with doors having hand full of grocery bag opening the door is just doing the right thing when the argument started it was more or less not only doing the smallest right things but to go out more than our way to help someone out in majority’s needs. I can most definitely agree with this because there have been more than several incident s in which I had difficulty helping someone out that did not involve in my residing living or the people in which are usually around I had found it difficult because it was someone that I would think would not need help but yet I was wrong to judge a guy with extreme strength to actually need help picking objects up because I would always see the sir everyday lifting weights. Well, come to find out that just because your extremely strong does not mean you have the brains to get stuff right. The guy eventually asked for help and so I did but doing a charity compared to actually extending out a major hand to feed someone is way different from it.
When it comes to charity most people think that giving a couple of pennies is not doing anything. There are many different types of charity; some people help out in churches and communities to make it a better place to live in, other people help foundations and volunteer and not expect to get paid for the work that they have given. Some charity can also be paid but the morals to actually doing something are having incentive to actually do the work. Showing that you care without expecting any type of reward to me Singer’s analysis requires us to do a great deal for others. Also rethinking their views about "Charity." I believe that’s what morality requires. In fact, it's a very traditional view; it was advocated by Thomas Aquinas. We need to give direct relief now and should also promote population control. When it comes to Singer’s idea of giving direct relief and promoting population control, most people can realize that it would hurt our economy This does not support the status quo (a mere one% going to famine relief). Instead, it opens the door to discussions of how far to increase relief. We should give to the level that does not reduce spending in a consumption-based society (like ours) below the point that would start to decrease what we have available to give. So expecting people to give 1% is far too little, but expecting twenty five% from everyone would be too much. It is most definitely crazy to expect the American people with such tight economy to give more than they have a not necessarily give more than what we have but instead making a part of our everyday bills. I believe that most people would not allow this in such matter that it would hurt the economy even more. Another thing is that when people think of charity or their mere one percent is that they think it makes a difference it does if it was accumulated everyday but it is mostly around festive holidays and medicine that it would be brought up.
To me like the reader that the suffering of an individual is per say bad to the other individual. It is true that the suffering is bad to that individual, but is it necessarily bad for the other so that he may act to rectify this bad? It is clear that the suffering to the sufferer is bad in itself but it is a little less clear if the suffering is bad to the other remote party. We can definitely also infer that the suffering of an individual is bad to the other so long as the other bears a special relationship with the sufferer. The suffering of a child due to the lack of necessities is bad not just for the child, but also to his mother-not simply because she has certain responsibilities towards her child, but also because her well-being is closely dependent on the best of her child. Now when it comes to someone different and no relation to the child it is said that it would be difficult to save the child if drowning in a shallow pond. Singer, along with his distance claim, points out that the number of individuals in the situation to provide aid does not bear any significance. I feel in this regard, Singer out rightly rubbishes any person that subscribes to the above argument. Singer states the fact that although many are in the same position, not acting still does not relieve our obligation. Singer once again cleverly states: “Again, of course, I admit that there is a psychological difference between the cases; one feels less guilty about doing nothing if one can point to others, similarly placed, who have also done nothing. Yet this can make no real difference to our moral obligations. Should I consider that I am less obliged to pull the drowning child out of the pond if on looking around I see other
People, no further away than I am who have also noticed the child but are doing nothing? One has only to ask this question to see the absurdity of the view that numbers lessen obligation.”
Singer in his rebuttal to such a number of arguments states that although they are many people in the same or perhaps even better situations than an individual to provide aid, it does not relieve the underlying obligation of one to help in a way that seems proportionate to each individual. The duty is not that we match the highest donor, but donate what we owe to ourselves to give individually. Overall I do believe that Singers arguments are in fact agreeable because you would not expect someone out the way or someone not related to help out in most definitely something that going out the way would actually jeopardize or affect them in any way would not be something you would see every day. As well as putting more effort in donations to make sure not everyone starves in the world like how he brought it up with the starving country.

Reference philosophy.stanford.edu/apps/stanfordphilosophy/.../raley.pdf aaaaarg.org/.../Unger-Peter-Living-High-and-Letting-Die-Our-.. dspace.unav.es/dspace/bitstream/10171/7204/1/Abboud.pdf sophistryandillusion.com
Hi Dora
I appreciate your work here. You provided an appropriate explanation of Singer’s purpose in writing the article. You also adequately provided three counter arguments in conjunction with Singer’s response, although your organization and presentation of the different arguments was fair at best. Your definition of marginal utility was missing, but you did a good job of presenting your own views on the issue.
Your paper a bit too many errors in writing. Continue to work on grammar and sentence formation. This will make your paper more cohesive and easy to read.
In regards to APA format, your reference page was formatted incorrectly. It is also important that you include citations whenever referring to the work of another.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Dr. Tredinnick

Total Given
The student explains Singer’s purpose in writing the article and presents argument on the issue. 1.5 1.5
The student explains three counter-arguments to
Singer’s position as well as Singer’s responses to those counter-arguments. 2 1.5
The student defines Singer’s concept of marginal utility and identifies how it relates to Singer’s argument. 1 0
The student compares how the ideas of duty and charity change in Singer’s proposed world. 1 .7
The student presents his or her own response to
Singer’s argument. 1 1
The paper includes an introduction paragraph which contains a thesis statement. 0.5 .2
The paper includes well-developed paragraphs which fully-support the topic. 1 1
The paper includes a concluding paragraph which restates the thesis. 0.5 .5
The paper is grammatically correct with respect to correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar. 0.5 .2
The student uses two scholarly resources 0.5 .5
The paper must be three double-spaced pages, formatted according to APA style 0.5 .3 TOTAL 10 7.4

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Peter Singer Famine Analysis

...Dreams versus Reality In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” he claims that people should give up until the point that by giving further they would be suffering just as much if not more than those we are attempting to help. However, I will show how he fails to address the risks and moral dilemmas that the resulting transportation of those goods and services would cause. Peter Singer asserts that poverty, famine, disease are bad, and claims that we should give until that point that by giving further we would be suffering just as much if not more than those we would be attempting to help. In his article Peter makes defines this level of giving: “By "without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance" I mean without causing...

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Peter Singer Famine Summary

...In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer discusses that individuals who live in a more developed and economical country such as the united states, have a moral obligation to contribute far more than than we actually do in the aid for famine, disaster relief, etc. Singer believes that if we were to change our lifestyles, it would benefit those in need. When faced with a situation that involves either the life of another individual or also just lending a hand we should help them. Singer states that, “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it”(235). Singer also discusses that by helping someone we aren't sacrificing...

Words: 1187 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Famine Inheritance And Morality Peter Singer Summary

...In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer begins by stating, people in East Bengal are dying from a shortage of food, shelter, and medical assistance. Singer says, this is a completely avoidable problem if richer nations took more notice and provided appropriate aid. He then continues to say that Britain, who provided the largest amount of financial aid to the people in East Bengal, provided more than thirty times that amount on a means of transportation. Singer then equates this and says that due to their actions, Britain values this project thirty times more than it values the people in East Bengal. Singer also uses this example to set up the rest of his argument by stating a general belief that, suffering and death from a lack of food, shelter and medical assistance is a bad thing....

Words: 609 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Famine Inheritance And Morality By Peter Singer Summary

...Munachonga Banji David St. Aubin PHL 102-004 November 10, 2016 Commentary In the essays “Famine, Affluence and Morality” by Peter Singer and “Poverty and Parenthood” by Stuart Rachel, both authors argue on their different viewpoint of what is morally right when it comes to preventing suffering and what hinders us to prevent or reduce that suffering. They both agree that donation to charity to reduce suffering is a short term solution, while reducing the population on the planet is a permeant solution to the suffering of starvation. They argue that it is our individual duty to make reasonable choices that will help prevent the suffering, but their view on what these choices are differs. In his essay, Perter Singer argues that affluent nations have the duty to prevent avoidable poverty and death in poorer nations. He states that our negative actions towards the suffering caused by poverty and death are not justifiable. By ignoring the suffering, we as a society are taking life for...

Words: 1089 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Famine Affluence And Morality Peter Singer Analysis

...Should we give money in charity to person’s around the world who might be in great need? Well, Peter Singer and Garrett Hardin can very easily answer this question. Both these men have written different articles on their point of view towards this issue. Peter Singer wrote the article, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”. This article is about that it’s our moral obligation to give money to people who are in need. Singer said, “…the idea that giving away a great deal of money is the best means to this end” (239). He believes that it is our duty to help those in need. When it comes down to it though we shouldn’t judge those who haven’t given their money. Also, we shouldn’t donate more than we have because if we do then we will become some of the needy. But, what it comes down to is, we need...

Words: 609 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Famine Affluence And Morality Peter Singer Summary

...Argument Analysis Two In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, he is observing how there are many people in our world suffering, and argues what morality says one should do about this. After going into the context of the situations at hand with millions of people living on unsustainable incomes etc., Singer proposes two principles, the strongest one he favors and a weaker one he uses as a backup. He agrees with the idea that morally one should always do whatever would prevent the greatest amount of bad from occurring unless the only way to do so is by doing something also morally wrong. Ultimately, Peter provides examples to prove how realistic and current his argument is, and characterizes the relationship between obligation...

Words: 485 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ethics Game Reflective Journal

...Reflective Journal Ashley Thompson MGT/216 July 19, 2011 Charles Donewar Ethics Game Reflective Journal The Ethics Game Simulation reflected two different situations in which G-Biosport were faced with. The first case was the Case of Fair Warning and the second was the Case of Stringent Standard. Both of these situations involved many different stakeholders. These stakeholders included: Customers of G-Biosport, employees of G-Biosport such as, The Shareholders, The Board of Directors, Carson Nelson (Chief Executive Officer), Cary Bryant (Chief Legal Officer), Jennifer (Quality Control Manager/Quality Compliance Director), Elaine Shields (Operations Director), and Judy Birch (Director of Public Relations). One will be able to read what these two case simulations reflected in this journal. Simulation 1: The Case of Fair Warning The first simulation was the Case of Fair Warning. In this simulation, it was discovered that G-Biosport products were contaminated with hazardous Fibranafren. The problem is that the products had already been distributed and were on the market. The staff of G-Biosport had to get together and share their opinions on what to do about the issue on hand. It was decided that the customers always have the right to know about the quality of all products. In this case Jennifer, the Quality Control Manager, was responsible for letting all shareholders involved know of all potential hazards and risks of the product. The decision was...

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Phi 208 Week 2 Quiz 85% Grade

...your instructor, are in the "Details" section below. | Date Taken: | 1/30/2015 | Time Spent: | 3 h , 16 secs | Points Received: | 17 / 20  (85%) | Number of Attempts: | 1 | | Question Type: | # Of Questions: | # Correct: | Multiple Choice | 20 | 17 | | | Grade Details - All Questions | Question 1. | Question : | What is Peter Singer’s point about performing vivisection on mentally disabled human infants? | |   | Student Answer: | x | That if we say that it would be wrong to perform experiments on such humans but not on non-humans then we are showing bias based upon species alone |   | | | That a good speciesist would not perform experiments on any being |   | | | That we should test upon mentally disabled human infants because the results would be more reliable than tests on animals |   | | | That anyone who would consider testing on a human infant is a monster |   | Instructor Explanation: | The answer can be found on p. 6 of Peter Singer’s “All Animals are Equal.” | | |   | Points Received: | 1 of 1 |   | Comments: | | | | Question 2. | Question : | Peter Singer’s “basic principles of equality” applied to animals means: | |   | Student Answer: | | Animals should be given all the same rights as human beings. |   | | x | Animals are not entitled to not all the same rights but to an equal consideration of interests. |   | | | Animals should not be given the same moral consideration because...

Words: 1923 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Utilitarian Ethics

...Leaders make rational decisions every day in the effect to maximize the benefits and minimize the costs for themselves and everyone affected by it. These leaders just as often make decisions based on emotions, opportunities, present states of condition, and other factors, which are considered irrational decisions. People have the natural desire to be correct without weighing the consequences. One recent example of a company that has been criticized for potentially making a very irrational decision is Facebook. CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, announced that he is buying WhatsApp for 16 Billion in cash and stock, along with another 3 over a couple years, making it a 19 Billion dollar deal for the company. WhatsApp is a leading chat app that has grown quickly in the last few years. It allows people to send video, photos, and text messages. It is more popular in many countries outside of the United States. The app will also not promote any ads for users. The deal’s enormous price tag brings a lot of question into Zuckerberg’s rationale behind his decision and if the pros outweigh the cons. Consequentialism is focused on the basic consequences that come with decisions and determining net balance between the good consequences and the bad ones. Zuckerberg’s decision to buy WhatsApp is consistent with his goal of connecting the entire world, especially developing countries, through technology. The app has over 450 million users. There almost as many messages sent using the app as there...

Words: 717 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Act Utilitarianism Research Paper

...The concept of utilitarianism was founded by Jeremy Bentham, and is a moral theory that emphasizes that the morally right action will produce the most good. This theory is considered to be another form of consequentialism. In laments terms, the determination of whether an act is right or wrong is based upon the effect it will result in. Another concept that is correlated with utilitarianism includes ruling utilitarianism. Both theories try to maximize happiness, and there is not one answer that is preferable to the other. Instead, we need to examine the two more complexly, allowing there to be a bilaterally multilevel approach. Act utilitarians believe decisions that need to be made should be based upon the action that will create the greatest net utility. This should also be applied on a case by case basis. The right action in any situation is the one that yields more utility. It is important to keep in mind that act utilitarianism focus on the individual actions. To act utilitarian obviously seems that maximum good will be produced. It will maximize the overall utility that is within our power by maximizing the utility of each individual action that we perform. If I choose actions that produced less utility than possible, the total utility of my actions would be smaller than the amount of potential goodness that I could have produced. For understandable reasons, this is a popular argument in favor of act utilitarianism. Another pro for act utilitarianism includes the...

Words: 1205 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Seminar Two Short Paper

...Seminar Two: Short Paper B Macland Baker College   Introduction: The Problem We are given two problems for ethical consideration. The problems are similar in some respects, but different in one primary detail. The problems are called The Trolley Problem 1 and The Trolley Problem 2. Both problems have a runaway trolley that will kill five people on the track ahead if it continues on its course uninterrupted. The first problem has a switch that will turn the trolley off the track with the five people on it and turn it onto a track where there is one person on it. By hitting the switch you will save the five people, but the trolley will kill the one person. Do you hit the switch to save the five, or let the trolley go and save the one? I would hit the switch and save the five. I felt that if I was put in the position of having to choose to save one or save five, I would choose to save five. To not act at all, to me, is still acting because your inaction still kills one person. It is better to kill five people over killing one person? Definitely not. Although I don’t advocate that killing one person is justified. My choice is simply made because I was given the option of saving one or saving five. My option was not killing one or killing five. Mentally, this changes the scenario. It makes me feel less personally responsible for the deaths. In the second problem there is no switch. The problem is made more personal by the presence of an individual. You are standing on a bridge...

Words: 943 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Arising from Poverty

...Kyle Steverson Ann Tatum- Caetano English 1A 13 March 2006 Arising form Poverty Consider these facts: an estimated 400 million people lack the necessary calories, vitamins and proteins needed for a normal life (Singer 50). Millions are constantly hungry, and others suffer from disease and infections. In some areas many children are not even expected to live past the ages of 5 years of age (Singer 51). The examples listed above are all effects of the type of impact that poverty has on society. Poverty can be classified into two major categories; “absolute Poverty” which is derived from Robert McNamara, meaning poverty by any standards compared to Relative Poverty meaning some citizens live in poverty while others enjoy wealth (Singer 36). When dealing with poverty there are many factors hat should be considered outside of just becoming poor; however, for many the two go hand and hand. Poverty is increasing quicker than ever before, due to factors such as over populating and less jobs. Peter Singer writes “ This is the background situation, the situation that prevails on our planet all the time and it does not make the headlines (Singer 160).” Yes, the factors listed are tough to combat; therefore, the issue of poverty should be taken more seriously. The constant debate between the rich and the poor are leaving many nauseated on an ethical roller coaster. Much of the Nation and the World are succumbing to poverty like a deadly plague devouring everything...

Words: 980 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Analysis

...Utilitarianism beliefs have been around for a long time but it wasn’t called utilitarianism until the philosopher Jeremy Bentham. John Stuart Mill was a philosopher born in 1806 and in 1861 wrote People haven’t’ agreed on what is right and what is wrong so the point is to come up with a universal systematic way to determine whether or not something is ethical The first principle of utility, as Mill describes, is “pleasure and freedom from pain are the only tings desirable as ends” The second principle is about the greatest happiness. “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to produce happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse.” He also describes happiness as pleasure with the absence of pain and unhappiness as pain with the absence of pleasure -First Premise- Constantly chasing pleasure brings about bad things (addictions, disease, an unhealthy life, loss of friends due to selfishness. You become a slave to your pleasure) The first thing that I believe is wrong with this theory is that a person should not be constantly chasing pleasure -Second Premise- mob rule This moral theory is not only wrong because it brings about bad things but it’s almost un-American because it allows for people to get run over and stripped of their rights if it generates more happiness fir the rest of the community. I don’t think that in any society an innocent person should be forced to be stripped of their human rights if they aren’t willing to give them up. I think it is interesting...

Words: 487 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Business in Context

...wants to in form to audiences that no child lives below international poverty live and the Children's commission needs to show that there is a problem or they will be abolished . • Applications and connections The article of Grant is convincing because he mentioned exactly of what is happening in nowadays society and he is also right if the average wage in New Zealand was $1M a year then the figures the commission given would say those on $600K a year would be living in poverty. It makes me to contradict with Singer’s ethic video recording . In Singer’s ethic video recording, he expresses his idea that people should spend their money for poverty rather than for a expensive Prada shoes. However Grant reading is better ,meanwhile Singers criticizes people who spend money for those expensive things. Because this is business , Its “the term includes any transaction designed to provide goods or services for a profit”. ( New Zealand dictionary of business term). • Insights This article informs me a new perception about globalization poverty. The question is “ Should we attempt to cure child poverty when it does not really exist and should the children commission be disappeared “ . • Reference list 1. Grant , D.( 2013, January 27 ). I’d rather a better phone than feed a hungry child . New Zealand Herald . Retrieved from:...

Words: 345 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Mgt500 Assignment 1

...Analyze the ethical dilemma faced by Antonio Incidents such as these - and today's heightened sensitivity to the risks of the insider threat - force organizations to redefine their screening strategies as part of their risk management approach. No longer is the focus solely on pre-hire background screening. Increasingly, organizations are engaging in continual screening, to catch anomalous activity that could be a precursor to actionable behavior. And they also are embracing policies and procedures to handle damaging data when it comes to light about current or acquired employees. How fraud occurs within organizations can be understood by examining the elements that comprise such actions. At an individual level, SAS No. 99 (Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit) issued by the Auditing Standards Board indicates that the occupational fraud triangle comprises three conditions that are generally present when a fraud occurs. These conditions include an incentive or pressure that provides a reason to commit fraud (personal financial problems or unrealistic performance goals), an opportunity for fraud to be perpetrated (weaknesses in the internal controls), and an attitude that enables the individual to rationalize the fraud. At the organizational level, leadership, organizational culture and management control systems form the three points of the organizational fraud triangle (Free, Stein &Macintosh). Create and describe two strategies for addressing the...

Words: 701 - Pages: 3