...York, NY 10021 martin.chodorow@hunter.cuny.edu Claudia Leacock Educational Testing Service Rosedale Road, 18E Princeton, NJ 08541 cleacock@ets.org Abstract This paper describes a deployed educational technology application: the CriterionSM Online Essay Evaluation Service, a web-based system that provides automated scoring and evaluation of student essays. Criterion has two complementary applications: E-rater®, an automated essay scoring system and Critique Writing Analysis Tools, a suite of programs that detect errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics, that identify discourse elements in the essay, and that recognize elements of undesirable style. These evaluation capabilities provide students with feedback that is specific to their writing in order to help them improve their writing skills. Both applications employ natural language processing and machine learning techniques. All of these capabilities outperform baseline algorithms, and some of the tools agree with human judges as often as two judges agree with each other. 2. Application Description Criterion contains two complementary applications that are based on natural language processing (NLP) methods. The scoring application, e-rater®, extracts linguisticallybased features from an essay and uses a statistical model of how these features are related to overall writing quality to assign a holistic score to the essay. The second application, Critique, is comprised of a suite of programs that evaluate and provide...
Words: 5634 - Pages: 23
...ARGUMENT FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION AT BAIL HEARINGS IN ALL CRIMINAL CASES IN STATE COURT The right to legal representation is generally accepted in the United States as a Constitutional right guaranteed to everyone. The Supreme Court promised the right to counsel to “ any person haled into court” in the infamous Gideon v Wainwright case. This case was instrumental in advancing the rights of indigent defendants through its proclamation that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in criminal proceedings should also apply to State Courts. However, Gideon’s promise to counsel has yet to completely guarantee equal access to justice when first appearing at judicial proceedings in state courts. Although defendants who can afford lawyers will usually hire one from the onset of a criminal proceeding, the right to counsel for indigent defendants (i.e. a state-provided attorney) is interpreted as attaching at varying stages of a prosecution in different states. Only eight states guarantee indigent defendants the right to legal counsel at the initial bail hearing. Representation at the initial bail hearing is critical as a lawyer’s intervention is crucial for obtaining a defendant’s release and for protecting a defendant’s due process right (guaranteed in the Fourteenth amendment) against an unreasonable denial of liberty during pretrial detention. The lack of counsel in pretrial proceedings can result in numerous consequences; some include a high number of pleas being accepted...
Words: 7110 - Pages: 29
...JAN LOKPAL BILL A DETAILED ANALYSIS Ver 1.0 Dated: 21 August 2011 Published by India Against Corruption Jan Lokpal Bill, A Detailed Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS Why do we need Jan Lokpal?................................................................... 4 a. c. Lack of Independence....................................................................................... 4 Multiplicity of agencies..................................................................................... 5 b. Powerless.......................................................................................................... 4 d. Lack of Transparency and internal accountability............................................. 5 Structure of Lokpal................................................................................. 7 a. Independence of Jan Lokpal and Jan Lokayukta................................................... 7 (i) Administrative independence........................................................................ 7 (ii) Financial independence................................................................................. 7 (iii) Manpower..................................................................................................... 7 b. Single anti-corruption agency.............................................................................. 7 c. No more advisory bodies..................................................................................... 8 What action will be...
Words: 9725 - Pages: 39
...Type of Submission: Case Problem “Hamilton County Judges” BUS 440 Quantitative Business Analyses Executive Summary Hamilton County Judges try thousands of cases per year. In an alarmingly large amount of these cases that are disposed, the verdict stands as rendered. Some of these cases are appealed and sometimes won or reversed. Using the resulted for 182,908 cases handled (disposed) by 38 judges in Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Court, and Municipal Court; Kristin DelGuzzi of the Cincinnati Enquirer conducted a study of these cases handled over a 3 year time period. Two of the judges, Dinkelacker and Hogan did not serve in the same court for the entire 3 year period. The purpose of the newspapers study was to evaluate the performance of these judges. Appeals are often caused by mistakes made by judges and the newspaper wanted to find out which judges were doing a good and bad jobs. Contents PROBLEM DEFINITION 5 MODEL VERIFICATION 14 OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING 15 MODEL COMMUNICATION TO MANAGEMENT 16 MODEL IMPLEMENTATION 16 Bibliography 17 PROBLEM DEFINITION Hamilton County Judges try thousands of cases per year. In an alarmingly large amount of these cases that are disposed, the verdict stands as rendered. Some of these cases are appealed and sometimes won or reversed. Using the resulted for 182,908 cases handled (disposed) by 38 judges in Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Court, and Municipal Court; Kristin DelGuzzi of the Cincinnati...
Words: 1615 - Pages: 7
...Court Issues Analysis January 30, 2012 CJUS/394 Troy Hakonsan Court Issues Analysis The courts system is defined as an impartial judiciary body. The courts purpose is to assure that offenders of the law receive the fairness of treatment in relations to criminal procedures, polices, trials, and sentencing. The ideal court system would consist of one that has overall operations that are impartial on all levels of criminal proceedings. This begins with the arresting officer he or she should be fair in booking, writing reports and testifying in court no matter how wrong the offender may or may not be. An offender that chooses a trial by judge places their fates in the hands of the judge. The judge must be impartial no matter the nature of the crime as well. Only in a ideal world this could exist. The financial strain that would be placed on the criminal justice system would be the contributing factor that would push the courts systems back to current roles. There would need to more enforce of the law and support staff for each and every offender to receive true impartiality in criminal proceedings. Immigration and cultural diversity among the 1900’s and next century are the nation’s most significant trends. The United States of America in 1900 showed that 32 million were the estimated home speakers of non-English languages. This trend will be a continuous growth. With this growth there will be a need for a more diverse court system. Diversity is continuous battle for...
Words: 1041 - Pages: 5
...important to identify areas of the court system that needs changes. Portions of the court system facing changes are the way courts are managed including their problems and resolutions. Victims’ rights have emerged as a new trend in the courts as victims are given the rights to be included in case proceedings. In the future, the courts face a loss of cases to a potential private sector of courts such as arbitration and mediation. These changes and issues should be understood in order for the courts to match the emerging trends. Court Issues Analysis The courts are an important piece of the criminal justice system. The courts adapt as the rest of the criminal justice system as new processes and trends emerge. This paper will discuss future court management issues in relation to technological innovations and the problems with new technology in the courts. Additionally, victim rights going forward will impact court proceedings. The biggest issue facing courts in the future will be the potential division between the courts and the private law sector. Future Court Management and Issues It is important to know about the technological innovations that impact court staff and judges. One of the most important aspects of a successful public court system is access to justice. Access to justice using technological innovations includes the use of electronic filings. Courts and those who work with the courts can utilize technology in many routine activities. These can include...
Words: 1239 - Pages: 5
...INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT YEARS FIGHTING IMPUNITY Case Information Sheet ICC-PIDS-CIS-DRC-01-010/12_Eng Updated: 13 September 2012 Situation in Democratic Republic of the Congo The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Case n° ICC-01/04-01/06 Found guilty, on 14 March 2012, of the war crimes of enlisting and conscripting of children under the age of 15 years and using them to participate actively in hostilities. Sentenced, on 10 July 2012, to a total of 14 years of imprisonment. On 7 August 2012, Trial Chamber I issued a decision on the principles to be applied for reparations to victims in the case, which is currently subject to appeal. Date of birth Place of birth Nationality Ethnicity Warrant of arrest Transfer to The Hague Confirmation of charges hearing Opening of the trial Verdict and Sentence On 14 March 2012, Mr Lubanga Dyilo was convicted of committing, as co-perpetrator, war crimes consisting of: 29 December 1960 Jiba, Utcha Sector, Djugu Territory, Ituri district, Orientale province, of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) Congolese Hema Issued under seal on 10 February 2006 Unsealed on 17 March 2006 16 March 2006 9 - 28 November 2006 26 January 2009 Decision on the confirmation of charges 29 January 2007 • Enlisting and conscripting of children under the age of 15 years into the Force patriotique pour la libération du Congo [Patriotic Force for the Liberation of Congo] (FPLC) and using them to participate actively in hostilities in...
Words: 2281 - Pages: 10
...Jury Trial Analysis Raquel Hearns CJA/364 April 13, 2015 Jonathan Sperling The sixth amendment states that all accused criminals have the right to a trial by impartial jury of the state, in which the person allegedly committed a crime (Right to Jury Trial, n.d). The jury is a group of citizens selected from the state randomly, to decide whether or not the accused criminal is guilty or not guilty. Once the jury has heard and reviewed the evidence, it is their duty to determine the faith of the accused by rendering a verdict of guilty or not guilty. Although, this criminal process ends with the verdict of the jury, it all begins when a person is arrested by law enforcement for committing a crime. Once an arrest, the accused individual is booked. During the booking course the person is advised of the charges, paperwork is completed stating the offense including the person’s name, birth date, social security number and other personal information of that nature. Shortly after, the individual will be fingerprinted and photographed upon booking (Worrall, 2012). From that point forward, the person is detained for the following court procedures that include the initial appearance, the pretrial process, and the preliminary hearing. In addition to those steps, the arraignment and discovery process follows (Worrall, 2012). In the course of the initial process, the defendant stands before a judge and is informed of the former charges, as well as acknowledged of his or her rights...
Words: 1747 - Pages: 7
...Business law Glossary Chapter 1 stare decisis “let the decision stand”; the principle that the decision of a court should serve as a guide or precedent and control the decision of a similar case in the future. administrative regulations rules made by state and federal administrative agencies. case law law that includes principles that are expressed for the first time in court decisions. common law the body of unwritten principles originally based upon the usages and customs of the community that were recognized and enforced by the courts. constitution a body of principles that establishes the structure of a government and the relationship of the government to the people who are governed. duty an obligation of law imposed on a person to perform or refrain from performing a certain act. equity the body of principles that originally developed because of the inadequacy of the rules then applied by the common law courts of England. law the order or pattern of rules that society establishes to govern the conduct of individuals and the relationships among them. precedent a decision of a court that stands as the law for a particular problem in the future. private law the rules and regulations parties agree to as part of their contractual relationships. procedural law the law that must be followed in enforcing rights and liabilities. right legal capacity to require another person to perform or refrain from an action. right of privacy...
Words: 2003 - Pages: 9
...Court Issues Analysis Introduction Some courthouse issues that are taking place in this day and may be around in the future are due process and the crime control model, violence in the courthouse, language interpretation, and the dilemma of delay. Some other courthouse issues include should the exclusionary rule be banned, and does plea bargaining belong. Courts and their Administrators’ Current and Future Issues Due process is a citizen’s right to justice same as when a person is presumed innocent, which protects the accused rights. With due process, each court case must involve formal fact finding(s) to uncover mistakes that were made by police and/or prosecutors. The crime control model is a breakdown of a person responsibility and defendants are presumed guilty. There are two types of courthouse violence. One of them is non-targeted violence, which involves an individual who does not have any intention that he/she will act out and become violent. When this person act is this type of manner it is most likely because the outcome of the court case, that is when anger take over. The most violent incidents came from this type of courthouse violence. Targeted violence involves someone who intend on causing harm or starting something in the courthouse. This type of violence is obviously premeditated and the attacker normally tries to avoid any other confrontations because they want everything to go as planned and unnoticed. In order to make security better in courthouses...
Words: 1131 - Pages: 5
...you have, for instance. - Franklin P. Jones THE CASE OF A.S. In December of 2007, A.S., a 17 year old female, was subpoenaed to testify as a state’s witness in a case against a man accused of assaulting another woman. When she failed to respond to the subpoena and did not appear at trial[1], St. Mary’s Circuit Court Judge C. Clarke Raley issued an order for her arrest. She was picked up by patrol officers on New Year’s Eve, and appeared before a different judge, who subsequently released her on her own recognizance. On January 9, 2008, Judge Raley issued another order, this time finding her in direct criminal contempt for her previous failure to appear as a witness, and summarily sentenced her to 30 days in the St. Mary’s County Detention Facility, the county’s general population prison for adult criminal offenders. A.S. was jailed in the detention center among the adult population; public defenders appealed to the judge on her behalf, claiming that her imprisonment was in violation of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act[2]. Judge Raley was not compelled by the argument, stating that she A.S. “was not best served by guidance, treatment or rehabilitation [in a juvenile facility], but by a brief exposure to the St. Mary’s County Detention Center, where she would have the opportunity [to] learn the consequences of disobeying a clear and direct order of this court.”[3] Ultimately, Judge Raley would relent., however, and ultimately ordered the...
Words: 11415 - Pages: 46
...Jury Trial Analysis When an individual is charged with a crime, he or she becomes a criminal defendant. The United States Constitution provides these criminal defendants a number of rights that limit the fashion in which the government can investigate, prosecute, and penalize criminal behavior. These include, but are not limited to, the right to a speedy trial, the right to an impartial judge, and the right to an impartial jury. Criminal defendants have the right to a public trial. This ensures that the government will not carry out any hearings in secret that may violate the individual’s constitutional rights. There are times when the court will hold a closed hearing to protect the identity of a victim, such as a minor. A criminal defendant also has the right to be tried by a jury of his or her peers. The type of jury varies from state to states but these juries are made up of members of the community that have been randomly designated by the court and chosen by attorney for both the prosecution and the defense. This leads the criminal defendant into the right to ask for a swift trial. The most intricate premises of the criminal justice system are that when justice is delayed, it is denied. The right to a swift and speedy trial is essential in a structure that places equality and integrity above all else (FindLaw, n.d.). Diligent trials promote civility within the criminal justice system. A speedy trial is one that is without any postponements. The Sixth Amendment...
Words: 1137 - Pages: 5
...I. Nonthematic Metaphoric Comparison Literary references for nonthematic comparison refer to a literary work, such as metaphors, in order to draw a comparison between persons or events in a legal case and characters or scenes in a literary work. Michael R. Smith, Advanced Legal Writing 253 (2d ed. 2008). The nonthematic metaphoric comparison has three key components. Id. First, the reference must have a comparison of a case and a literary work. Id. Second, it must contain a symbolic or figurative characteristic. Id. Lastly, the aspect of the literary work referred, either is not a major theme of the work, or does not support a major theme of the case. Id. For example, in In re Timmermann, 26 F.Supp. 600 (1939), District Judge McColloch made a metaphoric comparison of a legal case with the biblical story of Cain and Abel. This case was brought before the district court on a counter motion for an order staying foreclosure proceedings. In Timmerman, two brothers (John and Ernest) inherited a body of valuable wheat land from their parents. Id. at 600. Ernest borrowed $12,000, on the same property, solely to foreclose on a mortgage of $16,500, which John was unable to pay his share off in full. Id. This mortgage was then held by Ernest, but John offered to pay interest at the rate of 7% a year to keep taxes from becoming further delinquent. Id. John also assigned one half of the gross yield in grain to Ernest. Id. This assignment was reported by the county to yield...
Words: 1487 - Pages: 6
...arbitrary, or unreasonable treatment of an individual (Merriam-Webster). Due process of law is based on the idea that legal proceedings cannot interfere with life, liberty, or property unfairly. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that one will be given notice of the proceedings and will have an opportunity to be heard prior to the seizure of life, liberty, or property.” Due process is the principle that the government must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person according to the law. Due process holds the government subservient to the law of the land protecting individual persons from the state” (Wikipedia 2009). When a person gets harm by the government, the government has to follow the exact course of the law and if the government doesn’t follow, it will constitutes a due process violation that offends against the rule of law. Due process is traditionally divided into substantive and procedural categories. Substantive due process relates to general rights such as freedom of speech and privacy. Procedural due process relates to the right to an attorney, and other specifics associated with the procedures of legal proceedings. Adversarial system The legal system in the United States is known as an adversary system. In the adversarial system, cases are brought before the court and are presented by opposing sides. Both sides argue their cases in front of an unbiased panel of individuals. This panel hears the facts and determines what actions should be taken...
Words: 1097 - Pages: 5
...Court Issues Analysis CJA 394 August 06, 2012 Court Issues Analysis The court and court administrators are faced with numerous issues on a daily basis; everything from the crimes being committed, the language barriers, victims’ rights, and budget related issues just to name a few. The language barrier issue is one of the major challenges faced by the criminal justice system and administrators. The Administrative Office establishes the standards and guidelines for selecting and using interpreters in federal court proceedings (Interpreters Act 1978). Issues Courts and Administrators Face Perhaps the issues courts and administrators face in the courts today is the congestion, backlog, and delay in cases awaiting proceedings. This is a serious issue for courts and administrators in that due to the growing backlog cases may not receive the best of the justice system. Administrators may find themselves rushing through cases to get as many cases processed as possible. This can result in mistakes being made because the courts are not designed to function under such pressures and therefore errors occur in what is referred to as the assembly-line-justice (Stevens, 2004). Because of the stress prosecutors are under cases are dropped without a reason, this is known as nolle prosqui, according to The Free Dictionary it means "we shall no longer prosecute," which is a declaration made to the judge by a prosecutor in a criminal case (or by a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit) either...
Words: 1086 - Pages: 5