...TL 038 INNOVATION PROJECT MANAGEMENT: A RESEARCH AGENDA SERGEY FILIPPOV; HERMAN MOOI DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION SYSTEMS RESEARCHER AT DELFT CENTRE FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT (THE NETHERLANDS) Abstract th Originally developed in the mid-20 century, project management has become a distinctive way to manage business activities nowadays. Another important development is virtually universal recognition of the role of innovation and technology in the corporate change, growth and profitability. It is unsurprising that development of innovation is often run as a project. Yet, theoretically both project management and innovation studies have evolved over time as distinctively separate disciplines. In this paper we make an attempt to conceptualise the innovation project management and to specify the idiosyncratic nature of innovation projects as opposed to conventional projects. By doing so, we contribute to the nascent academic debate on the interplay between innovation and project management. Key words: project management, innovation, technology 1. Introduction This paper is concerned with three topics and the interplay between them, namely “Innovation”, “Research and Development (R&D)” and “Project Management”. The interest in these topics has exploded recently as they emerged both on the policy agenda and in the corporate strategies. The contribution of technological innovation to national economic growth has been well established in...
Words: 9508 - Pages: 39
...top-down playbook. by Keeley Wilson and Yves L. Doz 10 Rules for Managing Global Innovation Companies are well aware that hidden in their dispersed, global operations is a treasure trove of ideas and capabilities for innovation. But it’s proving harder than expected to unearth those ideas or exploit those capabilities in global innovation projects. Some of the challenges of global projects are familiar: figuring out the right role for top executives, for example, or finding a good balance between formal and informal project management processes. But although the challenges may be familiar, the solutions are not; what works for an innovation project conducted in a single location doesn’t necessarily work for one dispersed across many sites around the world. That’s partly because many important enablers of innovation happen naturally in colocation. Single location projects draw on large reservoirs of shared tacit knowledge and trust, and when issues arise, senior management is on hand to make decisions and provide direction and support. Team members october 2012 harvard business review 85 10 Rules foR Managing global innovation share the same language, culture, and norms, enabling flexibility and iterative learning as the project unfolds. When a project spans multiple locations, many of those natural benefits—often taken for granted—are lost. Part of the challenge of dispersed innovation thus becomes how to replicate the positive aspects of colocation while harnessing...
Words: 3615 - Pages: 15
...The article talks about the importance of project management in the current era. Project management has become one of the most critical processes of any project and it is due to this fact that project management is the core process that connects all other project activities and processes together. Project management has a role to play in every sector of the economy, let it be the industries, public sector, social services, pharmaceutical, in short any area, project management acts as a backbone for the overall success of the very project. Project management is a responsible process. The project management process connects all other project activities together and creates the harmony in the project. Today's organizations have developed a completely new way of doing business that has overturned the rigid, hierarchical and divided system of labor in years past making work easier, task focused and more organized that ever. That is the reason project management plays a very effective role in contributing to a country’s GDP. The delivery of business outcomes is realized through the success of projects, and in essence that is the way that project management strategies drive organizational success As data in the article suggests every year trillions are spent on projects, and more and more countries are entering into the project management, With little room for error and fewer resources to rely on, project management expertise and oversight is helping organizations streamline their...
Words: 534 - Pages: 3
...Name: Instructor: Course: Date: Management, Innovation and Organizational Performance Introduction Innovation is central to the understanding of how organizations sustain themselves over a certain period of time. This is because innovation enables organizations to create or generate new and multiple products and services. The process of innovation among organizations is to develop the basis of assessing creativity among organizations. More so, it enables managers to identify measures aimed at improving or changing organizational operations and functions. Through management innovation, new measures to plan, organize, coordinate, lead, and motivate the organization are identified. This can lead to achievement and sustenance of a competitive advantage in the industry. This is because principles of innovation involve creating long-lasting advantageous processes producing dramatic shifts in the competitive position. Global organizations therefore rely on innovation to systematically reinvent functions and operations being undertaken to enhance speed, effectiveness, and efficiency leading to a long business life (Alice 3). Organizations are referred to as open systems due to various reasons. Foremost, organizations are developed in order to produce new products and services regularly and successfully without facing barriers. As a result, they are referred to as open systems as they can determine market needs and technological capabilities to apply to ensure the products...
Words: 2842 - Pages: 12
...structures on innovation performance Matthias de Visser a,Ã, Petra de Weerd-Nederhof a,1, Dries Faems a,2, Michael Song b,3, Bart van Looy c,4, Klaasjan Visscher a,5 a University of Twente, Capitool 15, 7521 PL Enschede, The Netherlands University of Missouri-Kansas City, 5100 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO 64110-2499, USA c Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, 30000 Leuven, Belgium b a r t i c l e in fo Keywords: New product development process Cross-functional structure Structural ambidexterity Derivative innovation performance Breakthrough innovation performance abstract Based on a survey study of 155 U.S. firms, we conducted a firm-level assessment of the impact of different kinds of structures (i.e., functional versus cross-functional) in different kinds of new product development (NPD) processes (i.e., incremental versus radical) on different kinds of firm innovation performance (i.e., derivative versus breakthrough). We observe that most firms opt for similar structures for their incremental and radical NPD processes. At the same time, though, we find strong evidence that (1) firms that apply a cross-functional structure for the radical NPD process perform significantly better in terms of breakthrough innovation performance than firms that apply a functional structure for the radical NPD process and (2) firms that apply a functional structure for the incremental NPD process perform significantly better in terms of derivative innovation performance...
Words: 8100 - Pages: 33
...Innovation and project development: an impossible equation? Lessons from an innovative automobile project development Franck Aggeri and Blanche Segrestin Ecole des Mines de Paris, 60 Boulevard Saint Michel, 75272 Paris cedex 06, France. Franck.Aggeri@cgs.ensmp.fr; Blanche.Segrestin@cgs.ensmp.fr Product development performance has become a key issue for car manufacturers. But innovation seeks to outperform dominant design, whereas project development targets welldefined areas (costs, lead times, quality, etc.). This article provides an analysis of the extent to which innovation is compatible with recent managerial and technical methods (project and multi-project management, co-development, simulation tools and digital mock-ups, etc.). The analysis is based on a recent development project conducted at Renault in which these various techniques were used in an attempt to achieve highly ambitious targets simultaneously in the areas of lead times, costs and innovation. During the course of the project, unexpected design problems revealed failures in co-ordination, monitoring procedures and expertise. We argue that recent project development methods can induce negative effects on collective learning processes and that these effects have managerial implications for innovative developments. 1. Introduction I n recent years, innovation has, for most firms, become a key issue in an economic context in which competition is increasingly driven by high rates of...
Words: 7730 - Pages: 31
...Title Page Module: MGT3130 Innovations and Technology Management Name : Abdo Abdullahi Student Number: M0027455 Module leader: Mr Hong Woo Question 1: In the Skullcandy case (Chapter 12, Schilling 2010), would you characterise Skullcandy’s new product development team structure as Functional, Lightweight, Heavyweight or Autonomous and why? Provide your analysis with justifications. Question 2: Discuss the main sources of innovation, and what are particularly important for a company such as Skullcandy and why? MGT3130 Innovation and Technology Management – CP2 Question 1 Skull candy team structure can be characterised as hybrid lightweight and heavyweight. On the basis of it being lightweight the skull candy team members would still reside in their functional departments (Melissa A. Schilling 2010). The light weight teams at Skull candy have a very clear functional affiliation and would only work on the project that is given part time. The location of the team members of the Skull candy will always be in their functions thus allowing them to easily work together. Therefore the team members conduct the projects in their own departments (V. Patrick et all 2007). The functional departments will always have the responsibility of the work being done in that department. The skull candy case shows that there is close contact between the team members and also the functional managers and the project manager. Skull candy light weight team structure is cross-functional...
Words: 1949 - Pages: 8
...How to foster innovation in your business Presentation on the occasion of the Credit Suisse event 7th September 2013, Zurich Dr. Reto Müller Chairman of the Board of Directors Helbling Holding AG Helbling - a Leader in Technological Innovation and Business Consulting Helbling Group Key figures 2012 We are unique through our ability to integrate a spectrum of professional know-how, experience and skills. 458 employees Our ability to link technological expertise with business competence results in entrepreneurial success for our clients. Companies in Switzerland, Germany, USA and China Revenues CHF 110.9m International Network Offices (Corporate Finance International) Owned by 25 managing partners 2 Examples of innovations at Helbling Extract out of some thousand innovation projects in more than 50 countries Innovation leaders collaborating with Helbling: Nestlé, Roche, ABB, Airbus, Siemens, Medtronic, Schindler, Pfizer, Novartis, Sonova, Google, BSH, Geberit, Sika, V-Zug, Source: Helbling Qiagen, Tecan and many others 3 Strategic innovation management – selected Helbling references Companies Why Helbling? We measure ourselves - e.g. on the increase of the value of your innovation pipeline We are senior experts with over 15 years consulting experience and a focus on the topics "Increasing innovation success and increasing the power of innovation» We use self-developed tools and instruments ...
Words: 7299 - Pages: 30
...budget. How does your program rate on these 10 metrics? Robert G. Cooper and Elko J. Kleinschmidt OVERVIEW: 2007 is Research-Technology Management’s 50th year of publication. To mark the occasion, each issue reprints one of RTM’s six most frequently referenced articles. The articles were identified by N. Thongpapanl and Jonathan D. Linton in their 2004 study of technology innovation management journals, a citation-based study in which RTM ranked third out of 25 specialty journals in that field (see RTM, May–June 2004, pp. 5–6). The benchmarking study reprinted here was originally published in 1996 and has been updated with its author’s reflections. Their study of 161 business units uncovered the key drivers of new product performance at the business unit level. Ten different performance measures were gauged, including percentage of sales by new products, profitability and success rate. The ten gauges were reduced to two key performance dimensions—profitability and impact—which defined the “performance map.” Nine possible drivers— including strategy, process, organizational design, and climate for innovation—were investigated, and four key drivers of performance were identified; namely, a highquality new product process, the new product strategy for the business unit, resource availability, and R&D spending levels. Merely having a formal new product process had no impact. KEY CONCEPTS: product development, new product performance, critical success factors, strategy. What are the...
Words: 10608 - Pages: 43
...OVERVIEW & INNOVATION ACTIVITIES New Concept Development at Philips discusses how Philips revamped its approach to innovation and new product development in the early 2000s. Philips has a long, proud history of providing radical new products—innovations like X-ray tubes, CDs, Compact Cassettes, and Ambilight TV—mostly fueled by Philips’ understanding of innovation and significant R&D investments. Yet in 2000 Philips encountered a substantial net loss and the company decided it needed to rejuvenate the Philips’ brand, and give its approach to innovation a face lift, by focusing on innovation driven by end-user insights. Philips began its new journey with exploration. First, a vision team of four individuals was created with the goal of bringing inspirational ideas from the outside in. Second, they piloted a project for car headlights that combined the Dialogue Decision Process (DDP) and a design process based on socio-cultural insights. Third, Philips established the New Business Creation (NBC) group whose role was to challenge by asking simple questions and illicit “out of the box” development. Philips’ exploratory projects led to the inception of the “Think the Lighting Future” (TTLF) project by the end of 2001. Along with a list of intangible goals, the TTLF was tasked with clarifying alternative scope definitions, defining two to three NBC projects, and defining a knowledge sharing process. From the onset, TTLF benefited from having the full support of senior management...
Words: 851 - Pages: 4
...Case Studies Radical innovation at Philips Lighting 1.0 Introduction To state the obvious, radical innovation isn’t easy. It involves taking a leap into the unknown – and is particularly difficult for established organizations who have a track record of success which they don’t want to put at risk. So how does an organization jump the tracks? How can it switch off its immune system and open itself up to new – and potentially dangerous – inputs? How can it reframe, let go of its old ways of looking at the world and take on something which is very new – but by definition untried and risky? These are not academic challenges but the very stuff of innovation management – the essence of what it means to lead strategically. Put very simply, innovation is a survival imperative. If organizations don’t change what they offer the world – products and services – and the ways in which they create and deliver those offerings (processes) then they risk being left behind and at the limit disappearing. History shows us an almost Darwinian pattern of the rise of new entrepreneurial and agile organizations which mature, become comfortable and then fat and gradually lose their edge. Middle age gives way to a kind of sclerosis where change is reduced to smaller and smaller increments until one day the organization is upstaged by external events and unable to move fast enough to cope. It is the new kids on the block who exploit the new technology, pick up on the new market...
Words: 9774 - Pages: 40
...Product Development: Profiting from Innovation Business Value Research Series December 2005 The New Product Development Business Value Research Series Executive Summary eveloping a new technology or solution that fills a need for a customer is fulfilling. This feeling of accomplishment is not accompanied by the pleasant jingle of coins in the corporate pockets, however, unless the idea makes its way out of the innovator’s head, off of the planning board, and eventually off of the engineer’s harddrive. Product development teams and executives alike need to measure the success of innovation the way the corporation measures success – by the bottom line. Turning a concept into a profitable product or product platform is not an easy job, and requires people from multiple disciplines to work together. New product development (NPD) is a complex, collaborative process that requires coordinating the innovation efforts of many to meet a common goal. The following is a list of participating groups that may be required for a product to successfully come to market: • • • • • Marketing Engineering Procurement Regulatory Manufacturing • • • • • Design Suppliers Sales / Channels Finance Legal • Manufacturing Engineering D Different organizations and individuals are responsible for one or more aspects of the product, and few of these aspects can stand alone. Decisions made in one facet of a product impact many others. Aberdeen’s Product Innovation Agenda benchmark reported the importance...
Words: 5072 - Pages: 21
...DesIgnIng the OrganIzatIOn fOr User InnOvatIOn Peter Keinz • ChristoPh hienerth • ChristoPher LettL Abstract: there is increasing consensus among practitioners and academics alike that we are in the midst of a paradigm shift from producer-centered and internal innovation processes toward user-centered and open innovation processes. This paradigm shift induces significant changes to the design of organizations. Even though the research field of user innovation has been developing over a period of more than four decades, there have been only occasional intersections with the research field of organizational design. In this article, we aim to provide an integrated perspective of the two fields. We first identify major user innovation strategies. We then derive the implications for each user innovation strategy on key dimensions of organizational design. Keywords: User innovation; organization design the point of departure for this article is the growing literature around the phenomenon that companies are in the midst of a paradigm shift from closed, producer-centered ways of innovating to open, user-centered innovation processes (Chesbrough, 2003; von hippel, 2005). to improve innovation performance and increase competitiveness, more and more firms are employing user innovation strategies (von Hippel, 2005). Such strategies have proven to be of high value to almost every type of company; both start-ups and wellestablished companies, irrespective of the industry they are operating...
Words: 10831 - Pages: 44
...Marketing Min Ding Jehoshua Eliashberg Stefan Stremersch Editors Innovation and Marketing in the Pharmaceutical Industry Emerging Practices, Research, and Policies Chapter 3 Portfolio Management in New Drug Development Min Ding, Songting Dong, Jehoshua Eliashberg, and Arun Gopalakrishnan Abstract The pharmaceutical industry leads all industries in terms of R&D spend. Portfolio management in new drug development is extremely challenging due to long drug development cycles and high probabilities of failure. In 2010, a pharmaceutical company like GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) spent over USD 6 billion in R&D expenditure and managed a total of 147 R&D projects across 13 therapeutic areas in different stages of development. There are a lot of challenges in deciding on how to allocate resources to these projects in order to achieve the maximum returns. For example, how to evaluate the value and risk of each project, how to choose new projects for both short-term cash flow and long-term development, how to decide which projects to prioritize and which projects to remove from the portfolio, how to design drug development unit and incentive schemes to maximize the likelihood of success, and so forth. This chapter reviews both practice and the state-of-the-art research and summarizes the latest insights from both industry and academia. For a manager, it provides a guide to the tools they need in portfolio management in the new drug development context. For an academic, it provides a...
Words: 16001 - Pages: 65
...Innovation is the driving force for the advancement of technology, and always has been. But where does innovation come from? It comes from within, as it is highly dependent on one of the most basic facets of human nature, being unsatisfied with current situations. We, as human beings, are never truly satisfied, and this has led us to better ourselves and to innovate, and will continue to lead us to innovate in the future. The quote “Everything that can be invented, has been invented” (attributed to Charles Duell) couldn’t be more wrong. Dr. Kumar, a professor at London Business School makes a few interesting points on the topic of innovation, but more specifically, outsourcing innovation. While India has made a splash in the information technology aspect of business, it is becoming increasingly clear that India is starting to innovate in the management side of things. Therefore, India is destined to also become a global leader in both management and management innovation. Manufacturing isn’t the only thing that foreign countries have to offer US companies anymore. Kumar talks about four different kinds of “invisible” innovation (innovation not usually seen by consumers) coming from India. The first kind is known as Business to Business innovation, also known as B2B. These products are inventions made by businesses in their research & development departments. R&D projects in India have been shown to be as competent as American R&D projects, therefore debunking...
Words: 963 - Pages: 4
