Free Essay

Property Law

In:

Submitted By bemella89
Words 2039
Pages 9
PROPERTY LAW

Angela
This situation is clear to see that Co- ownership is involved. There are two parties involved in this co- ownership; Brad and Angelina. We are looking to see the type of ownership they got into and at the end what will they be entitled to. There are two forms of co- ownership; Joint tenancy and Tenancy in common. The presumption of Joint tenancy is that the joint tenants own the entire property in question. The presumption of Tenancy in common is that the tenants own a share of the property in question. Joint tenancy will only be applicable if the test of the four unities is satisfied. Difference with tenancy in common is that you only need to satisfy the unity of possession. Unity of time means the tenants interest of the property must commence at the same time as other tenants. Possession means that the entire co – owned land is the tenants’ entitlement. Interest means interests held should be the same as the duration and time. Title means that tenants involved should be given a title from the same supplier.
Again, we need to understand the sort of co-ownership we are dealing with here before advising the parties. There is a slight hope that we are dealing with joint tenancy as all four unities are present in this scenario. However, there are pros and cons of being a joint tenant, one of which is severance. One of the methods of severance is by notice. This is found in the case of Re Draper and Harris v Goddard . Both cases indicated immediate intention to sever by notice. The first instance of severance in this situation is when Brad wrote a notice of immediate severance stating that he intends to sell the house. Under s36 (2) of the Law of Property Act 1925 , the law states that “any tenant desires to sever the joint tenancy in equity, he shall give to the other joint tenants a notice in writing of such desire". Applying the law to this situation, we just know Brad wrote the letter before he died, we do not know whether he posted the letter. Supposing the Severer (Brad) posted the letter before he severs with precise intentions like in the case of Harris v Goddard , and the letter was delivered to Angelina then the Severance by notice will become effective according to s36(2) of LPA. However, if the severance was posted prior to the death of the Severer and it gets lost in the post, but there is proof of the posting i.e. recorded delivery or registered post then again Severance would become effective but would need a confirmation of proof by the courts.

The second act of severance occurs when Brad left a will for his lover Jennifer. Where a joint tenancy is concerned, a tenant cannot leave a will for another party. When one party of joint tenant decease, the survivor is automatically entitled to the entire property and not even a will can change it. There is no proof of mutual agreements between the joint tenants and cost of dealings. We move unto the Trust section to further advice Angelina of her entitlement of share to the property in question. Where there are two or more tenants involved the issue of trust will arise. This trust will further permit parties to split their ownership into legal or equitable. Express trusts are based upon the intentions of the party and Implied trust are based upon the presume intention of the party. Express trust is usually said to have been a cash contribution to the buying of the land but in another person. This could be clear indication of creating a presumption of resulting trust. Implied trust is usually the result for many scenarios, but it will be very inequitable if a trustee rejects beneficiary interest to the land. Implied trust is made up of the following: resulting trust constructive trust and statutory trust.
In the case of Stack v Dowden , the Courts take this instance to apply the implied trust and the case of Kernott v Jones as constructive trusts.
In Stack v Dowden, both parties were living together at the time constantly. The house was registered under the defendants name. The parties had four children later on and bought a new house, only that this time land was registered in both names. Majority monies came from the defendants building society and the rest came from a bank loan, which was down as joint tenants. They kept their separate bank accounts and savings. The parties split in 2002, with the defendant staying in the house that was registered under joint tenants. The claimant did not want that. The claimant wanted the land to be shared equally between the two. In first instance the Judge favoured the claimant, but as the defendant appealed against the decision made, she won the case of 65% and the initial claimant 35%. The initial claimant made an appeal against the decision. Lordship had to take into consideration that they were co- habitants. Then stated that a couple who registered under joint tenancy has a beneficial interest in the land. This could be proven otherwise. Court will have to look at the common intention of the parties that means their intentions towards the property. This would include the mortgage, loan repayments etc. Given to it the defendant put in more finance to these things than the claimant. The defendant judgement remained the same 65% to 35%.
In the case of Kernott v Jones, the couples bought a property together in the mid 1980s and had two childen together. There had been not written indication as to sever from the tenancy or any other indications.Mr kermott did not take up responsibilities for his children and split up with Miss Jones in 1993. Mr. Kermott used the joint insurance to purchase his land which was divided equally between both parties. Mr kernott was no longer interest in the property, despite having to appeal against decisions made in the courts. The Court of Appeal believed that he had no intention s in the property again, due to the fact that he did not take the responsibility of a father.
Applying this case to Angelina, She did not contribute to the land in terms of finance although she did sign the joint tenancy agreement with Brad in the beginning. This clearly indicates she had beneficiary interest in the land. For the mere fact that Angelina is a joint tenant and also registered jointly under the mortgage meant that she contributed in the little way she could. Angelina and Brad may have made agreements that she would take care of the children and the house. Again , it does not say that she made improvements in the land, even if she did it would not be enough to prove she has a share Pettit v Pettit . When Brad’s father contributed to the property that could indicate also that she contributed 50% of what Brad’s father gave as they both agreed to ask the father. In conclusion, Angelina would be entitled to a share in the property under resulting trust in equity as given 50 % of the property.
Jennifer
First of all we have to find out whether or not Jennifer would be entitled to a share in the property in question. We have already established that there was a joined ownership between Brad and Angelina, as they satisfied the four unities. This will automatically give Brad and Angelina a right to survivorship. This means that even if one of the joint tenants decides to write a will, it will be made void. Jennifer will not be entitled to a share in the property through Brad’s will due to the fact that there is a joint tenancy between Brad and Angelina.
Brad made an indication of severance by notice to Angelina under s 36(2) of LPA . This was considered to be made under immediate effect to severe. He did make his intentions clear stating that “he wanted to sell the property” indicating that as soon as possible. Yet, we perceive that Angelina did not receive the notice to severe with immediate effect. The case would have been different if Angelina received the notice of severance, as Angelina received the Notice. The Law would have come into full effect, making the joint tenancy to turn into tenancy in common. Jennifer cannot claim severance for her claim as there was no clear indication that Brad actually posted the letter. If Jennifer had proof by recorded delivery or registration of posting then the notice by severance will be effective.
We now have to find out whether Jennifer is entitled to a share in the property through implied trust and express trust.
Express trust is based upon the intentions of the trust while implied trust is based on the presumed intentions.

Charles
We want to find out whether Charles is entitled to a share of the property in question. We need to consider Trust, and what kind of trust in question.
Express trust is based on intention through writing under s 53(1) of the LPA , while implied trust is based on presumed trust s 53(2) of the LPA.
We will look into resulting and constructive trust to further advise Charles.
Resuting trust is when a person contributes money to the intitial cost of a property but in the name of another person that owns the property. Equity is presumed that the individual giving the money to another individual is said to have a beneficiary interest in the property, and is not seen as a mere gift. In the case of Bull v Bull, a mother contributed to the property of her son. He was registered on the house. After he got married the wife wanted to give the mother in law out. The court held that the mother is in tenancy in common under the statutory trust of sale.
In this case, to advise Charles I would use the Presumed resulting trust.
When there is property passed between individuals or relatives, it is presumed to the courts that it is an outright gift, and it has no reason to fall into a resulting trust. This is known as the presumption of advancement. However, when it is said that that contribution was miscarried then presumption of resulting trust is made effective. In Bennet v Bennet , the father gave his property to his son. This is to be considered as an outright gift.
Presumed resulting trust may arise in one of the three scenerios:
When it is a voluntary gift, contribution to the purchase of a land, or that the presumption of the gift being outright was false. In this scenario we know that Charles contributed to the purchase of the property. Under section 60(3) of the Law of Property Act 1925 the law inhibits the creation of any automatic resulting trust but refuse to say anything with regards to the presumed trusts. When an individual contributes to the purchase of the property, it is said that, that individual is permitted to hold comparable equity in the interest of the land. This is known to be the simplest way of understanding presumed resulting trust. This was stated in Re Vandervall by Megarry. The individual that contributes to the purchase of a property holds more interest than any co- ownership due to the fact that they put money down for the land. Charles has an entitlement to the land as he contributed £40,000 to the purchase of the property. He has up to 50% of the share. Although Charles did not give any clear indication as to whether he had any interest in the property. The scenario just says that he contributed £40,000. When an individual contribute to the mortgage they will create an equitable interest in the land as in Lloyds Bank v Rosset . In Burns v Burns , it must be shown that the contribution to the property, must be made under the intention that there is no interest in the property. A presumed resulting trust would be made effective if the courts would need to rebut the outright gift .

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Property Law

...characterized as property. ii) Policy in favor of private property (1) Things held in common are usually neglected (2) There is a fundamental property right that goes beyond monetary damages iii) Property Rights are not Absolute (1) Apply a balancing test of property and societal interest (a) One may trespass to put out a fire (2) Property rights are diminished when others are invited onto land (3) The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumcised by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it. (4) If property is open to the general public then the First Amendment supercedes property rights on it. (a) These protections are available against unreasonably restrictive or oppressive conduct on the part of private entities that have otherwise assumed a constitutional obligation no to abridge the individual exercise of such freedoms because of public use of their property. (b) The NJ court said that the right of free speech conferred by the state constitution was secure not only from State interference but – under certain conditions – from the interference of an owner of private property even when exercised on that private property. (i) Schmid Standard 1. The normal use of the property 2. The extent and nature of the public’s invitation to use it 3. The purpose of the expressional activity in relation to both its private and public use (5) Title to real property cannot include...

Words: 24978 - Pages: 100

Premium Essay

Property Law

...47LLB14 Synopsis Property Law Women's Right to Property under Hindu law: A Legal Analysis Introduction:- In India, it is no doubt that a woman is seen as pristine, pious and worshipped on one hand but on the other hand she faces discrimination against her gender identity and victimized by the societal norms created in male dominant society. She never got the legitimate place and never enjoyed a respected position in the society even after all the civilization and societal revolutions. Male superiority is still a legitimate concern for any society and adverse conditions for women are still widely prevalent. The emancipation of women and the accomplishment of full balance between genders should dependably be the essential goal of society. Such denial cannot be justified on any grounds – political, moral or legal and not even biological. If we look through the ancient Hindu Society, a woman did not enjoy any reasonable social status and looked upon as a dependent with hardly any property rights. Under the old Mitakshara Law, the son attains an interest and right in the family property on birth. According to this school, a son, grandson, and a great grandson constitute a class of coparceners, based on births in family. No female is a member of the coparcenary in Mitakshara Law. The constitution of India guarantees equality of opportunity and equal status to both men and women citizen. Since article 14 of the Constitution enshrines “equality before law” and article 15 prohibits...

Words: 588 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Law of Property

...Law of Property A huge subject of law and one that is very much debated on when it comes to ownership and rights is property law. There are different types of property that can be owned and how to go about owning it. The acquisition of property is important to understand to make sure there are no legal implications that are ignored. There are different ways that property can be owned, how it can be transferred to a different party, and controversies that surround the situation of property law. There are also different types of property that can be owned and how it can be acquired. Understanding these elements can help when trying to procure any type of property legally. There are different types of property that a person can purchase and own. There is real and personal property that an individual can own. And most of the legal concepts and rules that apply to these property types were originally derived from English Common Law, which modern law has incorporated these original rules and concepts into the law of real and personal property ("Property Law" 1). Personal property, which is also known as movable property, is anything other than that of land. It can be subject of ownership, which includes but is not limited to stocks, notes, money, patents, copyrights and intangible property. Then, there is real property, which is much different from personal property ("Property Law" 2). Real property is land and anything that is built or erected on this piece of land, grown on it...

Words: 1318 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Property Law

...Property Law         Property Law   Joe faces heavy legal penalties first for operating his demolition business illegally. Every business, whether the sole proprietorship, partnership or Limited Corporation must be registered with the registrar of businesses.    A sole proprietorship is the simplest form of business, but also the corporate law requires it to be registered.  Every state in America requires the owners of the sole proprietor to register the business under a certain name and obtain a trading license.  The majority of businesses need to acquire a certain category of license depending on the nature of business established before they start operating.  One is also required to acquire a federal license if the business activities involved require supervision from federal agencies.  Not adhering to these rules attract heavy fines for the business and even imprisonment for flouting corporate laws governing the registration of businesses in America.  Joe, therefore, overlooked all the above procedures of registering his business and went ahead to demolish private property without a business license authorizing him to engage in such transactions.  The business also required a legal operating name before undertaking any transactions which are a prerequisite to obtaining any other government document (Missouri Bar Center 2008).  Joe is also liable for trespassing on private property and demolishing it.  Crimes against other people’s property fall under three main activities...

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Property Law Summary

...PROPERTY LAW Introduction -Historically there were two branches of Property Law: • Real property: (Land and interests in land) • Personal property: (Everything besides land and interests in land) -The reason for the two separate branches is that historically land was the most valuable type of property (and arguably still is). -This course predominately focuses on real property. *Note that personal property can become real property by being attached to real property – referred to as ‘fixtures’. (E.g. carpet fixed to a house). SEE LATER FOR FULLER DISCUSSION OF FIXTURES. -General terminology: • Licence: all rights in relation to land, which look like a property rights, but are not actually property rights. ❖ Bare licence: The licence is not coupled with any form of consideration, and therefore can be revoked at will. ❖ Contractual licence: A licence coupled with a contract, and therefore may have remedies in breach of contract (damages, etc.). -Real Property (Common law) rights: • Fee Simple – An unencumbered inherited interest in land. It is almost equal to ownership (the crown actually owns all the land, but people have the right to reside on the land. • Native title – To be distinguished from the common law system. • Life estate – This estate lasts until death, i.e. it is not inheritable. • Lease / tenancy agreement – The right of possession is given (also known as a ‘possessory estate’. (If...

Words: 12263 - Pages: 50

Premium Essay

Property Law Essay

...In his book Principles of Property Law, Ziff discusses various justifications for the existence of private property. Of these, economic efficiency and prosperity is the most convincing, due to the objectively quantifiable success of mixed-market economies in providing development for their societies compared to socialist command systems with minimal private ownership of property. Other justifications such as personhood, moral development, labour and desert are questionable due to the social conflict they would engender, while freedom is unlikely to be enhanced by private property. While private property is not sufficient to cure all of society’s property-related ills, we would be in a much worse position without it. The most cogent justification given for private property is that of economic efficiency and increased prosperity through an incentive system. This can be seen in the relative economic backwardness of communist economic systems, where private property is minimal and productivity is stifled due to a lack of personal material reward for work. By allowing more private property and their transfer, property interests ought to settle with those who value them most and can utilise them most effectively. In addition, one of the main drivers of economic development is lending, and as de Soto has noted, this cannot readily occur without a mortgage over existing private property, hindering economies lacking in such. The leading evidence for the economic efficiency argument is...

Words: 1039 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Intellectual Property Law

...Intellectual Property Law Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Abstract Intellectual property law is vital to protecting the rights of creative individuals and their realized ideas. Most countries around the world protect the intellectual property of authors, inventors, and artists, in some similar form whether it is copyright, trademark, or other sources of protection. The topic of discussion herein explores intellectual property law in America and the protections afforded to unique works and their creators here at home. Research was conducted using web-based resources made accessible to the public by prestigious universities such as UC Berkley and Cornell. The findings revealed a substantial legal framework of protection for authors, creators, and inventors of industrial, literary, scientific, and artistic works. Rights Protected by Intellectual Property Law Intellectual property refers to creations of the human mind: inventions, literary and artistic works, symbols, names, images, and designs used in commerce. Exclusive rights protect the intellectual property and owners under corresponding categories of law. This law encompasses the legalities of copyrights, trademarks, patents, industrial design rights, and trade secrets. Legal property rights are defensible in a court of law, and are further defined by article 9 on the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C). To expand on creations of the human mind, intellectual property is further broken down into two categories:...

Words: 1671 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Law Private Property

...‘legal person’. However, women and slaves had to deal with difficulties with the law considering societies back then had a different view of them being recognized by the law as having legal rights, protections, privileges, responsibilities and liabilities under the law. the term and common law idea of "legal person" is to be visible and have a legal standing which, in other means, to be able to attract legal rights and assume legal obligations. If, however, a person was not considered to be recognized by the law, the human being will then be considered as a species of property that can only be bought and sold,(Davies and Naffine at casebook, 26). In that period of time, the subjugated Africans that were brought to America or Europe did not reach a ‘legal status’, hence were not considered as legal persons. As a result of not being granted legal status, they were treated as property to be bought and sold; they did not have control or ‘protection’ of their own lives. This lack of legal status affected their lives over the years; they were “bought and sold, treated as an ordinary merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it. This opinion was at that time fixed universal in the civilized portion of the white race.” (Brettle Dawson, 2101T S1_Introduction, Carleton University, May 8th 2012). Another case to support my answer is the Shelly v. Kraemer , they were not allowed obtaining a property based on their race. According to the philosopher John Locke, “a man cannot...

Words: 1573 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Intellectual Property Law

...Intellectual property law Name: Instructor: Task: Date: INTRODUCTION The foremost objective of this law is to protect the rights of people who come up with original works. These original works run across a very broad spectrum and range from; books like novels, innovative ideas and company logos among others. This law is one of the single most important laws that regulate business environment. This is because it encourages individuals to come up with new technologies and innovations that promote growth to the economy. When an innovative person is assured that their work will be accorded protection enabling them to benefit from it, they will thus be encouraged to continually engage in the production and creation of creative innovations. These creations may subsequently result in job creation, emergence of new technologies, new procedures in the business world that can improve efficiency and finally new ideas that can aesthetically make our surrounding more appealing. There exist three main and most important ways through which intellectual property laws are enforced; these include through patents, trademarks and copyrights. Copyrights protect ideas; they give the owner of the idea fundamental right over the idea. So only the owner can benefit financially from the idea. Patents, on the other hand, deal with the protection of inventions. Trademarks deals with the protection of company logos, this enable all competitors in a given industry to have a unique way of identifying...

Words: 1474 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Copyright Laws and Intellectual Property

...inventions and even innovations or improvement on their current properties. Some companies devise their formulas that have economic value as much as they would come up with new methods and processes. These inventions must not be used by any one wilily-nilly; this calls for laws to protect such innovations and intellectual properties. This has led to copyright laws and property or intellectual rights. A copyright law is a set of rules and regulations that protects a person or organization’s unique creation of invention or innovation against copying and abuse or other forms of illegal usage. The issue is that if a person has used his resources and expertise and knowledge to create a new item, no one must benefit from that item without the authorization of the inventor. In order to avoid illegal usage of another person’s property there is need for legislation to enforce compliance. The use of the property must be done with the authorization of the inventor or the creator. Some people want to be paid for the effort they would have put and the resources they would have used to come up with such an asset. Copyright laws are important because they regularize the usage of a person’s intellectual property. This is essential in business today. In the same category as the copyright laws is the intellectual property right. If there has not been property right and copyright organizations and people would use other people’s property without paying for it. That may also lead to tarnishing of other...

Words: 1192 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Tax Case

...EARL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Cite as 7 AFTR 8508 (30 F.2d 898), 02/25/1929 EARL v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Case Information: Code Sec(s): | | Court Name: | U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. | Docket No.: | No. 5602. | Date Decided: | 02/25/1929 | Disposition: | | Cites: | 7 AFTR 8508, 30 F2d 898. | HEADNOTE . Reference(s): OPINION Warren Olney, Jr., J. M. Mannon, Jr., Henry D. Costigan, and Robert L. Lipman, all of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Millar E. McGilchrist, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, and Prew Savoy, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent. Appeal from the United States Board of Tax Appeals. Petition by Guy C. Earl, for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals, sustaining an order of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, determining that there was a deficiency in income tax paid by the petitioner for the years 1912 and 1921. Reversed. Before RUDKIN and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges, and BEAN, District Judge. Judge: BEAN, District Judge. This is a petition for review of a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals. Section 1001, Revenue Act of 1926; 26 USCA § 1224. The petitioner is, and was during the times hereinafter mentioned, a married man domiciled in the state of California. In 1920 and 1921, the years here involved, he earned for personal services...

Words: 1376 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Last Will

...and shall be governed and administered according to New Mexico law, even though subject to probate or administered elsewhere. The New Mexico laws applied shall not include any principles or laws relating to conflicts of laws. ARTICLE II Whenever used herein, words using the singular shall include the plural, and words using the masculine shall include the feminine and neuter, and vice versa, unless the context requires otherwise. ARTICLE III I am married, and my wife’s name is Maria R. Hernandez. All references hereinafter made to “wife” or “spouse” shall refer to her and no other; if she is not my legal wife at the time of my death, then she shall be deemed for the purpose of this, my last Will and Testament, to have predeceased me. I was formerly married to Angela Sanchez, who is now deceased. There were three (3) children born of my marriage to Angela Sanchez. The names of those children are as follows: Rita Calderon, Timothy Sanchez, and Brian Sanchez. ARTICLE IV If My Spouse Survives. Except as may be provided hereunder in this Article IV, if my spouse survives me, I give to my spouse all my interest in household furniture and furnishings, books, apparel, and similar personal effects; art objects, gun collections, and jewelry; sporting and recreational equipment; all other tangible property for personal use; all other like contents of my home and any vacation property that I may own or reside in on the date of my death; all animals;...

Words: 357 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Hindu Succession Act

...focuses on the rights of women regarding section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 and its effects after it got deleted in 2005. Hindu Succession Act, 1956: Before the amendment The framers of the Indian Constitution took note of the adverse condition of women in society and a number of provisions and safeguards were included in the Constitution to ward off gender inequality. In this context, Articles 14, 15(3) and 16 of the Constitution can be mentioned. After the advent of the Constitution, the first law made at the central level pertaining to property and inheritance concerning Hindus was the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The Act took a giant leap in 1956 by granting several rights to women equal to that of men but failed to do complete justice to women. Prior to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 shastric and customary laws that varied from region to region governed Hindus and sometimes it varied in the same region on a caste basis resulting in diversity in the law. A woman in a joint Hindu family,...

Words: 2046 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Understanding Tangible Property

...Understanding Tangible Property Team E LAW531 February 07, 2012 Michelle Hamilton Understanding Tangible Property This week team discussion involves understanding the tangible property right of a business. The business rights depends in the field of industry that companies conducts its businesses in. Some tangible are similar while others pertain uniquely to its industry. Discussion amongst the team member lead to the decision to undertake the retail industry such as Wal-Mart, Target, Best Buy and other major retailer organization in the country. The paper will bring about an identification of its tangible assets and the company needs to consecutively protect and identify these properties. Cheeseman stated that “Tangible properties have physical characteristics, such as building, goods, animals, and minerals” (Business Law, 2010, p. 739). Big retail stores like Wal-Mart, Best Buy, and Target suffers from theft and shoplifting on a daily basis in its daily operations. These thefts take in numerous forms, shoplifting of clothing from a department store, eating a grape from a grocery store, or purchasing stolen property is considered tangible. Theft of tangible property from any of these mentioned retailers is infringing on property rights. Retailers and grocery chains industries implement security measures to protect their profits and consumers, however; these measures cost the retailer industries millions of dollars in operation cost each year. Statistics...

Words: 723 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mgmt 597 Case Review

...Cori Marie Buder, then minor children of Ms. Sartire Buder and ex-husband Alexander Buder. The mother filed an action against the father based on his alleged breach of the fiduciary duty he owed the couples minor children as the custodian of gift money they had received from a grandparent. The trial court found that the father had breached his fiduciary duty and assessed damages and attorney fees. The intermediate court affirmed and added attorney fees on appeal. The court’s held that: (1) the standard of care under the Uniform Gift to Minors Act (UGMA) and the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA), Colo. Rev. Stat. §§ 11-50-101 - 11-50-126 (1987), is not the same as under the general trust laws, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 15-1-304 (1973), (2) a custodian is a fiduciary, (3) the statutes contain different standards and that the standards contained in the UGMA/UTMA apply exclusively to custodians, while the standard contained in Colo. Rev. Stat. 15-1-304 applies to other fiduciaries, (4) any error in assessing the standard of care was harmless because the trial court used the lower standard under UGMA, (5) UTMA authorized the trial court to order an accounting and to assess damages, (6) attorney fees very properly awarded because it was a breach of trust case. Aforementioned, the Colorado Supreme Court held that the intermediate court properly affirmed the trial court's judgment and that...

Words: 1669 - Pages: 7