...In the field of Criminal Justice, there are many topics of controversy such as Police using body cameras. This topic is becoming a bigger issue around the country due to false accusations on people and police. There are pros and cons to every controversial issue. Four cons related to Police body cameras are the following: The cameras are expensive. There is a privacy issue for both police and civilians. There may be issues with the camera. The police don’t want them. On the positive side, there are pros as well. Four pros of police using body cameras are the following: Helps provide valuable evidence in obtaining accurate victim and witness statements. Protects police officers from false accusations. The use of cameras while on duty provides hard video evidence of...
Words: 1442 - Pages: 6
...Police Body Cameras Should police officers wear body cameras? The conflict in portland centers on how and when officers have access to video from body cameras. Videos of police shootings across the country have become critical. However police officers across the nation are beginning to push back on body cameras. Police officers should have to wear police body cameras. Some police stations are still debating on wether or not they should use police body cameras. State laws vary about what the public can see. Existing recordings are recovered under these laws, such as videos from cameras mount on patrol cars. “Body cameras produce more footage than dashboard cameras” (Kaleem). Footage that can show officers inside peoples homes. Body cameras have become an easy political answer to the problem of trust in police. Any policy that hides, shields, or opens up body-camera footage is probably wrong. Police body cameras created an issue on making a new contract between the city and the public union. Portlands labor agreement with...
Words: 490 - Pages: 2
...With new "body cam" technology such as GoPro becoming more prominent in today's society, debate has arisen over whether police officers should be required to wear body cameras or not, so that every action they take while on duty can be recorded. Especially in light of current events many feel that police should be required to wear body cameras to prevent injustices. Like any problem there are pros and cons. And I believe that cons need to be addressed before moving on to the pros. Some of the cons against body cameras are that there is a huge cost for buy each camera as well as budget issues for each department. Another example is that with the limited vision it may not be precise enough to get entire circumstance in which case would lead to...
Words: 587 - Pages: 3
...ENG 112 30 November 2015 Body Cameras Providing Accountability Thesis Statement: Yes, body cameras should be worn by police officers because they provide accurate accounts of what happens at crime scenes, help civilians trust police officers, and give Americans an idea of what it is like to be behind the gun to more appreciate officers. I. Introduction II. Body cameras provide accurate account III. Body cameras help civilians trust officers IV. Body cameras gives an idea of what it is like behind the gun V. Refutation VI. Conclusion Body Cameras Providing Accountability The shooting of Trayvon Martin has elevated a necessity around the country for police officers to be equipped with body cameras. Yes, it is necessary for police officers to wear these cameras for accountability for oneself and a potential victim. Body cameras can rule out possible suspicions of wrongful deaths or mistreatments, such as racism. Police officers should want to protect themselves and their jobs with this device that records what is actually happening and being said at the crime scene. Yes, body cameras should be worn by police officers because they provide accurate accounts of what happens at crime scenes, helps civilians trust police officers, and gives Americans an idea of what it is like to be behind the gun to more appreciate officers. Body cameras provide an accurate account of what happens at crime scenes. The use of body cameras is a great way to get first...
Words: 1225 - Pages: 5
...During the Speech Forum, there were two speakers who gave the reasons along with facts and explanations on the policy of why or why not law enforcement should wear body cameras. In the Pro's speech, she believe that law enforcement should wear the body camera because it would help in aiding in eyewitness testimony and because it eliminate police brutality while in the Con's speech he believe that law enforcement should not wear the body camera because they are counter productive and an invasion of privacy. Each gave their own reason behind their claims during the Speech Forum. In the Pro speaker's speech, her first claim of aiding in eyewitness testimony is a claim of fact, while her claim that it would stop police brutality was a claim...
Words: 596 - Pages: 3
...Brentyn Trujillo Period 3 11/3/2015 Police should wear body cameras at all times while on duty. Police officers should be forced to wear body cameras while on their patrol duty. Equipping police with body cameras may be an effective way to advance the behavior of officers and the community with which they interact, a new study finds. Researchers at the Campus of South Florida released their report on a yearlong body-worn camera pilot program at the Orlando Police Department, in which they randomly selected 46 officers to wear the plans and compared them against 43 officers who did not. In the 12 months from March 2014 through February 2015, use-of-force events also known as "response to resistance" events fell 53 percent amongst officers with...
Words: 970 - Pages: 4
...In light of recent events, tensions amongst American citizens and police officers have risen due to the alleged use of excessive force and the unjust shootings of African Americans. In the aftermath of such incidents, the integrity of police officers has been called into question, raising the issue of whether or not police should wear body cameras. With increasingly widespread reports of such incidents, it is clear that body cameras do need to be implemented into police forces in order to restore public confidence in police officers. On the 17th of July 2014, Eric Garner was approached by NYPD police officers, on the suspicion of selling cigarettes without tax stamps. Garner responded by saying that he would not be harassed and that he...
Words: 1806 - Pages: 8
...Con Side of Debate Summary As discussed on the pro side of my team’s debate about police officers wearing a body camera at all times, as we find ourselves going back in time with the racial tensions growing ever higher in America. My team and I have debated the arming of police officers with body camera’s, although there were many positive points to this action there are just as many negative points that could draw concern and force future studies before deciding this is for sure the way ahead for our police officers in today’s environment. With all the concerns one of the biggest that we all tended to agree on is the human factor, when the police are armed with a body camera someone would have to turn it on and turn it off so again if for some reason the officer camera wasn’t working then the argument would be made that the camera was deliberately turned off to hide something. One course of action to counter this was suggested that it would be like a time clock when the officer came on duty someone would key the camera on and then it wouldn’t be turned off until the end of the shift. Another concern that would have to be figured out was how here in America it seems we all come up with and have great idea’s but as soon as we are told that our taxes are going up to pay for this then everyone tends to back away from the idea. As we stop and think about most of the major crimes in America it seems most occur in the darkness of the night, so one of the biggest hurdles I think...
Words: 612 - Pages: 3
...Police brutality has been a huge issue in the U.S. going on for many years now, millions have died due to police officers, and majority of the time the police claim they did their duty rightfully. Who is there to blame other than the citizen killed by an officer when there were no witness accounts, and the police officer acted dramatically in killing a citizen, whom didn’t do anything to be killed? Being a very controversial subject, America has always wanted to find ways to fix the problem. Police have already obtained dashboard cameras but is that enough? For the past few years, the dashboard cameras have been some help on catching police brutality. But what about body cameras? Would they make a better more positive impact in the police...
Words: 2190 - Pages: 9
...excessive police is posed almost weekly in news outlets. Since the first of this year, one thousand and 4 people have been killed by police in our country. This number will probably change by the time I give my speech. USA Today reported that excessive force by law enforcement has gone up 25 percent since 2001. Tension is rising at an alarming rate, and something must be done to restore faith in our police officers. This strain is causing mistrust for the good police officers that are trying to protect our country. I believe widespread use of police body cameras would help our country start trusting our law enforcement again, and decrease violence against citizens and police alike. Tension is rising at an alarming rate, and something must be done to restore faith in our police officers. Having police wear tiny pocket cameras on duty would add a sense of transparency with law enforcement and their interactions with the public. There is a lot of guessing at what happened in some instances, most notably in last years cases of Mike Brown and Eric Garner which a lot of people believe the police officers could have handled differently. Having body cameras could solve situations like that, as it will give more insight as to what happened. It will also allow for us to stop relying on cellphone recordings in cases,...
Words: 727 - Pages: 3
...Police Officers Wear Body Cameras: Pro or Con? Should police officers wear cameras while on duty to document their activities? The body camera is intended to provide an accurate, objective view of every event with a civilian. In an ideal situation, the camera would provide evidence of or discourage police misconduct while protecting officers against unfounded complaints of brutality or corruption. When unnamed black teenager Michael Brown was fatally shot by police, there was no body camera footage available. His death was followed by weeks of riots in the streets of Ferguson, Missouri and started the national debate about police conduct particularly when it involved Africa-Americans. While some witnesses to the events that evening support the officers account of self-defense, others argue that Michael...
Words: 1167 - Pages: 5
...Future of Policing Proposal Team Alpha CJA/214 June 03, 2014 Robert Gasior Policing in this day and age is not about just keeping the peace in the community. Officers have numerous responsibilities and have an abundance of new technology at their finger- tips. The technology that we have now helps the officers perform at a higher level, when it comes to crime solving, communication, making communities, and decreasing crime levels. GPS tracking and Biometrics are two very useful technologies that allow the officers of the law to catch more criminals and solve crimes a lot quicker and more efficiently. These two specific technologies allow law enforcement to catch more criminals and solve cases a lot quicker. GPS tracking systems are some of the most advanced technology that has come into play for law enforcement in this day and age. In the past, officers would have the tedious job of following criminals on foot for days or even months at a time ("GPS Tracking for Law Enforcement", 2013). Officers now have GPS tracking technology, and that allows them to monitor potential suspects actions and movements by remote in almost real time from practically anywhere by a computer that his hooked up to the internet. Officers are able to also monitor them by using an IPhone, Samsung Galaxy, and even IPad. This incredible technology will permit law enforcement to dedicate more of their valuable time, resources, and money by resolving crimes that individuals commit a lot faster...
Words: 1265 - Pages: 6
...http://nlcatp.org/9-critical-pros-and-cons-of-constitutional-monarchy/ Next Amaryllis will improve the children and education.Amaryllis will use Japan's educational system; which starts children off in early childhood education at the age three; next they will move up to primary school, which are for ages six through twelve. Then they will move on to lower secondary...
Words: 611 - Pages: 3
...Joey Nguyen ELA 11 Period 1 5/15/17 Police Brutality: Throughout history, the relationship between police officers and citizens of the United States has been at a steady decline. There have been countless cases of police officers injuring civilians ranging from minor bruises to fatal incidents. Regardless of the magnitude of their injuries, it’s police brutality and it’s unnecessary to maintain order. Police brutality is the use of extra or excessive force by police that results in injury, hospitalization, or death of civilians. In the United States, events of police injuring civilians have appeared more often and have become more serious as time progressed. Police officers have the power to enforce the law and protect citizens, but they...
Words: 1344 - Pages: 6
...database management software, computers, automobiles, and weapons. The adoption and implementation of technology also directly shapes the policies and practices of the justice system. For example, the development of modern communications and transportation technologies in the early 1900s increased the response capability of police and changed citizen calls for service. Computers and cellular technologies have increased the capacity of data processing, information sharing, and communications within and across agencies. The increasing societal dependence on the Internet and computer-mediated communications have led law enforcement to develop tools to investigate offenses online. Thus, technology plays a pivotal role in the justice system, though a majority of researchers focus on the implementation and effect of technologies in law enforcement agencies. Over the last several decades’ technology has evolved in ways that most would never have imagined. Technology used to be something only seen in movies or The Jetson’s. Today, technology is used to operate in nearly everything we do throughout the day. The increased use of technology offers many pros and cons, when it comes to the criminal justice system, it can greatly impact and/or seriously hinder all in one scenario. New technology can drastically improve and expand our current limitations within law enforcement. Technology has the ability to offer broader searches for criminals, look deeper at the molecular levels of DNA...
Words: 1335 - Pages: 6
