...well we all know that psychology is derieved from a greek word psche and logos... psyche means soul and logos means study... the term psychology basically means study of soul. but the psychologist in earlies time got no perticular proof or defination to define psychology because the term soul was not pratical and no one could actually define about how it looks and where is it located so the terms study of soul was not reffred to psuchology any more later the psychology was termed as the study of mind but again the same problem arised as the term mind was not practical in terms of explanaiton... later after much efforts psychologists togather gave a simpler defination to psychology that is study of conative cognativee and affective behaviour of man and animal which are concious and unconcious. the common goals of psychology are: 1. to describe the behavious of people and other spices. 2.to ifnd the causes of behaviour. 3.to predict about how people will behave in certain situations or cicumstances. 4.to influence the behaviour of people by identifying its causes. 5.to appply psychological knowledege in differant way to enhance the huma life.. we have known a lot aout the goals of psychology now lets go little deep into it and know what is the scope of it.. the scope of psychology is really very wide... there are two branches of psychology.. 1.pure psychology and 2.applies psychology! *pure psychology: this part of psychology is intrested in the progress of psychological...
Words: 476 - Pages: 2
...Abstract The social context from which the earliest psychologists emerge worked to keep women uneducated and at home, operating under the belief that women were inferior to men. When women challenged the Zeitgeist and chose careers as psychologists, society responded by pushing them into low-end careers, usually doing jobs that were similar to the domestic activities accepted as the women’s sphere, and often jobs that resisted any notoriety. Despite these social forces, however, women did pursue their careers as psychologists and they often succeeded, making significant contributions to the field. In studying the history of psychology, one might wonder, where the women are. Have they been left out of psychology’s history because they did not contribute remarkable and noteworthy work; or was it that women did not achieve adequate prominence so as to rank with men? Whatever the circumstances may be, the scarcity of women in psychology’s textbooks does not accurately represent women’s contributions to the field. The exclusion of women and their work has been reduced to the belief that women have not contributed significantly to psychology; therefore, directed society to disregard their definite participation, thus reinforcing the initial belief that women have played no eminent role in psychology. Women have in fact been present and active in psychology since its beginnings, but for a variety of reasons women and their work have been largely invisible to psychology as a whole...
Words: 1746 - Pages: 7
...HUBUNGAN ANTARA PERSEPSI DUKUNGAN ORGANISASI DAN PERILAKU INOVATIF DI TEMPAT KERJA PADA KARYAWAN (Studi Pada PT. X) Yuki Gradiannisa¹* dan Alice Salendu Falkutas Psikologi, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia *E-mail: yuki.gradiannisa@gmail.com Abstrak Penelitian ini dirancang untuk melihat hubungan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi dan perilaku inovatif di tempat kerja pada karyawan di PT. X. Penelitian ini dilakukan di salah satu perusahaan tambang batu bara terbesar di Indonesia, terutama sebagai sebuah perusahaan yang melibatkan inovasi sebagai salah satu nilai perusahaan. Jumlah partisipan yang berpartisipasi adalah sebanyak 88 karyawan. Karakteristik partisipan yang disyaratkan dalam penelitian ini adalah memiliki lebih dari satu tahun masa kerja di perusahaan. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan kuesioner untuk kedua variabel. Perilaku inovatif diukur dengan menggunakan Innovative Work Behavior Scale yang dikembangkan oleh Janssen (2000) dan persepsi dukungan organisasi diukur dengan menggunakan SPOS (Survey of Perceived Organizational Support) yang dikembangkan oleh Eisenberger, Huntington, Hutchison, dan Sowa (1986). Hasil utama dalam penelitian ini menemukan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi dan perilaku inovatif dalam bekerja (r = .369 ; p < .01 (2-tailed)). Kedua variabel memiliki hubungan yang positif. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut maka ditunjukkan bahwa kenaikan skor pada persepsi dukungan organisasi, skor pada perilaku...
Words: 6687 - Pages: 27