Free Essay

Renaissance Prince

In:

Submitted By alaporta95
Words 649
Pages 3
How can a man, who played a part in the murders of 60,000 people, possibly be considered a “renaissance prince”? Those who ask this question are truly unaware of the definition of the said term. A ruler who is well educated, religious, and culturally diverse thoroughly qualifies for the title “renaissance prince”. Ivan the Terrible’s reign over Russian was full of contradiction, success and failure, but this has nothing to do with the unstable ruler being declared the aforementioned title. “Ivan himself characterized the “terrible” ruler” (Cherniavsky). Murdering thousands of people is most definitely a horrible thing to do, but doing so doesn’t disqualify a leader from falling under the definition of a “renaissance prince”. Ivan the Terrible’s interest in religion, culture, and education all help prove the point that the ruthless tsar was indeed, a “renaissance prince.”
As I mentioned earlier, being a “renaissance prince” had nothing to do with being a sane person, or having moral values. Religion played a major role in the definition of a “renaissance prince”, and coincidentally Ivan the Terrible was an extremely religious man. Ivan was a devout Christian, and had a huge adoration to God. Ivan ordered reforms to be made that would help further the growth of Christianity in Russia. Ivan would sometimes “go into fits of religious devotion, confessing his sins or banging his head against the floor with the same eagerness that he showed when slicing open live birds” (http://blog.lingualift.com/ivan-the-terrible/). He would also go to church and pray for the souls of the countless victims he murdered. “The image of the medieval rules was a consequence of his functions, and these, ideally, were quite simple - to render justice and defend the faith. His justice depended upon his closeness to God, and his defense of the faith upon his piety” (Cherniavsky). Ivan’s passion of religion not only helped unite Russia, but it also helps prove the fact that he is undeniably a “renaissance prince”.
Another trait of a “renaissance prince” was that a prince had to be well educated. Ivan the Terrible was an extremely intelligent, and skilled individual. Ivan was very smart when he was a young child, and he also loved to read. “The nineteen year-old ivan’s wisdom was certified by “Greek philosophers and Latin doctors” (Cherniavsky). At the time, it was not necessary for the elite to know more than how to read, and how write, but Ivan was literate in every sense of the word. Although he enjoyed doing strange things as a child, such as torturing, and killing animals, Ivan still gained an interest in literature and music. When Ivan grew older, people believed he was the most educated man in all of Russian. Ivan also had an extreme interest in the culture of Russia. His main goal as tsar was to ultimately make Russia powerful, and he did this in a vast number of ways. “He was responsible for centralizing the administration of Russia and expanding the boundaries of the Russian empire. He also established the empire in Siberia and promoted trade with various European countries, including England, France and Holland” (http://www.tristarmedia.com/bestofrussia/ivan.html) Ivan’s ability to read and write, combined with a passion for Russian culture, confirm that he truly does have the core traits of a “renaissance prince.” As you can see, Ivan the Terrible surely fits the bill of a “renaissance prince”. Ivan holds all of the qualities needed to be considered a “renaissance prince”, and these traits all impacted his reign over Russia in one way or another. Although Ivan ruthlessly murdered thousands of people, his reign established the current Russian territory, and centralized government for centuries to come. Ivan’s interest in religion, education, and Russian culture provide us with the answer to a highly controversial question, that yes, Ivan the Terrible, was a “renaissance prince.”

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Comparing Humanist Ideals In The Book Of The Courtier And The Prince

...In keeping with the themes of the Renaissance, Machiavelli recommended that a prince appear outwardly to be a shining example of virtue; that he was, in fact a deceitful and ruthless creature of vice ought to be carefully concealed. The Prince demonstrate roots in the fundamental principles of humanism however it explores humanist ideals as a tool to keep power rather than as a virtue in their own right. However when considering Machiavelli’s life and circumstances in addition to humanist ethics, the concepts expressed in The Prince can be easily explained. Machiavelli’s advice on how a prince should strive to appear to his subjects aligns almost perfectly with humanist values. In theory humanists placed importance on individual virtue and betterment, but oftentimes the mere appearance of such qualities was the true desire. The Book of the Courtier and The Prince are both books about power dynamics in Renaissance Italy. One focuses almost entirely on gaining power while the other is largely about maintaining it, but their basic ideas about the appearance which one must keep were the eerily similar. If a courtier was not a good writer he should “take pains to suppress his work, to avoid...

Words: 667 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Who Is Machiavelli's The Prince?

...The Prince illustrates the increasingly secular outlook of the Renaissance by describing the fortunes that were acquired during those times as a result of dubious politics. These fortunes are directed towards Lorenzo Medici, the prince this book is dedicated too, which basically is like a guidebook for how to be the greatest prince in all the land. Not only does The Prince describe the fortunes of the Renaissance, but also how to acquire these fortunes with strength and power. An important aspect of the Renaissance was the introduction of humanism, which is the belief that human beings are worthy of scrutiny and are genuinely good creatures with potential value. By reading The Prince, I felt that the sinister tactics of gaining absolute power...

Words: 815 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Castiglione Vs Machiavelli

...The Book of the Courtier and The Prince were books that explained how to be a Prince, a Courtier, or a well-rounded man. Castiglione and Machiavelli were Florentine and grew up in the same time but they ended up on different sides of the spectrum. They both wrote their books during the same time during the Renaissance. Both were well educated for their time and they were the beginning of the emergence of the middle class. Growing up both their families had money and freedom that allowed them to become educated and enabled them to achieve their own success. Machiavelli and Castiglione believed in your own arms, meaning they will do what they have to do with their military to stay strong as a country. Castiglione and Machiavelli had some similarities but most things were very different. Machiavelli and Castiglione believe that the Prince and Courtier should appear good but Machiavelli believed that doing evil to achieve goals was perfectly fine. Castiglione believed in human potential and the ability of a man to improve himself. Machiavelli believed that the end result is all that mattered and how you got there...

Words: 944 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Machi

...Born on May 3, 1469, in Florence, Italy, Niccolò Machiavelli was a diplomat for 14 years in Italy's Florentine Republic during the Medici family's exile. When the Medici family came back to power in 1512, Machiavelli was dismissed and briefly imprisoned. Machiavelli as an individual has been described as aloof, as standing to one side of life ‘with a sarcastic expression continually playing around his mouth and winking from his eyes’. This report is based on Machiavelli’s most famous work, The Prince, which was written in 1513-14.  While The Prince was not the foremost book of this kind, it was the first to propose a government that dominates with no respect for religious belief or morality.  Machiavelli did not particularly pay heed to religious law in the manner he lived his life, but he likewise did not particularly care for the Catholic Church of the time because of the lack of ethics demonstrated by the Pope's and other supposedly "religious men's" actions at the time.  The Prince, a handbook for politicians on the employment of ruthless, self-serving cunning, inspiring the term "Machiavellian" and establishing Machiavelli as the "father of modern political theory."(History.com) There are many types of leaderships that after being present over the centuries. Leadership styles have developed over time, with a prominent shift from the autocratic and directive leadership in the twentieth century to a more participative and democratic style of the younger generation. These changes...

Words: 1345 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Week 3 Questionnaire

...Week 3 Questionnaire Britney Galarza, Daniel Moffett, Angela Holbert, David Schownir ENG/106 Nov. 24, 2014 Jason Faulkner Week 3 Questionnaire 1. ------------------------------------------------- Machiavelli provides highly pragmatic advice to leaders in The Prince. How does this advice typify the period's overall worldview? Provide examples to support your response. How has this work influenced worldviews today? The Prince outlines several diplomatic and political strategies that underline a need to fulfill the single patriotic goal of uniting one’s country. Some of Machiavelli’s advice, however, suggests that the end justifies the means. Chapter 18, How a Prince Should Keep His Word, nearly states the opposite of what its title implies. Machiavelli goes on to tell how manipulation, breaking promises, and lying are acceptable political actions because “since men are a contemptible lot, and would not keep their promises to you, you too need not keep yours to them.” This idea of betrayal for the greater good, however effective, has been vilified and shunned in modern politics. Breaking treaties, manipulation, and leading through force are the trademarks of a dictator and should be avoided if one wants to compete in the modern political scene. 2. ------------------------------------------------- John Milton's Paradise Lost is a Protestant epic. Dante's Divine Comedy was a Catholic epic. How do you think the faiths and periods of the two poets shape the differences...

Words: 779 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Did Machiavelli Influence On Religion

...Machiavelli's The Prince was one of the principal humanist works of the Renaissance. Without a doubt it is a gem, an artistic perfect work of art of sorts. However this work has been energetically discussed throughout the hundreds of years and stays a standout amongst the most dubious bits of composing today. Albeit numerous commentators consider The Prince a parody, just an endeavor to uncover the issues with the decision class, most observe Machiavelli's work as a genuine endeavor to lay the basis for the reunification of Italy under the Medici group of Florence. Machiavelli's thought that the model sovereign ought to utilize an assortment of strategies to secure his energy specifically that the end legitimizes the methods is the most questionable...

Words: 411 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Good Leadertship

...Leadership A good leader is only as good as the qualities he possess, the advisors he surrounds himself with, and if he carries out his role properly. It is a leader’s role to benefit the people he is ruling; by making society a peaceful, organized, and flourishing place to lead a productive life. A good leader will consult and seek advice from his advisors, whose job it is to council the leader in matters concerning his leadership. During the Renaissance, in the fifteenth century, there were many scholars and royal advisors that depicted what a leader should be like and how a leader actually was during the Renaissance. There were many leaders that failed to carry out their roles properly by ignoring the advice of their advisors and by neglecting their role as leaders to fulfill their own selfish needs, as will be discussed through Thomas More’s book Utopia. A great leader is one who rules to benefit his people and puts aside any selfish intentions. He does not seek to increase his wealth and power at the expense of his people. This however, was not the case in the time of Thomas More during the fifteenth century. Thomas More served as the chancellor to the King of England, he was also a civic humanist and wrote the book Utopia. In his book Utopia his character Raphael Hythlodaeus, a great scholar, described how the kings were not good rulers and that he would not serve on the court of such kings as it says, “Most kings are more interested in the science of war…than in useful...

Words: 1614 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

...begun to change in terms of the way of thinking as it pertains to governing a state. An Italian author, Niccolò Machiavelli introduced his way of thinking by writing The Prince, which is often interpreted as a way to rule, or not to rule. He uses humanism to back up his views on how governing should be handled. Of course, the book was rejected by the Catholic Church, which believed in divine authority. In The Prince, Machiavelli expresses that people are actually responsible for their own actions rather than supernatural forces. This form of humanism was the beginning of the breaking away from the dogma of the Catholic Church. According to (Hunt, Martin and Rosenwein 459), Humanism originated during The Renaissance in Italy amongst highly educated individuals attached to the personal households of prominent rulers. It is defined as “a system of...

Words: 806 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Did The Renaissance Affect Society

...The renaissance(1) was an era meaning "rebirth", that took place from approx. 1300 to 1600. The renaissance was named the "rebirth" because it was the period of regeneration and prosperity after the black death plagued much of Europe. The Black Death(2) was a plague that decreased the European population a substantial amount. The population decrease led to the social ladder being dismantled and the wealthy had no way to show their social status. Therefore, knowledge and ownership of fine art became very popular amongst the higher class, as they were trying to distinguish themselves in society. With the renaissance came also, an acknowledgement of secular(3) humanitarianism, (the idea that worldly things such as science, philosophy, etc. were...

Words: 260 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

World History

...With the short answers, you will be expected to write a paragraph answering one or more questions posed to you. a. Describe the importance of the individual in Renaissance humanist thought. Humanism, an educational and philosophical outlook that emphasizes the personal worth of the individual and the central importance of human values as opposed to religious belief, developed in Europe during the Renaissance, influenced by the study of ancient Greek and Latin literature and philosophy. Humanists believed that people should enjoy life on earth, and question the bible while interpreting how they wish. Humanism was more independent from the Roman Catholic Church, and allowed people to think about other things rather than just Religion. In art, music, philosophy, and political theory, the new emphasis was on what was human; hence the word humanism has come to describe much of the Italian Renaissance This effected the Renaissance Worldview because people of the time started to believe more in Humanist ideas and life on earth rather than just working to death, just to go to heaven. Or Individualism. People thought it right to be themselves - the great man can shape his own destiny. Humans are the center of the universe and the "measure of all things." Humans could do well at many things: "The Renaissance Man." Humans began to have a questioning attitude and challenged tradition and authority. They believed life on earth was more important than the afterlife. There was greater...

Words: 1099 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ap European - Renaissance and Discovery

...Renaissance and Discovery (pg 317-349)   1) Jacob Burckhardt’s interpretation of the Renaissance in the 14th and 15th century, was that through the revival of ancient learning, new secular and scientific values began to supplant traditional religious beliefs. Some scholars believe that Burckhardt’s description was too modernizing and accused him of overlooking the continuity of the Renaissance and the Middle ages. His critics especially stress the still strongly Christian character of Renaissance humanism. 2) The term of Renaissance in fifteenth and sixteenth- century Italy meant “re-birth” or “revival”. In the 14th century many Italian scholars believed that the arts had been declining in quality for 1,000 years. They admired the art and writing of the Classical Age (400 B.C.-A.D. 400), the time of the Greek and Roman empires. To revive the glory and grandeur of the ancient past, these scholars eagerly studied classical literature, architecture, and sculpture. 3) Renaissance humanism is simply the focusing on the individual and learning. Before the Renaissance, people of Europe focused on the city-states and the knowledge they had attained before not worrying what new knowledge was out there. Then came the Renaissance and brought focus to those things. 4) The Renaissance was a break from the Middle Ages because it brought new ideas and new ways of thinking into society, but without the Middle Ages (medieval civilization), the Renaissance wouldn’t have...

Words: 737 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Masaccio Charts In The Renaissance

...In the Renaissance, Masaccio brought Giotto had begun, back to light which was the monumental figures, a realistic relationship between figures and landscape, and visual representation of the laws of perspective. With all of this, a new realistic of painting was conformed. His massive, three-dimensional human figures inspired other Florentine painters. Other Florentine painters adopted and changed this new Renaissance style. With this development growing, the experiment went in two directions. One stressed the mathematical side, working out the laws of perspective and the organization of outdoor space and light by geometry and perspective. And the second stressed the investigation of movement and anatomical structure. The realistic portrayal...

Words: 1057 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Machiavelli's Support Of The Florentine Republic

...The political setting of this time was quite against those who held views like Machiavelli. From the personal perspective of Machiavelli, he had just been imprisoned and tortured for his views after serving 14 years as Secretary to the Second Chancery. This was not uncommon at the time and The Prince can be seen as Machiavelli’s response to what has happened to him. Machiavelli had lost his livelihood because of the restoration of the Medici’s’ and his support of the Florentine Republic, which is far away from how it is in today’s society. During this time, Florence and Italy were mainly ruled by conquest with military force. The five major powers at the time were the Kingdom of Naples, the Papal States, Florence, Venice and Milan; Florence...

Words: 368 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Ren History

...Machiavelli was an Italian politician, historian, and author of The Prince, a novel written in 1513 about the rise to political power and maintaining political power. Through Machiavelli’s text we gain insight to politics during the Renaissance and learn Machiavelli’s thoughts on what makes a good leader. Even though the book was written in specific after Machiavelli had been tortured for a week as a prisoner after the fall of the Florentine Republic, we still use The Prince as a foundation for political theory as the book transcends historical moments. By comparing The Prince to Jacob Burckhardt, analyzing Machiavelli’s principles, and looking into Machiavelli’s notion of virtù we are able to better comprehend the Italian Renaissance and how an article written for a specific historical moment can still be used as a political foundation. Jacob Burckhardt was a historian of art and culture and the author of, “The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy,” which laid the foundation for our understanding of the renaissance. Now how does that play into the text, The Prince? Burckhardt brought to light two main concepts that play defining roles in what we understand of the renaissance. The first of these two concepts is individuality. Up until the 14th century, at the beginning of the Italian Renaissance, people didn’t view themselves as individuals and therefore didn’t identify in an individualistic light. Before the Renaissance people always identified as a part of something bigger such...

Words: 1353 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Machiavelli's The Prince

...The time of the Renaissance, a period filled with growth of intellect, beauty of nature, the dignity of mankind, and the rising of artists. A representation of the Renaissance is the move from the move of scholasticism, a devotion specifically for the theological and philosophical teachings of the Church, to humanism, a devotion to the humanities of rhetoric, arithmetic, and other subjects. An example of this movement, as seen in Machiavelli’s The Prince, which describes Niccolo Machiavelli’s ideal ruler and how to obtain stability as it was lacking during the time he was writing this due to a power shift from the Mediterranean to Northern Europe. While Machiavelli promotes stability, he has a disordered love towards his country as he promotes...

Words: 779 - Pages: 4