Premium Essay

Rule Of Law In Australia

Submitted By
Words 544
Pages 3
showcases the importance that is attached to the appearance of judicial independence.
The Rule of law is possibly the most fundamental proposition in law. In Australian public law, the rule of law operates as an underlying principle of legality that constrains government action. The rule of law is based on the simple premise that the law rules government, in that the law is one method of government that rules all the others. However, this idea is neither as black and white nor as clear as it may seem. In order to understand it further, the initial step would be to explore what function the rule of law serves. In its most basic form, the rule of law is the principle that no one is above the law. This basic idea was well expounded by Oxford Scholar, Albert Venn Dicey, at the end of the 19th century. Dicey developed a three-part definition. Firstly, he sated that it means the absolute supremacy or predominance of regular law as opposed to the influence of arbitrary power. Secondly, it means equality before the law and thirdly, that the law of the constitution are not the source, but the consequence of the rights of individuals, as defined and enforced by the courts . Ultimately, based on Dicey’s definition, the rule of law serves the function of providing the most secure means of protecting each citizen from the arbitrary will of every other. The law forms …show more content…
His list includes certain mechanisms that he deems important such as an independent judiciary, a limited form of legislative and administrative review, open and fair hearings, accessible justice, and laws that are prospective, open, clear, public, certain and relatively stable . Based on the list, Raz believes that there is essentially no connection between the law and morality. Furthermore, that the law should be balanced with other values as opposed to always trumping

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Australia's Adversarial System

...In Australia, the system of law that is used is called the adversarial law, this system was first used in England and this system is furthermost used by countries that were settled by the British. Another system of law used around the world is called the inquisitorial system and it is greatly debated that Australia should be using this system. However, because of the several advantages the adversarial system has for providing to the principles of the rule of law it should be shown that this system of law is better served for Australia. In Australia everyone is to be subjected to the law. The Rule of Law is the legal principle that governs Australia, it implies that all persons including the law makers are subject to the law, the law should...

Words: 657 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Separation Of Powers In Australia Case Study

...Legal Studies Essay ‘Discuss the importance of the separation of powers in upholding the rule of law in Australia.’ Upholding the rule of law in Australia retains an importance with confiding in the separation of powers, this can certainly be explored through the relationship between the Magna Carta and the legal concept of the Habeas corpus and the understanding of the separation in powers and how they uphold the rule of law. The relationship between The Magna Carta and the legal concept of Habeas Corpus is of close proportions as the Habeas Corpus roots from the 17th century adding a greater advancement in legal times toward the Magna Carta which was contextually developed in June 15, 1215, which King John set as a guarantee to all...

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Bernard Finnigan's Rule Of Law

...The rule of Law establishes the way Australia is governed. The law should be applied to all people equally and fairly, no matter what race, gender or age. Within Australia people have the right to a fair trial and are judged by their peers. They also have the right to be told what the law means so that it is certain and clear for all people equally no matter their cultural background, religious or economic status. In Australia the rule of law allows all people to have independent legal advice and to be presumed innocent and to have a fair and public trial. Within society, all people should be treated with respect and dignity and all states must follow their legal obligations. In the Bernard Finnigan case there were several aspects of the Rule of Law that were upheld. Finnigan was clear and certain as to what the law meant and would have known that he was committing an offence. Although in court his defense lawyer, Michael Abbott was suggesting that Finnigan wasn’t deliberately searching for the illegal content. It was clear in the article that the law was...

Words: 592 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Australia Law Resources

...This essay tend to discuss this issue ' all laws in Australia are made by the federal parliament' . Based on the English legal system, the Australian legal system is known as a common law legal system, which are in widespread use, particularly in England. Under such a legal system, the law is derived from the courts and parliament. From the two sources of law making, this essay will relate the role of parliament in making laws, the division of law making powers in a federal system, the role of the common law in making laws to show how various parliaments and courts share the role of making law. Lastly, it will illustrate the relationship between the courts and parliament. Legislating is one of the important functions of parliament so parliament is one of the main primary sources of law in Australia. Section 1 of chapter 1 of the Australian Constitution defines the federal Parliament’s power to make laws: 'The legislative power of the Commonwealth shall be vested in a Federal Parliament' (Parliamentary Education Office, 2010). Thus, parliaments have the power to make new laws and update old laws and the laws made by parliament are called Acts of Parliament, statutes or legislation. The systems of laws in each State are influential on each other, but not binding. Laws passed by the Parliament of Australia apply to the whole of Australia. The distribution of law-making powers between the Commonwealth and the six States is often referred to as the division of powers. The Constitution...

Words: 841 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Inquisitorial System In Australia

...In Australia the legal system that is used is called the adversarial system In Australia everyone is to be subjected to the law. The Rule of Law is the legal principle that governs Australia, it implies that all persons including the law makers are subject to the law, the law should be justly, and fair and all persons have to willingly and equally abide by it (RoLIA 2015). The legal system that is used in Australia is called the Adversarial system, in this system there are two opposing sides, with each trying to prove the other wrong (Law Institute Victoria 2013). The adversarial system has many features including the role that the judge has at hearings. The judge acts as an impartial and individual participant (Law institute Victoria 2013), their primary role is to adjudicate rather than participate in the disputes (Creighton 1999). The adversary system...

Words: 499 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Bus 378 International Commercial Law and International Business Transactions

...International Commercial Law and International Business Transactions Bristan Keller BUS 378 International Business Law Ashford University Instructor Jumper May 5, 2014 International Commercial Law and International Business Transactions In recent years, various conflicts of law have been identified regarding commercial law and international business transactions. In most cases, there are procedures to follow when a conflict of law comes into play. In others, much is open to interpretation and can be argued in favor of all parties. Normally if this happens, mediation is sought after and all parties compromise upon agreeable terms. Though there are various issues, international commercial law affects international business transactions and strategies through combining common law, international policies, and international organizations. In 2001 the Brussels Convention of 1968 was replaced with the Brussels I Regulation. This has been the topic of many debates as it governs cross-border disputes in civil matter and commercial matters in the European Union (EU). The Brussels I Regulation establishes rules regarding international jurisdictions of courts in addition to enforcing foreign judgments. The regulation was revised in 2007 and publicized in the Heidelberg Report. “It became apparent that the question of possible inclusion of arbitration in the scope of the Regulation would be a controversial question during the revision process.” (Hauberg, 2014) Theoretically...

Words: 2879 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Law Balancing Competing Interests in Corporate Contracts

...LAW BALANCING COMPETING INTERESTS IN CORPORATE CONTRACTS I. Introduction As an abstract entity, a company can enter into contracts[1] only as a principal through the actions of a natural person (agent) exercising powers within the company’s express or implied authority.[2] Since outsiders and shareholders rarely transact directly, the agent may act opportunistically for their personal benefit.[3] Therefore, the appropriate objective of the law may be balancing in allocations of the risk of fraud and the costs of its avoidance.[4] In other terms, the rule must balance between the business convenience[5] for the outsider and commercial morality factors[6] to prevent fraud.[7] This essay attempts to answer whether the Australian law has got the balance right by analysing the issues relating to remained uncertainties in current statutory provisions. II. Innocent Parties According to the general law of agency, the contract will not bind the company if its agent or organ enters into the contract without actual or apparent authority.[8] This may have harsh outcomes for the outsider who may suffer significant loss (e.g. cases of loan transactions). Therefore, outsiders are always in risky position because of uncertainty of the agent’s authority to enter the contract and unawareness of company’s internal irregularities. On the other hand, if the contract would be binding to the company, the shareholders, who have not authorised the agent to enter into that contract...

Words: 2541 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Business Law in Australia

...I hope you've been well. I have done some research after receiving your mail last week regarding some questions of the postal rule of acceptance and the case of Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353. After researching those issues, and based on acceptance set out below, I believe that you will obtain some exact concepts of acceptance on the contract. Thus, I will explain the postal acceptance rule and whether it still operates in Australia or not, discuss how businesses generally modify the postal acceptance rule, and conclude the case of Masters v Cameron more fully below as I understand them. * Postal Acceptance Rule The postal acceptance rule or the mailbox rule, created in 1818, is a term of common law contracts and affect communication of acceptance. It is defined as acceptance by post has been requested or use an appropriate and reasonable means of communication between the parties, then acceptance is taken effect immediately upon the letter posted. This rule determines the timing of acceptance of an offer when mail is concerned as the medium of acceptance. The general principle is that a contract is formed when acceptance is actually communicated to the offeror. Thus, an offer made by letter is not effective until or unless received by the offeree. Acceptance is effective as soon as it is posted. The major case in the postal acceptance rule is Adams v Lindsell (1818) B & Ald 681 that a contract was formed when the acceptance letter was posted. As the case described...

Words: 2457 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Australian Administrative Law Analysis

...Question: “Administrative law doctrine is an accumulation - a wilderness almost - of single instances, most cases turning ultimately on fine and often unique points of statutory interpretation or factual analysis.” McMillan – ‘The Role of Judicial Review in Australian Administrative Law’ AIAL Forum No.30, 47. The above quote suggests that judicial review in Australia is not based on any general principles which are capable of guiding judicial decision making or of being used to impose a coherent vision of the role of judicial review on the cases. Do you agree? Analyse the law relating to standing and access to the courts plus one of the following areas of law in order to demonstrate the extent to which the above quote...

Words: 2275 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Legt1710 Assignment 1

...interpretations for what common law is. The most common expression can be interpreted as the combination of statute law, which is created by State and Federal parliaments and other government bodies which is known as delegated legislation, and judge made law, which is written by judges in courts. The common law system originally developed in England and later being inherited by Australia in 1788. However, statute law always overrules common law when there is a clash between them. In addition, the common law can be further classified into two aspects, civil law and criminal law. “Civil law involves matters between person and person regarding the enforcement of rights and the carrying out of obligations” while civil case only results in compensations for the person who wins and liabilities for the person who lost. On the other side, criminal law contains all statute and case law in conducting a certain offence. It is enforced by government and concerned on punishment. Furthermore, with the growing concern over the inflexibility and rigidity of common law, equity has been developed by the Court of Chancery as the supplement of common law rules and procedures in two types of equitable remedies: injunction and specific performance. However, equity does not apply to criminal law as it only focuses on remedies and money damages. The main function of judges is to interpret and apply the law to each case. However, judicial decisions made by judge are able to change the law as well. For example...

Words: 1001 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Australiamarketing

...829 15-64 years: male 7,532,611, female 7,326,120 65 years and over: male 1,451,869, female 1,707,744 _In Australia, for couple families with two incomes, the median income for those with children was $2,310 and those without children was $2,081. _Literacy level: Australia has a very high literacy rate. About 99% of Australians are literate. 99% male and 99% female are literate. 2. Market: _ Product “Sorbent” toilet tissues (50 cents/roll), a brand name run by the SCA Hygiene Australasia Consumer. On average, well over 5 million rolls of Sorbent are sold in Australia and New Zealand every week, enough tissue to go more than twice around the world. 3. Retailers: _Woolworth is the largest supermarket/grocery chain in Australia, owns by Woolworth Limited. Woolworths Limited is the largest retail company in Australia. _Woolworth has more than 3,000 stores across Australia that sell food, liquor petrol, general merchandise, home improvement and hotels. The company serves 24 million customers each week and is a committed business partner of many thousands local farmers, producers and manufactures. The company also offer shopping online for customers called “Homeshop”, it allows users to purchase their groceries online and have them delivered to their front door. 4. E-commerce: _Online marketing would be viable as a channel into Australia because Australia is a developed country where people use technology every day and internet is a common part of their lives,...

Words: 696 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Tabl Major Assignment

...Introduction The familial relationship between parties Choy (“C”), Maggie (“M”) and Billy (“B”) establish issues to whether there is intent to enter into a legal relationship. Also, C’s promise for an extra $20 000 must be determined as to whether it is fair consideration. When C returns, he pays the $30 000 only. This outcome may lead to inequity, and thus the doctrine of promissory estoppel may apply. To determine whether Billy is entitled to the extra $20 000 and a share of the property, we need to examine whether a legally binding contract exists, whether the subsequent consideration of $20 000 is good consideration, and whether the doctrine of promissory estoppel applies. Is there a contract? For B to be entitled to the extra $20 000 and a share of the property, it must be determined that a legally enforceable contract existed between C and B. To determine whether a contract exists, the following essential elements of a contract can be examined: intention to be legally bound, offer, acceptance, and consideration. For a contract to exist, there also must legal capacity, genuine consent and legality of purpose, however these are not relevant to the case. In order for a contract to exist, there must be evidence that all parties had intended to enter into a legally binding contract. The facts in this case suggests that due to C and B’s relationship as father and son, it is presumed that there is no intention to enter into legal relations . However, this presumption...

Words: 1709 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Laws1006 Essay Semester 1 2010

...FOUNDATIONS OF LAW 2010 Combined Law Essay Critically analyse the Australian Government’s proposed reforms for protecting and promoting human rights for the more vulnerable groups in Australia. A bill of rights alone will not protect the rights of the people. But nor will a majoritarian democracy. Contemporary democracy stands for more than just the primitive notion of according full power to the popular majorities of Parliament by the vote. It requires the recognition of Parliamentary sovereignty, and furthermore it calls for the preservation of the principles of rule of law, judicial independence and more importantly the rights of all individuals. Although the Government’s recently launched National Human Rights Framework promises a selection of human rights protection mechanisms, in light of its failure to provide a bill of rights that many Australians want, it is an inadequate attempt at promoting and protecting the more vulnerable groups. Even though the Framework claims that it reserves the function of statutory interpretation for the courts, in reality it empowers the Parliament with the capacity to “guide”[1] the courts into enacting legislation. The Government’s downplay of judicial influence cannot be ignored and this points to a discussion of whether Australia needs a bill of rights. The role of the courts also need to be evaluated with respect to the other branches of government, the legislature and the Executive, in an effort to attain a healthy balance between...

Words: 3956 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Australia V Foreetst

...Metal Group in the Federal Court. But finally, in the High Court of Australia, the verdict found that both Forest was not guilty and the Company did not breach any sections of the Corporate Act in 2001. BACKGROUND Fortescue Metal Group Ltd (Fortescue), located in Western Australia, was a mining company (Fortescue Metal Group Ltd 2014). Mr Andrew Forest was chairman, chief executive and substantial shareholder in Fortescue (Fortescue Metal Group Ltd 2014). The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) sued Fortescue and Forrest about a contract regarding the Port Hedland and a railway was to be built to connect the mine and the port. Fortescue signed a contract with three Chinese corporations, included China Railway Engineering Corporation (CREC), China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC) and China Metallurgical Construction Corporation (CMCC) during August and November 2004. The three contracts were signed separately and being combined to be known as “Framework Agreement”. During August and November 2004, Forrest released a press that Fortescue had entered into a binding contract with CREC to build and finance a project which included construction of the railway. In March 2005, Australian Financial Review published an article stated that framework agreements were not legally binding. One year later, ASIC began proceedings to Mr Forrest and Fortescue in the Federal Court of Australia. Finally, ASIC was successfully in obtaining orders that Fortescue...

Words: 2760 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Conflict of Laws (Marriage)

...(marriage)2010] ILI Law Review 269 VALIDITY OF MARRIAGE AND CONFLICT OF LAWS Rajat Dosi Abstract Marriage, which is considered as one of the vital societal institutions to carry forth the society, may also now-a-days lead to conflict of law situation between two different countries. To tackle such a situation, every country has its own Private International Law rules. In Private International Law, the validity of marriage is dependent upon two things, formal and essential validity of marriage, for which every country has its own rules. In this paper, the first chapter deals with introduction to marriage and its relation with conflict of laws. The second chapter deals with formal validity of marriage and its position in different counties. The third chapter deals with essential validity of marriage and its position in various countries. The fourth chapter provides a comparative analysis of five different countries. The fifth chapter deals with Hague Convention and lastly, the sixth chapter deals with recommendations and suggestions. I. Introduction Marriage is a universal human institution which has formed the foundation of the family throughout history.1 It usually means a voluntary union for life of one man with one woman to the exclusion of others.2 While the traditions surrounding marriage ceremonies, the rights and obligations of marriage, the way of choosing one's marriage partner, and even who all are permitted to marry may differ from culture to culture.3 In the...

Words: 6363 - Pages: 26