Premium Essay

SOCI 350: Marx's Critique Of Capitalism

Submitted By
Words 960
Pages 4
Sociological Theory
SOCI 350
Student Learning Activity 2

1. Compose a brief essay (i.e., three or four well-developed paragraphs) in which you introduce Marx’s concept of human nature. Conclude with (another two or three paragraphs) commentary on how that concept is central to Marx’s critique of capitalism. Marx’s introduces human nature basically how humans adapt to various things to survive. There are many questions how people react when being alienated in the work place. Either A. The worker doesn’t accept being alienated, or B. The worker accepts alienation due to the fact they are content on meeting their living standards outside of the work place, so they suck it up and deal with the alienation. However, it is in human nature for …show more content…
Compose a brief essay in which you present and discuss Marx’s concept of labor as it characterizes the fulfillment of human creative potential AND as it exists within the parameters of capitalistic relations of production. Be sure to include an explanation of how exploitation and alienation emanate from capitalistic relations of production. (I’m thinking you will need six or seven well-developed paragraphs.) Human potential is stripped away by people everyday. Reason why human potential is unutilized, because in a capitalistic work environment workers are paid to do task asked by the owner. In a capitalistic environment there is no time for ideas, because the owner has it planned out into a system cheapest and efficiently as possible. The worker does not sell his labor, but they sell their labor-power. Marx’s believe being a human and labor were closely related. Marx tells us how man can control starts, regulations, and controls the material reactions between himself and nature. He explains that every successful laborer has a imagination of the task at hand, and what makes them successful laborers is if they can execute that plan imagined. Marx’s use of the term labor should not be restricted to economic activities; it includes all positive actions that transform the material aspects of nature with our

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Marx and Tocqueville's Views on Religion

...Soci- 300 Classical Social Theory Question 1. Compare and contrast the views of religion held by Marx and Tocqueville. Religions, all over the world have always tried to find an association between mankind and nature and a relation between human beings themselves. One of religion’s main goals is to provide rules and guidance that create order and support for the people that follow it. However, the notion of religion and where it came from has been a subject of debate amongst many historians, thinkers, sociologists and philosophers. Karl Marx, the German philosopher, revolutionist, and sociologist, believed that religion was a manmade ideology. He did not believe that God made humankind; he believed we made God (Marx, 1978). Alex de Tocqueville did not believe in what I just previously mentioned. Instead, the Roman Catholic political thinker and historian believed that God created us and he was responsible for providing the people with the proper rules and keys to living in a materialistic and worldly place (Tocqueville, 1972 pp 359). In this paper, I will be contrasting the different views of religion from the perspectives of Karl Marx and Alex de Tocqueville. With that being said, and although by now we know that both thinkers have different views regarding religion, some of their writings show otherwise and in turn, we will find some striking similarities between them. Beginning with the ideas of Karl Marx; Karl Marx was known to be an atheist who strongly believed...

Words: 1996 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Cyrus the Great

...critical theory today critical theory today A Us e r - F r i e n d l y G u i d e S E C O N D E D I T I O N L O I S T Y S O N New York London Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Routledge Taylor & Francis Group 270 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 Routledge Taylor & Francis Group 2 Park Square Milton Park, Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RN © 2006 by Lois Tyson Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business Printed in the United States of America on acid‑free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number‑10: 0‑415‑97410‑0 (Softcover) 0‑415‑97409‑7 (Hardcover) International Standard Book Number‑13: 978‑0‑415‑97410‑3 (Softcover) 978‑0‑415‑97409‑7 (Hardcover) No part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Library of Congress Cataloging‑in‑Publication Data Tyson, Lois, 1950‑ Critical theory today : a user‑friendly guide / Lois Tyson.‑‑ 2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0‑415‑97409‑7 (hb) ‑‑ ISBN 0‑415‑97410‑0 (pb) 1. Criticism...

Words: 221284 - Pages: 886